Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Growth, public investment and corruption with failing institutions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Economics of Governance Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Corruption is thought to prevent poor countries from catching up with richer ones. We analyze one channel through which corruption hampers growth: public investment can be distorted in favor of specific types of spending for which rent-seeking is easier and better concealed. To study this distortion, we propose a dynamic model where households vote for the composition of public spending, subject to an incentive constraint reflecting individuals’ choice between productive activity and rent-seeking. In equilibrium, the structure of public investment is determined by the predatory technology and the distribution of political power. Among different regimes, the model shows a possible scenario of distortion without corruption in which there is no effective corruption but the possibility of corruption still distorts the allocation of public investment. We test the implications of the model on a set of countries using a two-stage least squares estimation. We find that developing countries with high predatory technology invest more in housing and physical capital in comparison with health and education. The reverse is true for developed countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu D (1995) Reward structures and the allocation of talent. Eur Econ Rev 39: 17–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Verdier T (2000) The choice between market failures and corruption. Am Econ Rev 90(1): 194–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Arrow K, Kurz M (1970) Public investment, the rate of return and optimal fiscal policy. The Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  • Banerjee AV (1997) A theory of misgovernance. Q J Econ 112(4): 1289–1332

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bardhan PK (2006) The economist’s approach to the problem of corruption. World Dev 34(2): 341–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barro R (1990) Government spending in a simple model of endogenous growth. J Polit Econ 98(5): S103–S125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beck T, Levine R (2003) September. Legal institutions and financial development. Policy research working paper series 3136, The World Bank

  • Beck T, Clarke G, Groff A, Keefer P, Walsh P (2001) New tools in comparative political economy: the database of political institutions. World Bank Econ Rev 15(1): 165–176

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker GS, Stigler GJ (1974) Law enforcement, malfeasance, and compensation of enforcers. J Legal Stud 3(1): 1–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernheim D, Whinston M (1986) Menu auctions, resource allocation, and economic influence. Q J Econ 101(1): 1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bockstette V, Chanda A, Putterman L (2002) States and markets: the advantage of an early start. J Econ Growth 7(4): 347–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucekkine R (1995) An alternative methodology for solving non-linear forward-looking models. J Econ Dyn Control 19(4): 711–734

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coughlin P, Nitzan S (1981) Electoral outcomes with probabilistic voting and nash social welfare maxima. J Public Econ 15(1): 113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cragg JG, Donald SG (1993) Testing identifiability and specification in instrumental variable models. Econom Theory 9(2): 222–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de la Croix D, Delavallade C (2008) Democracy, Rule of Law, Corruption Incentives and Growth. CORE Discussion Paper, 2008/35

  • de la Croix D, Michel P (2002) A theory of economic growth: dynamics and policy in overlapping generations. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Delavallade C (2006) Corruption and distribution of public spending in developing countries. J Econ Finance 30(2): 222–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Docquier F, Tarbalouti E (2001) Bribing votes: a new explanation to the “Inequality-Redistribution” puzzle in LDCs. Public Choice 108(3–4): 259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta S, Sharan R, de Mello L (2000) February. Corruption and Military Spending. Imf working papers 00/23, International Monetary Fund

  • Gupta S, Davoodi H, Alonso-Terme R (2002) Does corruption affect income inequality and poverty?. Econ Governance 3(1): 23–45 (03)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jacquemet N (2006) Micro-économie de la corruption. Revue Française d’Economie XX(4): 118–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Juillard M (1996) A program for the resolution and simulation of dynamic models with forward variables through the use of a relaxation algorithm. Technical Report 9602, CEPREMAP, Paris

  • Kanczuk F (1998) The political economy of poverty trap. UCLA Ph.D. thesis

  • Kenny C (2007) June. Construction, corruption, and developing countries. Policy research working paper series 4271, The World Bank

  • La Porta R, Shleifer A, Vishny RW, Lopezde Silanes F (1998) Law and finance. J Polit Econ 106(6): 1113–1155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leite C, Weidmann J (1999) Does mother nature corrupt—natural resources, corruption, and economic growth. Imf working papers 99/85, International Monetary Fund

  • Mariani F (2007) Migration as an antidote to rent-seeking?. J Dev Econ 84: 609–630

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro P (1997) Chapter The Effects of Corruption on Growth. In: Elliot K (ed) Investment and Government Expenditure of Corruption and the Global Economy, pp 83–108

  • Mauro P (1998) Corruption and the composition of government expenditure. J Public Econ 69(2): 263–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie L (1986) Optimal economic growth, turnpike theorems and comparative dynamics. Chapter 26 of Handbook in Mathematical Economics, edited by Kenneth Arrow and Michael Intriligator, pp 1281–1355. North-Holland, Amsterdam

  • Persson T, Tabellini GE (2000) Political economics: explaining economic policy. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Putterman L, Weil DN (2007) Post-1500 Population Flows and the Long Run Determinants of Economic Growth and Inequality. mimeo

  • Reinikka R, Svensson J (2004) The Power of Information: Evidence from Public Expenditure Tracking Surveys. Global Corruption Report 2004. Transparency International

  • Sargan J (1958) The estimation of economic relationships using instrumental variables. Econometrica 26(3): 393–415

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1993) Corruption. Q J Econ 108(3): 599–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solow R (1956) A contribution to the theory of economic growth. Q J Econ 70(1): 65–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Staiger D, Stock JH (1997) Instrumental variables regression with weak instruments. Econometrica 65(3): 557–586

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH, Wright J (2000) GMM with weak identification. Econometrica 68(5): 1055–1096

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stock JH, Yogo M (2002) November. Testing for Weak Instruments in Linear IV Regression. Nber technical working papers 0284, National Bureau of Economic Research Inc

  • Stock JH, Wright JH, Yogo M (2002) A survey of weak instruments and weak identification in generalized method of moments. J Bus Econ Stat 20(4): 518–529

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi V (1998) Corruption around the world: causes,consequences, scope, and cures. IMF Staff Pap 45(4): 1

    Google Scholar 

  • Tanzi V, Davoodi H (1998) Roads to Nowhere: How Corruption in Public Investment Hurts Growth. Imf economic issues 12, International Monetary Fund

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to David de la Croix.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

de la Croix, D., Delavallade, C. Growth, public investment and corruption with failing institutions. Econ Gov 10, 187–219 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-008-0057-4

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10101-008-0057-4

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation