Skip to main content
Log in

What we learn from the shifts in highly cited data from 2001 to 2014?

  • Published:
Scientometrics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Thomson Reuter’s highly cited database (HiCite) (http://www.highlycited.com) is composed of the top researchers in several subspecialties belonging to the 22 essential science indicator fields of the web of science. By analyzing the data collected, we are able to calculate several correlations in the data based upon select areas, view trends of changes in rank, percentage of contribution, and countries, and re-rank the organizations by new standards. The purpose of this is to refocus and highlight previously unaccounted but significant details that are historically ignored, such as economics, specialties, nationality, efficiency, and field, and to evaluate performance of the separate organizations by multiple factors, with an emphasis on the status of the United States of America.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John T. Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J.T. What we learn from the shifts in highly cited data from 2001 to 2014?. Scientometrics 108, 57–82 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1958-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-016-1958-6

Keywords

Navigation