Skip to main content
Log in

Homohysteria: A Commentary and Critique

  • Feminist Forum Review Article
  • Published:
Sex Roles Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

McCormack and Anderson (2014) present a case for using homohysteria as a lens through which to examine the effects of declining homophobia. This commentary addresses limitations of the concept of homohysteria, and offers suggestions on ways to improve the concept as a theoretical lens. We identify two central concerns in this presentation of homohysteria; a definitional problem in operationalizing the construct of homohysteria, and a logical weakness in the construction of the definition of a homohysteric society. We offer suggestions based in psychological and historical data aimed to improve homohysteria as a lens through which to view shifts in attitudes toward sexual orientation minorities.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson, E. (2009). Inclusive masculinity: The changing nature of masculinities. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bluck, S. (2012). Transsexual in Iran: A fatwa for freedom? In C. Pullen (Ed.), LGBT transnational identity and the media (pp. 59–66). Hampshire: Palgrave MacMillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boroughs, M., & Thompson, J. K. (2002). Body depiliation in males: A new body image concern? International Journal of Men’s Health, 1, 247–257. doi:10.3149/jmh.0103.247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boroughs, M., Cafri, G., & Thompson, J. K. (2005). Male body depiliation: Prevalence and associated features of body hair removal. Sex Roles, 52, 637–644. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3731-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chauncy, G. (1994). Gay New York: Gender, urban culture, and the making of the gay male world 1890–1940. New York: Basic Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cowie, J. (2010). Stayin’ alive: The 1970s and the last days of the working class. New York: The New Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Echols, A. (2010). Hot stuff: Disco and the remaking of American culture. New York: W.W. Norton & Company, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraterrigo, E. (2009). Playboy and the making of the good life in modern America. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall, E. T., & Hall, M. R. (1990). Hidden differences: Doing business with the Japanese. New York: Anchor books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1988). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: Correlates and gender differences. The Journal of Sex Research, 25, 451–477. doi:10.1080/00224498809551476.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (1994). Assessing heterosexuals’ attitudes toward lesbians and gay men: A review of empirical research with the ATLG scale. In B. Greene & G. M. Herek (Eds.), Lesbian and gay psychology: Theory, research, and clinical applications (pp. 206–228). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Herek, G. M. (2002). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward bisexual men and women in the United States. Journal of Sex Research, 39, 264–274. doi:10.1080/00224490209552150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hinrichs, D. W., & Rosenberg, P. J. (2002). Attitudes toward gay, lesbian, and bisexual persons among heterosexual liberal arts college students. Journal of Homosexuality, 43, 61–83. doi:10.1300/J082v43n01_04.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstede, G. (1994). The business of international business is culture. International Business Review, 3, 1–14. doi:10.1016/0969-5931(94)90011-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Israel, T., & Mohr, J. J. (2004). Attitudes toward bisexual women and men: Current research, future directions. Journal of Bisexuality, 4, 117–134. doi:10.1300/J159v04n01_09.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, D. K. (2004). The Lavender scare: The cold war persecution of gays and lesbians in the federal government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • King, M. E., Winter, S., & Webster, B. (2009). Contact reduces transprejudice: A study on attitudes towards transgenderism and transgender civil rights in Hong Kong. International Journal of Sexual Health, 21, 17–34. doi:10.1080/19317610802434609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinsey, A. (1948). Sexual behavior in the human male. New York: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kras, E. S. (1995). Management in two cultures: Bridging the gap between U.S. and Mexican managers. Yarmouth: Intercultural press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Martins, Y., Tiggemann, M., & Churchett, L. (2008). Hair today, gone tomorrow: A comparison of body hair removal practices in gay and heterosexual men. Body Image, 5, 312–316. doi:10.1016/j.bodyim.2008.04.001.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McCormack, M., & Anderson, E. (2014). The influence of declining homophobia on men’s gender in the United States: An argument for the study of homohysteria. Sex Roles, this issue. doi:10.1007/s11199-014-0358-8.

  • Meehl, P. E. (1990). Why summaries of research on psychological theories are often uninterpretable. Psychological Reports, 66, 195–244. doi:10.2466/pr0.1990.66.1.195.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morin, S. F., & Garfinkle, E. M. (1978). Male homophobia. Journal of Social Issues, 34, 29–47. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.1978.tb02539.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moses, L. (2013). Millennial guys are turning to makeup. Adweek. Retrieved from http://www.adweek.com/news/advertising-branding/millennial-guys-are-turning-makeup-150313.

  • Norton, A. T., & Herek, G. M. (2012). Heterosexuals’ attitudes toward transgender people: Findings from a national probability sample of US adults. Sex Roles, 68, 738–753. doi:10.1007/s11199-011-0110-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parent, M. C., Schwartz, E. N., & Bradstreet, T. C. (2014). Men’s body image. In Y. J. Wong & S. R. Wester (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of Men and masculinities. Washington: American Psychological Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rieger, G., Chivers, M. L., & Bailey, J. M. (2005). Sexual arousal patterns of bisexual men. Psychological Science, 16, 579–584. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01578.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Riggs, D. W., Webber, K., & Fell, G. R. (2012). Australian undergraduate psychology students’ attitudes towards trans people. Gay & Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 8, 52–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenthal, A. M., Sylva, D., Safron, A., & Bailey, J. M. (2012). The male bisexuality debate revisited: Some bisexual men have bisexual arousal patterns. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 41, 135–147. doi:10.1007/s10508-011-9881-7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shibusawa, N. (2012). The Lavender scare and empire: Rethinking cold war antigay politics. Diplomatic History, 36, 723–752. doi:10.1111/j.1467-7709.2012.01052.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shweder, R. A. (1999). Why cultural psychology? Ethos, 27, 62–73. doi:10.1525/eth.1999.27.1.62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, I., Oades, L. G., & McCarthy, G. (2012). Homophobia to heterosexism: Constructs in need of re-visitation. Gay & Lesbian Issues and Psychology Review, 8, 33–44.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steffens, M. C., & Wagner, C. (2004). Attitudes toward lesbians, gay men, bisexual women, and bisexual men in Germany. The Journal of Sex Research, 41, 137–149. doi:10.1080/00224490409552222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strong, S. R. (1991). Theory-driven science and naive empiricism in counseling psychology. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 38, 204–210. doi:10.1037/0022-0167.38.2.204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D. M., Kashubeck-West, S., & Meyer, J. (2008a). Internalized heterosexism: A historical and theoretical overview. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 510–524. doi:10.1177/0011000007309488.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szymanski, D. M., Kashubeck-West, S., & Meyer, J. (2008b). Internalized heterosexism: Measurement, psychosocial correlates, and research directions. The Counseling Psychologist, 36, 525–574. doi:10.1177/0011000007309489.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taywaditep, K. J. (2002). Marginalization among the marginalized: Gay men’s anti-effeminiacy attitudes. Journal of Homosexualiy, 42, 1–28. doi:10.1300/J082v42n01_01.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, B. (2010). The un-natural state: Arkansas and the queer south. Fayetteville: The University of Arkansas Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tung, R. L. (1982). U.S.-China trade negotiations: Practices, procedures and outcomes. Journal of International Business Studies, 13, 25–37. doi:10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mike C. Parent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Parent, M.C., Batura, A. & Crooks, K. Homohysteria: A Commentary and Critique. Sex Roles 71, 121–125 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0393-5

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-014-0393-5

Keywords

Navigation