Abstract
Peer providers are integral to Full Service Partnerships (FSPs), which are team-based mental health service models. Peer providers use principles of recovery to engage clients, but FSPs can vary in their recovery orientation. Whether and how peer recovery orientation reflects the organizational environments of FSPs is unclear. This qualitative study explored peer provider attitudes towards recovery within the organizational contexts of FSPs where they are employed. Case study analysis was conducted on eight purposively sampled FSPs using qualitative interviews with peer providers and program directors. In two cases, peer recovery attitudes diverged from those of their organizational context. In these cases, peer providers were champions for recovery, and used practice-based strategies to promote client autonomy despite working in settings with lower recovery orientation. Peer providers could be uniquely positioned to promote client autonomy in settings where organizational factors limit consumer choice.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Aarons, G. A. (2006). Transformational and transactional leadership: Association with attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychiatric Services, 57, 1162–1169. doi:10.1176/ps.2006.57.8.1162.
Aarons, G. A., & Sawitzky, A. C. (2006). Organizational culture and climate and mental health provider attitudes toward evidence-based practice. Psychological Services, 3, 61–72. doi:10.1037/1541-1559.3.1.61.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory: A practical guide through qualitative analysis. London: Sage.
Clarke, G. N., Herinckx, H. A., Kinney, R. F., Paulson, R. I., Cutler, D. L., Lewis, K., & Oxman, E. (2000). Psychiatric hospitalizations, arrests, emergency room visits, and homelessness of clients with serious and persistent mental illness: Findings from a randomized trial of two ACT programs vs. usual care. Mental Health Services Research, 2, 155–164. doi:10.1023/A:1010141826867.
Davidson, L., Chinman, M., Sells, D., & Rowe, M. (2006). Peer support among adults with serious mental illness: A report from the field. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 32, 443–450. doi:10.1093/schbul/sbj043.
Davidson, L., & Roe, D. (2007). Recovery from versus recovery in serious mental illness: One strategy for lessening confusion plaguing recovery. Journal of Mental Health, 16(4), 459–470.
Davidson, L., O’Connell, M. J., Tondora, J., Lawless, M., & Evans, A. C. (2005). Recovery in serious mental illness: A new wine or just a new bottle? Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 36, 480–487. doi:10.1037/0735-7028.36.5.480.
Fraser, D. (2000). QSR NVivo NUD*IST Vivo reference guide. Melbourne: QSR International.
Gilmer, T. P., Katz, M. L., Stefancic, A., & Palinkas, L. A. (2013). Variation in the implementation of California’s full service partnerships for persons with serious mental illness. Health Services Research, 48, 2245–2267. doi:10.1111/1475-6773.12119.
Glisson, C., & James, L. R. (2002). The cross level effects of culture and climate in human service teams. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23(6), 767–794.
SAMHSA- HRSA Center for Integrated Health Solutions. (2016). Peer providers. Retrieved from, http://www.integration.samhsa.gov/workforce/peer-providers.
Inciardi, J. A., & Harrison, L. D. (2000). Introduction: The concept of harm reduction. In J. A. Inciardi & L. D. Harrison (Eds.), Harm reduction: National and international perspectives (pp. vii–xix). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). Thousnd Oaks: Sage.
Min, S.-Y., Whitecraft, J., Rothbard, A. B., & Salzer, M. S. (2007). Peer support for persons with co-occurring disorders and community tenure: A survival analysis. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 30, 207–213. doi:10.2975/30.3.2007.207.213.
Ostrow, L., & Adams, N. (2012). Recovery in the USA: From politics to peer support. International Review of Psychiatry, 24(1), 70–78.
Palinkas, L. A. Horwitz, S. M., Green, C. A., . Wisdom, J. P., Duan, N., & Hoagwood, K. (2015). Purposeful sampling for qualitative data collection and analysis in mixed method implementation research. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 42(5), 533–544.
Patton, M. Q. (2005). Qualitative research. In Encyclopedia of statistics in behavioral science. Hoboken: Wiley. doi:10.1002/0470013192.bsa514 .
Ralph, R. O. (2000). Recovery. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Skills, 4, 480–517. doi:10.1080/10973430008408634.
Repper, J., & Carter, T. (2011). A review of the literature on peer support in mental health services. Journal of Mental Health, 20, 392–411.
Salzer, M. S., Schwenk, E., & Brusilovskiy, E. (2010). Certified peer specialist roles and activities: Results from a national survey. Psychiatric Services, 61, 520–523. doi:10.1176/ps.2010.61.5.520.
Sells, D., Davidson, L., Jewell, C., Falzer, P., & Rowe, M. (2006). The treatment relationship in peer-based and regular case management for clients with severe mental illness. Psychiatric Services, 57, 1179–1184. doi:10.1176/ps.2006.57.8.1179.
Slade, M., Amering, M., Farkas, M., Hamilton, B., O’Hagan, M., Panther, G., & Whitley, R. (2014). Uses and abuses of recovery: implementing recovery—oriented practices in mental health systems. World Psychiatry, 13(1), 12–20.
Sledge, W. H., Lawless, M., Sells, D., Wieland, M., O’Connell, M. J., & Davidson, L. (2011). Effectiveness of peer support in reducing readmissions of persons with multiple psychiatric hospitalizations. Psychiatric Services, 62, 541–544. doi:10.1176/ps.62.5.pss6205_0541.
Solomon, P. (2004). Peer support/peer provided services: Underlying processes, benefits, and critical ingredients. Psychiatric Rehabilitation Journal, 27, 392–401. doi:10.2975/27.2004.392.401.
Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1994). Grounded theory methodology. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 273–285). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (2014). Recovery and recovery support. Retrieved from, http://www.samhsa.gov/recovery.
Yin, R. (2003). Case study research: Design and method (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Funding
This research was supported by the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality [AHRQ1R01HS019986].
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Siantz, E., Henwood, B. & Gilmer, T. Peer Support in Full-Service Partnerships: A Multiple Case Study Analysis. Community Ment Health J 53, 542–549 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-017-0106-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10597-017-0106-y