Skip to main content
Log in

Evolutionary ecology of inducible morphological plasticity in predator–prey interaction: toward the practical links with population ecology

  • Special Feature: Review
  • Rapid Adaptation
  • Published:
Population Ecology

Abstract

The outcome of species interactions is often strongly influenced by variation in the functional traits of the individuals participating. A rather large body of work demonstrates that inducible morphological plasticity in predators and prey can both influence and be influenced by species interaction strength, with important consequences for individual fitness. Much of the past research in this area has focused on the ecological and evolutionary significance of trait plasticity by studying single predator–prey pairs and testing the performance of individuals having induced and noninduced phenotypes. This research has thus been critical in improving our understanding of the adaptive value of trait plasticity and its widespread occurrence across species and community types. More recently, researchers have expanded this foundation by examining how the complexity of organismal design and community-level properties can shape plasticity in functional traits. In addition, researchers have begun to merge evolutionary and ecological perspectives by linking trait plasticity to community dynamics, with particular attention on trait-mediated indirect interactions. Here, we review recent studies on inducible morphological plasticity in predators and their prey with an emphasis on internal and external constraints and how the nature of predator–prey interactions influences the expression of inducible phenotypes. In particular, we focus on multiple-trait plasticity, flexibility and modification of inducible plasticity, and reciprocal plasticity between predator and prey. Based on our arguments on these issues, we propose future research directions that should better integrate evolutionary and population studies and thus improve our understanding of the role of phenotypic plasticity in predator–prey population and community dynamics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrams PA (1984) Foraging time optimization and interactions in food webs. Am Nat 124:80–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA (1992) Predators that benefit prey and prey that harm predators: unusual effects of interacting foraging adaptations. Am Nat 140:573–600

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA (1995) Implications of dynamically variable traits for identifying, classifying, and measuring direct and indirect effects in ecological communities. Am Nat 146:112–134

    Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA (2007) Habitat choice in predator–prey systems: spatial instability due to interacting adaptive movements. Am Nat 169:581–594

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Abrams PA, Matsuda H (1997) Prey evolution as a cause of predator–prey cycles. Evolution 51:1740–1748

    Google Scholar 

  • Adler FR, Grünbaum D (1999) Evolution of forager responses to inducible defenses. In: Tollrian R, Harvell CD (eds) The evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp 259–285

    Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA (2001) Phenotypic plasticity in the interactions and evolution of species. Science 294:321–326

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Agrawal AA, Ackerly AD, Adler F, Arnold AE, Cáceres C, Doak DF, Post E, Hudson PJ, Maron J, Mooney KA, Power M, Schemske D, Stachowicz J, Straus S, Turner MG, Werner E (2007) Filling key gaps in population and community ecology. Front Ecol Environ 5:145–152

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersson J, Johansson F, Soderlund T (2007) Interaction between predator- and diet- induced phenotypic changes in body shape of crucian carp. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 273:431–437

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleton RD, Palmer RA (1988) Water-borne stimuli released by predatory crabs and damaged prey induce more predator-resistant shells in a marine gastropod. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:4387–4391

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Baldridge AK, Smith LD (2008) Temperature constraints on phenotypic plasticity explain biogeographic patterns in predator trophic morphology. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 365:25–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerji A, Morin PJ (2009) Phenotypic plasticity, intraguild predation and anticannibal defences in an enigmatic polymorphic ciliate. Funct Ecol 23:427–434

    Google Scholar 

  • Barbosa P, Castellanos I (2005) Ecology of predator–prey interactions. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Benard MF (2006) Survival trade-offs between two predator-induced phenotypes in Pacific treefrogs (Pseudacris regilla). Ecology 87:340–346

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bolker B, Holyoak M, Krivan V, Rowe L, Schmitz O (2003) Connecting theoretical and empirical studies of trait-mediated interactions. Ecology 84:1101–1114

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourdeau PE (2009) Prioritized phenotypic responses to combined predators in a marine snail. Ecology 90:1659–1669

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brönmark C, Miner JG (1992) Predator-induced phenotypical change in body morphology in crucian carp. Science 258:1348–1350

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brönmark C, Pettersson LB (1994) Chemical cues from piscivores induce a change in morphology in crucian carp. Oikos 70:396–402

    Google Scholar 

  • Chase JM, Abrams PA, Grover JP, Diehl S, Chesson P, Holt RD, Richards SA, Nisbet RM, Case TJ (2002) The interaction between predation and competition: a review and synthesis. Ecol Lett 5:302–315

    Google Scholar 

  • Chivers DP, Zhao X, Brown GE, Marchant TA, Ferrari MCO (2008) Predator-induced changes in morphology of a prey fish: the effects of food level and temporal frequency of predation risk. Evol Ecol 22:561–574

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke A (1983) Life in cold water: the physiological ecology of polar marine ectotherms. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 21:341–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins JP, Cheek JE (1983) Effect of food and density on development of typical and cannibalistic salamander larvae in Ambystoma tigrinum nebulosum. Am Zool 23:77–84

    Google Scholar 

  • Dayton GH, Saenz D, Baum KA, Langerhans RB, DeWitt TJ (2005) Body shape burst speed and predator susceptibility of larval anurans. Oikos 111:582–591

    Google Scholar 

  • DeAngelis DL, Vos M, Moij WM, Abrams PA (2007) Feedback effects between the food chain and induced defense strategies. In: Rooney N, McCann K, Noakes D (eds) From energetics to ecosystems: the dynamics and structure of ecological systems. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 213–236

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt TJ, Scheiner SM (2004) Phenotypic plasticity. Functional and conceptual approaches. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • DeWitt TJ, Sih A, Hucko J (1999) Trait compensation and cospecialization: size, shape, and antipredator behaviour. Anim Behav 58:397–407

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Edgell TC, Rochette R (2007) Geographic correlation between reciprocally adaptive traits of an exotic decapod predator and native gastropod prey: evidence of an arms race? Evol Ecol Res 9:579–597

    Google Scholar 

  • Edgell TC, Rochette R (2008) Differential snail predation by an exotic crab and the geography of shell-craw covariance in the northwest Atlantic. Evolution 62:1216–1228

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gurevitch J, Morrison JA, Hedges LV (2000) The interaction between competition and predation: a meta analysis of field experiments. Am Nat 155:435–453

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hanazato T (1990) Induction of helmet development by a Chaoborus factor in Daphnia ambigua during juvenile stages. J Plankton Res 12:1287–1294

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvell CD (1984) Predator-induced defense in a marine Bryozoan. Science 224:1357–1359

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hoverman JT, Relyea RA (2007) The rules of engagement: how to defend against combinations of predators. Oecologia 154:551–560

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Iwami T, Kishida O, Nishimura K (2007) Direct and indirect induction of a compensatory phenotype that alleviates the costs of an inducible defense. Plos One 2:e1084

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kerfoot WC, Sih A (1987) Predation: direct and indirect impacts on aquatic communities. University Press of New England, New Hampshire

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishida O, Nishimura K (2004) Bulgy tadpoles: inducible defense morph. Oecologia 140:414–421

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kishida O, Nishimura K (2005) Multiple inducible defenses against multiple predators in anuran tadpoles (Rana pirica). Evol Ecol Res 7:619–631

    Google Scholar 

  • Kishida O, Nishimura K (2006) Flexible architecture of inducible morphological plasticity. J Anim Ecol 75:705–712

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kishida O, Mizuta Y, Nishimura K (2006) Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity in a predator–prey interaction between larval amphibians. Ecology 87:1599–1604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kishida O, Trussell GC, Nishimura K (2007) Geographic variation in a predator-induced defense and its genetic basis. Ecology 88:1948–1954

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kishida O, Trussell GC, Nishimura K (2009a) Top-down effects on antagonistic inducible defense and offense. Ecology 90:1217–1226

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kishida O, Trussell GC, Nishimura K, Ohgushi T (2009b) Inducible defenses intensify predator cannibalism. Ecology (in press)

  • Kokko H, Ruxton GD (2000) Breeding suppression and predator–prey dynamics. Ecology 81:252–260

    Google Scholar 

  • Kondoh M (2003) Foraging adaptation and the relationship between food web complexity and stability. Science 299:1388–1391

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kondoh M (2007) Anti-predator defence and the complexity-stability relationship of food webs. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 274:1617–1624

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopp M, Gabriel W (2006) The effect of an inducible defense in the Nicholson–Bailey model. Theor Popul Biol 70:43–55

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kopp M, Tollrian R (2003a) Trophic size polyphenism in Lembadion bullinum: costs and benefits of an inducible offense. Ecology 84:641–651

    Google Scholar 

  • Kopp M, Tollrian R (2003b) Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity in a predator–prey system: inducible offences against inducible defences? Ecol Lett 6:742–748

    Google Scholar 

  • Krivan V (2007) The Lotka-Volterra predator–prey model with foraging-predation risk trade-offs. Am Nat 170:771–782

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Krivan V, Cressman R, Schneider C (2008) The ideal free distribution: a review and synthesis of the game theoretic perspective. Theor Popul Biol 73:403–425

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lakowitz T, Brönmark C, Nystrom P (2008) Tuning in to multiple predators: conflicting demands for shell morphology in a freshwater snail. Freshw Biol 53:2184–2191

    Google Scholar 

  • Laurila A, Pakkasmaa S, Merila J (2006) Population divergence in growth rate and antipredator defences in Rana arvalis. Oecologia 147:585–595

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lively CM (1986a) Competition, comparative life histories and the maintenance of shell dimorphism in the acorn barnacle Chthamalus anispoma. Ecology 67:858–864

    Google Scholar 

  • Lively CM (1986b) Predator-induced shell dimorphism in the acorn barnacle Chthamalus anisopoma. Evolution 40:232–242

    Google Scholar 

  • Lively CM, Hazel WN, Schellenberger MJ, Michelson KS (2000) Predator-induced defense: variation for inducibility in an intertidal barnacle. Ecology 81:1240–1247

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda H, Abrams PA, Hori M (1993) The effect of adaptive anti-predator behavior on exploitative competition and mutualism between predators. Oikos 68:549–559

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda H, Hori M, Abrams PA (1994) Effects of predator-specific defense on community complexity. Evol Ecol 8:628–638

    Google Scholar 

  • Matsuda H, Hori M, Abrams P (1996) Effects of predator-specific defense on biodiversity and community complexity in two-trophic-level communities. Evol Ecol 10:13–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Michimae H, Hangui J (2007) A trade-off between prey- and predator-induced polyphenisms in larvae of the salamander Hynobius retardatus. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 62:699–704

    Google Scholar 

  • Michimae H, Wakahara M (2002) A tadpole-induced polyphenism in the salamander Hynobius retardatus. Evolution 56:2029–2038

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Miner BG, Sultan SE, Morgan SG, Padilla DK, Relyea RA (2005) Ecological consequences of phenotypic plasticity. Trends Ecol Evol 20:685–692

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mirza RS, Pyle GG (2009) Waterborne metals impair inducible defences in Daphnia pulex: morphology, life-history traits and encounters with predators. Freshw Biol 54:1016–1027

    Google Scholar 

  • Mori T, Hiraka I, Kurata Y, Kawachi H, Kishida O, Nishimura K (2005) Genetic basis of phenotypic plasticity for predator-induced morphological defenses in anuran tadpole, Rana pirica, using cDNA subtraction and microarray analysis. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 330:1138–1145

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mori T, Kawachi H, Imai C, Sugiyama M, Kurata Y, Kishida O, Nishimura K (2009) Identification of a novel uromodulin-like gene related to predator-induced bulgy morph in Anuran tadpoles by functional microarray analysis. Plos One 4:e5936

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mougi A, Kishida O (2009) Reciprocal phenotypic plasticity can lead to stable predator–prey interaction. J Anim Ecol 78:1172–1181. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01600.x

    Google Scholar 

  • Mougi A, Nishimura K (2007) A resolution of the paradox of enrichment. J Theor Biol 248:194–201

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mougi A, Nishimura K (2008a) Enrichment can damp population cycles: a balance of inflexible and flexible interactions. Oikos 117:1732–1740

    Google Scholar 

  • Mougi A, Nishimura K (2008b) The paradox of enrichment in an adaptive world. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 275:2563–2568

    Google Scholar 

  • Mougi A, Nishimura K (2009) Imperfect optimal foraging and the paradox of enrichment. Theor Ecol 2:33–39

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla DK (2001) Food and environmental cues trigger an inducible offense. Evol Ecol Res 3:15–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Padilla DK, Adolph SC (1996) Plastic inducible morphologies are not always adaptive: the importance of time delays in a stochastic environment. Evol Ecol 10:105–117

    Google Scholar 

  • Pfennig DW (1992) Polyphenism in spadefoot toad tadpoles as a locally adjusted evolutionarily stable strategy. Evolution 46:1408–1420

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Jiliberto R (2003) Population dynamics of prey exhibiting inducible defenses: the role of associated costs and density-dependence. Theor Popul Ecol 64:221–231

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramos-Jiliberto R, Frodden E, Aranguiz-Acuna A (2007) Pre-encounter versus post-encounter inducible defenses in predator–prey model systems. Ecol Model 200:99–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2001) The lasting effects of adaptive plasticity: predator-induced tadpoles become long-legged frogs. Ecology 82:1947–1955

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2002a) Local population differences in phenotypic plasticity: predator-induced changes in wood frog tadpoles. Ecol Monogr 72:77–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2002b) Competitor-induced plasticity in tadpoles: consequences, cues, and connections to predator-induced plasticity. Ecol Monogr 72:523–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2003) How prey respond to combined predators: a review and an empirical test. Ecology 84:1827–1839

    Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2004) Fine-tuned phenotypes: tadpole plasticity under 16 combinations of predators and competitors. Ecology 85:172–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2005a) The heritability of inducible defenses in tadpoles. J Evol Biol 18:856–866

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA (2005b) Constraints on inducible defenses: phylogeny, ontogeny, and phenotypic trade-offs. In: Barbarosa P, Castellanos I (eds) Ecology of predator–prey interactions. Oxford University Press, New York, pp 189–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA, Auld JR (2004) Having the guts to compete: how intestinal plasticity explains costs of inducible defenses. Ecol Lett 7:869–875

    Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA, Auld JR (2005) Predator- and competitor-induced plasticity: how changes in foraging morphology affect phenotypic trade-offs. Ecology 86:1723–1729

    Google Scholar 

  • Relyea RA, Hoverman JT (2003) The impact of larval predators and competitors on the morphology and fitness of juvenile treefrogs. Oecologia 134:596–604

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rundle SD, Brönmark C (2001) Inter- and intraspecific trait compensation of defense mechanism in freshwater snails. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 268:1463–1468

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Rundle SD, Spicer JI, Coleman RA, Vosper J, Soane J (2004) Environmental calcium modifies induced defences in snails. Proc R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 271:s67–s70

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt BR, Ramer N, Van Buskirk J (2006) A trophic polymorphism induced by both predators and prey. Evol Ecol Res 8:1301–1309

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz OJ, Krivan V, Ovadia O (2004) Trophic cascades: the primacy of trait-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol Lett 7:153–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmitz OJ, Grabowski JH, Peckarsky BL, Preisser EL, Trussell GC, Vonesh JR (2008) From individuals to ecosystems: toward an integration of evolutionary and ecosystem ecology. Ecology 89:2436–2455

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schoeppner NM, Relyea RA (2008) Detecting small differences: risk-response curves for predator-induced behavior and morphology. Oecologia 154:743–754

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sih A, Englund G, Wooster D (1998) Emergent impacts of multiple predators on prey. Trends Ecol Evol 13:350–355

    Google Scholar 

  • Skelly DK (1994) Activity level and the susceptibility of anuran larvae to predation. Anim Behav 47:465–468

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith LD, Palmer AR (1994) Effects of manipulated diet on size and performance of brachyuran crab claws. Science 264:710–712

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Steiner UK (2007) Linking antipredator behaviour, ingestion, gut evacuation and costs of predator-induced responses in tadpoles. Anim Behav 74:1473–1479

    Google Scholar 

  • Steiner UK, Pfeiffer T (2007) Optimizing time and resource allocation trade-offs for investment into morphological and behavioral defense. Am Nat 169:118–129

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Stoks R, De Block M, Van de Meutter F, Johansson F (2005) Predation cost of rapid growth: behavioural coupling and physiological decoupling. J Anim Ecol 74:708–715

    Google Scholar 

  • Teplitsky C, Laurila A (2007) Flexible defense strategies: competition modifies investment in behavioral vs. morphological defenses. Ecology 88:1641–1646

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Teplitsky C, Plenet S, Joly P (2004) Hierarchical responses of tadpoles to multiple predators. Ecology 85:2888–2894

    Google Scholar 

  • Teplitsky C, Räsänen K, Laurila A (2007) Adaptive plasticity in stressful environments: acidity constrains inducible defences in Rana arvalis. Evol Ecol Res 9:447–458

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollrian R (1995) Predator-induced morphological defenses: costs, life history shifts, and maternal effects in Daphnia pulex. Ecology 76:1691–1705

    Google Scholar 

  • Tollrian R, Harvell CD (1999) The ecology and evolution of inducible defenses. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC (1996) Phenotypic plasticity in an intertidal snail: the role of a common crab predator. Evolution 50:448–454

    Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC (2000a) Phenotypic clines, plasticity, and morphological trade-offs in an intertidal snail. Evolution 54:151–166

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC (2000b) Predator-induced plasticity and morphological trade-offs in latitudinally separated populations of Littorina obtusata. Evol Ecol Res 2:803–822

    Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC, Nicklin MO (2002) Cue sensitivity, inducible defense, and trade-offs in a marine snail. Ecology 83:1635–1647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC, Smith LD (2000) Induced defenses in response to an invading crab predator: an explanation of historical and geographic phenotypic change. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 97:2123–2127

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Bertness MD (2002) Field evidence of trait-mediated indirect effects in a rocky intertidal food web. Ecol Lett 5:241–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Matassa CM (2006a) Habitat effects on the relative importance of trait- and density-mediated indirect interactions. Ecol Lett 9:1245–1252

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Matassa CM (2006b) The fear of being eaten reduces energy transfer in a simple food chain. Ecology 87:2979–2984

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Trussell GC, Ewanchuk PJ, Matassa CM (2008) Resource identity modifies the influence of predation risk on ecosystem function. Ecology 89:2798–2807

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Urban MC (2007) Risky prey behavior evolves in risky habitats. Proc Natl Acd Sci USA 104:14377–14382

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • van Baalen M, Sabelis MW (1993) Coevolution of patch selection strategies of predator and prey and the consequences for ecological stability. Am Nat 142:646–670

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J (2002) A comparative test of the adaptive plasticity hypothesis: relationships between habitat and phenotype in anuran larvae. Am Nat 160:87–102

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J, Arioli M (2002) Dosage response of an induced defense: how sensitive are tadpoles to predation risk? Ecology 83:1580–1585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J, Saxer G (2001) Delayed costs of an induced defense in tadpoles? Morphology, hopping, and developmental rate at metamorphosis. Evolution 55:821–829

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Van Buskirk J, Anderwald P, Lüpold S, Reinhardt L, Schuler H (2003) The lure effect, tadpole tail shape, and the target of dragonfly strikes. J Herpetol 37:192–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Van der Stap I, Vos M, Verschoor AM, Helmsing NR, Mooij WM (2007) Induced defenses in herbivores and plants differentially modulate a trophic cascade. Ecology 88:2474–2481

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verschoor AM, Vos M, van der Stap I (2004) Inducible defences prevent strong population fluctuations in bi- and tritrophic food chains. Ecol Lett 7:1143–1148

    Google Scholar 

  • Vonesh JR, Bolker BM (2005) Compensatory larval responses shift trade-offs associated with predator-induced hatching plasticity. Ecology 86:1580–1591

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos M, Kooi BW, DeAngelis DL, Mooij WM (2004a) Inducible defenses and the paradox of enrichment. Oikos 105:471–480

    Google Scholar 

  • Vos M, Verschoor AM, Kooi BW, Wackers FL, DeAngelis DL, Mooij WM (2004b) Inducible defenses and trophic structure. Ecology 85:2783–2794

    Google Scholar 

  • Werner EE, Peacor SD (2003) A review of trait-mediated indirect interactions in ecological communities. Ecology 84:1083–1100

    Google Scholar 

  • West-Everhard MJ (2003) Developmental plasticity and evolution. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Wicklow BJ (1988) Developmental polymorphism induced by intraspecific predation in the ciliated protozoan Onychodromus quadricornutus. J Protozool 35:137–141

    Google Scholar 

  • Yurista PM (2000) Cyclomorphosis in Daphnia lumholtzi induced by temperature. Freshw Biol 43:207–213

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to Dr. Masakazu Shimada for providing us the opportunity to write this paper. This work was supported by a Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (no. 19370005) to K. Nishimura from the Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology, and in part by a Grant-in-Aid for a Research Fellow of the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science for young scientists (no. 820076200003) to O. Kishida and (no. 20*01655) to A. Mougi, and grants from the US National Science Foundation (OCE-0648525, OCE-0727628) to G.C. Trussell.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Osamu Kishida.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kishida, O., Trussell, G.C., Mougi, A. et al. Evolutionary ecology of inducible morphological plasticity in predator–prey interaction: toward the practical links with population ecology. Popul Ecol 52, 37–46 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-009-0182-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-009-0182-0

Keywords

Navigation