Skip to main content
Log in

Building Opportunity: Developing City Systems to Expand and Improve After School Programs

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
American Journal of Community Psychology

Abstract

A growing body of research is examining the strengths and weaknesses of specific after school programs and their effect on youth outcomes. Few reviews, however, have sought to examine the components of citywide system-building—to understand intentional efforts to develop, support and sustain high quality after school programming across a community. Beginning in the mid-1990s and continuing through the present, private funders, public officials and program practitioners in cities across America have joined together to build systems to support the expansion and improvement of after school programs at the city-level. This paper presents the community context and underlying principles that drove the development of Baltimore’s After-School Strategy; articulates a set of system components derived from this experience and the available literature; and lays out future work to expand high quality after-school opportunities for youth in Baltimore and in other distressed urban environments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abell Foundation. (1997). Baltimore area jobs and low skill job seekers, assessing the gaps. A report for the job opportunities task force. Baltimore: Author.

  • Bruns, E. J. (2004). Baltimore’s After-School Strategy: Evaluation overview. Unpublished evaluation report. Baltimore: Safe and Sound Campaign.

  • Bruns, E. J., Holleman, M. A., & Ferebee, H. (2005). Evaluating comprehensive community-based initiatives: Lessons learned from Baltimore City. Paper presented at the Eighth Annual Urban Health Seminar, Harvard University Kennedy School of Government, Boston.

  • Center for Health and Public Service Research. (2002). State of the cities of the urban health initiative; An interim report. New York: Robert F. Wagner School of Public Service, New York University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P. (1981). Systems thinking: Systems practice. Chichester: Wiley. (as cited by Foster-Fishman, Nowell & Yang, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland, P., & Scholes, J. (1990). Soft systems methodology in action. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (as cited by Foster-Fishman, Nowell & Yang, 2007).

    Google Scholar 

  • Emshoff, J., Darnell, A., Darnell, D., Erickson, S., Schneider, S., & Hudgins, R. (2007). Systems change as an outcome and a process in the work of community collaboratives for health. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 255–267.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Family League of Baltimore City. (2007). About us. Accessed http://www.flbcinc.org/index.htm. August 15, 2007. Baltimore: Family League of Baltimore City.

  • Foster-Fishman, P. G., Nowell, B., & Yang, H. (2007). Putting the system back into systems change: A framework for understanding and changing organizational and community systems. American Journal of Community Psychology, 39, 197–215.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, R. (1999). After school programs for low income children: Promise and challenges. The Future of Children, 9(2), Fall 1999.

  • Halpern, R. (2003). The challenge of system-building in the after-school field: Lessons from experience. Wellesley, MA: National Institute on Out-of-School-Time.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halpern, R., & Horton, C. (2003). The design and implementation of Baltimore’s After-School Strategy: An in-process look. Chicago: Erikson Institute for Graduate Study in Child Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jellinek, P. (2007). The urban health initiative. To improve health and health care, Volume XI. Princeton, NJ: The Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.

  • Marzke, C., & Bruns, E. J. (2003). Evaluating after school programs. Paper presented at the Third Annual After School Institute Conference, Ellicott City, MD.

  • Marzke, C., & Pechman, E. (2003). The after school observation instrument. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marzke, C., & White, R. (2001). Evaluation of the Baltimore after school YouthPlaces initiative: An initial report. Washington, DC: Policy Studies Associates, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman-Sheldon, B. (2006). Evaluation of Baltimore’s After-School Strategy, 20045: Summary report. Unpublished evaluation report. Baltimore: Safe and Sound Campaign.

  • Open Society Institute. (1998). Internal memoranda and funding recommendations. Baltimore: The Open Society Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Open Society Institute. (2007). Internal memoranda and funding recommendations. Baltimore: The Open Society Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Petersilia, J. (1990). Conditions that permit intensive supervision. Crime and Delinquency, 36, 126–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safe and Sound. (2007). Baltimore After School Strategy overview. Baltimore: The Safe and Sound Campaign.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundius, M. J. (2007). Finding the resources for summer learning programs. New Directions for Youth Development, 114, 109–122.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We acknowledge our debt to Robert Halpern whose previous writing on the history, development, challenges and opportunities of the after-school field—and his assessment of the Baltimore Strategy conducted in 2002 and 2003—provide much of the background for this paper. Many colleagues provided thoughtful reviews and comments. Especially, we thank Hathaway Ferebee and Erin Coleman of the Safe and Sound Campaign, Gerry Grimm of the Family League of Baltimore City, Rebkha Atnafou of The After School Institute, and Beth Weitzman of New York University, who served as a particularly careful reader and advisor. Three independent reviewers also helped us to clarify our ideas and strengthen their presentation, and we thank them for this. Martha Holleman’s time on this paper was generously supported by a Distinguished Fellows Program grant from the WT Grant Foundation for which she is profoundly grateful. Finally, in telling Baltimore’s story, we honor and recognize the thousands of city residents who over the last ten years have attended rallies, given testimony and reached out to their elected officials to convince them to expand funding for the basic opportunities all children need and deserve if they are to grow and thrive. The work continues.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Martha A. Holleman.

Additional information

This article was originally written in 2007 and accepted with changes as suggested by peer reviewers for publication in August, 2008.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Holleman, M.A., Jane Sundius, M. & Bruns, E.J. Building Opportunity: Developing City Systems to Expand and Improve After School Programs. Am J Community Psychol 45, 405–416 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9308-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10464-010-9308-y

Keywords

Navigation