Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Concerns regarding oral sulfate tablet versus polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
Journal of Gastroenterology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

A Letter to the Editor to this article was published on 27 April 2024

The Original Article was published on 16 March 2024

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Kang HS, Na SY, Yoon JY, et al. Efficacy, tolerability, and safety of oral sulfate tablet versus 2 L-polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients: prospective, multicenter, investigator single-blinded, randomized study. J Gastroenterol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-024-02089-9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Wang F, Huang X, Wang Z, et al. One-day versus three-day low-residue diet bowel preparation regimens before colonoscopy: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2024. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgh.16466.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Calderwood AH, Thompson KD, Schroy PC 3rd, et al. Good is better than excellent: bowel preparation quality and adenoma detection rates. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015;81:691–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Choi JM, Seo JY, Lee J, et al. Longer withdrawal time is more important than excellent bowel preparation in colonoscopy of adequate bowel preparation. Dig Dis Sci. 2021;66:1168–74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anderson JC, Butterly LF, Goodrich M, et al. Differences in detection rates of adenomas and serrated polyps in screening versus surveillance colonoscopies, based on the new hampshire colonoscopy registry. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013;11:1308–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

None.

Author information

Author notes

  1. Jia-Su Li and Zi-Xuan He contributed equally to the work.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Gastroenterology, Changhai Hospital, Naval Medical University, 168 Changhai Road, Shanghai, 200433, China

    Jia-Su Li, Zi-Xuan He, Zhao-Shen Li & Yu Bai

Authors
  1. Jia-Su Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Zi-Xuan He
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Zhao-Shen Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Yu Bai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

JSL and ZXH designed and drafted this manuscript. ZSL and YB revised it.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zhao-Shen Li or Yu Bai.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, JS., He, ZX., Li, ZS. et al. Concerns regarding oral sulfate tablet versus polyethylene glycol/ascorbate for bowel preparation in older patients. J Gastroenterol 59, 526–527 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-024-02107-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00535-024-02107-w

Search

Navigation