Abstract
Over the past decade, structured programming for children and youth during the non-school hours has expanded exponentially. A confluence of recent research studies and program evaluations backs the publicly perceived notion that after-school programs can positively influence important developmental and learning outcomes. The rapid expansion of the field and the potential of programs to contribute to child and youth development have made defining what high quality programs look like and learning how to improve program quality key challenges facing the field. This paper describes what is known about the relation between youth program quality and youth developmental outcomes, summarizes different quality assessment tools being used in the field, and discusses how such tools are being used to drive systemic quality improvement efforts.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Afterschool Alliance. (2004). America after 3 PM: A household survey on afterschool in America. Washington, DC: Afterschool Alliance.
Benson, P. L., & Saito, R. N. (2001). The scientific foundations of youth development. In P. L. Benson & K. J. Pittman (Eds.), Trends in youth development: Visions, realities and challenges (pp. 135–154). Boston: Kluwer.
Blazevski, J., & Smith, C. (2007). Inter-rater reliability on the youth program quality assessment. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.
Connell, J., & Gambone, M. A. (2002). Youth development in community settings: A community action framework. Philadelphia, PA: Youth Development Strategies Inc.
Durlak, J. A., & Weissberg, R. P. (2007). The impact of after-school programs that promote personal and social skills. Chicago, IL: Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning.
Forum for Youth Investment. (2003). Quality counts. Forum Focus, 1, 1–4.
Granger, R., Durlak, J. A., Yohalem, N., & Reisner, E. (2007). Improving after-school program quality. New York, NY: William T. Grant Foundation.
Grossman, J., Campbell, M., & Raley, B. (2007). Quality time after school: What instructors can do to enhance learning. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.
Harms, T., Jacobs, E. V., & White, D. R. (1996). School-age care environment scale. New York, NY: Teachers College Press.
High/Scope Educational Research Foundation. (2005). Youth program quality assessment. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Press.
Intercultural Center for Research in Education & National Institute on Out-of-School Time. (2005). Pathways to success for youth: What works in afterschool: A report of the Massachusetts Afterschool Research Study. Boston, MA: United Way of Mass Bay.
Lauer, P. A., Akiba, M., Wilkerson, S. B., Apthorp, H. S., Snow, D., & Martin-Glenn, M. L. (2006). Out-of-school time programs: A meta-analysis of effects for at-risk students. Review of Educational Research, 76, 275–313.
McLaughlin, M. (2000). Community counts: How youth organizations matter for youth development. Washington, DC: Public Education Network.
Miller, B., & Surr, W. (2005). The assessment of afterschool program practices tool. Wellesley, MA: National Institute on Out-of-School Time.
National Research Council and Institute of Medicine, Committee on Community-level Programs for Youth. (2002). Community programs to promote youth development. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
National School-Age Care Alliance. (2001). NSACA program observation tool. Charlestown, MA: National School-Age Care Alliance.
New York State Afterschool Network. (n.d.). Program quality self-assessment tool. New York, NY: New York State Afterschool Network.
Padgette, H. C. (2003). Finding funding: A guide to federal sources for out-of-school time and community school initiatives. Washington, DC: The Finance Project.
Pittman, K. J., & Irby, M. (1996). Preventing problems or promoting development: Competing priorities or inseparable goals?. Takoma Park, MD: International Youth Foundation—US.
Policy Studies Associates, Inc. (2005). Out-of-school time observation tool (2nd ed.). Washington D.C.: Policy Studies Associates, Inc.
Reisner, E. R., White, R. N., Russell, C. A., & Birmingham, J. (2004). Building quality, scale, and effectiveness in after-school programs: Summary report of the TASC evaluation. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates, Inc.
Smith, C., Akiva, T., Blazevski, J. & Pelle, L. (2008). Final report on the Palm Beach quality improvement system pilot. Ypsilanti, MI: David P. Weikart Center for Youth Program Quality.
Smith, C., & Hohmann, C. (2005). Full findings from the youth program quality assessment validation study. Ypsilanti, MI: High/Scope Educational Research Foundation.
Vandell, D. L., & Pierce, K. M. (2001). Experiences in after-school programs and child well-being. In J. L. Mahoney (Chair), Protective aspects of after-school activities: Processes and mechanisms. Paper symposium conducted at the biennial meeting of the Society for Research in Child Development, Minneapolis, MN.
Vandell, D. L., Reisner, E. R., & Pierce, K. M. (2007). Outcomes linked to high-quality afterschool programs: Longitudinal findings from the study of promising afterschool programs. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates.
Vandell, D. L., Shumow, L., & Posner, J. (2004). After-school programs for low-income children: Differences in program quality. In J. Mahoney, J. Eccles, & R. Larson (Eds.), Organized activities as contexts for development: Extracurricular activities, after-school, and community programs. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Westmoreland, H., & Little, P. (2006). Exploring quality standards for middle school after school programs: What we know and what we need to know. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Family Research Project.
Wilson-Ahlstrom, A., & Yohalem, N. (2007). Building quality improvement systems: Lessons from three emerging efforts in the youth-serving sector. Washington, DC: The Forum for Youth Investment.
Wisconsin Center for Education Research & Policy Studies Associates, Inc. (2005). Study of promising afterschool programs: Observation manual for site verification visits. Madison, WI: Wisconsin Center for Education Research & Policy Studies Associates, Inc.
Yohalem, N., Wilson-Ahlstrom, A., Fischer, S., & Shinn, M. (2007). Measuring youth program quality. Washington, DC: The Forum for Youth Investment.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yohalem, N., Wilson-Ahlstrom, A. Inside the Black Box: Assessing and Improving Quality in Youth Programs. Am J Community Psychol 45, 350–357 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9311-3
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9311-3