Abstract
This article examines the ethical framing of employment in contemporary human resource management (HRM). Using Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition and classical critical notions of reification, I contrast recognition and reifying stances on labor. The recognition approach embeds work in its emotive and social particularity, positively affirming the basic dignity of social actors. Reifying views, by contrast, exhibit a forgetfulness of recognition, removing action from its existential and social moorings, and imagining workers as bundles of discrete resources or capacities. After discussing why reification is a problem, I stress that recognition and reification embody different ethical standpoints with regards to organizational practices. Thus, I argue paradoxically that many current HRM best practices can be maintained while cultivating an attitude of recognition. If reification is a type of forgetting, cultivating a recognition attitude involves processes of “remembering” to foster work relations that reinforce employee dignity.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ball, K. (2005). Organization, surveillance and the body: Towards a politics of resistance. Organization, 12(1), 89–108.
Berger, P., & Pullberg, S. (1966). Reification and the sociological critique of consciousness. New Left Review, 35, 56–71.
Bernstein, J. (2006). All together now: Common sense for a new economy. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.
Borman, D. A. (2009). Labour, exchange and recognition: Marx contra Honneth. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 35(8), 935–959.
Burrell, G. (1994). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: The contribution of Jurgen Habermas. Organization Studies, 5(1), 1–45.
Burris, V. (1988). Reification: A Marxist perspective. California Sociologist, 10(1), 22–43.
Butler, J. (2008). Taking anothers view: Ambivalent implications. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea (pp. 97–119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Carlon, D. M., Downs, A. A., & Wert-Gray, S. (2006). Statistics as fetishes: The case of financial performance measures and executive compensation. Organizational Research Methods, 9(4), 475–790.
Cavell, S. (1976). Knowing and acknowledging. In S. Cavell (Ed.), Must we mean what we say? (pp. 278–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Chari, A. (2010). Toward a political critique of reification: Lukacs, Honneth and the aims of critical theory. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 36(5), 587–606.
Christopherson, S. (2008). Beyond the self-expressive creative worker: An industry perspective on entertainment media. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 73–95.
Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.
Deranty, J. P. (2008). Work and the precarisation of existence. European Journal of Social Theory, 11, 443–463.
Deranty, J. P., & Renault, E. (2007). Politicizing Honneth’s ethics of recognition. Thesis Eleven, 88(1), 92–111.
Dewey, J. (1931). Philosophy and civilization. New York: Balch.
Duttmann, A. G. (2000). Between cultures: Tensions in the struggle for recognition (Kenneth B. Woodgate, Trans.). London: Verso.
Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, Articles in Advance, pp. 1–14. http://orgsci.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/orsc.1100.0612v1.
Foss, N. J. (2008). Human capital and transaction cost economics, SMG Working Paper No. 2, Copenhagen Business School Working Paper Series.
Fraser, N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition? Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. New Left Review, 212, 68–93.
Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition: A political–philosophical exchange. London: Verso.
Gellner, E. (1996). Conditions of liberty: Civil society and its rivals. London: Penguin.
Gill, F. (1999). The meaning of work: Lessons from sociology, psychology, and political theory. Journal of Socio-Economics, 28(6), 725–743.
Gill, R., & Pratt, A. (2008). In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 1–30.
Greenwood, M. R. (2002). Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 36, 261–278.
Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80.
Guion, R. M. (1998). Assessment, measurement, and prediction for personnel decisions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Gutmann, A. (1994). Preface. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Exploring the politics of recognition (pp. 9–12). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action. London: Beacon Press.
Heery, E. (2008). Runt redux: The rise of human resource management as a field of study. Work and Occupations, 35(3), 351–357.
Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York: Harper & Row.
Heinich, N. (2009). The sociology of vocational prizes: Recognition as esteem. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(5), 85–107.
Hillard, M. G. (2005). The failure of labor–management cooperation at two Maine paper mills: A case study. Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 14, 127–171.
Holgrewe, U. (2001). Recognition, intersubjectivity and service work: Labour conflicts in call centres. The German Journal of Industrial Relations, 8(1), 37–54.
Honneth, A. (1995a). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Honneth, A. (1995b). Work and instrumental action: On the normative basis of critical theory. In C. W. Wright (Ed.), The fragmented world of the social (pp. 15–49). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.
Honneth, A. (1997). Recognition and moral obligation. Social Research, 64(1), 30–32.
Honneth, A. (2002). Grounding recognition: A rejoinder to critical questions. Inquiry, 45, 499–520.
Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution as recognition: A response to Nancy Fraser (J. Golb, & J. Ingram, Trans.). In Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical profile (pp. 110–197). Verso: New York.
Honneth, A. (2008a). Reification and recognition: A new look at an old idea. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea (pp. 17–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Honneth, A. (2008b). Rejoinder. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea(pp 147–160). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Honneth, A. (2009). Work and recognition: A redefinition, presentation at work and recognition. An international conference, Macquarie University.
Honneth, A., & Margalit, A. (2001). Recognition. Aristotelian Society Proceedings, 75, 111–139.
Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (1999). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Continuum.
Ibarra-Colado, E., Clegg, S. R., Rhodes, C., & Kornberger, M. (2006). The ethics of managerial subjectivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(1), 45–55.
Islam, G., & Zyphur, M. J. (2008). Concepts and directions in critical industrial/organizational psychology. In D. Fox, I. Prilleltensky, & S. Austin (Eds.), Critical psychology (pp. 110–135). London: SAGE.
Jameson, F. (1984). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review, 146, 53–94.
Jay, M. (2008). Introduction. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74, 1–22.
Kallinikos, J. (2003). Work, human agency and organizational forms: An anatomy of fragmentation. Organization Studies, 24(4), 595–618.
Lamont, M. (2000). The dignity of working men. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lear, J. (2008). The slippery middle. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea (pp. 131–146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Levinson, D. J., Darrow, C. N., Klein, E. B., Levinson, M. H., & McKee, B. (1978). Seasons of a man’s life. New York: Knopf.
Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Genes and environment in personality development. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Lovell, T. (2007). Introduction. In T. Lovell (Ed.), (Mis)recognition, social inequality and social justice: Nancy Fraser and Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 1–16). New York: Routledge.
Lukacs, G. (1971). History and class consciousness (R. Livingstone, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. London: Duckworth.
McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.
Moll, K. N. (2009). The enduring significance of Axel Honneth’s critical conception of work. Emergent Australian Philosophers, 2, 1–16.
Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 1–52). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
Pinnington, A., Macklin, R., & Campbell, T. (2007). Human resource management: Ethics and employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pless, N. M., & Maak, T. (2004). Building an inclusive diversity culture: Principles, processes and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 129–147.
Rousseau, D. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.
Rowan, J. R. (2000). The moral foundation of employee rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(2), 355–361.
Sayer, A. (2007). Dignity at work: Broadening the agenda. Organization, 14(4), 565–581.
Sennett, R. (2006). The culture of the new capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Simon, H. A. (1951). A formal theory of the employment relationship. Econometrica, 19(3), 293–305.
Stone, K. V. W. (2002). Knowledge at work: Disputes over the ownership of human capital in the changing workplace. Connecticut Law Review, 34, 721–763.
Thompson, E. P. (1924/1993). Customs in common. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Townley, B. (1993). Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. The Academy of Management Review, 18, 518–545.
van Marrewijk, M., & Timmers, J. (2003). Human capital management: New possibilities in people management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 171–184.
Whyte, M. (2003). Marxism and media studies: Key concepts and contemporary trends. London: Pluto Press.
Wiley, C. (2000). Ethical standards for human resource management professionals: A comparative analysis of five major codes. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 93–114.
Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.
Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.
Winstanley, D., & Woodall, J. (2000). The ethical dimensions of human resource management. Human Resource Management Journal, 10(2), 5–20.
Acknowledgments
The author would like to acknowledge Janna L. Rose, Charles Kirschbaum, and Patrick O’Sullivan for their in-depth comments on previous versions of this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Islam, G. Recognition, Reification, and Practices of Forgetting: Ethical Implications of Human Resource Management. J Bus Ethics 111, 37–48 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1433-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1433-0