Skip to main content
Log in

Is a trout a trout? A range-wide comparison shows nonnative brook trout exhibit greater density, biomass, and production than native inland cutthroat trout

Biological Invasions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Frequently nonnative species invade habitats occupied by a similar, even closely related, species, and it is often assumed that the two have functionally redundant ecological roles. However, the consequences of these types of invasions are rarely studied. Eastern brook trout are the most widely distributed and abundant nonnative fish throughout western North America and are assumed to be analogous in terms of ecological function to the native cutthroat trout they replace. However, based on results of previous studies conducted on a few streams, we hypothesized that the two species differ ecologically, and we predicted that brook trout would exhibit greater density, biomass, and annual production than cutthroat trout at the onset of invasion (i.e., in sympatry) and once replacement has occurred (i.e., in allopatry). We compiled data sets (sympatry: n = 169; allopatry: n = 687) from across the historical range of inland cutthroat trout and made comparisons for all sites combined (western scale) and among regions. In sympatry, at the western scale we observed that brook trout exhibited 3.1 times greater density and 2.5 times greater biomass than cutthroat trout, but no difference in production. In allopatry, density and biomass were 1.5 times greater and annual production 1.9 times higher for brook trout than cutthroat trout. Results of comparisons by region were similar, though more variable. In addition, we found that trout density and biomass were correlated with landscape features such as elevation and gradient, but such watershed variables did not account for the differences we observed between the trout species. These results suggest a general pattern of greater density, biomass, and production when brook trout invade and replace cutthroat trout, and highlight the need for more studies that elucidate the mechanisms responsible for this pattern and that investigate the broader consequences of a nonnative species replacing a closely related (and often presumed to be similar) native species.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams SB, Frissell CA, Rieman BE (2000) Movements of nonnative brook trout in relation to stream channel slope. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:623–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adams SB, Frissell CA, Rieman BE (2002) Changes in distribution of nonnative brook trout in an Idaho drainage over two decades. Trans Am Fish Soc 131:561–568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allan JD, Castillo MM (2008) Stream ecology: structure and function of running waters, 2nd edn. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Baxter CV, Fausch KD, Murakami M, Chapman PL (2004) Non-native stream fish invasion restructures stream and forest food webs by interrupting reciprocal prey subsidies. Ecology 85:2656–2663

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Behnke RJ (1992) Native trout of western North America. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda

    Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin JR, Baxter CV (2010) Do nonnative salmonines exhibit greater density and production than the natives they replace? A comparison of nonnative brook trout and native cutthroat trout. Trans Am Fish Soc 139:641–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin JR, Dunham JB, Dare MR (2007) Invasion of nonnative brook trout in Panther Creek, Idaho: roles of local habitat quality, biotic resistance, and connectivity to source habitats. Trans Am Fish Soc 136:875–888

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin JR, Fausch KD, Baxter CV (2011) Species replacement by a nonnative salmonid alters ecosystem function by reducing prey subsidies that support riparian spiders. Oecologia 167:503–512

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Budy P, Thiede GP, McHugh P (2007) Quantification of the vital rates, abundance, and status of a critical population of Bonneville cutthroat trout. N Am J Fish Manage 27:593–604

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byers JE (2000) Competition between two estuarine snails: implications for invasions of exotic species. Ecology 81:1225–1239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clarke K, Scruton DA (1999) Brook trout production dynamics in the streams of a low fertility Newfoundland watershed. Trans Am Fish Soc 128:1222–1229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis MA, Chew MK, Hobbs RJ et al (2011) Don’t judge a species on their origin. Nature 474:153–154

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • de Gruchy MA, Reader RJ, Larson DW (2005) Biomass, productivity, and dominance of alien plants: a multihabitat study in a national park. Ecology 86:1259–1266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dolman PM, Wäber K (2008) Ecosystem and competition impacts of introduced deer. Wild Res 35:202–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dudgeon D, Arthington AH, Gessner MO, Kawabata Z, Knowler D, Lévêque C, Naiman RJ, Prieur-Richard AH, Soto D, Stiassny MLJ, Sullivan CA (2006) Freshwater biodiversity: importance, threats, status and conservations challenges. Biol Rev 81:163–182

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham JB, Vinyard GL (1997) Relationships between body mass, population density, and the self-thinning rule in stream-living salmonids. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 54:1025–1030

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham JB, Peacock MM, Rieman BE, Schroeter RE, Vinyard GL (1999) Local and geographic variability in the distribution of stream-living Lahontan cutthroat trout. Trans Am Fish Soc 128:875–889

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunham JB, Rahn ME, Schroeter RE, Breck SW (2000) Diets of sympatric Lahontan cutthroat trout and nonnative brook trout: implications for species interactions. West N Am Nat 60:304–310

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunham JB, Adams SB, Schroeter RE, Novinger DC (2002) Alien invasions in aquatic ecosystems: towards an understanding of brook trout invasions and the potential impacts on inland cutthroat trout in western North America. Rev Fish Biol Fisheries 12:373–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fausch KD (1989) Do gradient and temperature affect distributions of, and interactions between, brook charr (Salvelinus fontinalis) and other resident salmonids in streams? Physiol Ecol Jpn Spec Vol 1:303–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Fausch KD (2008) A paradox of trout invasions in North America. Biol Invasions 10:685–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester GE, Chace JG, McCarthy W (1994) Diel and density-related changes in food consumption and prey selection by brook charr in a New Hampshire stream. Environ Biol Fish 39:301–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritts TH, Rodda GH (1998) The role of introduced species in the degradation of island ecosystems: a case history of Guam. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 29:113–140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganio LM, Torgersen CE, Gresswell RE (2005) A geostatistical approach for describing spatial pattern in stream networks. Front Ecol Environ 3:138–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory JS, Griffith JS (2000) First-winter survival of caged wild and hatchery cutthroat trout in allopatry and in sympatry with brook trout. Intermoun J Sci 6:217–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith JS (1972) comparative behavior and habitat utilization of brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and cutthroat trout (Salmo clarki) in small streams in northern Idaho. J Fish Res Board Can 29:265–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griffith JS (1974) Utilization of invertebrate drift by brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) and cutthroat trout (Salmo clarki) in small streams in Idaho. Trans Am Fish Soc 3:440–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grosholz ED (2005) Recent biological invasion may hasten invasional meltdown by accelerating historical introductions. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA 102:1088–1091

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hayes DB, Bence JR, Kwak TJ, Thompson BE (2007) Abundance, biomass, and production. In: Guy CS, Brown ML (eds) Analysis and interpretation of freshwater fisheries data. American Fisheries Society, Bethesda, pp 327–374

    Google Scholar 

  • Holway DA (1999) Competitive mechanisms underlying the displacement of native ants by the invasive Argentine ant. Ecology 80:238–251

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horan DL, Kershner JJ, Hawkins CP, Crowl TA (2001) Effects of habitat area and complexity on Colorado River cutthroat trout in Uinta Mountain streams. Trans Am Fish Soc 129:1250–1263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchings JA (1996) Adaptive phenotypic plasticity in brook trout, Salvelinus fontinalis, life histories. Ecoscience 3:25–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy BM, Peterson DP, Fausch KD (2003) Different life history of brook trout populations invading mid-elevation and high-elevation cutthroat trout streams in Colorado. West N Am Nat 63:215–223

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolar C, Lodge DM (2001) Progress in invasion biology: predicting invaders. Trends Ecol Evol 16:199–204

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kwak TJ, Waters TF (1997) Trout production dynamics and water quality in Minnesota streams. Trans Am Fish Soc 126:35–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levine JM, Vila M, D’Antonio CM, Dukes JS, Grigulis K, Lavorel S (2003) Mechanisms underlying the impacts of exotic plant invasions. Proc Nat Acad Sci 270:775–781

    Google Scholar 

  • Littell RC, Milliken GA, Stroup WW, Wolfinger RD, Schabenberger O (2006) SAS for mixed models, 2nd edn. SAS Institute Inc, Cary

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack RN, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Evans H, Clout M, Bazzaz RA (2000) Biotic invasions: causes, epidemiology, global consequences, and control. Ecol Appl 10:689–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGrath CC, Lewis WM Jr (2007) Competition and predation as mechanisms for displacement of greenback cutthroat trout by brook trout. Trans Am Fish Soc 136:1381–1392

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer KA, Schill DJ, Elle RS, Schrader WC (2003) A long-term comparison of yellowstone cutthroat trout abundance and size structure in their historical range in Idaho. N Am J Fish Manage 23:149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer KA, Schill DJ, Lamansky JA Jr, Campbell MR, Kozfkay CC (2006) Status of Yellowstone cutthroat trout in Idaho. Trans Am Fish Soc 135:1329–1347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newman RM, Martin FB (1983) Estimation of fish production rates and associated variances. Can J Fish Aquat Sci 40:1729–1736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum EP, Barrett GW (2005) Fundamentals of ecology, 5th edn. Brooks/Cole, Belmont

    Google Scholar 

  • Parker IM, Simberloff D, Lonsdale WM, Goodell K, Wonham M, Kareiva PM, Williamson MH, Von Holle B, Moyle PB, Byers JE, Goldwasser L (1999) Impact: toward a framework for understanding the ecological effects of invaders. Biol Invasions 1:3–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson DP, Fausch KD (2003) Testing population-level mechanisms of invasion by a mobile vertebrate: a simple framework for salmonids in streams. Biol Invasions 5:239–259

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peterson DP, Fausch KD, White GC (2004) Population ecology of an invasion: effects of brook trout on native cutthroat trout. Ecol Appl 14:754–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petren K, Case TJ (1996) An experimental demonstration of exploitation competition in an ongoing invasion. Ecology 77:118–132

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poff NL (1997) Landscape filters and species traits: towards mechanistic understanding and prediction in stream ecology. J N Am Benthol Soc 16:391–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Power G (1980) The brook charr, Salvelinus fontinalis. In: Balon EK (ed) Charrs: salmonid fishes of the genus Salvelinus. Dr. W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 141–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Quist MC, Hubert WA (2004) Bioinvasive species and the preservation of cutthroat trout in the western United States: ecological, social, and economic issues. Environ Sci Policy 7:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rahel FJ (2002) Homogenization of freshwater faunas. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:291–315

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Richardson DM, Allsopp N, D’Antonio CM, Milton SJ, Rejmánek M (2000) Plant invasions—the role of mutualisms. Biol Rev 75:65–93

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rieman BE, Peterson JT, Myers DL (2006) Have brook trout (Salvelinus fontinalis) displaced bull trout (Salvelinus confluentus) along longitudinal gradients in central Idaho streams? Can J Fish Aquat Sci 63:63–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarnecchia DL, Bergersen EP (1986) Production and habitat of threatened greenback and Colorado River cutthroat trouts in Rocky Mountain headwater streams. Trans Am Fish Soc 115:382–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scarnecchia DL, Bergersen EP (1987) Trout production and stand crop in Colorado’s small streams, as related to environmental features. N Am J Fish Manage 7:315–330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schade CB, Bonar SA (2005) Distribution and abundance of nonnative fishes in streams of the western United States. N Am J Fish Manage 25:1386–1394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shea K, Chesson P (2002) Community ecology theory as a framework for biological invasions. Trends Ecol Evol 17:170–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shepard BB (2004) Factors that may be influencing nonnative brook trout invasion and their displacement of native westslope cutthroat trout in three adjacent southwestern Montana streams. N Am J Fish Manage 24:1088–1100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simon KS, Townsend CR (2003) Impacts of freshwater invaders at different levels of ecological organisation, with emphasis on salmonids and ecosystem consequences. Freshw Biol 48:989–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szlavecz K, Placella SA, Pouyat RV, Groffman PM, Csuzdi C, Yesilonis I (2006) Invasive earthworm species and nitrogen cycling in remnant forest patches. Appl Soil Ecol 32:54–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tarboton DG (1997) A new method for the determination of flow directions and contributing areas in grid Digital Elevation Models. Water Resour Res 33:309–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tompkins DM, White AR, Boots M (2003) Ecological replacement of native red squirrels by invasive greys driven by disease. Ecol Lett 6:186–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters TF (1977) Secondary production in inland waters. Adv Ecol Res 10:91–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Waters TF (1999) Long-term trout production dynamics in Valley Creek, Minnesota. Trans Am Fish Soc 128:1151–1162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White GC, Anderson DR, Burnham KP, Otis D (1982) Capture-recapture and removal methods for sampling closed populations. Los Alamos National Laboratory Report, LA-8787-NERP, Los Alamos, New Mexico, USA

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank P. Budy, J. Capurso, P. Chase, J. Dunham, K. Fausch, R. Gipson, D. Horan, A. Jenne, C. Kennedy, S. Kujala, T. Lamansky, K. Meyer, B. Rieman, H. Vermillion, and M. Young for generously allowing us to use data they collected. Statistical consultation was provided by T. Peterson. C. Torgersen assisted with analysis and interpretation of spatial autocorrelation. K. Fausch and two anonymous reviewers provided comments that improved the manuscript. This research was supported by the National Science Foundation (DEB-0516136, EPS-0447689 and EPS-08-14387).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph R. Benjamin.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Benjamin, J.R., Baxter, C.V. Is a trout a trout? A range-wide comparison shows nonnative brook trout exhibit greater density, biomass, and production than native inland cutthroat trout. Biol Invasions 14, 1865–1879 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0198-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10530-012-0198-9

Keywords

Navigation