Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Should smoking habit dictate the fusion technique?

  • Original Article
  • Published:
European Spine Journal Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of smoking on the outcome of patients undergoing surgery for degenerative spinal diseases, and to examine whether smoking had a differential impact on outcome, depending on the fusion technique used. The cohort included 120 patients treated with two different fusion techniques (translaminar screw fixation and TLIF). They were categorised with regard to their smoking habits at the time of surgery and completed the Core Outcome Measures Index at baseline and follow-up (FU) (3, 12 and 24 months FU); at FU they also rated the global outcome of surgery. The distribution of smokers was comparable in the two groups. For the TS group, the greater the number of cigarettes smoked, the less the reduction in pain intensity from pre-op to 24 months FU; the relationship was not significant for the TLIF group. The percentage of good global outcomes declined with time in the TS smokers such that by 24 months FU, there was a significant difference between TS smokers and TS-non-smokers. No such difference between smokers and non-smokers was evident in the TLIF group at any FU time. In conclusion, the TS technique was more vulnerable to the effects of smoking than was TLIF: possibly the more extensive stabilisation of the 360° fusion renders the environment less susceptible to the detrimental effects on bony fusion of cigarette smoking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Read RC (1984) Presidential address. Systemic effects of smoking. Am J Surg 148(6):706–711

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Krupski WC (1991) The peripheral vascular consequences of smoking. Ann Vasc Surg 5(3):291–304

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Silcox DH, IIIrd et al. (1995) The effect of nicotine on spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 20(14):1549–1553

  4. Blumenthal SL et al (1988) The role of anterior lumbar fusion for internal disc disruption. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 13(5):566–569

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Brown CW, Orme TJ, Richardson HD (1986) The rate of pseudarthrosis (surgical nonunion) in patients who are smokers and patients who are nonsmokers: a comparison study. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 11(9):942–943

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Hanley EN Jr, Levy JA (1989) Surgical treatment of isthmic lumbosacral spondylolisthesis. Analysis of variables influencing results. Spine (Phila Pa 1976), 14(1):48–50

    Google Scholar 

  7. Daftari TK et al (1994) Nicotine on the revascularization of bone graft. An experimental study in rabbits. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 19(8):904–911

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hollo I, Gergely I, Boross M (1977) Smoking results in calcitonin resistance. JAMA 237(23):2470

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. de Vernejoul MC et al. (1983) Evidence for defective osteoblastic function. A role for alcohol and tobacco consumption in osteoporosis in middle-aged men. Clin Orthop Relat Res (179):107–115

  10. Glassman SD et al (2000) The effect of cigarette smoking and smoking cessation on spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25(20):2608–2615

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Andersen T et al (2001) Smoking as a predictor of negative outcome in lumbar spinal fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 26(23):2623–2628

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Woertgen C et al (1997) Does the choice of outcome scale influence prognostic factors for lumbar disc surgery? A prospective, consecutive study of 121 patients. Eur Spine J 6(3):173–180

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Manniche C et al (1994) Analysis of preoperative prognostic factors in first-time surgery for lumbar disc herniation, including Finneson’s and modified Spengler’s score systems. Dan Med Bull 41(1):110–115

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Weir BK (1979) Prospective study of 100 lumbosacral discectomies. J Neurosurg 50(3):283–289

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Magerl F, WB (1985) Translaminäre Verschraubung der Intervertebralgelenke. Springer, Berlin, pp 315–317

  16. Aepli M, Mannion AF, Grob D (2009) Translaminar screw fixation of the lumbar spine: long-term outcome. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34(14):1492–1498

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tuli J et al (2007) A comparison of long-term outcomes of translaminar facet screw fixation and pedicle screw fixation: a prospective study. J Neurosurg Spine 7(3):287–292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Grob D et al (2009) A prospective, cohort study comparing translaminar screw fixation with transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and pedicle screw fixation for fusion of the degenerative lumbar spine. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(10):1347–1353

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Grob D, Humke T (1998) Translaminar screw fixation in the lumbar spine: technique, indications, results. Eur Spine J 7(3):178–186

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Humke T et al (1998) Translaminar screw fixation of the lumbar and lumbosacral spine. A 5-year follow-up. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(10):1180–1184

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Mannion AF et al (2005) Outcome assessment in low back pain: how low can you go? Eur Spine J 14(10):1014–1026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Deyo RA et al (1998) Outcome measures for low back pain research. A proposal for standardized use. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 23(18):2003–2013

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Ferrer M et al (2006) Validation of a minimum outcome core set in the evaluation of patients with back pain. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(12):1372–1379 (discussion 1380)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Mannion AF et al (2007) Pain measurement in patients with low back pain. Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol 3(11):610–618

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. White P, Lewith G, Prescott P (2004) The core outcomes for neck pain: validation of a new outcome measure. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 29(17):1923–1930

    Google Scholar 

  26. Anjarwalla N, Morcom RK, Fraser RD (2006) Supplementary stabilization with anterior lumbar intervertebral fusion—a radiologic review. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 31(11):1281–1287

    Google Scholar 

  27. Warner DO (2007) Tobacco dependence in surgical patients. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol 20(3):279–283

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Luca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Luca, A., Mannion, A.F. & Grob, D. Should smoking habit dictate the fusion technique?. Eur Spine J 20, 629–634 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1594-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-010-1594-4

Keywords

Navigation