Abstract
Try to imagine that a figure, a table or an explanatory box in your main manuscript gets cited, in addition to citations to the main paper. Some scientists would no doubt be ecstatic at this unrealistic opportunity of gathering additional citations. This paper highlights a case in which a text box (Unger and Couzin in Science 312(5770):40–41, 2006. doi:10.1126/science.312.5770.40) within a larger paper (Couzin and Unger in Science 312(5770):38–43, 2006. doi:10.1126/science.312.5770.38), as well as the paper itself, are both cited, 33 and 8 times, respectively, according to Clarivate Analytics’ (formerly Thomson Reuters) Web of Science. Both papers were published in AAAS’ Science. This paper explores details of these citations and shows how four papers between 2007 and 2015 have cited both papers, including the text box. The argument is put forward that citation of least divisible units of a paper, in this case, a text box, are unfair citation practices, and since they refer to the citation of a part of the same paper, the term “nested self-citation” has been coined. Given the attention given in recent times to citation manipulation, citation rings and inappropriate citations, the risks of nested self-citations, including the skewing of citation counts, and of not correcting potentially misleading information, need to be explored.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
References
Couzin, J., & Unger, K. (2006). Cleaning up the paper trail. Science, 312(5770), 38–43. doi:10.1126/science.312.5770.38.
Katavic, V. (2010). Responsible conduct of research: Do we need training in fraud-science? Biochemia Medica, 20(3), 288–294. doi:10.11613/BM.2010.036.
Madlock-Brown, C. R., & Eichmann, D. (2015). The (lack of) impact of retraction on citation networks. Science and Engineering Ethics, 21(1), 127–137. doi:10.1007/s11948-014-9532-1.
Maurer, J. J. (2007). The proper conduct of research. Avian Diseases, 51(1), 1–7. doi:10.1637/0005-2086(2007)051[0001:TPCOR]2.0.CO;2.
Neale, A. V., Northrup, J., Dailey, R., Marks, E., & Abrams, J. (2007). Correction and use of biomedical literature affected by scientific misconduct. Science and Engineering Ethics, 13(1), 5–24. doi:10.1007/s11948-006-0003-1.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2015a). Debunking post-publication peer review. International Journal of Education and Information Technology (Public Science Framework), 1(2), 34–37.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2015b). Fair use in post-publication peer review. Journal of Educational and Social Research, 5(3), 13. doi:10.5901/jesr.2015.v5n3p13.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A. (2016). On the abuse of online submission systems, fake peer reviews and editor-created accounts. Persona y Bioética, 20(2), 151–158. doi:10.5294/PEBI.2016.20.2.3.
Teixeira da Silva, J. A., & Bornemann-Cimenti, H. (2016). Why do some retracted papers continue to be cited? Scientometrics (in press). doi:10.1007/s11192-016-2178-9.
Unger, K., & Couzin, J. (2006). Even retracted papers endure. Science, 312(5770), 40–41. doi:10.1126/science.312.5770.40.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The author wishes to thank the kind assistance of a source that wishes to remain anonymous for assistance in obtaining the meta-data pertaining to the citations of the papers. The author also thanks Klaas Van Dijk for offering feedback and critical analysis of a pre-submission version of this paper, and for exchanging ideas about the term I coined, “nested self-citation”. Finally, and most importantly, I wish to thank the authors of the Science papers and the AAAS, as well as the authors of the papers that cited the “nested” paper for their responses and feedback, or silence. Screenshots used in Fig. 1 used under the fair-use agreement (Teixeira da Silva 2015b), as part of an exploration of the academic literature in post-publication peer review (Teixeira da Silva 2015a). The author declares no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Teixeira da Silva, J.A. Nested self-citation: the citation of a paper’s least divisible unit. Scientometrics 111, 547–552 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2249-6
Received:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-017-2249-6