Skip to main content
Log in

Population ecology of polar bears at Svalbard, Norway

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Population Ecology

Abstract

The population ecology of polar bears at Svalbard, Norway, was examined from 1988 to 2002 using live-captured animals. The mean age of both females and males increased over the study, litter production rate and natality declined and body length of adults decreased. Dynamics of body mass were suggestive of cyclical changes over time and variation in body mass of both adult females and adult males was related to the Arctic Oscillation index. Similarly, litter production rate and natality correlated with the Arctic Oscillation index. The changes in age-structure, reproductive rates and body length suggest that recovery from over-harvest continued for almost 30 years after harvest ended in 1973 and that density-dependent changes are perhaps being expressed in the population. However, the variation in reproduction and body mass in the population show a relationship between large-scale climatic variation and the upper trophic level in an Arctic marine ecosystem. Similar change in other polar bear populations has been attributed to climate change, and further research is needed to establish linkages between climate and the population ecology of polar bears.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aanes R, Sæther BE, Smith FM, Cooper EJ, Wookey PA, Øritsland NA (2002) The Arctic Oscillation predicts effects of climate change in two trophic levels in a high-arctic ecosystem. Ecol Lett 5:445–453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ådlandsvik B, Loeng H (1991) A study of the climatic system in the Barents Sea. Polar Res 10:45–49

    Google Scholar 

  • AMAP (1998) AMAP assessment report: Arctic pollution issues. Arctic monitoring and assessment programme, Oslo

    Google Scholar 

  • Amstrup SC, Durner GM (1995) Survival rates of radio-collared female polar bears and their dependent young. Can J Zool 73:1312–1322

    Google Scholar 

  • Amstrup SC, Stirling I, Lentfer JW (1986) Past and present status of polar bears in Alaska. Wildl Soc Bull 14:241–254

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson SN, Ramsay MA (1995) The effects of prolonged fasting of the body composition and reproductive success of female polar bears (Ursus maritimus). Funct Ecol 9:559–567

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson SN, Stirling I, Ramsay MA (1996) Growth in early life and relative body size among adult polar bears (Ursus maritimus). J Zool 239:225–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Barber DG, Iacozza J (2004) Historical analysis of sea ice conditions in M’Clintock Channel and the Gulf of Boothia, Nunavut: implications for ringed seal and polar bear habitat. Arctic 57:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhoft A, Skaare JU, Wiig Ø, Derocher AE, Larsen HJS (2000) Possible immunotoxic effects of organochlorines in polar bears (Ursus maritimus) at Svalbard. J Toxicol Environ Health A 59:561–574

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell FL, Tait DEN (1981) Population dynamics of bears—implications. In: Fowler CW, Smith TD (eds) Dynamics of large mammal populations. Wiley, New York, pp 75–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Bunnell FL, Tait DEN (1985) Mortality rates of North American bears. Arctic 38:316–323

    Google Scholar 

  • Calvert W, Ramsay MA (1998) Evaluation of age determination of polar bears by counts of cementum growth layer groups. Ursus 10:449–453

    Google Scholar 

  • Comiso JC (2002) A rapidly declining perennial sea ice cover in the Arctic. Geophys Res Lett 29:1956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Conway M (1906) No man’s land: a history of Spitsbergen from its discovery in 1596 to the beginning of the scientific exploration of the country. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • DeMaster DP, Stirling I (1981) Ursus maritimus. Mamm Spec 145:1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE (1999) Latitudinal variation in litter size of polar bears: ecology or methodology? Polar Biol 22:350–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE, Lunn NJ, Stirling I (2004) Polar bears in a warming climate. Integr Comp Biol 44:163–176

    Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE, Stirling I (1992) The population dynamics of polar bears in western Hudson Bay. In: McCullough DR, Barrett RH (eds) Wildlife 2001: populations. Elsevier, London, pp 1150–1159

    Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE, Stirling I (1994) Age-specific reproductive performance of female polar bears. J Zool 234:527–536

    Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE, Stirling I (1995) Temporal variation in reproduction and body mass of polar bears in western Hudson Bay. Can J Zool 73:1657–1665

    Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE, Stirling I (1996) Aspects of survival in juvenile polar bears. Can J Zool 74:1246–1252

    Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE, Stirling I (1998) Maternal investment and factors affecting offspring size in polar bears (Ursus maritimus). J Zool 245:253–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE, Wiig Ø, Andersen M (2002) Diet composition of polar bears in Svalbard and the western Barents Sea. Polar Biol 25:448–452

    Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE, Wiig Ø (2002) Postnatal growth in body length and mass of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) at Svalbard. J Zool 256:343–349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derocher AE, Wolkers H, Colborn T, Schlabach M, Larsen TS, Wiig Ø (2003) Contaminants in Svalbard polar bear samples archived since 1967 and possible population level effects. Sci Total Environ 301:163–174

    Google Scholar 

  • Eberhardt LL (1977) Optimal policies for conservation of large mammals, with special reference to marine ecosystems. Biol Conserv 4:205–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferguson SH, Stirling I, McLoughlin P (2005) Climate change and ringed seal (Phoca hispida) recruitment in western Hudson Bay. Mar Mamm Sci 21:121–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Forchhammer MC, Post E (2004) Using large-scale climate indices in climate change ecology studies. Pop Ecol 46:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Forchhammer MC, Post E, Stenseth NC (1998) Breeding phenology and climate. Nature 391:29–30

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler CW (1990) Density dependence in northern fur seals (Callorhinus ursinus). Mar Mamm Sci 6:171–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser D, Gardner JF, Kolenosky GB, Strathearn S (1982) Estimation of harvest rate of black bears from age and sex data. Wildl Soc Bull 10:53–57

    Google Scholar 

  • Hammill MO, Smith TG (1991) The role of predation in the ecology of the ringed seal in Barrow Strait, Northwest Territories, Canada. Mar Mamm Sci 7:123–135

    Google Scholar 

  • Henriksen EO, Derocher AE, Gabrielsen GW, Skaare JU, Wiig Ø (2001) Monitoring PCBs in polar bears: lessons learned from recent data. J Environ Monit 3:493–498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley MCS (1979) Fitting the von Bertalanffy growth equation to polar bear age-weight data. Can J Zool 57:1020–1025

    Google Scholar 

  • Kingsley MCS, Nagy JA, Reynolds HV (1988) Growth in length and weight of northern brown bears: differences between sexes and populations. Can J Zool 66:981–986

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen T (1985) Polar bear denning and cub production in Svalbard, Norway. J Wildl Manage 49:320–326

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen T (1986) Population biology of the polar bear (Ursus maritimus) in the Svalbard area. Norsk Polarinst Skr 184:1–55

    Google Scholar 

  • Leberg PL, Smith MH (1993) Influence of density on growth of white-tailed deer. J Mamm 74:723–731

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee J, Taylor M (1994) Aspects of the polar bear harvest in the Northwest Territories, Canada. Int Conf Bear Biol Manag 9:237–243

    Google Scholar 

  • Lie E, Larsen HJS, Larsen S, Johansen GM, Borgen T, Derocher AE, Lunn NJ, Norstrom RJ, Wiig Ø, Skaare JU (2003) Does high OC exposure impair the resistance to infection in polar bears (Ursus maritimus)? Part I: effect of OC on the humoral immunity. J Toxicol Environ Health A 67:555–582

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Curry JA, Hu Y (2004) Recent Arctic sea ice variability: connections to the Arctic Oscillation and the ENSO. Geophys Res Lett 31:L09211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lønø O (1970) The polar bear (Ursus maritimus Phipps) in the Svalbard area. Norsk Polarinst Skr 149:1–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Mauritzen M, Derocher AE, Wiig Ø (2001) Space-use strategies of female polar bears in a dynamic sea ice habitat. Can J Zool 79:1704–1713

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauritzen M, Derocher AE, Wiig Ø, Belikov SE, Boltunov A, Hansen E, Garner GW (2002) Using satellite telemetry to define spatial population structure in polar bears in the Norwegian and western Russian Arctic. J Appl Ecol 39:79–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norstrom RJ, Belikov SE, Born EW, Garner GW, Malone B, Olpinski S, Ramsay MA, Schliebe S, Stirling I, Stishov MS, Taylor MK, Wiig Ø (1998) Chlorinated hydrocarbon contaminants in polar bears from eastern Russia, North America, Greenland and Svalbard. Arch Environ Contam Toxicol 35:354–367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Ottersen G, Stenseth NC (2001) Atlantic climate governs oceanographic and ecological variability in the Barents Sea. Limnol Ocean 46:1774–1780

    Google Scholar 

  • Paetkau D, Amstrup SC, Born EW, Calvert W, Derocher AE, Garner GW, Messier F, Stirling I, Taylor M, Wiig Ø, Strobeck C (1999) Genetic structure of the world’s polar bear populations. Mol Ecol 8:1571–1585

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Paloheimo JE, Fraser D (1981) Estimation of harvest rate and vulnerability from age and sex data. J Wildl Manag 45:948–958

    Google Scholar 

  • Parkinson CL (2000) Variability of Arctic sea ice: the view from space, an 18-year record. Arctic 53:341–358

    Google Scholar 

  • Post E, Forchhammer MC (2002) Synchronization of animal population dynamics by large-scale climate. Nature 420:168–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Prestrud P, Stirling I (1994) The International Polar Bear Agreement and the current status of polar bear conservation. Aquat Mamm 20.3:113–124

    Google Scholar 

  • Ralls K, Harvey PH (1985) Geographic variation in size and sexual dimorphism of North American weasels. Biol J Linn Soc 25:119–167

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsay MA, Stirling I (1988) Reproductive biology and ecology of female polar bears (Ursus maritimus). J Zool 214:601–634

    Google Scholar 

  • SAS Institute (1989) SAS/STAT User’s guide, ver. 6, 4th edn. SAS Institute, Cary, N.C.

  • Shapiro I, Colony R, Vinje T (2003) April sea ice extent in the Barents Sea, 1850–2001. Polar Res 22:5–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Skaare JU, Bernhoft A, Derocher A, Gabrielsen GW, Goksøyr A, Henriksen E, Larsen HJ, Lie E, Wiig Ø (1999) Organochlorines in top predators at Svalbard—occurrence, levels and effects. Toxicol Lett 112:103–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I (2002) Polar bears and seals in the eastern Beaufort Sea and Amundsen Gulf: a synthesis of population trends and ecological relationships over three decades. Arctic 55:59–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I, Calvert W, Andriashek D (1980) Population ecology studies of the polar bear in the area of southeastern Baffin Island. Can Wildl Serv Occ Pap 44:1–31

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I, Derocher AE (1993) Possible impacts of climatic warming on polar bears. Arctic 46:240–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I, Kingsley M, Calvert W (1982) The distribution and abundance of seals in the eastern Beaufort Sea, 1974–1979. Can Wildl Serv Occ Pap 47:1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I, Lunn NJ, Iacozza J (1999) Long-term trends in the population ecology of polar bears in western Hudson Bay in relation to climate change. Arctic 52:294–306

    Google Scholar 

  • Stirling I, Spencer C, Andriashek D (1989) Immobilization of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) with Telazol in the Canadian Arctic. J Wildl Dis 25:159–168

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor MK, DeMaster DP, Bunnell FL, Schweinsburg RE (1987) Modeling the sustainable harvest of female polar bears. J Wildl Manag 51:811–820

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson DWJ, Wallace JM (1998) The Arctic Oscillation signature in the wintertime geopotential height and temperature fields. Geophy Res Lett 25:1297–1300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay LB (2001) Can we consider the Arctic Oscillation independently from the Barents Oscillation? Geophys Res Lett 28:4227–4330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vibe C (1967) Arctic animals in relation to climatic fluctuations. Meddelelser om Grønland 170:1–227

    Google Scholar 

  • Watts PD, Hansen SE (1987) Cyclic starvation as a reproductive strategy in the polar bear. Symp Zool Soc Lond 57:305–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig Ø (1995) Distribution of polar bears (Ursus maritimus) in the Svalbard area. J Zool 237:515–529

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiig Ø (1998) Survival and reproductive rates for polar bears at Svalbard. Ursus 10:25–32

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study was supported by the Norwegian Polar Institute, the Norwegian Research Council, the Norwegian Ministry of the Environment, the Norwegian Department of Nature Management, the WWF Arctic Programme and the Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada. I am grateful for the assistance provided by the Governor of Svalbard and the staff of the Hopen Weather Station. I would like to thank Øystein Wiig, Magnus Andersen, Pål Prestrud, Mette Mauritzen, Stanislav Belikov and Andrei Boltunov for their support and assistance in this study. Animal handling methods were approved by the National Animal Research Authority (P.O. Box 8147 Dep., 0033 Oslo, Norway).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrew E. Derocher.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Derocher, A.E. Population ecology of polar bears at Svalbard, Norway. Popul Ecol 47, 267–275 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-005-0231-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10144-005-0231-2

Keywords

Navigation