Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Buffer Constituents on Retention and Separation in Achiral and Chiral HPLC Systems with β-Cyclodextrin-Based Stationary Phase

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Chromatographia Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In HPLC, cyclodextrin-based stationary phases allow separation of both achiral and chiral analytes. Complexation of analytes into the cyclodextrin cavity is a very important part of the interaction mechanism. However, possible complexation of buffer constituents must be also considered. This fact should not be overlooked in method development procedures. In this study, β-cyclodextrin-based stationary phase (CYCLOBOND I 2000) was used, and two different buffers, namely aqueous solutions composed of lithium hydroxide/benzoic acid 10.0/24.5 mM, pH 4.00 and lithium hydroxide/acetic acid 9.9/60.0 mM, pH 4.01 of the same ionic strength were compared. Methanol was added as organic modifier in a methanol/buffer volume ratio 40/60. The linear free energy relationship method was used for evaluation of interactions contributing to chromatographic performance of the separation system. Strong complexation of benzoic acid with cyclodextrin was obvious from the results. This effect was clearly reflected in reduced retention and restricted (enantio) separation ability of the separation system containing benzoic acid in the buffer. On the other hand, complexing buffer constituents of mobile phases can offer a worthy alternative, to less “green”organic solvents, for reduction of the analysis time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Notes

  1. log P = partition coefficient between n-octanol and water [15].

References

  1. Armstrong DW, Demond W (1984) J Chromatogr Sci 22:411–415

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kalíková K, Riesová M, Tesařová E (2012) Cent Eur J Chem 10:450–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Scriba GKE (2012) Chromatographia 75:815–838

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kalíková K, Šlechtová T, Vozka J, Tesařová E (2014) Anal Chim Acta 821:1–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Nagy ZM, Molnár M, Fekete-Kertész I, Molnár-Perl I, Fenyvesi É, Gruiz K (2014) Sci Tot Env 485–486:711–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chankvetadze B, Burjanadze N, Santi M, Massolini G, Blaschke G (2002) J Sep Sci 25:733–740

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Riesová M, Svobodová J, Tošner Z, Beneš M, Tesařová E, Gaš B (2013) Anal Chem 85:8518–8525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Beneš M, Riesová M, Svobodová J, Tesařová E, Dubský P, Gaš B (2013) Anal Chem 85:8526–8534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Abraham MH, McGowan J (1987) Chromatographia 23:243–246

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kalíková K, Lokajová J, Tesařová E (2006) J Sep Sci 29:1476–1485

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Abraham MH, Whiting GS, Doherty RM, Shuely W (1991) J Chromatogr 587:213–228

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Ahn J, Bones J, Yu YQ, Rudd PM, Gilar M (2010) J Chromatogr B 878:403–408

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Kalíková K, Kozlík P, Gilar M, Tesařová E (2013) J Sep Sci 36:2421–2429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Pitchumani K, Vellayappan M (1992) J Inclusion Phenom Mol Recognit Chem 14:157–162

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Klopman G, Li J-Y, Wang S, Dimayuga M (1994) J Chem Inf Comput Sci 34:752–781

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support of the Grant Agency of the Charles University, Grant No. 790314 and the Grant Agency of the Czech Republic, Grant No. P206/14-19278P.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Květa Kalíková.

Additional information

Published in the topical collection 20th International Symposium on Separation Sciences in Prague with guest editors Aleš Horna and Pavel Jandera.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 106 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kučerová, G., Kalíková, K., Riesová, M. et al. Effect of Buffer Constituents on Retention and Separation in Achiral and Chiral HPLC Systems with β-Cyclodextrin-Based Stationary Phase. Chromatographia 78, 917–921 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-014-2834-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10337-014-2834-2

Keywords

Navigation