Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Life cycle assessment and valuation of the packaging waste recycling system in Belgium

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Material Cycles and Waste Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study analyses the packaging waste management system in Belgium. Waste management operations involve a significant number of processes associated with energy consumption and emission of pollutants in air and water. To assess the impact on the environment of the several waste management operations, a life cycle assessment was developed. The operations of selective and refuse collection, sorting, recycling and incineration of packaging waste were considered. A comparison between two scenarios was developed. The first scenario comprised the packaging waste management system in operation in 2010. This system comprises the waste management operations envisaging the recycling of the packaging materials. The second scenario was developed based on the hypothesis that there was no recycling system and all packaging waste would be collected in the refuse collection system. An environmental valuation was performed to convert the environmental results into a common unit (EUR). To accomplish this valuation, three methods were used: Ecocost, Ecovalue and Stepwise. These methods were developed in Europe and follow different methodologies. The environmental results were compared using the three methods and they were consistent with the conclusion that the recycling scenario (i.e. the actual situation in 2010) is more environmentally sound.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Printed paper is collected together with packaging paper.

References

  1. Rigamonti L, Grosso M, Giugliano M (2009) Life cycle assessment for optimising the level of separated collection in integrated MSW management systems. Waste Manag 29:934–944

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Eriksson O, Carlsson RM, Frostell B, Björklund A, Assefa G, Sundqvist JO, Granath J, Baky A, Thyselius L (2005) Municipal solid waste management from a system perspective. J Clean Prod 13:241–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cherubini F, Bargigli S, Ulgiati S (2009) Life cycle assessment LCA of waste management strategies: landfilling, sorting plant and incineration. Energy 34:2116–2123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Giugliano M, Cernuschi S, Grosso M, Rigamonti L (2011) Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems. An evaluation based on life cycle assessment. Waste Manag 31:2090–2101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Massarutto A, Carli A, Graffi M (2011) Material and energy recovery in integrated waste management systems: a life-cycle costing approach. Waste Manag 31:2102–2111

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wada Y, Okumoto T, Wada N (2008) Evaluating waste disposal systems. J Mater Cycles Waste 10:173–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Fost Plus (2013) Intermunicipal authorities. The complete list. http://www.fostplus.be/SiteCollectionDocuments/Werking%20Fost%20Plus%20en%20partners/Inzamelen/Intercommunales_2013.htm. Accessed 27 Dec 2013

  8. Eurostat (2015) Statistics. Database. Environment. http://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/data/database. Accessed 05 Feb 2015

  9. OVAM (2012), publieke lijsten (public lists). http://www.ovam.be/webtoepassingen-en-publieke-lijsten. Accessed 05 July 2012

  10. Wallonie (2015), Direction des Infrastructures de Gestion des Déchets. Statistiques. http://environnement.wallonie.be/cgi/dgrne/plateforme_dgrne/visiteur/v2/frameset.cfm?page=http://environnement.wallonie.be/administration/dsd.htm. Accessed 05 Feb 2015

  11. Brussel L (2015), Documentatie and Kaarten (documents and maps). http://www.leefmilieu.brussels/doc. Accessed Feb 2015

  12. EIMPack (2013) The economics of the recycling of packaging waste: the case of Belgium. Economic impact of the packaging and packaging waste directive. Instituto Superior Técnico, Lisbon

    Google Scholar 

  13. International Organization for Standardization (ISO) (2006) ISO 14040 international standard. In: Environmental management—life cycle assessment—principles and framework. ISO, Geneva, Switzerland

  14. Clift R, Doig A, Finnveden G (2000) The application of life cycle assessment to integrated solid waste management. Part 1: methodology. Process Saf Environ 78:279–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. EEA (2012) EMEP/EEA emission inventory guidebook 2009, updated May 2012. European Environment Agency

  16. Pulles T, Denier van der Gon H, Appelman W, Verheul M (2012) Emission factors for heavy metals from diesel and petrol used in European vehicles. Atmos Environ 61:641–651

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. EEA (2007) EMEP/CORINAIR emission inventory guidebook—2007. Technical Report No 16/2007. European Environment Agency

  18. Spielmann M, Dones R, Bauer C (2007) Life cycle inventories of transport services. Final report ecoinvent data v2.0, vol 14. Swiss Centre for Life Cycle Inventories, Dübendorf, Villigen, Switzerland

  19. FostPlus (2014). http://www.fostplus.be/Documentation/annualreport/Pages/Annualreport2010.aspx#sub42. Accessed 1 July 2014

  20. Margallo M, Aldaco R, Bala A, Fullana P, Irabien A (2013) Modeling of municipal solid waste (MSW) Incineration in Spain and Portugal. The 6th international conference on life cycle management in Gothenburg, Nebraska, USA

  21. Sabin Guendehou GH, Koch M, Hockstad L, Pipatti R, Yamada M (2006) Incineration and open burning of waste, Chapter 5. In: 2006 IPCC Guidelines for national greenhouse gas inventories, vol. 5. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) National Greenhouse Gas Inventories Programme, Geneva, Switzerland, p 5.5. http://www.ipcc-nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/pdf/5_Volume5/V5_5_Ch5_IOB.pdf

  22. Blanco MM (2012) FENIX—giving packaging a new life waste incineration in Spain and Portugal: a multi-input/multi-output allocation model. Department of Chemical Engineering and Inorganic Chemical, Cantabria University. Paper presented at the meeting “Avances metodológicos en el Análisis de Ciclo de Vida (ACV) de gestión de residuos: Proyecto FENIX”, Lisbon, Portugal

  23. IPCC (2006). Guidelines for National Greenhouse Gas Inventories. Chapter 2. Waste generation, composition and management data, vol. 5, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC), Geneva, Switzerland

  24. Reinhart (2004). Estimation of energy content of municipal solid waste. http://msw.cecs.ucf.edu/EnergyProblem.pdf. Accessed 05 June 2013

  25. Arena U, Mastellone ML, Perugini F (2003) Life cycle assessment of a plastic packaging recycling system. Int J Life Cycle Assess 8:92–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Nakamura S, Kondo Y (2002) Recycling, landfill consumption, and CO2 emission: analysis by waste input–output model. J Mater Cycles Waste 4:2–11

    Google Scholar 

  27. Spitzley J-B, Najdawi C (2011) Integration of electricity from renewables to the electricity grid and to the electricity market—RES-INTEGRATION. National report: Belgium (and Flanders and Walloon Regions). Eclareon and Institute for Applied Ecology, Berlin, Germany

  28. Eurostat (2013a). Imports (by country of origin)—electricity—annual data. http://appsso.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/. Accessed 26 Dec 2013

  29. Eurostat (2013b) Statistics. Main tables. Energy. http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/portal/page/portal/energy/data/main_tables. Accessed 26 Dec 2013

  30. Vogtländer JG, Brezet HC, Hendriks CF (2001) The virtual eco-costs 99—a single LCA-based indicator for sustainability and the eco-costs—value ratio (EVR) model for economic allocation. A new LCA-based calculation model to determine the sustainability of products and services. Int J Life Cycle Assess 6:157–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. TU Delft (2013) The model of the eco-costs/value ratio (EVR). Delft University of Technology, The Netherlands. http://www.ecocostvalue.com. Accessed 1 July 2013

  32. Weidema BP (2013) Impact assessment with option of full monetarisation. http://www.lca-net.com/projects/Stepwise2006_ia. Accessed 1 July 2013

  33. Ahlroth S, Finnveden G (2011) Ecovalue08—a new valuation set for environmental systems analysis tools. J Clean Prod 19:1994–2003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Eurostat (2013c). HICP–inflation rate. Annual average rate of change (%). http://epp.eurostat.ec.europa.eu/tgm/table.do;jsessionid=9ea7d07d30e7e84a2aa50db743a19f49c1b10583cf2d.e34OaN8PchaTby0Lc3aNchuMc3yMe0?tab=table&plugin=1&language=en&pcode=tec00118. Accessed 30 Dec 2013

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper had the financial support of the European Investment Bank University Research Sponsorship (EIBURS) Program. The findings, interpretation and conclusions presented in this article are entirely those of the authors and should not be attributed in any manner to the EIB.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to S. Ferreira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ferreira, S., Cabral, M., De Jaeger, S. et al. Life cycle assessment and valuation of the packaging waste recycling system in Belgium. J Mater Cycles Waste Manag 19, 144–154 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-015-0383-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10163-015-0383-x

Keywords

Navigation