Skip to main content
Log in

Quantitative Correlation between Viscosity of Concentrated MAb Solutions and Particle Size Parameters Obtained from Small-Angle X-ray Scattering

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Pharmaceutical Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Correction to this article was published on 24 February 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

To investigate the relationship between viscosity of concentrated MAb solutions and particle size parameters obtained from small-angle X-ray scattering (SAXS).

Methods

The viscosity of three MAb solutions (MAb1, MAb2, and MAb3; 40–200 mg/mL) was measured by electromagnetically spinning viscometer. The protein interactions of MAb solutions (at 60 mg/mL) was evaluated by SAXS. The phase behavior of 60 mg/mL MAb solutions in a low-salt buffer was observed after 1 week storage at 25°C.

Results

The MAb1 solutions exhibited the highest viscosity among the three MAbs in the buffer containing 50 mM NaCl. Viscosity of MAb1 solutions decreased with increasing temperature, increasing salt concentration, and addition of amino acids. Viscosity of MAb1 solutions was lowest in the buffer containing histidine, arginine, and aspartic acid. Particle size parameters obtained from SAXS measurements correlated very well with the viscosity of MAb solutions at 200 mg/mL. MAb1 exhibited liquid–liquid phase separation at a low salt concentration.

Conclusions

Simultaneous addition of basic and acidic amino acids effectively suppressed intermolecular attractive interactions and decreased viscosity of MAb1 solutions. SAXS can be performed using a small volume of samples; therefore, the particle size parameters obtained from SAXS at intermediate protein concentration could be used to screen for low viscosity antibodies in the early development stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

Abbreviations

D max app :

Apparent maximum dimension

EMS:

Electromagnetically spinning

IFT:

Indirect fourier transformation

p(r):

Pair–distance distribution function

q.s.:

quantity sufficient

R g app :

Apparent radius of gyration

SAXS:

Small-angle X-ray scattering

References

  1. Shire SJ, Shahrokh Z, Liu J. Challenges in the development of high protein concentration formulations. J Pharm Sci. 2004;93:1390–402.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Liu J, Nguyen MDH, Andya JD, Shire SJ. Reversible self-association increases the viscosity of a concentrated monoclonal antibody in aqueous solution. J Pharm Sci. 2005;94:1928–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kanai S, Liu J, Patapoff TW, Shire SJ. Reversible self-association of a concentrated monoclonal antibody solution mediated by Fab–Fab interaction that impacts solution viscosity. J Pharm Sci. 2008;97:4219–27.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yadav S, Liu J, Shire SJ, Kalonia DS. Specific interactions in high concentration antibody solutions resulting in high viscosity. J Pharm Sci. 2010;99:1152–68.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Yadav S, Sreedhara A, Kanai S, Liu J, Lien S, Lowman H, et al. Establishing a link between amino acid sequences and self-associating and viscoelastic behavior of two closely related monoclonal antibodies. Pharm Res. 2011;28:1750–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Carpenter JF, Randolph TW, Jiskoot W, Crommelin DJ, Middaugh CR, Winter G. Potential inaccurate quantitation and sizing of protein aggregates by size exclusion chromatography: essential need to use orthogonal methods to assure the quality of therapeutic protein products. J Pharm Sci. 2010;99:2200–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukunaga K, Onuki M, Ohtsuka Y, Hirano T, Sakai K, Ohgoe Y, et al. Blood viscometer applying electromagnetically spinning method. J Artif Organs. 2013;16:359–67.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Glatter O. Evaluation of small-angle scattering data from lamellar and cylindrical particles by the indirect transformation method. J Appl Cryst. 1980;13:577–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Mosbæk CR, Konarev PV, Svergun DI, Rischel C, Vestergaard B. High concentration formulation studies of an IgG2 antibody using small angle X-ray scattering. Pharm Res. 2012;29:2225–35.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Lilyestrom WG, Shire SJ, Scherer TM. Influence of the cosolute environment on IgG solution structure analyzed by small-angle X-ray scattering. J Phys Chem B. 2012;116:9611–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Tian X, Langkilde AE, Thorolfsson M, Rasmussen HB, Vestergaard B. Small-angle X-ray scattering screening complements conventional biophysical analysis: comparative structural and biophysical analysis of monoclonal antibodies IgG1, IgG2, and IgG4. J Pharm Sci. 2014;103:1701–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh SN, Yadav S, Shire SJ, Kalonia DS. Dipole-dipole interaction in antibody solutions: correlation with viscosity behavior at high concentration. Pharm Res. 2014. doi:10.1007/s11095-014-1352-0.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Nishi H, Miyajima M, Nakagami H, Noda M, Uchiyama S, Fukui K. Phase separation of an IgG1 antibody solution under a low ionic strength condition. Pharm Res. 2010;27:1348–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Salinas BA, Sathish HA, Bishop SM, Harn N, Carpenter JF, Randolph TW. Understanding and modulating opalescence and viscosity in a monoclonal antibody formulation. J Pharm Sci. 2010;99:82–93.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Arakawa T, Ejima D, Tsumoto K, Obeyama N, Tanaka Y, Kita Y, et al. Suppression of protein interactions by arginine: a proposed mechanism of the arginine effects. Biophys Chem. 2007;127:1–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Golovanov AP, Hautbergue GM, Wilson SA, Lian LY. A simple method for improving protein solubility and long- term stability. J Am Chem Soc. 2004;126:8933–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Shukla D, Trout BL. Understanding the synergistic effect of arginine and glutamic acid mixtures on protein solubility. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115:11831–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Fukuda M, Kameoka D, Torizawa T, Saitoh S, Yasutake M, Imaeda Y, et al. Thermodynamic and fluorescence analyses to determine mechanisms of IgG1 stabilization and destabilization by arginine. Pharm Res. 2014;31:992–1001.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Saito S, Hasegawa J, Kobayashi N, Kishi N, Uchiyama S, Fukui K. Behavior of monoclonal antibodies: relation between the second virial coefficient (B2) at low concentrations and aggregation propensity and viscosity at high concentrations. Pharm Res. 2012;29:397–410.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Yadav S, Shire SJ, Kalonia DS. Viscosity behavior of high-concentration monoclonal antibody solutions: correlation with interaction parameter and electroviscous effects. J Pharm Sci. 2012;101:998–1011.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Connolly BD, Petry C, Yadav S, Demeule B, Ciaccio N, Moore JM, et al. Weak interactions govern the viscosity of concentrated antibody solutions: high-throughput analysis using the diffusion interaction parameter. Biophys J. 2012;103:69–78.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  22. Cardinaux F, Zaccarelli E, Stradner A, Bucciarelli S, Farago B, Egelhaaf SU, et al. Cluster-driven dynamical arrest in concentrated lysozyme solutions. J Phys Chem B. 2011;115:7227–37.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yearley EJ, Godfrin PD, Perevozchikova T, Zhang H, Falus P, Porcar L, et al. Observation of small cluster formation in concentrated monoclonal antibody solutions and its implications to solution viscosity. Biophys J. 2014;106:1763–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Zhang F, Skoda MW, Jacobs RM, Martin RA, Martin CM, Schreiber F. Protein interactions studied by SAXS: effect of ionic strength and protein concentration for BSA in aqueous solutions. J Phys Chem B. 2007;111:251–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lilyestrom WG, Yadav S, Shire SJ, Scherer TM. Monoclonal antibody self-association, cluster formation, and rheology at high concentrations. J Phys Chem B. 2013;117:6373–84.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS AND DISCLOSURES

The authors thank Dr. Kohei Tsumoto (Medical Proteomics Laboratory, Institute of Medical Science, The University of Tokyo) for thoughtful discussions. The authors also thank Akira Hayasaka, Masaru Muraoka, and Yuji Hori in the Discovery Research Department of Chugai Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. for their support with viscosity measurements.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Masakazu Fukuda.

Additional information

The original article has been corrected. The expression “I(r)” has changed to “I(q)” in an equation in page 3805. The supplementary files have been updated to remove the revision history.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 56.1 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 276 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fukuda, M., Moriyama, C., Yamazaki, T. et al. Quantitative Correlation between Viscosity of Concentrated MAb Solutions and Particle Size Parameters Obtained from Small-Angle X-ray Scattering. Pharm Res 32, 3803–3812 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-015-1739-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11095-015-1739-6

KEY WORDS

Navigation