Shaping achievement goal orientations in a mastery-structured environment and concomitant changes in related contingencies of self-worth
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Across three time-points spanning 9 months, changes in achievement goal orientations and contingencies of self-worth were assessed as a function of participating in a mastery-structured academic program for high-ability adolescents (N = 126). Endorsement of mastery goal orientations increased during the program and remained high even after students returned to their home learning environments. In contrast, performance-approach and performance-avoidance goal orientations decreased during the summer program, but returned to previous levels when assessed 6 months later. Latent growth curve models assessed the covariation of performance goal orientations and two contingencies of self-worth (outperforming others and others’ approval) hypothesized to represent elements of performance goal orientations. Changes in the contingency of self-worth based on outperforming others positively covaried with observed changes in both performance goal orientations; however, changes in self-worth contingent on others’ approval did not. Results are discussed in terms of mastery-structured environments’ potential to alter achievement goal orientations via their underlying psychological processes. Implications for achievement goal theory and the design of achievement-oriented environments are discussed.
Supplementary Material (0)
- Ames, C. (1992a). Achievement goals and the classroom motivational climate. In D. H. Schunk & J. L. Meece (Eds.), Student perceptions in the classroom (pp. 327–348). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Ames, C. (1992b). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271. doi:10.1037/0022-06126.96.36.1991. CrossRef
- Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), 260–267. doi:10.1037/0022-06188.8.131.520. CrossRef
- Anderman, E. M., & Midgley, C. (1997). Changes in achievement goal orientations, perceived academic competence, and grades across the transition to middle-level schools. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 22(3), 269–298. CrossRef
- Anderman, E. M., Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1999). Declining motivation after the transition to middle school: Schools can make a difference. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 32(3), 131–147.
- Bandura, A. (1993). Perceived self-efficacy in cognitive development and functioning. Educational Psychologist, 28, 117–148. CrossRef
- Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 3–26. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.91.1.3. CrossRef
- Brophy, J. (2008). Developing students’ appreciation for what is taught in school. Educational Psychologist, 43, 132–141. doi:10.1080/00461520701756511. CrossRef
- Church, M. A., Elliot, A. J., & Gable, S. L. (2001). Perceptions of classroom environment, achievement goals, and achievement outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 43–54. doi:10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.206. CrossRef
- Ciani, K. D., Middleton, M. J., Summers, J. J., & Sheldon, K. M. (2010). Buffering against performance classroom goal structures: The importance of autonomy support and classroom community. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 88–99. doi:10.1080/01443411003660232. CrossRef
- Crocker, J., & Wolfe, C. T. (2001). Contingencies of self-worth. Psychological Review, 108(3), 593–623. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.593. CrossRef
- Crocker, J., Luhtanen, R. K., Cooper, M. L., & Bouvrette, A. (2003). Contingencies of self-worth in college students: Theory and measurement. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(5), 894–908. doi:10.1037/0022-35220.127.116.114. CrossRef
- Dweck, C. S., & Leggett, E. L. (1988). A social-cognitive approach to motivation and personality. Psychological Review, 95(2), 256–273. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.95.2.256. CrossRef
- Elliot, A. J. (1997). Integrating the “classic” and “contemporary” approaches to achievement motivation: A hierarchical model of approach and avoidance achievement motivation. In M. L. Maehr & P. R. Pintrich (Eds.), Advances in Motivation and Achievement (Vol. 10, pp. 143–179). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press Inc.
- Elliot, A. J. (1999). Approach and avoidance motivation and achievement goals. Educational Psychologist, 34(3), 169–189. doi:10.1207/s15326985ep3403_3. CrossRef
- Elliot, A. J. (2005). A Conceptual History of the Achievement Goal Construct. In A. J. Elliot & C. S. Dweck (Eds.), Handbook of competence and motivation (pp. 52–72). New York, NY: Guilford Publications Guilford Publications.
- Elliot, A. J., & McGregor, H. A. (2001). A 2x2 achievement goal framework. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(3), 501–519. doi:10.1037/0022-3518.104.22.1681. CrossRef
- Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2001). Achievement goals and the hierarchical model of achievement motivation. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 139–156. doi:10.1023/A:1009057102306. CrossRef
- Elliot, A. J., Murayama, K., & Pekrun, R. (2011). A 3x2 achievement goal model. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 632–648. doi:10.1037/a0023952. CrossRef
- Epstein, J. L. (1988). Effective schools or effective students: Dealing with diversity. In R. Haskins & D. MacRae Jr (Eds.), Policies for America’s public schools: Teachers, equity, and indicators (pp. 89–126). Westport, CT: Ablex Publishing.
- Friedel, J. M., Cortina, K. S., Turner, J. C., & Midgley, C. (2007). Achievement goals, efficacy beliefs and coping strategies in mathematics: The role of perceived parent and teacher goal emphases. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 48–73. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2006.10.009. CrossRef
- Grant, H., & Dweck, C. S. (2003). Clarifying achievement goals and their impact. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85(3), 541–553. doi:10.1037/0022-3522.214.171.1241. CrossRef
- Gutman, L. M. (2006). How student and parent goal orientations and classroom goal structures influence the math achievement of African Americans during the high school transition. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(1), 44–63. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2005.01.004. CrossRef
- Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., & Elliot, A. J. (1998). Rethinking achievement goals: When are they adaptive for college students and why? Educational Psychologist, 33, 1–21. CrossRef
- Harackiewicz, J. M., Barron, K. E., Pintrich, P. R., Elliot, A. J., & Thrash, T. M. (2002). Revision of achievement goal theory: Necessary and illuminating. Journal of Educational Psychology, 94, 638–645. CrossRef
- Harackiewicz, J. M., Durik, A. M., Barron, K. E., Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., & Tauer, J. M. (2008). The role of achievement goals in the development of interest: Reciprocal relations between achievement goals, interest, and performance. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100(1), 105–122. doi:10.1037/0022-06126.96.36.199. CrossRef
- Hulleman, C. S., Schrager, S. M., Bodmann, S. M., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2010). A meta-analytic review of achievement goal measures: Different labels for the same constructs or different constructs with similar labels? Psychological Bulletin, 136, 422–449. doi:10.1037/a0018947. CrossRef
- Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (1999). Achievement goals and student well-being. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 24(4), 330–358. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.0993. CrossRef
- Kaplan, A., & Maehr, M. L. (2007). The contribution and prospects of goal orientation theory. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 141–187. doi:10.1007/s10648-006-9012-5. CrossRef
- Karabenick, S. A. (2004). Perceived achievement goal structure and college student help seeking. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 569–581. CrossRef
- Koskey, K. L. K., Karabenick, S. A., Woolley, M. E., Bonney, C. R., & Dever, B. V. (2010). Cognitive validity of students’ self-reports of classroom mastery goal structure: What stuents are thinking and why it matters. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 35, 254–263. doi:10.1016/j.cedpsych.2010.05.004. CrossRef
- Leary, M. R. (1995). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Social psychology series. Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior xv (pp. 246). Madison, WI: Brown & Benchmark Publishers.
- Linnenbrink, E. A. (2004). Person and context: Theoretical and practical concerns in achievement goal theory. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement: Motivating students, improving schools: The legacy of Carol Midgley. Greenwich, CT: Elsevier.
- Linnenbrink, E. A. (2005). The Dilemma of performance-approach goals: The use of multiple goal contexts to promote students’ motivation and learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 197–213. doi:10.1037/0022-06188.8.131.52. CrossRef
- Linnenbrink-Garcia, L., Durik, A. M., Conley, A. M., Barron, K. E., Tauer, J. M., Karabenick, S. A., et al. (2010). Measuring situational interest in academic domains. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 70, 647–671. doi:10.1177/0013164409355699. CrossRef
- Maehr, M. L. (2001). Goal theory is not dead—not yet, anyway: A reflection on a special issue. Educational Psychology Review, 13, 177–185. doi:10.1023/A:1009065404123. CrossRef
- Maehr, M. L., & Midgley, C. (1996). Transforming school cultures. Lives in context. Transforming school cultures. xiv (pp. 252). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
- Maehr, M. L., & Nicholls, J. G. (1980). Culture and achievement motivation: A second look. In N. Warren (Ed.), Studies in cross-cultural psychology (Vol. 3). New York: Academic Press.
- Maehr, M. L., & Zusho, A. (2009). Achievement goal theory: The past, present, and future. In K. R. Wentzel & A. Wigfield (Eds.), Handbook of motivation at school (pp. 77–104). New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
- Middleton, M. J., & Midgley, C. (1997). Avoiding the demonstration of lack of ability: An underexplored aspect of goal theory. Journal of Educational Psychology, 89(4), 710–718. doi:10.1037/0022-06184.108.40.2060. CrossRef
- Midgley, C. (1993). Motivation and middle level schools. In P. R. Pintrich & M. L. Maehr (Eds.), Advances in motivation and achievement, Vol. 8: Motivation and adolescent development. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
- Midgley, C., & Maehr, M. L. (1999). Using motivational theory to guide school reform. In A. J. Reynolds, H. J. Walberg, & R. P. Weissberg (Eds.), Promoting positive outcomes (pp. 129–159). Washington, DC: Child Welfare League of America.
- Midgley, C., & Urdan, T. (2001). Academic self-handicapping and achievement goals: A further examination. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(1), 61–75. doi:10.1006/ceps.2000.1041. CrossRef
- Midgley, C., Anderman, E., & Hicks, L. (1995). Differences between elementary and middle school teachers and students: A goal theory approach. The Journal of Early Adolescence, 15(1), 90–113. doi:10.1177/0272431695015001006. CrossRef
- Midgley, C., Maehr, M. L., Hruda, L. Z., Anderman, E., Anderman, L. H., Freeman, K. E., et al. (2000). Manual for the Patterns of Adaptive Learning Scales (PALS). Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan.
- Murayama, K., & Elliot, A. J. (2009). The joint influence of personal achievement goals and classroom goal structures on achievement-relevant outcomes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 432–447. doi:10.1037/a0014221. CrossRef
- Nolen, S. B., & Haladyna, T. M. (1990). Personal and environmental influences on students’ beliefs about effective study strategies. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 15(2), 116–130. doi:10.1016/0361-476X(90)90011-O. CrossRef
- Patrick, H., Anderman, L. H., Ryan, A. M., Edelin, K. C., & Midgley, C. (2001). Teachers’ communication of goal orientations in four fifth-grade classrooms. The Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 35–58. doi:10.1086/499692. CrossRef
- Patrick, H., Kaplan, A., & Ryan, A.M. (2011). Positive classroom motivational environments: Convergence between mastery goal structure and the classroom social climate. Journal of Educational Psychology, 103, 367–382. doi:10.1037/a0023311. CrossRef
- Pintrich, P. R. (2000a). An achievement goal theory perspective on issues in motivation terminology, theory, and research. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 92–104. doi:10.1006/ceps.1999.1017. CrossRef
- Pintrich, P. R. (2000b). The role of goal orientation in self-regulated learning. In M. Boekaerts, P. R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 451–502). San Diego, CA: Academic Press. CrossRef
- Roeser, R. W., Midgley, C. M., & Urdan, T. C. (1996). Perceptions of the school psychological environment and early adolescents’ psychological and behavioral functioning in school: The mediating role of goals and belonging. Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 408–422. CrossRef
- Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. CrossRef
- Ryan, A., Gheen, M., & Midgley, C. (1998). Why do some students avoid asking for help? An examination of the interplay among students' academic efficacy, teachers' social-emotional role, and classroom goal structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 528–535. CrossRef
- Senko, C., Hulleman, C. S., & Harackiewicz, J. M. (2011). Achievement goal theory at the crossroads: Old controversies, current challenges, and new directions. Educational Psychologist, 46, 26–47. doi:10.1080/00461520.2011.538646. CrossRef
- Urdan, T. (2001). Contextual influences on motivation and performance: An examination of achievement goal structures. In F. Salili, C.-y. Chiu & Y.-y. Hong (Eds.), Student motivation: The culture and context of learning (pp. 171–201). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
- Urdan, T. (2004). Using multiple methods to assess students’ perceptions of classroom goal structures. European Psychologist, 4, 222–231. doi:10.1027/1016-9040.9.4.222. CrossRef
- Urdan, T. (2010). The challenges and promise of research on classroom goal structures. In J. L. Meece & J. S. Eccles (Eds.), Handbook of research on schools, schooling, and human development (pp. 92–108). New York: Routledge.
- Urdan, T., & Mestas, M. (2006). The goals behind performance goals. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(2), 354–365. doi:10.1037/0022-06220.127.116.114. CrossRef
- Urdan, T., Midgley, C., & Anderman, E. A. (1998). The role of classroom goal structure in students' use of self-handicapping. American Educational Research Journal, 35, 101–122.
- Wolters, C. A. (2004). Predictors of academic self-handicapping and achievement: Examining achievement goals, classroom goal structures, and culture. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 251–264. doi:10.1037/0022-0618.104.22.168. CrossRef
About this Article
- Shaping achievement goal orientations in a mastery-structured environment and concomitant changes in related contingencies of self-worth
Motivation and Emotion
Volume 37, Issue 1 , pp 50-64
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Achievement goals
- Achievement motivation
- Classroom context
- Contingencies of self-worth
- Goal orientations
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Psychology and Neuroscience, Duke University, Durham, NC, USA
- 2. Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Jordan Hall, Building 420, 450 Serra Mall, Stanford, CA, 94305, USA
- 3. Learning Research and Development Center, University of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA, USA