Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Corruption, growth and ethnic fractionalization: a theoretical model

  • Published:
Journal of Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper analyzes the existing relationship between ethnic fractionalization, corruption and the growth rate of a country. We provide a simple theoretical model. We show that a nonlinear relationship between fractionalization and corruption exists: corruption is high in homogeneous or very fragmented countries, but low where fractionalization is intermediate. In fact, when ethnic diversity is intermediate, constituencies act as a check and balance device to limit ethnically-based corruption. Consequently, the relationship between fractionalization and growth rate is also non-linear: growth is high in the middle range of ethnic diversity, low in homogeneous or very fragmented countries.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acemoglu D, Verdier T (1998) Property rights, corruption and the allocation of talent: a general equilibrium approach. Econ J 108: 1381–1403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acemoglu D, Verdier T (2000) The choice between market failures and corruption. Am Econ Rev 90(1): 194–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Drazen A (1991) Why are stabilizations delayed. Am Econ Rev 81(5): 1170–1188

    Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, La Ferrara E (2005) Ethnic diversity and economic performance. J Econ Lit 43: 762–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Spolaore E (1997) On the number and size of nations. Q J Econ 112(4): 1027–1056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Baqir R, Easterly W (1999) Public goods and ethnic divisions. Q J Econ 114(4): 1243–1284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina A, Devlseschawuer A, Easterly W, Kurlat S, Wacziarg R (2003) Fractionalization. J Econ Growth 8(2): 155–194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allport GW (1954) The nature of prejudice. Beacon Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Atlas Narodov Mira (1964) Moscow: Glavnoe upravlenie geodezii i cartografii

  • Bellini F, Rosazza Gianin E (2008) On Haezendonck risk measures. J Banking Finance 32(6): 986–994

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benchekroun H, Withagen C (2010) The optimal depletion of exhaustible resources: a complete characterization. Cahiers de recherche 04-2010, Centre interuniversitaire de recherche en économie quantitative, CIREQ

  • Bhattacharyya S, Hodler R (2010) Natural resources, democracy and corruption. Eur Econ Rev 54(4): 608–621

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackburn K, Bose N, HM Emranul (2010) Endogenous corruption in economic development. J Econ Stud 37(1): 4–25

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucekkine R, Ruiz-Tamarit J (2008) Special functions of the study of economics dynamics: the case of the Lucas-Uzawa model. J Math Econ 44: 33–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boucekkine R, Martinez B, Ruiz-Tamarit J (2008) Global dynamics and imbalance effects in the Lucas-Uzawa model. Int J Econ Theory 4(4): 503–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Collier P (2001) Implications of ethnic diversity. Econ Policy 32(16): 127–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corneo G (2010) Nationalism, cognitive ability, and interpersonal relations. Int Rev Econ 57: 19–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dobson S, Ramlogan-Dobson C (2010) Is there a trade-off between income inequality and corruption? Evidence from Latin America. Econ Lett 107(2): 102–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drugov M (2010) Competition in bureaucracy and corruption. J Dev Econ 92(2): 107–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterly W, Levine R (1997) Africa’s growth tragedy: policies and ethnic divisions. Q J Econ 112(4): 1203–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evrensel AY (2010) Corruption, growth, and growth volatility. Int Rev Econ Finance 19(3): 501–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fisman R, Gatti R (2002) Decentralization and corruption: evidence across countries. J Public Econ 83(3): 325–345

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goovaerts MJ, Kaas R, Dhaene J, Tang Q (2004) Some new classes of consistent risk measures. Insur: Math Econ 34(3): 505–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haezendonck J, Goovaerts M (1982) A new premium calculation principle based on Orlicz norms. Insur: Math Econ 1(1): 41–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krasnoselskii MA, Rutitsky YB (1961) Convex function and Orlicz spaces. P. Noordhoff, Groningen

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambsdorff JG (1998) An empirical investigation of bribery in international trade. Eur J Dev Res 10: 40–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • La Porta R, Lopes de Silanes F, Shleifer A, Vishny R (1999) The quality of government. J Law Econ Organ 15(1): 222–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lessmann C, Markwardt G (2010) One size fits all? Decentralization, corruption, and the monitoring of bureaucrats. World Dev 38(4): 631–646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li H, Xu CL, Zou H (2000) Corruption, income distribution and growth. Econ Polit 12(2): 155–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro P (1995) Corruption and growth. Q J Econ 110: 681–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro P (1997) The effects of corruption on growth, investment, and government expenditure: a cross-country analysis. In: Elliot KA (ed) Corruption in the global economy. Institute for International Economics, Washington

  • Musila JW, Siguè SP (2010) Corruption and international trade: an empirical investigation of African Countries. World Econ 33(1): 129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ortega J, Tångeras TP (2008) Unilingual versus bilingual education: a political economy analysis. J Eur Econ Assoc 6(5): 1078–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rose-Ackerman S (1999) Corruption and government. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Schmidt KD (1989) Positive homogeneity and multiplicativity of premium principles on positive risks. Insur: Math Econ 8(4): 315–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shleifer A, Vishny R (1993) Corruption. Q J Econ 108(3): 599–617

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Svensson J (2000) Foreign aid and rent-seeking. J Int Econ 51: 437–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H, Turner JC (1986) The social identity theory of inter-group behavior. In: Worchel S, Austin LW (eds) Psychology of intergroup relations. Nelson-Hall, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel H, Billig M, Bundy RP, Flament C (1971) Social categorization and intergroup behavior. Eur J Soc Psychol 1: 149–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tångeras TP, Lagerlöf NP (2009) Ethnic diversity, civil war and redistribution. Scand J Econ 111(1): 1–27

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treisman D (2000) The causes of corruption: a cross-national study. J Public Econ 76(3): 399–457

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vicente PC (2010) Does oil corrupt? Evidence from a natural experiment in West Africa. J Dev Econ 92(1): 28–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrong M (2009) It’s our turn to eat: the story of a Kenyan Whistle-Blower. Harper, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Yoo SH (2008) Petty corruption. Econ Theory 37: 267–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gustavo Piga.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cerqueti, R., Coppier, R. & Piga, G. Corruption, growth and ethnic fractionalization: a theoretical model. J Econ 106, 153–181 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-011-0253-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00712-011-0253-5

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation