Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Use of hazard and vulnerability maps for landslide planning scenarios: a case study of the Nilgiris, India

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Natural Hazards Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Even small number of built-up areas experienced landslide problems; however, the loss could rise when the built-up areas develop in and on the unstable slopes. Landslide hazard information serves one of the many components in an integrated development planning study. A study on spatial vulnerability assessment is carried out for the part of Nilgiris district in the Western Ghats of India with the help of remote sensing and geographical information system to make use of landslide planning scenario. A spatial database is created for past landslide histories in the study area. The critical facilities, transportation and lifeline utilities, which include tourist spots, banks, ATMs, educational institutions, hospitals, bus stops, railway stations, that are potential threat under the very high to severe landslide hazard areas were identified. These are the elements at risk during landslides. From the study, it has been found that the eastern part of the study area is more prone to landslides. The past landslide inventories very clearly reveal that most of the landslides are triggered by the intense rainfall, human and cultural activities. Out of 36 utilities in the study area, about 65 % critical facilities and 36 % of transportation and lifeline utilities are vulnerable to severe landslide threat. The output of the present study can be used as first-hand information for the decision makers and planners and also helpful for the further developmental activities in the landslide-prone areas of the Nilgiris district of India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://nilgiris.nic.in/disaster.htm. Accessed on 10.12.2011.

  2. http://municipality.tn.gov.in/ooty/BY%20LAWS. Accessed on 15.12.2011.

References

  • Alexander ED (2004) Vulnerability to landslides. In: Glade T, Anderson MG, Crozier MJ (eds) Landslide risk assessment. Wiley, New York, pp 175–198

    Google Scholar 

  • APEGBC (2010) Guidelines for legislated landslide assessments for proposed residential developments in BC, Association of Professional Engineers and Geoscientists of British Columbia. Revised May 2010

  • Bhandari RK (2006) The Indian landslide scenario, strategic issues and action points, A key note address—technical session on landslides, First India Disaster Management Congress, New Delhi. 29–30 November 2006

  • BMTPC (2003) Landslide hazard zonation atlas of India. Building Materials and Technology Promotion Council, Government of India and Anna University, Chennai, p 125

    Google Scholar 

  • CVAT (1999) Community Vulnerability Assessment Tool. Office of the Coastal Management, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Fell R, Corominas J, Bonnard C, Cascini L, Leroi E, Savage WZ (2008) Guidelines for landslide susceptibility, hazard and risk zoning for land-use planning, JTC-1 Joint Technical Committee on Landslides and Engineered Slopes. Eng Geol 102(2008):99–111. doi:10.1016/j.enggeo.2008.03.014 0013–7952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganapathy GP, Mahendran K, Sekar SK (2010) Need and urgency of landslide risk planning for Nilgiri district, Tamil Nadu, India. Int J Geomat Geosci 1(1):29–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganapathy GP, Rao D, Sekar SK (2012) Assessing spatial vulnerability for landslide threat in hilly areas of Nilgiris, Tamil Nadu, India. In: Proceedings of the international symposium on mountain resource management in a changing environment, 29–31 May 2012, Organised by Kathmandu University, Nepal. p 31

  • GNS (2007) Guidelines for assessing planning policy and consent requirements for landslide prone land, Compiled by Saunders W and Glassey P, GNS Science Miscellaneous Series 7. ISSN 1177-2441, ISBN 0-478-099657: 71

  • GSI (1993) District resource map series: Nilgiri District Tamil Nadu, published by Geological Survey of India-explanatory Note

  • GSI (2013) Landslide investigation, standard operation procedure (SoP), Mission IV, Geological Survey of India, p 19

  • Highland L, Bobrowsky PT (2008) The landslide handbook—a guide to understanding landslides, USGS 1325. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Geological Survey, USA, p 129

    Google Scholar 

  • Jaiswal P, van Westen CJ, Jetten V (2011) Quantitative estimation of landslide risk from rapid debris slides on natural slopes in the Nilgiri hills, India. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 11:1723–1743

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kayastha P, Dhital MR, De Smedt F (2012) Landslide susceptibility mapping using the weight of evidence method in the Tinau watershed Nepal. Nat Hazards 63(2):479–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leone F, Asté JP, Leroi E (1996) Vulnerability assessment of elements exposed to mass-movement: working toward a better risk perception. In: Senneset K (ed) Landslides—Gliessements de Terrain, vol 1. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 263–270

    Google Scholar 

  • NDMA (2009) National disaster management guidelines: management of landslides and snow avalanches, National Disaster Management Authority, Government of India, June 2009: 145

  • OAS (1991) Primer on natural hazard management in integrated regional development planning. Department of Regional Development and Environment Executive Secretariat for Economic and Social Affairs Organization of American States With support from the Office of Foreign Disaster Assistance United States Agency for International Development, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajarathnam S, Ganapathy GP (2006) Landslide hazard zonation of India, a GIS approach. In: Proceedings of the First India Disaster Management Congress, New Delhi, 29–30 November 2006

  • Seligson H (2008), HAZUS, The ShakeOut Scenario: US Geological Survey Open File Report 2008-1150, California Geological Survey Preliminary Report 25 version 1.0, p 40

  • Saunders W, Glassey P (2007) Guidelines for assessing planning, policy and consent requirements for landslide-prone land, GNS Science Miscellaneous Series 7, published by Institute of Geological and Nuclear Sciences Limites, ISBN 0-478-099657, 71

  • Saunders W, Forsyth J, Johnston DM, Becker J (2007) Strengthening linkages between land-use planning and emergency management in New Zealand. Emerg Manag Aust 22(1):36–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Seshagiri DN, Badrinarayanan S, Upendran R, Lakshmikantham CB, Srinivasan V (1982) The Nilgiris landslide—miscellaneous publication no 57. Geological Survey of India, Hyderabad, p 86

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharda YP (2008) Landslide studies in India, Glimpses of Geoscience Research in India. The Indian report to IUGS 2004–2008. Indian National Science Academy, Silver jubilee Volume. pp 98–101

  • Thanavelu C, Chandrasekaran, (2008) Geotechnical assessment of November 2006 landslides in The Nilgiris Tamil Nadu, In: Abstract volume: proceedings of the national seminar on challenges in engineering geology, 03rd to 05th December 2008, Hyderabad

  • The Hindu (2009) Scale of damage in Nilgiris huge, relief work space, http://www.thehindu.com/2009/11/12/stories/2009111258110100.htm. Accessed 12 Nov 2009

  • UNDRO-1 (1991) Mitigating natural disasters-phenomena, effects and options, a manual for policy Makers and planners, A publication within the framework of the International Decade for Natural Disaster Reduction (IDNDR) 1990–1999, Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Co-ordinator, Geneva. p 164

  • UNDRO-2 (1978) Disaster prevention and mitigation- A compendium of current knowledge, Vol. 9, Legal aspects—disaster legislation, Office of the United Nations Disaster Relief Co-ordinator, Geneva. p 69

  • Van Westen CJ, Van Asch TWJ, Soeter R (2006) Landslide hazard and risk zonation—Why is it so difficult? Bull Eng Geol Env 65:167–184. doi:10.007/s10064-005-0023-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • William F Case (2013) Landslides: What they are, why they occur, Public Information Series 74. Utah Geological Survey, A division of Utah Department of Natural Resources, Salt Lake City, p 2

    Google Scholar 

  • Wold RL, Jochim CL (1989) Landslide loss reduction: A guide for state and local government planning Earthquake Hazards Reduction Series 52. FEMA, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The present study is the part of Indian Space Research Organisation Ongoing Project-ISRO/RES/4/611/13-14. The authors are thankful to SAC and ISRO for funding under RESPOND programme. The authors are gratefully acknowledged, Geotechnical Cell, Coonoor, for the valuable data and information. Without these data, this study cannot be done. Mr. Venkatesh, Department of Post, Ooty, is specially acknowledged for sharing some of the landslide photographs and valuable information with us during the field visit. Another special thank to Dr G. Viswanathan, Chancellor at VIT University, Vellore, who provides all the facilities and his encouragement about this work.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ganapathy Pattukandan Ganapathy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ganapathy, G.P., Rajawat, A.S. Use of hazard and vulnerability maps for landslide planning scenarios: a case study of the Nilgiris, India. Nat Hazards 77, 305–316 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1587-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11069-015-1587-z

Keywords

Navigation