Abstract
Objectives
To disseminate lessons learned from implementing a randomized trial in a community setting so that other randomized trials can anticipate and prevent some of the challenges we encountered.
Methods
A discussion of common challenges to the implementation of randomized trials and how the structure of our trial mitigated some of these, and a description of unanticipated challenges we encountered and how we addressed them.
Results
While we set up our randomized trial in a way that avoided some of the “pitfalls” of trials identified in the literature, we still encountered challenges that we did not anticipate. We undertook corrective actions to address these, and the caseflow of the trial improved.
Conclusion
All the lessons from our trial are variants of the same issue: ensuring sufficient buy-in among the program staff and community stakeholders. Even though we thought we had engaged in extensive activities to promote buy-in, it turned out that these efforts were not adequate. Trials would benefit from developing an outreach plan that targets individuals from across the organizational chart of involved organizations, is ongoing, and actively solicits concerns from stakeholders so that these can be addressed in a timely fashion. These activities represent a sizable amount of effort and need to be incorporated into project budgets.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Boruch, R. F., & Wothke, W. (1985). Seven kinds of randomization plans for designing field experiments. In R. F. Boruch & W. Wothke (Eds.), Randomization and field experimentation (pp. 95–118). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Braught, G. N., & Reichardt, C. S. (1993). A computerized approach to trickle-process, random assignment. Evaluation Review, 17, 79–90.
Chen, H.-T. (2005). Practical program evaluation: Assessing and improving planning, implementation and effectiveness. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Conner, R. F. (1977). Selecting a control group: an analysis of the randomization process in twelve social reform programs. Evaluation Quarterly, 1, 195–244.
Daro, D. A., McCurdy, K., Falconnier, L., & Stojanovic, D. (2003). Sustaining new parents in home visitation services: key participant and program factors. Child Abuse & Neglect, 27, 1101–1125.
Elliott, D. S., & Mihalic, S. (2004). Issues in disseminating and replicating effective prevention programs. Prevention Science, 5(1), 47–52.
Flay, B. R. (1986). Efficacy and effectiveness trials (and other phases of research) in the development of health promotion programs. Preventive Medicine, 15, 451–474.
Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., Móscicki, E. K., Schinke, S., Valentine, J. C., & Ji, P. (2005). Standards of evidence: criteria for efficacy, effectiveness and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6(3), 151–175.
Freedman, B. (1987). Equipoise and the ethics of clinical research. The New England Journal of Medicine, 317(3), 141–145.
Johnson, K. (2009). State-based home visiting: Strengthening programs through state leadership, national center for children in poverty. New York: Columbia University.
Kellam, S. G., & Langevin, D. J. (2003). A framework for understanding “evidence” in prevention research and programs. Prevention Science, 4(3), 137–153.
Rossi, P. H., Lipsey, M. W., & Freeman, H. E. (2004). Evaluation: A systematic approach (7th ed.). Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Sackett, D. L., & Hoey, J. (2000). Why randomized controlled trials fail but needn’t: a new series is launched. Canadian Medical Association Journal, 162, 1301–1302.
Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental design for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kilburn, M.R. Lessons from the randomized trial evaluation of a new parent program: when the evaluators see the glass as half full, and the community sees the glass as half empty. J Exp Criminol 8, 255–270 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-012-9152-1
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11292-012-9152-1