Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Touchy Subjects: Sex in the Workplace on Broadcast, Cable, and Internet Television

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A content analysis of workplace sexual interactions, informed by past research on sexual harassment in televised workplaces, was conducted of 100 U.S. broadcast, cable, and Internet television programs that featured work or a workplace as a prominent setting. Although sexual interactions were relatively common, they were generally depicted in ways that did not clearly communicate harassment. Sexual talk and behavior in the workplace were generally met with either reciprocation or no response. Workplace sexual behavior was more frequent in situation comedies than in other genres of entertainment television content and more common in programs produced for distribution over the Internet than in programs produced for distribution through cable channels or broadcast networks. Results are discussed in terms of likely consequences of viewing, particularly noting that theories of media influence suggest that viewing such programming is likely to contribute to greater tolerance of sexual talk and behavior in the actual workplace.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aggarwal, A., & Gupta, M. (2000). Sexual harassment in the workplace (3rd ed.). Vancouver: Butterworths.

    Google Scholar 

  • Andsager, J. L., Bemker, V., Choi, H. L., & Torwel, V. (2006). Perceived similarity of exemplar traits and behavior effects on message evaluation. Communication Research, 33, 3–18. doi:10.1177/0093650205283099.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aubrey, J. S., Harrison, K., Kramer, L., & Yellin, J. (2003). Variety versus timing: Gender differences in college students’ sexual expectations as predicted by exposure to sexually oriented television. Communication Research, 30, 432–460.

  • Bandura, A. (1965). Influence of models’ reinforcement contingencies on the acquisition of imitative responses. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1, 589–595.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory of mass communication. Media Psychology, 3(3), 265–299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2002). Social cognitive theory in cultural context. Applied Psychology, 51, 269–290. doi:10.1111/1464-0597.00092.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (2003). Social cognitive theory for personal and social change by enabling media. In A. Singhal, M. J. Cody, E. M. Rogers, & M. Sabido (Eds.), Entertainment-education and social change: History, research, and practice (pp. 75–96). Mahwah: Erlbaum.

  • Bandura, A., Ross, D., & Ross, S. A. (1963). Imitation of film-mediated aggressive models. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 66(1), 3–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Burkhardt, M., & Nathaniel, A. (1998). Ethics and issues in contemporary nursing. Albany: Delmar Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Consumer News and Business Channel. (2009). Porn at work: Recognizing a sex addict. Retrieved from http://www.cnbc.com/id/31922685.

  • European Commission. (1991). Commission recommendation of 27 November 1991 on the protection of the dignity of women and men at work. Official Journal of the European Communities, L049, 0001–0008. Retrieved from http://eur-lex.europa.eu/.

    Google Scholar 

  • Farrar, K. M. (2006). Sexual intercourse on television: Do safe sex messages matter? Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 50, 635–650. doi:10.1207/s15506878jobem5004_4.

  • Fineran, S., & Bennett, L. (1999). Gender and power issues of peer sexual harassment among teenagers. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 14(6), 626–641. doi:10.1177/088626099014006004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, A. R. (1992). Rape and domestic violence: The experience of refugee women. Women & Therapy, 13, 65–78. doi:10.1300/J015V13N01_07.

  • Gelfand, M. J., Fitzgerald, L. F., & Drasgow, F. (1995). The structure of sexual harassment:A confirmatory analysis across cultures and settings. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 47(2), 164–177. doi:10.1006/jvbe.1995.1033.

  • Gerding, A., & Signorielli, N. (2014). Gender roles in tween television programming: A content analysis of two genres. Sex Roles, 70, 43–56. doi:10.1007/s11199-013-0330-z.

  • Grauerholz, E., & King, A. (1997). Prime time sexual harassment. Violence Against Women, 3, 129–148. doi:10.1177/1077801297003002003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffner, C., & Buchanan, M. (2005). Young adults’ wishful identification with television characters: The role of perceived similarity and character attributes. Media Psychology, 7(4), 325–351. doi:10.1207/S1532785XMEP0704_2.

  • Jacobs, L., Claes, E., & Hooghe, M. (2015). The occupational roles of women and ethnic minorities on primetime television in Belgium: An analysis of occupational status measurements. Mass Communication and Society, 18, 498–521. doi:10.1080/15205436.2014.1001908.

  • Kunkel, D., Eyal, K., Finnerty, K., Biely, E., & Donnerstein, E. (2005). Sex on TV 4: A Kaiser Family Foundation report. Retrieved from KFF.org.

  • Lampman, C., Rolfe-Maloney, B., David, E. J., Yan, M., McDermott, N., Winters, S., & Lathrop, R. (2002). Messages about sex in the workplace: A content analysis of primetime television. Sexuality and Culture, 6, 3–22.

  • Levine, K. J., & Hoffner, C. A. (2006). Adolescents’ conceptions of work: What is learned from different sources during anticipatory socialization? Journal of Adolescent Research, 21, 647–669. doi:10.1177/0743558406293963.

  • MacKinnon, C. A. (1979). Sexual harassment of working women: A case of sex discrimination (No. 19). New Haven: Yale University Press.

  • Martino, S. C., Collins, R. L., Kanouse, D. E., Elliott, M., & Berry, S. H. (2005). Social cognitive processes mediating the relationship between exposure to television’s sexual content and adolescents’ sexual behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 89, 914–924. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.89.6.914.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCann, D. (2005). Sexual harassment at work: National and international responses. Geneva: International Labour Office.

  • McDonald, P. (2012). Workplace sexual harassment 30 years on: A review of the literature. International Journal of Management Reviews, 14, 1–17. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00300.x.

  • Montemurro, B. (2003). Not a laughing matter: Sexual harassment as ‘material’ on workplace-based situation comedies. Sex Roles, 48, 433–445. doi:10.1023/A:1023578528629.

  • Moyer-Guse, E., & Nabi, R. L. (2011). Comparing the effects of entertainment and educational television programming on risky sexual behavior. Health Communication, 26, 416–426. doi:10.1080/10410236.2011.552481.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, M. B. (2008). Tender affective states as predictors of entertainment preference. Journal of Communication, 58(1), 40–61.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osborn, J. L. (2012). When TV and marriage meet: A social exchange analysis of the impact of television viewing on marital satisfaction and commitment. Mass Communication and Society, 15, 739–757. doi:10.1080/15205436.2011.618900.

  • Parents Television Council. (2016). Worst show of the week. Retrieved from http://w2.parentstv.com/.

  • Perry, D. G., & Bussey, K. (1979). The social learning theory of sex differences: Imitation is alive and well. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(10), 1699–1712.

  • Pryor, J. B. (1995). The phenomenology of sexual harassment: Why does sexual behavior bother people in the workplace? Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 47, 160–168.

  • Rubinstein, M. (1987). The dignity of women at work: Report on the problem of sexual harassment in the member states of the European community. Brussels: Publication Office of the European Community.

  • Russell, B. L., & Trigg, K. Y. (2004). Tolerance of sexual harassment: An examination of gender differences, ambivalent sexism, social dominance, and gender roles. Sex Roles, 50, 565–573. doi:10.1023/B:SERS.0000023075.32252.fd.

  • Schunk, D. H. (1987). Peer models and children’s behavioral change. Review of Educational Research, 57, 149–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Signorielli, N. (1993). Television and adolescents’ perceptions about work. Youth and Society, 24, 314–341. doi:10.1177/0044118X93024003004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Signorielli, N., & Bacue, A. (1999). Recognition and respect: A content analysis of prime-time television characters across three decades. Sex Roles, 40, 527–544.

  • Snyder, J. A., Scherer, H. L., & Fisher, B. S. (2012). Social organization and social ties: Their effects on sexual harassment victimization in the workplace. Work, 42, 137–150.

  • Taco Bell. (2007). Restaurant orientation handbook. Retrieved from tacoonline.yum.com.

  • Taylor, L. D. (2012). Cads and dads on screen: Do film representations of partner scarcity affect partner trait preferences? Communication Research, 39, 523–542. doi:10.1177/00936502111405647.

  • Taylor, L. D. (2013). Male partner selectivity and romantic confidence and media depictions of partner scarcity. Evolutionary Psychology, 11, 36–49.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Television Academy. (2015). Emmy award nominees and winners. Retrieved from www.emmys.com.

  • Till, F. (1980). Sexual harassment: A report on the sexual harassment of students. Washington: National Advisory Council on Women’s Educational Programs.

  • U. S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission. (1990). Policy guidance on employer liability under title VII for sexual favoritism. Retrieved from http://www.eeoc.gov/policy/docs/sexualfavor.html.

  • v. Feilitzen, C., & Linné, O. (1975). Identifying with television characters. Journal of Communication, 25, 51–55. doi:10.1111/j.1460-2466.1975.tb00638.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vault.com. (2014). Love is in the air: Vault’s 2014 office romance survey. Retrieved from http://www.vault.com.

  • Waldeck, N. E. (2009). The relationship between television exposure and individual work expectations: An empirical study. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 39, 208–234. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2008.00436.x.

  • Walmart. (2016). Walmart: Global statement of ethics. Retrieved from www.walmartethics.com.

  • Williams, C. L., Giuffre, P. A., & Dellinger, K. (1999). Sexuality in the workplace: Organizational control, sexual harassment, and the pursuit of pleasure. Annual Review of Sociology, 25, 73–93.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Laramie D. Taylor.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOC 101 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taylor, L.D., Alexopoulos, C. & Ghaznavi, J. Touchy Subjects: Sex in the Workplace on Broadcast, Cable, and Internet Television. Sex Roles 75, 476–489 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0642-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-016-0642-x

Keywords

Navigation