Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

A phase 1 study of ABT-806 in subjects with advanced solid tumors

  • PHASE I STUDIES
  • Published:
Investigational New Drugs Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

Purpose ABT‐806, a humanized recombinant monoclonal antibody, binds a unique epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) epitope exposed in the EGFRde2‐7 (EGFRvIII) deletion mutant and other EGFR proteins in the activated state. This phase I study evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and recommended phase two dose (RP2D) of ABT-806 in patients with solid tumors that commonly overexpress activated EGFR or EGFRvlll. Methods Patients with advanced solid tumors, including glioblastoma, were eligible. Following a dose escalation phase, expanded safety cohorts of patients with solid tumors or EGFR-amplified glioblastoma were enrolled. Adverse events (AEs) were graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v4.0; tumor response was assessed by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors v1.1. EGFR protein expression was quantified by immunohistochemistry. Results 49 patients were treated. Frequent AEs (≥10 %) possibly/probably related to ABT-806 were fatigue (18 %), nausea (16 %), dermatitis acneiform (12 %), and vomiting (10 %). Only one dose-limiting toxicity (grade three morbilliform rash) occurred. The RP2D was the pre-specified highest dose (24 mg/kg). Systemic exposures were dose proportional between 2 and 24 mg/kg. Median time to progression was 55 days (95 % confidence interval, 53–57) in all patients and 43 days (22–57) for glioblastoma patients. No objective responses occurred; however, two patients had prolonged stable disease. An EGFR-amplified penile cancer patient has stable disease lasting over 2.5 years. Conclusions ABT-806 has unique pharmacokinetic and safety profiles. Toxicities were infrequent and typically low grade at the RP2D. Linear ABT-806 pharmacokinetics suggest lack of significant binding to wild-type EGFR in normal tissues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Krause DS, Van Etten RA (2005) Tyrosine kinases as targets for cancer therapy. N Engl J Med 353:172–187

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ciardiello F, Tortora G (2008) EGFR antagonists in cancer treatment. N Engl J Med 358:1160–1174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Wong RW (2003) Transgenic and knock-out mice for deciphering the roles of EGFR ligands. Cell Mol Life Sci 60:113–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bonner JA, Raisch KP, Trummell HQ, Robert F, Meredith RF, Spencer SA, Buchsbaum DJ, Saleh MN, Stackhouse MA, LoBuglio AF, Peters GE, Carroll WR, Waksal HW (2000) Enhanced apoptosis with combination C225/radiation treatment serves as the impetus for clinical investigation in head and neck cancers. J Clin Oncol 18:47S–53S

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baselga J, Mendelsohn J (1994) The epidermal growth factor receptor as a target for therapy in breast carcinoma. Breast Cancer Res Treat 29:127–138

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Frederick L, Wang XY, Eley G, James CD (2000) Diversity and frequency of epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in human glioblastomas. Cancer Res 60:1383–1387

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Sugawa N, Ekstrand AJ, James CD, Collins VP (1990) Identical splicing of aberrant epidermal growth factor receptor transcripts from amplified rearranged genes in human glioblastomas. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 87:8602–8606

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Van Cutsem E, Peeters M, Siena S, Humblet Y, Hendlisz A, Neyns B, Canon JL, Van Laethem JL, Maurel J, Richardson G, Wolf M, Amado RG (2007) Open-label phase III trial of panitumumab plus best supportive care compared with best supportive care alone in patients with chemotherapy-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol 25:1658–1664

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Jonker DJ, O’Callaghan CJ, Karapetis CS, Zalcberg JR, Tu D, Au HJ, Berry SR, Krahn M, Price T, Simes RJ, Tebbutt NC, van Hazel G, Wierzbicki R, Langer C, Moore MJ (2007) Cetuximab for the treatment of colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med 357:2040–2048

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Boone SL, Rademaker A, Liu D, Pfeiffer C, Mauro DJ, Lacouture ME (2007) Impact and management of skin toxicity associated with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy: survey results. Oncology 72:152–159

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Albanell J, Codony-Servat J, Rojo F, Del Campo JM, Sauleda S, Anido J, Raspall G, Giralt J, Rosello J, Nicholson RI, Mendelsohn J, Baselga J (2001) Activated extracellular signal-regulated kinases: association with epidermal growth factor receptor/transforming growth factor alpha expression in head and neck squamous carcinoma and inhibition by anti-epidermal growth factor receptor treatments. Cancer Res 61:6500–6510

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Huang SM, Bock JM, Harari PM (1999) Epidermal growth factor receptor blockade with C225 modulates proliferation, apoptosis, and radiosensitivity in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck. Cancer Res 59:1935–1940

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Thomas SM, Grandis JR (2004) Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of EGFR inhibitors under clinical investigation. Cancer Treat Rev 30:255–268

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gan HK, Burgess AW, Clayton AH, Scott AM (2012) Targeting of a conformationally exposed, tumor-specific epitope of EGFR as a strategy for cancer therapy. Cancer Res 72:2924–2930

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Luwor RB, Johns TG, Murone C, Huang HJ, Cavenee WK, Ritter G, Old LJ, Burgess AW, Scott AM (2001) Monoclonal antibody 806 inhibits the growth of tumor xenografts expressing either the de2-7 or amplified epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) but not wild-type EGFR. Cancer Res 61:5355–5361

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Li D, Ji H, Zaghlul S, McNamara K, Liang MC, Shimamura T, Kubo S, Takahashi M, Chirieac LR, Padera RF, Scott AM, Jungbluth AA, Cavenee WK, Old LJ, Demetri GD, Wong KK (2007) Therapeutic anti-EGFR antibody 806 generates responses in murine de novo EGFR mutant-dependent lung carcinomas. J Clin Invest 117:346–352

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Mishima K, Johns TG, Luwor RB, Scott AM, Stockert E, Jungbluth AA, Ji XD, Suvarna P, Voland JR, Old LJ, Huang HJ, Cavenee WK (2001) Growth suppression of intracranial xenografted glioblastomas overexpressing mutant epidermal growth factor receptors by systemic administration of monoclonal antibody (mAb) 806, a novel monoclonal antibody directed to the receptor. Cancer Res 61:5349–5354

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Scott AM, Lee FT, Tebbutt N, Herbertson R, Gill SS, Liu Z, Skrinos E, Murone C, Saunder TH, Chappell B, Papenfuss AT, Poon AM, Hopkins W, Smyth FE, MacGregor D, Cher LM, Jungbluth AA, Ritter G, Brechbiel MW, Murphy R, Burgess AW, Hoffman EW, Johns TG, Old LJ (2007) A phase I clinical trial with monoclonal antibody ch806 targeting transitional state and mutant epidermal growth factor receptors. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104:4071–4076

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Pirker R, Pereira JR, von Pawel J, Krzakowski M, Ramlau R, Park K, de Marinis F, Eberhardt WE, Paz-Ares L, Storkel S, Schumacher KM, von Heydebreck A, Celik I, O’Byrne KJ (2012) EGFR expression as a predictor of survival for first-line chemotherapy plus cetuximab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: analysis of data from the phase 3 FLEX study. Lancet Oncol 13:33–42

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Panousis C, Rayzman VM, Johns TG, Renner C, Liu Z, Cartwright G, Lee FT, Wang D, Gan H, Cao D, Kypridis A, Smyth FE, Brechbiel MW, Burgess AW, Old LJ, Scott AM (2005) Engineering and characterisation of chimeric monoclonal antibody 806 (ch806) for targeted immunotherapy of tumours expressing de2-7 EGFR or amplified EGFR. Br J Cancer 92:1069–1077

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Erbitux (cetuximab) [package insert] (2013) Indianapolis, IN: Eli Lilly

  22. Tan AR, Moore DF, Hidalgo M, Doroshow JH, Poplin EA, Goodin S, Mauro D, Rubin EH (2006) Pharmacokinetics of cetuximab after administration of escalating single dosing and weekly fixed dosing in patients with solid tumors. Clin Cancer Res 12:6517–6522

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Baselga J, Pfister D, Cooper MR, Cohen R, Burtness B, Bos M, D’Andrea G, Seidman A, Norton L, Gunnett K, Falcey J, Anderson V, Waksal H, Mendelsohn J (2000) Phase I studies of anti-epidermal growth factor receptor chimeric antibody C225 alone and in combination with cisplatin. J Clin Oncol 18:904–914

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Rowinsky EK, Schwartz GH, Gollob JA, Thompson JA, Vogelzang NJ, Figlin R, Bukowski R, Haas N, Lockbaum P, Li YP, Arends R, Foon KA, Schwab G, Dutcher J (2004) Safety, pharmacokinetics, and activity of ABX-EGF, a fully human anti-epidermal growth factor receptor monoclonal antibody in patients with metastatic renal cell cancer. J Clin Oncol 22:3003–3015

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Hatanpaa KJ, Burma S, Zhao D, Habib AA (2010) Epidermal growth factor receptor in glioma: signal transduction, neuropathology, imaging, and radioresistance. Neoplasia 12:675–684

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Snuderl M, Fazlollahi L, Le LP, Nitta M, Zhelyazkova BH, Davidson CJ, Akhavanfard S, Cahill DP, Aldape KD, Betensky RA, Louis DN, Iafrate AJ (2011) Mosaic amplification of multiple receptor tyrosine kinase genes in glioblastoma. Cancer Cell 20:810–817

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Yasuda H, Kobayashi S, Costa DB (2012) EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations in non-small-cell lung cancer: preclinical data and clinical implications. Lancet Oncol 13:e23–e31

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Yasuda H, Park E, Yun CH, Sng NJ, Lucena-Araujo AR, Yeo WL, Huberman MS, Cohen DW, Nakayama S, Ishioka K, Yamaguchi N, Hanna M, Oxnard GR, Lathan CS, Moran T, Sequist LV, Chaft JE, Riely GJ, Arcila ME, Soo RA, Meyerson M, Eck MJ, Kobayashi SS, Costa DB (2013) Structural, biochemical, and clinical characterization of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations in lung cancer. Sci Transl Med 5:216ra177

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Men HT, Gou HF, Qiu M, He JP, Cheng K, Chen Y, Ge J, Liu JY (2014) A case of penile squamous cell carcinoma treated with a combination of antiepidermal growth factor receptor antibody and chemotherapy. Anticancer Drugs 25:123–125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Brown A, Ma Y, Danenberg K, Schuckman AK, Pinski JK, Pagliaro LC, Quinn DI, Dorff TB (2014) Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the penis: a report of 3 cases. Urology 83:159–165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Chaux A, Munari E, Katz B, Sharma R, Lecksell K, Cubilla AL, Burnett AL, Netto GJ (2013) The epidermal growth factor receptor is frequently overexpressed in penile squamous cell carcinomas: a tissue microarray and digital image analysis study of 112 cases. Hum Pathol 44:2690–2695

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Carthon BC, Ng CS, Pettaway CA, Pagliaro LC (2014) Epidermal growth factor receptor-targeted therapy in locally advanced or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the penis. BJU Int 113:871–877

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Gou HF, Li X, Qiu M, Cheng K, Li LH, Dong H, Chen Y, Tang Y, Gao F, Zhao F, Men HT, Ge J, Su JM, Xu F, Bi F, Gao JJ, Liu JY (2013) Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-RAS signaling pathway in penile squamous cell carcinoma. PLoS One 8:e62175

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Medical writing support was provided by Jacqueline Nielsen, an AbbVie Inc. employee.

Funding

This study was funded by AbbVie Inc.

Author contributions

All authors participated in the collection and analysis of data, manuscript writing or editing, and provided final approval of the manuscript.

Sponsor disclosures

The design, study conduct, analysis, and financial support of the clinical trial were provided by AbbVie Inc. AbbVie Inc. participated in the interpretation of data, review, and approval of this manuscript.

Compliance With Ethical Standards

Conflict of interest

J M Cleary, D A Reardon, N Azad, L Gandhi, G I Shapiro, and Jorge Chaves declare that they have no conflicts of interest. M Pedersen, P Ansell, W Ames, H Xiong, W Munasinghe, M Dudley, E Reilly, K Holen, and R Humerickhouse are employees of AbbVie Inc. and may own AbbVie Inc. stocks or options.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to James M. Cleary.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cleary, J.M., Reardon, D.A., Azad, N. et al. A phase 1 study of ABT-806 in subjects with advanced solid tumors. Invest New Drugs 33, 671–678 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-015-0234-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10637-015-0234-6

Keywords

Navigation