Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Evaluation of Methylated Silica Solid-Phase Extraction Sorbent to Retain a Surfactant in the Detection of Pesticides in Water Using Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry

  • Original
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study examined the matrix effect of a typical surfactant on the detection of pesticides in water using ultra-performance liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC–ESI–MS/MS). When direct sample injection is employed, surfactants in water samples tend to adsorb onto the chromatographic column, weakening its analyte separation capability and consequently lowering signal detection intensities and raising detection limits. A new sample preparation approach of a tailored solid-phase extraction (SPE) is proposed based on the difference in adsorption affinities between surfactant and pesticide for silylated surfaces. Using sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS) as a representative surfactant, four types of silylated silica particles with different surface hydrophobicity and functionality were examined for selectively adsorbing and removing SDS from water samples with pesticide analytes to eliminate the matrix effect of the surfactant on liquid chromatographic (LC) separation. It was found that the tailored SPE sample preparation for cleanup of SDS could be effectively achieved based on this concept. Samples prepared with trimethylchlorosilane methylated silica particles in the tailored SPE produced a desirable LC separation and low detection limits for the pesticide analytes. The linear calibration range extended from 0.1 up to 40 μg L−1 (R 2 = 0.9906–0.9998, n = 6). Low limits of quantitation for the 11 pesticides were achieved (0.027–0.090 μg L−1). The precision of the proposed method for the 11 analytes was less than 10%.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Götz RBOH, Bauer OH, Friesel P, Roch K (1998) Organic trace compounds in the water of the River Elbe near Hamburg part II. Chemosphere 36:2103–2118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Konstantinou IK, Hela DG, Albanis TA (2006) The status of pesticide pollution in surface waters (rivers and lakes) of Greece. Part I. Review on occurrence and levels. Environ Pollut 141:555–570

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Moore MT, Lizotte RE, Knight SS, Smith S, Cooper CM (2007) Assessment of pesticide contamination in three Mississippi Delta oxbow lakes using Hyalella azteca. Chemosphere 67:2184–2191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. El-Kabbany S, Rashed MM, Zayed MA (2000) Monitoring of the pesticide levels in some water supplies and agricultural land, in El-Haram, Giza (A.R.E.). J Hazard Mater 72:11–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Zhang Z, Hong HS, Wang XH, Lin JQ, Chen WQ, Xu L (2002) Determination and load of organophosphorus and organochlorine pesticides at water from Jiulong River Estuary, China. Mar Pollut Bull 45:397–402

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hiemstra M, De Kok A (2007) Comprehensive multi-residue method for the target analysis of pesticides in crops using liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1154:3–25

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Frenich AG, Vidal JM, Pastor-Montoro E, Romero-González R (2008) High-throughput determination of pesticide residues in food commodities by use of ultra-performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. Anal Bioanal Chem 390:947–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Romero-González R, Frenich AG, Vidal JM, Prestes OD, Grio SL (2011) Simultaneous determination of pesticides, biopesticides and mycotoxins in organic products applying a quick, easy, cheap, effective, rugged and safe extraction procedure and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1218:1477–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Reemtsma T, Alder L, Banasiak U (2013) A multimethod for the determination of 150 pesticide metabolites in surface water and groundwater using direct injection liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1271:95–104

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Atkinson SF, Johnson DR, Venables BJ, Slye JL, Kennedy JR, Dyer SD, Nielsen A (2009) Use of watershed factors to predict consumer surfactant risk, water quality, and habitat quality in the upper Trinity River, Texas. Sci Total Environ 407:4028–4037

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Heinig K, Vogt C, Werner G (1996) Separation of ionic and neutral surfactants by capillary electrophoresis and high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 745:281–292

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hanif NM, Adnassssn SN, Latif M, Zakaria AM, Othman MR (2012) The composition of surfactants in river water and its influence to the amount of surfactants in drinking water. World Appl Sci J 17:970–975

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kloepfer A, Quintana JB, Reemtsma T (2005) Operational options to reduce matrix effects in liquid chromatography–electrospray ionisation-mass spectrometry analysis of aqueous environmental samples. J Chromatogr A 1067:153–160

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Stahnke H, Kittlaus S, Kempe G, Alder L (2012) Reduction of matrix effects in liquid chromatography–electrospray ionization–mass spectrometry by dilution of the sample extracts: how much dilution is needed? Anal Chem 84:1474–1482

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Zrnčić M, Gros M, Babić S, Petrović M (2014) Analysis of anthelmintics in surface water by ultra high performance liquid chromatography coupled to quadrupole linear ion trap tandem mass spectrometry. Chemosphere 99:224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Li W, Liu YC, Duan JM, Saint CP, Mulcahy D (2015) The role of methanol addition to water samples in reducing analyte adsorption and matrix effects in liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 1389:76–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Han J, Qiu W, Gao W (2010) Adsorption of estrone in microfiltration membrane filters. Chem Eng J 165:819–826

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mahmoud ME (1997) Silica gel-immobilized Eriochrome black-T as a potential solid phase extractor for zinc(II) and magnesium(II) from calcium(II). Talanta 45:309–315

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Goswami A, Singh AK, Venkataramani B (2003) 8-Hydroxyquinoline anchored to silica gel via new moderate size linker: synthesis and applications as a metal ion collector for their flame atomic absorption spectrometric determination. Talanta 60:1141–1154

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Li Z, Yoon RH (2013) Thermodynamics of hydrophobic interaction between silica surfaces coated with octadecyltrichlorosilane. J Colloid Interface Sci 392:369–375

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yang J, Duan JM, Fornasiero D, Ralston J (2007) Kinetics of CO2 nanobubble formation at the solid/water interface. Phys Chem Chem Phys 9:6327–6332

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Rodríguez-Cuesta MJ, Boqué R, Rius FX, Vidal JM, Frenich AG (2005) Development and validation of a method for determining pesticides in groundwater from complex overlapped HPLC signals and multivariate curve resolution. Chemometr Intell Lab Syst 77:251–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Beale DJ, Kaserzon SL, Porter NA, Roddick FA, Carpenter PD (2010) Detection of s-triazine pesticides in natural waters by modified large-volume direct injection HPLC. Talanta 82:668–674

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Watanabe E, Kobara Y, Baba K, Eun H (2014) Aqueous acetonitrile extraction for pesticide residue analysis in agricultural products with HPLC–DAD. Food Chem 154:7–12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Majors RE (2003) The cleaning and regeneration of reversed-phase HPLC columns. LC GC N Am 21:19–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Im SH, Jeong YH, Ryoo JJ (2008) Simultaneous analysis of anionic, amphoteric, nonionic and cationic surfactant mixtures in shampoo and hair conditioner by RP-HPLC/ELSD and LC/MS. Anal Chim Acta 619:129–136

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. D’Archivio AA, Fanelli M, Mazzeo P, Ruggieri F (2007) Comparison of different sorbents for multiresidue solid-phase extraction of 16 pesticides from groundwater coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography. Talanta 71:25–30

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Zhou Q, Fang Z (2015) Graphene-modified TiO2 nanotube arrays as an adsorbent in micro-solid phase extraction for determination of carbamate pesticides in water samples. Anal Chim Acta 869:43–49

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Basheer C, Alnedhary AA, Rao BM, Lee HK (2009) Determination of carbamate pesticides using micro-solid-phase extraction combined with high-performance liquid chromatography. J Chromatogr A 1216:211–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Clausen L, Fabricius I, Madsen L (2001) Adsorption of pesticides onto quartz, calcite, kaolinite, and α-alumina. J Environ Qual 30:846–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Jal PK, Pate S, Mishra BK (2004) Chemical modification of silica surface by immobilization of functional groups for extractive concentration of metal ions. Talanta 62:1005–1028

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. USEPA (2000) Assigning values to non-detected/non-quantified pesticide residues in human health food exposure assessments, guidance document: office of pesticide programs. US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was financially supported by Foundation of Shaanxi Educational Committee of China (2013JK0980).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Water Science and Engineering, Key Laboratory of Northwest Water Resources, Environment and Ecology, MOE, School of Environmental and Municipal Engineering, Xi’an University of Architecture and Technology, 13 Yanta Road, Xi’an, 710055, China

    Jiang Yuan, Jinming Duan & Wei Li

  2. Natural and Built Environments Research Centre, School of Natural and Built Environments, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Campus, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia

    Jinming Duan, Christopher P. Saint & Dennis Mulcahy

Authors
  1. Jiang Yuan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Jinming Duan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wei Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Christopher P. Saint
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Dennis Mulcahy
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jinming Duan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yuan, J., Duan, J., Li, W. et al. Evaluation of Methylated Silica Solid-Phase Extraction Sorbent to Retain a Surfactant in the Detection of Pesticides in Water Using Ultra-Performance Liquid Chromatography–Tandem Mass Spectrometry. Chromatographia 80, 247–257 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3233-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-016-3233-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation