Skip to main content
Log in

SEMIFARMA-HYGARCH Modeling of Dow Jones Return Persistence

  • Published:
Computational Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the cyclical behavior of Dow Jones by testing the existence of long memory through a new class of semiparametric ARFIMA models with HYGARCH errors (SEMIFARMA-HYGARCH); this class includes nonparametric deterministic trend, stochastic trend, short-range and long-range dependence and long memory heteroscedastic errors. We study the daily returns of the Dow Jones from 1896 to 2006. We estimate several models and we find that the coefficients of the SEMIFARMA-HYGARCH model, including long memory coefficients for the equations of the mean and the conditional variance, are highly significant. The forecasting results show that the informational shocks have permanent effects on volatility and the SEMIFARMA-HYGARCH model has better performance over some other models for long and/or short horizons. The predictions from this model are also better than the predictions of the random walk model; accordingly, the weak efficiency assumption of financial markets seems violated for Dow Jones returns studied over a long period.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akaike H. (1970) Statistical predictor identification. Annals of Institute of Statistical Mathematics 22: 203–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aloui C., Mabrouk S. (2010) Value-at-risk estimations of energy commodities via long-memory, asymmetry and fat-tailed GARCH models. Energy Policy 38: 2326–2339

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews D. W. K., Guggenberger P. (2003) A bias-reduced log-periodogram regression estimator for the long-memory parameter. Econometrica 71: 675–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baillie R. T., Bollerslev T, Mikkelsen H. O. (1996) Fractionally integrated generalized autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 74: 3–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkoulas J. T., Baum C. F. (1997) Long memory and forecasting in Euroyen deposit rates. Financial Engineering and the Japanese Market 4: 189–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barkoulas J. T., Baum C. F. (2006) Long-memory forecasting of US monetary indices. Journal of Forecasting 25(4): 291–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beran, J. (1999). SEMIFAR models—A semiparametric framework for modelling trends, long-range dependence and nonstationarity. Discussion Paper No. 99/16. Center of Finance and Econometrics, University of Konstanz.

  • Beran J., Feng Y. (2002a) SEMIFAR models—A semiparametric framework for modelling trends, long-range dependence and nonstationarity. Computational Statististics & Data Analysis 40: 393–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beran J., Feng Y. (2002b) Iterative plug-in algorithms for SEMIFAR models -definition, convergence and asymptotic properties. Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics 11: 690–713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beran J., Ocker D. (1999a) SEMIFAR forecasts, with applications to foreign exchange rates. Journal of Statistical Planning and Inference 80: 137–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beran, J., & Ocker, D. (1999b). Volatility of stock market indices—An analysis based on SEMIFAR models. Working Paper, Department of Economics and Statistics, University of Konstanz, Germany.

  • Bollerslev T. (1986) Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroskedasticity. Journal of Econometrics 31: 307–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brock, W. A., Dechert, W. D., & Scheinkman, J. (1987). A test for independence based on the correlation dimension. Discussion Paper 8702, University of Wisconsin-Madison.

  • Cardamone, E., & Folkinshteyn, D. (2007). HYGARCH Approach to Estimating Interest Rate and Exchange Rate Sensitivity of a Large Sample of U.S. Banking Institutions. Working Paper, Temple University, Department of Finance, USA.

  • Christodoulou-Volos C. C., Siokis F. M. (2006) Long range dependence in stock market returns. Applied Financial Economics 16: 1331–1338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conrad C. (2010) Non-negativity conditions for the hyperbolic GARCH model. Journal of Econometrics 157: 441–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson J. (2004) Moments and memory properties of linear conditional heteroskedasticity models and a new model. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 22: 16–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey D., Fuller W. (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74: 427–431

    Google Scholar 

  • Diebold F. X., Mariano R. S. (1995) Comparing predictive accuracy. Journal of Business and Economic Statistics 13(3): 253–263

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott G., Rothenberg T. J., Stock J. H. (1996) Efficient tests for an autoregressive unit root. Econometrica 64(4): 813–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle R. F. (1982) Autoregressive conditional heteroskedasticity with estimation of U.K. inflation. Econometrica 50: 987–1008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E. F. (1965) Random walks in stock market prices. Financial Analysts Journal 21(5): 55–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E. F. (1970) Efficient capital markets: A review of theory and empirical work. The Journal of Finance 25(2): 383–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fama E. F. (1998) Market efficiency, long-term returns, and behavioral finance. Journal of Financial Economics 49: 283–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feng Y., Beran Y., Yu K. (2007) Modelling financial time series with SEMIFAR–GARCH model. IMA Journal of Management Mathematics 18: 395–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geweke J., Porter-Hudak S. (1983) The estimation and application of long-memory time series models. Journal of Time Series Analysis 4: 221–238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger C. W. J., Joyeux R. (1980) An introduction to long-memory time series models and fractional differencing. Journal of Time Series Analysis 1: 15–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman S. J. (1976) On the efficiency of competitive stock markets where trades have diverse information. The Journal of Finance 31(2): 573–585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gursakal S. (2010) Detecting long memory in bulls and bears markets: Evidence from Turkey. Journal of Money, Investment and Banking 18: 95–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Hall P., Hart J. (1990) Nonparametric regression with long-range dependence. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications 36: 339–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Härdle, W., & Mungo, J. (2008). Value at risk and expected short fall when there is long range dependence. Discussion Paper 2008-006, Humboldt-universität zu Berlin, Germany.

  • Hosking J. R. M. (1981) Fractional differencing. Biometrika 68: 165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen M. C. (1978) Some anomalous evidence regarding market efficiency. Journal of Financial Economics 6(2–3): 95–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasman A., Kasman S., Torun E. (2009) Dual long memory property in returns and volatility: Evidence from the CEE countries’ stock markets. Emerging Markets Review 10: 122–139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwan, W., Li, W. K., & Li, G. (2011). On the estimation and diagnostic checking of the ARFIMA-HYGARCH Model. Computational Statistics and Data Analysis, forthcoming.

  • Kwiatkowski D., Phillips P., Schmidt P., Shin Y. (1992) Testing the null hypothesis of stationary against the alternative of a unit root: How sure are we that economic time series have a unit root?. Journal of Econometrics 54: 159–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lillo F., Farmer J. D. (2004) The long memory of the efficient market. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics & Econometrics 8: 3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan D. G., Kambouroudis D. (2009) Are risk metrics forecasts good enough? Evidence from 31 stock markets. International Review of Financial Analysis 18: 117–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mizrach, B. (1995). A simple nonparametric test for independence. Working Paper 1995-23, Rutgers University, USA.

  • Nadaraya E. A. (1964) On estimating regression. Theory of Probability and Their Applications 9: 134–137

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips P. C. B., Perron P. (1988) Testing for unit roots in time series regression. Biometrika 75: 335–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray B. K., Tsay R. S. (1997) Bandwidth selection for kernel regression with long-range dependence. Biometrika 84: 791–802

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt P., Phillips P. C. B. (1992) LM test for a unit root in the presence of deterministic trends. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 54: 257–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz G. (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Annals of Statistics 6: 461–464

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tang T. L., Shieh S. J. (2006) Long memory in stock index future markets: A value-at-risk approach. Physica A 366: 437–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Watson G. S. (1964) Smooth regression analysis. Sankhyä A26: 359–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Wei Y., Wang Y., Huang D. (2010) Forecasting crude oil market volatility: Further evidence using GARCH-class models. Energy Economics 32: 1477–1484

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Anne Péguin-Feissolle.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chikhi, M., Péguin-Feissolle, A. & Terraza, M. SEMIFARMA-HYGARCH Modeling of Dow Jones Return Persistence. Comput Econ 41, 249–265 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-012-9328-9

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10614-012-9328-9

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation