Abstract
Sometimes in clinical trials, the hazard rates are anticipated to be nonproportional, resulting in potentially crossing survival curves. In these cases, researchers are usually interested in which treatment has better long-term survival. The log-rank test and the weighted log-rank test may not be appropriate or efficient to use here, because they are sensitive to differences in survival at any time and don’t just focus on long-term outcomes. Also in a prospective clinical trial, patients are entered sequentially over calendar time, so that group sequential designs may be considered for ethical, administrative and economic concerns. Here we develop group sequential methods for testing the null hypothesis that the survival curves are identical after a prespecified time point. Several classes of tests are considered, including an integrated difference in survival probabilities after this time point, and linear or quadratic combinations of two component test statistics (pointwise comparisons of survival at the time point and comparisons of hazard rates after the time point). We examine the type I errors, stopping probabilities, and powers of these tests through simulation studies under the null and different alternatives, and we apply them to a real bone marrow transplant clinical trial.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bilias Y, Gu M, Ying Z (1997) Towards a general asymptotic theory for the Cox model with staggered entry. Ann Stat 25:662–682
Fleming TR, Harrington DP (1981) A class of hypothesis tests for one and two samples of censored survival data. Commun Stat 10:763–794
Goldstone AH, Richards SM, Lazarus HM, Tallman MS, Buck G, Fielding AK et al (2008) In adults with standard-risk acute lymphoblastic leukemia, the greatest benefit is achieved from a matched sibling allogeneic transplantation in first complete remission, and an autologous transplanation is less effect than coventional consolidation/maintenance chemotherapy in all patients. Blood 111:1827–1833
Greenwood M (1926) The natural duration of cancer. Rep Public Health Med Subj 33:1–26
Gu M, Lai T (1991) Weak convergence of time-sequential censored rank statistics with applications to sequential testing in clinical trials. Ann Stat 19:1403–1433
Harrington DP, Fleming TR (1982) A class of rank test procedures for censored survival data. Biometrika 69:133–143
Jennison C, Turnbull BW (1985) Repeated confidence intervals for the median survival time. Biometrika 72:619–625
Jennison C, Turnbull BW (1997) Distribution theory of group sequential \(t, \chi ^{2}\) and \(F\) tests for general linear models. Seq Anal 16:295–317
Jennison C, Turnbull BW (2000) Group sequential tests with applications to clinical trials. Chapman and Hall/CRC, Boca Raton
Lee JW, Sather HN (1995) Group sequential methods for comparison of cure rates in clinical trails. Biometrics 51:756–763
Li Z (1999) A group sequential test for survival trials: an alternative to rank-based procedures. Biometrics 55:277–283
Lin DY, Shen L, Ying Z, Breslow NE (1996) Group sequential designs for monitoring survival probabilities. Biometrics 52:1033–1041
Logan BR, Klein J, Zhang M-J (2008) Comparing treatments in the presence of crossing survival curves: an application to bone marrow transplantation. Biometrics 64:733–740
Murray SA, Tsiatis AA (1999) Sequential methods for comparing years of life saved in the two-sample censored data problem. Biometrics 55:1085–1092
Pepe MS, Fleming TR (1989) Weighted Kaplan–Meier statistics: a class of distance tests for censored survival data. Biometrics 45:497–507
Pepe MS, Fleming TR (1991) Weighted Kaplan–Meier statistics: large sample and optimality considerations. J R Stat Soc B 53:341–352
Slud EV (1984) Sequential linear rank tests for two-sample censored survival data. Ann Stat 12:551–571
Sposto R, Stablein D, Carter-Campbell S (1997) A partially grouped logrank test. Stat Med 16:695–704
Tsiatis AA (1982) Repeated significance testing for a general class of statistics used in censored survival analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 77:855–861
Tsiatis AA, Rosner GL, Tritchler DL (1985) Group sequential tests with censored survival data adjusting for covariates. Biometrika 72:365–373
Acknowledgments
The authors would like to thank Dr. Susan Richards and Ms. Georgina Buck at the Clinical Trial Service Unit and Epidemiological Studies Unit, University of Oxford, for providing the de-identified dataset of the example used in the paper. This research was partially supported by a Grant (R01 CA54706-14) from the National Cancer Institute.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Logan, B.R., Mo, S. Group sequential tests for long-term survival comparisons. Lifetime Data Anal 21, 218–240 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-014-9298-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10985-014-9298-4