Skip to main content
Log in

Recognition, Reification, and Practices of Forgetting: Ethical Implications of Human Resource Management

  • Published:
Journal of Business Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article examines the ethical framing of employment in contemporary human resource management (HRM). Using Axel Honneth’s theory of recognition and classical critical notions of reification, I contrast recognition and reifying stances on labor. The recognition approach embeds work in its emotive and social particularity, positively affirming the basic dignity of social actors. Reifying views, by contrast, exhibit a forgetfulness of recognition, removing action from its existential and social moorings, and imagining workers as bundles of discrete resources or capacities. After discussing why reification is a problem, I stress that recognition and reification embody different ethical standpoints with regards to organizational practices. Thus, I argue paradoxically that many current HRM best practices can be maintained while cultivating an attitude of recognition. If reification is a type of forgetting, cultivating a recognition attitude involves processes of “remembering” to foster work relations that reinforce employee dignity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball, K. (2005). Organization, surveillance and the body: Towards a politics of resistance. Organization, 12(1), 89–108.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berger, P., & Pullberg, S. (1966). Reification and the sociological critique of consciousness. New Left Review, 35, 56–71.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, J. (2006). All together now: Common sense for a new economy. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borman, D. A. (2009). Labour, exchange and recognition: Marx contra Honneth. Philosophy and Social Criticism, 35(8), 935–959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burrell, G. (1994). Modernism, postmodernism and organizational analysis: The contribution of Jurgen Habermas. Organization Studies, 5(1), 1–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burris, V. (1988). Reification: A Marxist perspective. California Sociologist, 10(1), 22–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butler, J. (2008). Taking anothers view: Ambivalent implications. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea (pp. 97–119). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlon, D. M., Downs, A. A., & Wert-Gray, S. (2006). Statistics as fetishes: The case of financial performance measures and executive compensation. Organizational Research Methods, 9(4), 475–790.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavell, S. (1976). Knowing and acknowledging. In S. Cavell (Ed.), Must we mean what we say? (pp. 278–353). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chari, A. (2010). Toward a political critique of reification: Lukacs, Honneth and the aims of critical theory. Philosophy & Social Criticism, 36(5), 587–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christopherson, S. (2008). Beyond the self-expressive creative worker: An industry perspective on entertainment media. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 73–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R. M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deranty, J. P. (2008). Work and the precarisation of existence. European Journal of Social Theory, 11, 443–463.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deranty, J. P., & Renault, E. (2007). Politicizing Honneth’s ethics of recognition. Thesis Eleven, 88(1), 92–111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1931). Philosophy and civilization. New York: Balch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duttmann, A. G. (2000). Between cultures: Tensions in the struggle for recognition (Kenneth B. Woodgate, Trans.). London: Verso.

  • Feldman, M. S., & Orlikowski W. J. (2011). Theorizing practice and practicing theory. Organization Science, Articles in Advance, pp. 1–14. http://orgsci.journal.informs.org/cgi/content/abstract/orsc.1100.0612v1.

  • Foss, N. J. (2008). Human capital and transaction cost economics, SMG Working Paper No. 2, Copenhagen Business School Working Paper Series.

  • Fraser, N. (1995). From redistribution to recognition? Critical reflections on the “postsocialist” condition. New Left Review, 212, 68–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser, N., & Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution or recognition: A political–philosophical exchange. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gellner, E. (1996). Conditions of liberty: Civil society and its rivals. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gill, F. (1999). The meaning of work: Lessons from sociology, psychology, and political theory. Journal of Socio-Economics, 28(6), 725–743.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gill, R., & Pratt, A. (2008). In the social factory? Immaterial labour, precariousness and cultural work. Theory, Culture & Society, 25(7–8), 1–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, M. R. (2002). Ethics and HRM: A review and conceptual analysis. Journal of Business Ethics, 36, 261–278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenwood, R., Suddaby, R., & Hinings, C. R. (2002). Theorizing change: The role of professional associations in the transformation of institutionalized fields. Academy of Management Journal, 45(1), 58–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guion, R. M. (1998). Assessment, measurement, and prediction for personnel decisions. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gutmann, A. (1994). Preface. In A. Gutmann (Ed.), Multiculturalism: Exploring the politics of recognition (pp. 9–12). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, J. (1981). The theory of communicative action. London: Beacon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heery, E. (2008). Runt redux: The rise of human resource management as a field of study. Work and Occupations, 35(3), 351–357.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heidegger, M. (1962). Being and time. New York: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heinich, N. (2009). The sociology of vocational prizes: Recognition as esteem. Theory, Culture & Society, 26(5), 85–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillard, M. G. (2005). The failure of labor–management cooperation at two Maine paper mills: A case study. Advances in Industrial and Labor Relations, 14, 127–171.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holgrewe, U. (2001). Recognition, intersubjectivity and service work: Labour conflicts in call centres. The German Journal of Industrial Relations, 8(1), 37–54.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (1995a). The struggle for recognition: The moral grammar of social conflicts. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (1995b). Work and instrumental action: On the normative basis of critical theory. In C. W. Wright (Ed.), The fragmented world of the social (pp. 15–49). Albany, NY: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (1997). Recognition and moral obligation. Social Research, 64(1), 30–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2002). Grounding recognition: A rejoinder to critical questions. Inquiry, 45, 499–520.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2003). Redistribution as recognition: A response to Nancy Fraser (J. Golb, & J. Ingram, Trans.). In Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical profile (pp. 110–197). Verso: New York.

  • Honneth, A. (2008a). Reification and recognition: A new look at an old idea. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea (pp. 17–96). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2008b). Rejoinder. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea(pp 147–160). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Honneth, A. (2009). Work and recognition: A redefinition, presentation at work and recognition. An international conference, Macquarie University.

  • Honneth, A., & Margalit, A. (2001). Recognition. Aristotelian Society Proceedings, 75, 111–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horkheimer, M., & Adorno, T. (1999). Dialectic of enlightenment. New York: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ibarra-Colado, E., Clegg, S. R., Rhodes, C., & Kornberger, M. (2006). The ethics of managerial subjectivity. Journal of Business Ethics, 64(1), 45–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Islam, G., & Zyphur, M. J. (2008). Concepts and directions in critical industrial/organizational psychology. In D. Fox, I. Prilleltensky, & S. Austin (Eds.), Critical psychology (pp. 110–135). London: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jameson, F. (1984). Postmodernism, or the cultural logic of late capitalism. New Left Review, 146, 53–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jay, M. (2008). Introduction. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea (pp. 3–16). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalleberg, A. L. (2009). Precarious work, insecure workers: Employment relations in transition. American Sociological Review, 74, 1–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kallinikos, J. (2003). Work, human agency and organizational forms: An anatomy of fragmentation. Organization Studies, 24(4), 595–618.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, M. (2000). The dignity of working men. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lear, J. (2008). The slippery middle. In M. Jay (Ed.), Reification: A new look at an old idea (pp. 131–146). Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, D. J., Darrow, C. N., Klein, E. B., Levinson, M. H., & McKee, B. (1978). Seasons of a man’s life. New York: Knopf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loehlin, J. C. (1992). Genes and environment in personality development. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovell, T. (2007). Introduction. In T. Lovell (Ed.), (Mis)recognition, social inequality and social justice: Nancy Fraser and Pierre Bourdieu (pp. 1–16). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lukacs, G. (1971). History and class consciousness (R. Livingstone, Trans.). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

  • MacIntyre, A. (1981). After virtue. London: Duckworth.

  • McCrae, R. R., & John, O. P. (1992). An introduction to the five-factor model and its applications. Journal of Personality, 60, 175–215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moll, K. N. (2009). The enduring significance of Axel Honneth’s critical conception of work. Emergent Australian Philosophers, 2, 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. C. (2006). Frontiers of justice: Disability, nationality, species membership. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfeffer, J. (1981). Management as symbolic action. In L. L. Cummings & B. M. Staw (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior (Vol. 3, pp. 1–52). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pinnington, A., Macklin, R., & Campbell, T. (2007). Human resource management: Ethics and employment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pless, N. M., & Maak, T. (2004). Building an inclusive diversity culture: Principles, processes and practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 129–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rousseau, D. (1995). Psychological contracts in organizations: Understanding written and unwritten agreements. Newbury Park, CA: SAGE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowan, J. R. (2000). The moral foundation of employee rights. Journal of Business Ethics, 24(2), 355–361.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayer, A. (2007). Dignity at work: Broadening the agenda. Organization, 14(4), 565–581.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sennett, R. (2006). The culture of the new capitalism. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simon, H. A. (1951). A formal theory of the employment relationship. Econometrica, 19(3), 293–305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone, K. V. W. (2002). Knowledge at work: Disputes over the ownership of human capital in the changing workplace. Connecticut Law Review, 34, 721–763.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, E. P. (1924/1993). Customs in common. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

  • Townley, B. (1993). Foucault, power/knowledge, and its relevance for human resource management. The Academy of Management Review, 18, 518–545.

    Google Scholar 

  • van Marrewijk, M., & Timmers, J. (2003). Human capital management: New possibilities in people management. Journal of Business Ethics, 44, 171–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whyte, M. (2003). Marxism and media studies: Key concepts and contemporary trends. London: Pluto Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, C. (2000). Ethical standards for human resource management professionals: A comparative analysis of five major codes. Journal of Business Ethics, 25, 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williamson, O. E. (1985). The economic institutions of capitalism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Winstanley, D., & Woodall, J. (2000). The ethical dimensions of human resource management. Human Resource Management Journal, 10(2), 5–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The author would like to acknowledge Janna L. Rose, Charles Kirschbaum, and Patrick O’Sullivan for their in-depth comments on previous versions of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gazi Islam.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Islam, G. Recognition, Reification, and Practices of Forgetting: Ethical Implications of Human Resource Management. J Bus Ethics 111, 37–48 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1433-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-012-1433-0

Keywords

Navigation