Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mock Juror Gender Biases and Perceptions of Self-Defense Claims in Intimate Partner Homicide

  • Perceptions of Intimate Partner Violence in the Justice System
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Findings are reported from an experiment that examined mock jurors’ gender biases regarding intimate homicide case adjudications. Mock jurors were more likely to convict a man than a woman who had killed an abusive partner, which was partially mediated by sympathy toward both the victim and defendant. Analyses revealed an abuser height and abuser gender interaction such that conviction rates for women defendants were higher when her abuser was taller compared to when he was shorter than she; abuser height did not influence conviction rates for men. Findings also suggested that when given information about a child being present, mock jurors perceived the killing of the abusive partner as an act to protect that child. The results are discussed in relation to how extra-legal factors impact juror perceptions of domestic violence cases in the courtroom.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Archer, J. (2000). Sex difference in aggression between heterosexual partners: a meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 126, 651–680. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.126.5.651.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, O. W., Lee, C. Y., & Thelan, R. (1997). Gender differences in attributions of self-defense and control in interpartner aggression. Violence Against Women, 3, 462–481. doi:10.1177/107780102237408.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173–1182. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.51.6.1173.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Belknap, J., & Melton, H. (2005). Are heterosexual men also victims of intimate partner abuse? Harrisburg: VAWnet, a project of the National Resource Center on Domestic Violence. Retrieved February 23, 2012 from: http://www.vawnet.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bible, A., Das Dasgupta, S., & Osthoff, S. (2002). Guest editors’ introduction. Violence Against Women, 8, 1267–1270. doi:10.1177/0886260506291658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bornstein, B. H. (1999). The ecological validity of jury simulations: is the jury still out? Law and Human Behavior, 23, 75–91. doi:10.1023/A:1022326807441.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, A. (1987). When battered women kill. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bullock, J. G., Green, D. P., & Ha, S. E. (2010). Yes, but what’s the mechanism? (Don’t expect an easy answer). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 550–558. doi:10.1037/a0018933.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, J. C., Glass, N., Sharps, P. W., Laughon, K., & Bloom, T. (2007). Intimate partner homicide: review and implications of research and policy. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 8(3), 246–269. doi:10.1177/1524838007303505.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2011). National intimate partner and sexual violence survey: 2010 summary report. Atlanta: Author.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, L., & Krane, J. (2006). Collaborate with caution: protecting children, helping mothers. Critical Social Policy, 26(2), 412–425. doi:10.1177/0261018306062592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diamond, S. S. (1997). Illuminations and shadows from jury simulations. Law and Human Behavior, 21, 561–571. doi:10.1023/A:1024831908377.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., & Dobash, R. P. (2011). What were they thinking? Men who murder an intimate partner. Violence Against Women, 17, 111–134.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dobash, R. E., Dobash, R. P., Cavanagh, K., & Lewis, R. (2004). Not an ordinary killer—just an ordinary guy: when men murder an intimate woman partner. Violence Against Women, 10, 577–605. doi:10.1177/1077801204265015.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G. (2006). Rethinking domestic violence. Vancouver: University of British Columbia Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dutton, D. G., Corvo, K. N., & Hamel, J. (2009). The gender paradigm in domestic violence research and practice part II: the information website of the american bar association. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 14, 30–38. doi:10.1016/j.avb.2008.08.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelson, J. (1998). Responsible mothers and invisible men: child protection in the case of adult domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 13(2), 294–298. doi:10.1177/088626098013002010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing, C. P., & Aubrey, M. (1987). Battered women and public opinion: some realities about the myths. Journal of Family Violence, 2(3), 257–264. doi:10.1007/BF00976543.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K. J. (2003). The words change, but the melody lingers: the persistence of the battered woman syndrome in criminal cases involving battered women. Violence Against Women, 9, 110–129. doi:10.1177/1077801202238432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K. J. (2006). Neither angels nor demons. Boston: Northeastern University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferraro, K. J., & Busch-Armendariz, N. (2009). The use of expert testimony on intimate partner violence. Harrisburg: VAWnet: The National Online Resource Center on Violence Against Women. Retrieved February 23, 2012 from: http://www.vawnet.org.

    Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R., Shillinglaw, R. D., DeHart, D. D., & Kleinfelter, K. J. (1997). The impact of elements of NGRSD and objective versus subjective instructions on jurors’ verdicts for battered women defendants. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 12, 729–747. doi:10.1177/088626097012005008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Follingstad, D. R., Runge, M. M., Ace, A., Buzan, R., & Helff, C. (2001). Justifiability, sympathy level, and internal/external locus of the reasons battered women remain in abusive relationships. Violence and Victims, 16(6), 621–644.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, J.A., & Zawitz, M.W. (2007). Homicide trends in the United States. U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics. Retrieved February 17, 2008. http://www.ojp.usdoj.gov/bjs/homicide/homtrnd.htm.

  • George, M. J. (1994). Riding the donkey backwards: men as the unacceptable victims of marital violence. Journal of Men’s Studies, 3(2), 137–159.

    Google Scholar 

  • Glick, P., & Fiske, S. T. (2001). An ambivalent alliance: hostile and benevolent sexism as complementary justifications for gender inequality. American Psychologist, 56, 109–118.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling, S. D., Vazire, S., Srivastava, S., & John, O. P. (2004). Should we trust web-based studies? A comparative analysis of six preconceptions about internet questionnaires. American Psychologist, 59(2), 93–104.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Graham-Kevan, N., & Archer, J. (2005). Investigating three explanations of women’s relationship aggression. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 29, 270–277. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2005.00221.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greene, E., Raitz, A., & Lindblad, H. (1989). Jurors’ knowledge of battered women. Journal of Family Violence, 4, 105–125. doi:10.1007/BF01006624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamberger, L. K., & Guse, C. E. (2002). Men’s and women’s use of intimate partner violence in clinical samples. Violence Against Women, 8, 1301–1331. doi:10.1177/107780102762478028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris, R. J., & Cook, C. A. (1994). Attributions about spouse abuse: it matters who the batterers and victims are. Sex Roles, 30, 553–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helgeson, V. S. (1994). Prototypes and dimensions of masculinity and femininity. Sex Roles, 31, 653–682.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodell, E. C., Dunlap, E. E., Wasarhaley, N. E., & Golding, J. M. (2012). Factors impacting juror perceptions of battered women who kill their abusers: delay and sleeping status. Psychology, Public Policy & Law, 18(2), 338–351. doi:10.1037/a0025145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, L. A., & Ervin, K. S. (1992). Height stereotypes of women and men: the liabilities of shortness for both sexes. The Journal of Social Psychology, 132, 433–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasian, M., Spanos, N. P., Terrance, C. A., & Peebles, S. (1993). Battered women who kill: jury simulation and legal defenses. Law and Human Behavior, 17(3), 289–312. doi:10.1007/BF01044510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, J. B., & Johnson, M. P. (2008). Differentiation among types of intimate partner violence: research update and implications for interventions. Family Court Review, 46(3), 476–499. doi:10.1111/j.1744-1617.2008.00215.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kentucky revised statutes. (2002). Retrieved from http://www.lrc.state.ky.us/statrev/frontpg.htm.

  • Kerr, N. L., & Bray, R. M. (2005). Simulation, realism, and the study of the jury. In N. Brewer & K. Williams (Eds.), Psychology and law: An empirical perspective. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolbo, J. R., & Blakely, E. H. (1996). Children who witness domestic violence: a review of empirical literature. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11, 281–293. doi:10.1177/088626096011002010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Landsman, M. J., & Hartley, C. (2007). Attributing responsibility for child maltreatment when domestic violence is present. Child Abuse & Neglect, 31, 445–461. doi:10.1016/j.chiabu.2006.08.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mbilinyi, L. F., Edleson, J. L., Beeman, S. K., & Hagemeister, A. K. (2007). What happens to children when their mothers are battered? Journal of Family Violence, 22, 309–317. doi:10.1007/s10896-007-9087-x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Menard, K. S., Anderson, A. L., & Godboldt, S. M. (2009). Gender differences in intimate partner recidivism: a 5-year follow-up. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 36, 61–76. doi:10.1177/0093854808325905.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Migliaccio, T. A. (2002). Abused husbands: a narrative analysis. Journal of Family Issues, 23, 26–52. doi:10.1177/0192513X02023001002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preacher, K. J., & Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879–891. doi:10.3758/BRM.40.3.879.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rajan, M., & McCloskey, A. (2007). Victims of intimate partner violence: arrest rates across recent studies. Journal of Aggression, Maltreatment & Trauma, 15(3/4), 27–52. doi:10.1080/10926770802097186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rittiman, B. (2008, January 17). Mack thought about killing one more. Channel 2 News. Retrieved from http://darren-mack-news.newslib.com/story/8673-190/

  • Salska, I., Frederick, D. A., Pawlowski, B., Reilly, A. H., Laird, K. T., & Rudd, N. A. (2008). Conditional mate preferences: factors influencing preferences for height. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 203–215. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2007.08.008.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schuller, R. A., & Hastings, P. A. (1996). Trials of battered women who kill: the impact of alternative forms of expert evidence. Law and Human Behavior, 20(2), 167–187. doi:10.1007/BF01499353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swami, V., Furnham, A., Balakumar, N., Williams, C., Canaway, K., & Stanistreet, D. (2008). Factors influencing preferences for height: a replication and extension. Personality and Individual Differences, 45, 395–400. doi:10.1016/j.paid.2008.05.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terrance, C. A., Matheson, K., & Spanos, N. P. (2000). Effects of judicial instructions and case characteristics in a mock jury trial of battered women who kill. Law and Human Behavior, 24(2), 207–229. doi:10.1023/A:1005411003414.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Vatnar, S. K. B., & Bjorkly, S. (2010). Does it make any difference if she is a mother? An interactional perspective on intimate partner violence with a focus on motherhood and pregnancy. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 25, 94–110. doi:10.1177/0886260508329129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Worthen, J. B., & Varnado-Sullivan, P. (2005). Gender bias in attributions of responsibility for abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 20, 305–311. doi:10.1007/s10896-005-6606-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychology, Kastle Hall, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY, 40506, USA

    Emily C. Hodell, Nesa E. Wasarhaley, Kellie Rose Lynch & Jonathan M. Golding

Authors
  1. Emily C. Hodell
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nesa E. Wasarhaley
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kellie Rose Lynch
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Jonathan M. Golding
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nesa E. Wasarhaley.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hodell, E.C., Wasarhaley, N.E., Lynch, K.R. et al. Mock Juror Gender Biases and Perceptions of Self-Defense Claims in Intimate Partner Homicide. J Fam Viol 29, 495–506 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9609-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-014-9609-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation