Abstract
Searching new sources of resistance to the maize weevil are critical in a successful breeding program to address grain damage by postharvest pests. This study was undertaken to evaluate resistance in 28 quality protein maize (QPM) inbred lines against Sitophilus zeamais infestation and their important agronomic attributes, and consequently their value for use in breeding programs to develop resistant QPM hybrids. Susceptibility index (SI), which considers the progeny number in the F1 generation and the time the insects take to mature from egg to adult, was used to measure the susceptibility. Out of the 28 inbred lines tested, one inbred line (CML-142) was resistant, three (CML-144/144-7-b (F2)-4-2-1-1-1-1-1, POOL 15QPFS-693-B-2-B-#-B-B-B-# and CML-149) were moderately resistant and the remaining 24 inbred lines were categorized as susceptible to highly susceptible. Importantly, those inbred lines that are resistant and moderately resistant had better yield and other agronomic performances as compared to the susceptible ones. These resistant and moderately resistant inbred lines showed considerable reduction in grain damage and losses for S. zeamais, suggesting that they contained genes that confer resistance to the pest. Correlations between kernel size, breadth and texture with some important susceptibility parameters were found to be significant, indicating possible influence of these factors together with others in determining the susceptibility of the QPM inbred lines to S. zeamais. Identification of QPM lines resistant to S. zeamais in the present study offers an opportunity to breed for resistance to maize weevil in developing QPM hybrid with enhanced resistance to S. zeamais.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abebe F, Tefera T, Mugo S, Beyene Y, Vidal S (2009) Resistance of maize varieties to the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais (Motsch.) (Coleoptera: curculionidae). Afr J Biotech 8(21):5937–5943
Adams JM, Schulten GGM (1978) Loss caused by insects, mites and micro-organisms. In: Harris KL, Lindblad CJ (eds) Post-Harvest Grain Loss Assessment Methods. American Association of Cereal Chemists, USA, pp 83–95
Alexander DE, Creech RG (1977) Breeding special industrial and nutritional types. In: Sprague GF (ed) Corn and Corn Improvement. American Soci Agron Madison, WI, U.S.A, pp 363–389
Altieri MA, Nicholls CI (2003) Soil fertility management and insect pests: harmonizing soil and plant health in agroecosystems. Soil Till. Res. 72:203–211
Arnason JT, Lambert JDH, Gale J, Mihm J, Bjarnason M, Jewell DC, Serratos JA, Fregeau-Reid J, Pietrzak L (1993) Is quality protein maize more susceptible than the normal lines to attack by maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais? Postharvest Bio Techno 2:349–358
Aruna I, Lakshmi K, Ratnasudhakar T (2009) Varietal preference studies of paddy varieties against Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier) in relation to physical parameters. J Entomol Res 33:297–304
Bergvinson DJ (2001) Storage pest resistance in maize. In: Maize Program Maize Research Highlights 1999-2000. CIMMYT, Mexico D.F., Mexico, pp. 32-39
Bjarnason M, Vasal SK (1992) Breeding of quality protein maize (QPM). Plant Breed Revi 9:181–216
Demissie G (2014) Biology and Management of Angoumois Grain Moth, Sitotroga cerealella (Olivier) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiidae) through host plant resistance and inert dusts in stored maize. Dissertation, Maharana Pratap University of Agriculture and Technology, India. 140p
Demissie G, Tefera T, Tadesse A (2008a) Importance of Husk Covering on Field Infestation of Maize by Sitophilus zeamais Motsch. (Coleoptera: curculionidea) at Bako, Western Ethiopia. Afr J Biotech 7(20):3774–3779
Demissie G, Teshom A, Abakemal D, Tadesse A (2008b) Cooking oils and ‘‘Triplex’’ in the control of Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky (Coleoptera: curculionidae) in farm-stored maize. J Stored Prod Res 44:173–178
Demissie G, Bitew T, Berhanu T, Teshome K, Tende R, Tefera T, Mugo S (2014) Response of the popular maize cultivars in Ethiopia to stem borers and post-harvest pests. Abstract. A paper presented on End-of IRMA III Conference “Consolidating Experiences from IRMA I, II and III: Achievements, Lessons and Prospects” IRMA Project Document No. 17. 23 – 27 February 2014, Nairobi, Kenya
Derera J, Pixley KV, Giga DP, Makanda I (2014) Resistance of maize to the maize weevil: III. Grain weight loss assessment and implications for breeding. J Stored Prod Res 59:24–35
Dimler RJ (1966) Report on kernel structure and wet milling of high lysine corn. High Lysine Corn Conference, 1966, Purdue University. Washington, D.C, Corn Refiners Association, pp 121–127
Dobie P (1978) The susceptibility of triticale to postharvest infestation by Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky, Sitophilus oryzae (L.) and Sitophilus runcates (L.). J Stored Prod Res 14:87–93
Gomez LA, Rodriguez JG, Poneleit CG, Blake DF, Smith CRJ (1983) Influence of nutritional characteristics of selected corn genotypes on food utilization by the rice weevil (Coleoptera: curculionidae). J Econ Entomol 76:728–732
Hossain F, Prasanna MB, Rakesh KS, Pradyumn K, Bir BS (2007) Evaluation of quality protein maize genotypes for resistance to stored grain weevil Sitophilus oryzae (Coleoptera:curculionidae). Int J Trop Insec Sci 27(2):114–121
Kim SK, Kossou D (2003) Responses and genetics of maize germplasm resistant to the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky in West Africa. J Stored Prod Res 39:489–505
Kim SK, Brewbaker JL, Hallauer AR (1988) Insect and disease resistance from tropical maize for use in temperate zone hybrids, pp. 194–226. In Proceedings of the 43rd Annual Corn/Sorghum Research Conference, American Seed Trade Association, Washington DC, USA
Kossou DK, Mareck J, Bosque-Perez N (1993) Comparison of improved and local maize varieties in the Republic of Benin with emphasis on susceptibility to Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky. J Stored Prod Res 29:333–343
Lale NES, Kartay MO (2006) Role of physical characteristics of the seed in the resistance of local cultivars of maize to Sitophilus zeamais infestation storage. Trop Sci 46:1–3
Mertz ET, Bates LS, Nelson OE (1964) Mutant gene that changes protein composition and increases lysine content of maize endosperm (Washington). Science 145:279–280
Mwololo JK, Mugo S, Tefera T, Munyiri SW (2013) Evaluation of traits of resistance to postharvest insect pests in tropical maize. Int J Agric Crop Sci 6(13):926–933
Oliveira EE, Guedes RNC, Totola MR, De Marco P (2007) Competition between insecticide-susceptible and resistant population of the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais. Chemosphere 69:17–24
Ortega A, De Leon C, Granados G, Vasal, SK (1975) Disease-insect interactions in quality protein maize, pp. 173–192. In High Quality Protein Maize (Edited by L. F. Bauman). Hutchinson Ross Publishing Co., Stroudsburg, PA, USA
Prasanna BM, Vasal SK, Kassahun B, Singh NN (2001) Quality protein maize. Curr Sci 81:1308–1319
Ribeiro BM, Guedes RNC, Oliveira EE, Santos JP (2003) Insecticide resistance and synergism in Brazilian population of Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: curculionidae). J Stored Prod Res 39:21–31
Santos JP, Guimaraes PEO, Waquil JM, Foster JE (1996) Resistance to maize weevil in quality protein maize lines and commercial corn hybrids. Resist Pest Manage 8:52–54
Santos JP, Guimaraes PEO, Waquil JM, Foster JE (2006) Relative index of susceptibility to the maize weevil, Sitophilus zeamais, among some QPM corn lines. Revista Brasileira de Milhoe Sorgo 5(2):159–169
SAS (2004). SAS Statistical Users Guide, Statistical analysis system. SAS Institute Inc. Carry
Siwale J, Mbata K, Mcrobert J, Lungu D (2009) Comparative resistance of improved maize genotypes and Landraces to maize weevil. Afr Crop Sci J 17:1–16
Tadesse A (2003) Studies on some non-chemical insect pest management options on farm-stored maize in Ethiopia. Dissertation, Giessen University, Germany
Tefera T, Demissie G, Mugo S, Beyene Y (2013a) Yield and agronomic performance of maize hybrids resistant to the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais motschulsky (Coleoptera:curculionidae). Crop Prot 46:94–99
Tefera T, Mugo S, Beyene Y, Karaya H, Gokunga J, Demissie G (2013b) Post harvest insect pest and foliar disease resistance and agronomic performance of new maize hybrids in East Africa. Int J Plant Breed Genet 10:1–13
Tipping PW, Rodriguez JG, Poneleit CG, Legg DE (1988) Resistance of dent corn inbreds to oviposition by the maize weevil. J Kansas Entomol Socie 61:131–134
Tollenar M, Dwyer LM (1999) Physiology of maize. In: Smith DL, Hamel C (eds) Crop yield, physiology and processes. Springer-Verlag, Berlin
Vasal SK, Srinivasan G, Pandey S, Gonzalez CF, Crossa J (1993) Heterosis and combining ability of CIMMYT’s quality protein maize germplasm: i lowland tropical. Crop Sci 33:46–51
Vowotor KA, Meikle WG, Ayertey JN, Markham RH (2005) Distribution and association between the larger grain borer Prostephanus runcates (Horn) and the maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais Motschulsky in maize stores. J Stored Prod Res 41:498–512
Wheatley PE (1973) Relative susceptibility of maize varieties (London). Tropical Stored Product Information 25:16–18
Acknowledgments
This research was supported by CIMMYT coordinated Nutritional Maize for Ethiopia (NuME) project funded by the Government of Canada through the Department of Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development. Their financial support is gratefully acknowledged. All technical staffs of Maize Protection, Bako National Maize Research Centre, are recognized for their assistance during field trail and laboratory experimental set-up and data collection. This work is a collaborative research undertaken between the CIMMYT-Ethiopia and the EIAR, Bako National Maize Research Centre.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Demissie, G., Tilahun, B., Dida, M. et al. Evaluation of quality protein maize inbred lines for resistance to maize weevil Sitophilus zeamais (Coleoptera: curculionidae) and other important agronomic traits. Euphytica 205, 137–150 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1412-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-015-1412-5