Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Peer Support in Full-Service Partnerships: A Multiple Case Study Analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Community Mental Health Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Peer providers are integral to Full Service Partnerships (FSPs), which are team-based mental health service models. Peer providers use principles of recovery to engage clients, but FSPs can vary in their recovery orientation. Whether and how peer recovery orientation reflects the organizational environments of FSPs is unclear. This qualitative study explored peer provider attitudes towards recovery within the organizational contexts of FSPs where they are employed. Case study analysis was conducted on eight purposively sampled FSPs using qualitative interviews with peer providers and program directors. In two cases, peer recovery attitudes diverged from those of their organizational context. In these cases, peer providers were champions for recovery, and used practice-based strategies to promote client autonomy despite working in settings with lower recovery orientation. Peer providers could be uniquely positioned to promote client autonomy in settings where organizational factors limit consumer choice.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aarons, G. A. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership: Association with attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Services, 57, 1162–1169. doi:10.1176/ps.2006.57.8.1162.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Aarons, G. A., & Sawitzky, A. C. (2006). Organizational culture and climate and mental health provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychological Services, 3, 61–72. doi:10.1037/1541-1559.3.1.61.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, G. N., Herinckx, H. A., Kinney, R. F., Paulson, R. I., Cutler, D. L., Lewis, K., & Oxman, E. (2000). Psychiatric hospitalizations, arrests, emergency room visits, and homelessness of clients with serious and persistent mental illness: Findings from a randomized trial of two ACT programs vs. usual care. Mental Health Services Research, 2, 155–164. doi:10.1023/A:1010141826867.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, L., Chinman, M., Sells, D., & Rowe, M. (2006). Peer support among adults with serious mental illness: A report from the field. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32, 443–450. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbj043.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, L., & Roe, D. (2007). Recovery from versus recovery in serious mental illness: One strategy for lessening confusion plaguing recovery. Journal of Mental Health, 16(4), 459–470.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, L., O’Connell, M. J., Tondora, J., Lawless, M., & Evans, A. C. (2005). Recovery in serious mental illness: A new wine or just a new bottle? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 480–487. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.36.5.480.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, D. (2000). QSR NVivo NUD*IST Vivo reference guide. Melbourne: QSR International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilmer, T. P., Katz, M. L., Stefancic, A., & Palinkas, L. A. (2013). Variation in the implementation of California’s full service partnerships for persons with serious mental illness. Health Services Research, 48, 2245–2267. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12119.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Glisson, C., & James, L. R. (2002). The cross level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 767–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SAMHSA- HRSA Center for Integrated Health Solutions. (2016). Peer providers. Retrieved from, http://www.integration.samhsa.gov/workforce/peer-providers.

  • Inciardi, J. A., & Harrison, L. D. (2000). Introduction: The concept of harm reduction. In J. A. Inciardi & L. D. Harrison (Eds.), Harm reduction: National and international perspectives (pp. vii–xix). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousnd Oaks: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Min, S.-Y., Whitecraft, J., Rothbard, A. B., & Salzer, M. S. (2007). Peer support for persons with co-occurring disorders and community tenure: A survival analysis. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 30, 207–213. doi:10.2975/30.3.2007.207.213.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ostrow, L., & Adams, N. (2012). Recovery in the USA: From politics to peer support. International Review of Psychiatry, 24(1), 70–78.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Palinkas, L. A. Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., . Wisdom, J. P.,  Duan, N., & Hoagwood,  K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.

  • Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. In Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Hoboken: Wiley. doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa514 .

  • Ralph, R. O. (2000). Recovery. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills, 4, 480–517. doi:10.1080/10973430008408634.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repper, J., & Carter, T. (2011). A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 20, 392–411.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Salzer, M. S., Schwenk, E., & Brusilovskiy, E. (2010). Certified peer specialist roles and activities: Results from a national survey. Psychiatric Services, 61, 520–523. doi:10.1176/ps.2010.61.5.520.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sells, D., Davidson, L., Jewell, C., Falzer, P., & Rowe, M. (2006). The treatment relationship in peer-based and regular case management for clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 57, 1179–1184. doi:10.1176/ps.2006.57.8.1179.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Slade, M., Amering, M., Farkas, M., Hamilton, B., O’Hagan, M., Panther, G., & Whitley, R. (2014). Uses and abuses of recovery: implementing recovery—oriented practices in mental health systems. World Psychiatry, 13(1), 12–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Sledge, W. H., Lawless, M., Sells, D., Wieland, M., O’Connell, M. J., & Davidson, L. (2011). Effectiveness of peer support in reducing readmissions of persons with multiple psychiatric hospitalizations. Psychiatric Services, 62, 541–544. doi:10.1176/ps.62.5.pss6205_0541.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, P. (2004). Peer support/peer provided services: Underlying processes, benefits, and critical ingredients. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27, 392–401. doi:10.2975/27.2004.392.401.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). Recovery and recovery support. Retrieved from, http://www.samhsa.gov/recovery.

  • Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and method (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ1R01HS019986].

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Siantz.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siantz, E., Henwood, B. & Gilmer, T. Peer Support in Full-Service Partnerships: A Multiple Case Study Analysis. Community Ment Health J 53, 542–549 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-017-0106-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-017-0106-y

Keywords

Navigation