Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Special Education Teachers’ Perspective on Mandatory Reporting of Sexual Victimization of Students in Taiwan

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Sexuality and Disability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little research has been conducted specifically on the factors which have a bearing on a special education teacher’s decision to report sexual victimization. The aim of this study is to determine what these factors are and the role they play amongst special education teachers in Taiwan. Individual interviews were conducted with eight female and four male special education teachers and thematic analysis was used to interpret the data. The relevant factors are categorized in accordance with the ecological system theory proposed by Bronfenbrenner. Microsystem factors include consequences of reporting, severity of victimization, and characteristics of students with disabilities. Mesosystem factors include relationship with student’s family and colleagues, and support from school administration. Exosystem factors include paperwork load, rotation of social workers, and oppositional positions between school and government. Macrosystem factors include emphasis on maintaining harmonious relationships with colleagues and the student’s family, and doubts about the applicability of mandatory reporting in cases involving students with disabilities. The results of this study indicate the need for clearer reporting standards for students with disabilities, more support and resources from school administration, and more comprehensive training on the mandatory reporting policy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hershkowitz, I., Lamb, M.E., Horowitz, D.: Victimization of children with disabilities. Am. J. Orthopsychiat. 77, 629–635 (2007)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Nosek, M.A., Foley, C.C., Hughes, R.B., Howland, C.A.: Vulnerabilities for abuse among women with disabilities. Sex. Disabil. 19, 177–189 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Sobsey, D., Doe, T.: Patterns of sexual abuse and assault. Sex. Disabil. 9, 243–259 (1991)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Liou, W., Chen, H.: A study of the sexual abuse of people with intellectual disabilities. Bull. Spec. Educ. 31, 23–42 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  5. Balogh, R., Bretherton, K., Whibley, S., Berney, T., Graham, S., Richold, P., Worsley, C., Firth, H.: Sexual abuse in children and adolescents with intellectual disability. J. Intell. Disabil. Res. 45, 194–201 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chamberlain, A., Rauh, J., Passer, A., McGrath, M., Burket, R.: Issues in fertility control for mentally retarded female adolescents: I sexual activity, sexual abuse, and contraception. Pediatrics 73, 445–450 (1984)

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mansell, S., Sobsey, D., Moskal, R.: Clinical findings among sexually abused children with and without developmental disabilities. Ment. Retard. 36, 12–22 (1998)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. McCormack, B., Kavanagh, D., Caffrey, S., Power, A.: Investigating sexual abuse: findings of a 15-year longitudinal study. J. Appl. Res. Intellect. Disabil. 18, 217–227 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Cooke, P., Standen, P.J.: Abuse and disabled children: Hidden needs…? Child Abuse Rev. 11, 1–18 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mallén, A.: ‘It’s like piecing together small pieces of a puzzle’: difficulties in reporting abuse and neglect of disabled children to the social services. J. Scand. Stud. Criminol. Crime Prev. 12, 45–62 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Phasha, N.: Responses to situations of sexual abuse involving teenagers with intellectual disability. Sex. Disabil. 27, 187–203 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Phasha, T.N.: Influences on under reporting of sexual abuse of teenagers with intellectual disability: results and implications of a South African study. J. Psychol. Afr. 23, 625–630 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  13. Dove, M.K., Miller, K.L.: Child sexual abuse: what every educator should know. Delta Kappa Gamma Bull. 73(3), 21–25 (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  14. Paine, M.L., Hansen, D.J.: Factors influencing children to self-disclose sexual abuse. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 22, 271–295 (2002)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Bradley, A.R., Wood, J.M.: How do children tell? The disclosure process in child sexual abuse. Child Abuse Negl. 20, 881–891 (1996)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sorenson, T., Snow, B.: How children tell: the process of disclosure in child sexual abuse. Child Welf. 70, 3–15 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  17. Abrahams, N., Casey, K., Daro, D.: Teachers knowledge, attitudes, and beliefs about child abuse and its prevention. Child Abuse Negl. 16, 229–238 (1992)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Kenny, M.C.: Child abuse reporting: teachers’ perceived deterrents. Child Abuse Negl. 25, 81–92 (2001)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Webster, S.W., O’Toole, R., O’Toole, A.W., Lucal, B.: Overreporting and underreporting of child abuse: teachers’ use of professional discretion. Child Abuse Negl. 29, 1281–1296 (2005)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Crenshaw, W.B., Crenshaw, L.M., Lichtenberg, J.W.: When educators confront child abuse: an analysis of the decision to report. Child Abuse Negl. 19, 1095–1113 (1995)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Goebbels, A.F.G., Nicholson, J.M., Walsh, K., DeVries, H.: Teachers’ reporting of suspected child abuse and neglect: behaviour and determinants. Health Educ. Res. 23, 941–951 (2008)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Zellman, G.: Reporting decision-making patterns among mandated child abuse reporters. Child Abuse Negl. 19, 1095–1113 (1990)

    Google Scholar 

  23. Hinson, J., Fossey, R.: Child abuse: what teachers in the ‘90 s know, think, and do. J. Educ. Stud. Placed Risk 5, 251–266 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson, R.A., Wyatt, J.M.: Current research on child maltreatment: implications for educators. Educ. Psychol. Rev. 11, 173–201 (1999)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Alvarez, K.M., Kenny, M.C., Donohue, B., Carpin, K.M.: Why are professionals failing to initiate mandated reports of child maltreatment, and are there any empirically based training programs to assist professionals in the reporting process? Aggress. Violent Behav. 9, 563–578 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Kenny, M.C.: Teachers’ attitudes toward and knowledge of child maltreatment. Child Abuse Negl. 28, 1311–1319 (2004)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kenny, M.C.: Compliance with mandated child abuse reporting: comparing physicians and teachers. J. Offender Rehabil. 34, 9–23 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Liou, W.: The challenges and requirements facing with judiciary professionals while working with sexual abuse victims with intellectual disabilities. Natl. Taiwan U. Soc. Work Rev. 17, 93–130 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Mathews, B., Walsh, K., Rassafiani, M., Butler, D., Farrell, A.: Teachers reporting suspected child sexual abuse: results of a three-state study. Univ. N. S. W. Law J. 32, 772–813 (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  30. Child Welfare Information Gateway.: Mandatory reporters of child abuse and neglect. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Children’s Bureau, Washington, DC. https://www.childwelfare.gov/systemwide/laws_policies/statutes/manda.cfm (2015). Accessed 31 Aug 2015

  31. Bronfenbrenner, U.: The ecology of human development. Harvard University Press, Cambridge (1979)

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hayashi, M., Arakida, M., Ohashi, K.: The effectiveness of a sex education program facilitating social skills for people with intellectual disability in Japan. J. Intellect. Dev. Disabil. 36, 11–19 (2011)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Liao, I., Kuang, S.: Pre-Chin Confucianism and postmodern political ethics- in reference to “the new rhetoric”. Philos. Cult. 40, 39–59 (2013)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Technology of Taiwan (Project Number MOST101-2410-H-415-025), which played no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of the data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the article for publication.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wen-Ying Liou.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflict of interest exists for this research.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liou, WY., Chen, LY. Special Education Teachers’ Perspective on Mandatory Reporting of Sexual Victimization of Students in Taiwan. Sex Disabil 34, 131–143 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-016-9436-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11195-016-9436-x

Keywords

Navigation