Abstract
In this paper, analytical expressions correlating the volumetric flow rate to the pressure drop are derived for the flow of Carreau and Cross fluids through straight rigid circular uniform pipes and long thin uniform plane slits. The derivation is based on the application of Weissenberg-Rabinowitsch-Mooney-Schofield (WRMS) method to obtain flow solutions for generalized Newtonian fluids through pipes and our adaptation of this method to the flow through slits. The derived expressions are validated by comparing their solutions to the solutions obtained from direct numerical integration. They are also validated by comparison to the solutions obtained from the variational method which we proposed previously. In all the investigated cases, the three methods agree very well. The agreement with the variational method also lends more support to this method and to the variational principle which the method is based upon. We also compared the derived analytical solutions of Carreau and Cross fluids to the analytical solutions of power law fluids with comparable rheology and observed logical trends in the relation between the corresponding flow rates as a function of the applied pressure field.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abraham F, Behr M, Heinkenschloss M (2005) Shape optimization in steady blood flow: a numerical study of non-Newtonian effects. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Eng 8(2):127–137
Balhoff M, Sanchez-Rivera D, Kwok A, Mehmani Y, Prodanović M (2012) Numerical algorithms for network modeling of yield stress and other non-Newtonian fluids in porous media. Transp Porous Media 93(3):363–379
Box F, van der Geest R, Rutten M, Reiber J (2005) The influence of flow, vessel diameter, and non-Newtonian blood viscosity on the wall shear stress in a carotid bifurcation model for unsteady flow. Investigative Radiology 40(5):277–294
Cannella W, Huh C, Seright R (1988) Prediction of xanthan rheology in porous media. SPE annual technical conference and exhibition, 2-5 October, Houston, Texas, SPE 18089
Chen J, Lu X-Y, Wang W (2006) Non-Newtonian effects of blood flow on hemodynamics in distal vascular graft anastomoses. Journal of Biomechanics 39:1983–1995
de Castro A, Omari A, Ahmadi-Sénichault A, Bruneau D (2014) Toward a new method of porosimetry: principles and experiments. Transp Porous Media 101(3):349–364
Desplanques S, Renou F, Grisel M, Malhiac C (2012) Impact of chemical composition of xanthan and acacia gums on the emulsification and stability of oil-in-water emulsions. Food Hydrocoll 27(2):401–410
Fisher C, Rossmann J (2009) Effect of non-Newtonian behavior on hemodynamics of cerebral aneurysms. Journal of Biomechanical Engineering 131(9):091004(1–9)
Georgiou G (2003) The time-dependent, compressible Poiseuille and extrudate-swell flows of a Carreau fluid with slip at the wall. J Non-Newtonian Fluid Mech 109(2-3):93–114
Gijsen F, Allanic E, van de Vosse F, Janssen J (1999) The influence of the non-Newtonian properties of blood on the flow in large arteries: unsteady flow in a 90° curved tube. J Biomech 32(6):601–608
Gijsen F, van de Vosse F, Janssen J (1998) Wall shear stress in backward-facing step flow of a red blood cell suspension. Biorheology 35(4-5):263–279
Hundertmark-Zaušková A, Lukáčová-Medvid’ová M (2010) Numerical study of shear-dependent non-Newtonian fluids in compliant vessels. Comput Math Appl 60(3):572–590
Jonášová A, Vimmr J (2008) Numerical simulation of non-Newtonian blood flow in bypass models. Proceedings in Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, 79th Annual Meeting of the International Association of Applied Mathematics and Mechanics, Bremen 2008 8(1):10179–10180
Kim Y, VandeVord P, Lee J (2008) Multiphase non-Newtonian effects on pulsatile hemodynamics in a coronary artery. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 58(7):803–825
Liu B, Tang D (2011) Non-Newtonian effects on the wall shear stress of the blood flow in stenotic right coronary arteries. Int Conf Comput Exp Eng Sci 17(2):55–60
Lopez X (2004) Pore-scale modelling of non-Newtonian flow. Ph. D. thesis, Imperial College London
Lopez X, Blunt M (2004) Predicting the impact of non-Newtonian rheology on relative permeability using pore-scale modeling. SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhibition, 26–29 September, Houston, Texas, SPE 89981
Lopez X, Valvatne P, Blunt M (2003) Predictive network modeling of single-phase non-Newtonian flow in porous media. J Colloid Interface Sci 264(1):256–265
Lukáčová-Medvid’ová M, Zaušková A (2008) Numerical modelling of shear-thinning non-Newtonian flows in compliant vessels. Int J Numer Methods Fluids 56(8):1409–1415
Molla M, Paul M (2012) LES of non-Newtonian physiological blood flow in a model of arterial stenosis. Med Eng Phys 34(8):1079–1087
Owens R, Phillips T (2002) Computational rheology. Imperial college press
Perrin C, Tardy P, Sorbie S, Crawshaw J (2006) Experimental and modeling study of Newtonian and non-Newtonian fluid flow in pore network micromodels. J Colloid Interface Sci 295(2):542–550
Sankar D, Ismail A (2009) Two-fluid mathematical models for blood flow in stenosed arteries: a comparative study. Boundary Value Problems 2009, 1–15
Skelland A (1967) Non-Newtonian flow and heat transfer. John Wiley and Sons Inc
Sochi T (2011) Slip at fluid-solid interface. Polym Rev 51(4):309–340
Sochi T (2014) Using the Euler-Lagrange variational principle to obtain flow relations for generalized Newtonian fluids. Rheol Acta 53(1):15–22
Sochi T (2015a) Further validation to the variational method to obtain flow relations for generalized Newtonian fluids. Korea-Australia Rheol J 27(2):113–124
Sochi T (2015b) Variational approach for the flow of Ree-Eyring and Casson fluids in pipes. Submitted. arXiv:1412.6209
Sorbie K (1991) Polymer-improved oil recovery. Blackie and Son Ltd
Sorbie K, Clifford P, Jones E (1989) The rheology of pseudoplastic fluids in porous media using network modeling. J Colloid Interface Sci 130(2):508–534
Tanner R (2000). Engineering rheology. (2nd ed.). Engineering rheology. Oxford University Press
Tosco T, Marchisio D, Lince F, Sethi R (2013) Extension of the Darcy-Forchheimer law for shear-thinning fluids and validation via pore-scale flow simulations. Transp Porous Media 96(1):1–20
Vimmr J, Jonás̆ová A (2008) On the modelling of steady generalized Newtonian flows in a 3D coronary bypass. Eng Mech 15(3):193–203
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Nomenclature
Nomenclature
- γ :
-
shear rate (s−1)
- γ w :
-
shear rate at conduit wall (s−1)
- δ :
-
μ o − μ i (Pa.s)
- λ :
-
characteristic time constant (s)
- μ:
-
dynamic shear viscosity of generalized Newtonian fluid (Pa.s)
- μi :
-
high-shear viscosity (Pa.s)
- μo :
-
low-shear viscosity (Pa.s)
- τ :
-
shear stress (Pa)
- τ w :
-
shear stress at conduit wall (Pa)
- B :
-
slit half height (m)
- f :
-
\(\lambda ^{m}{\gamma _{w}^{m}}\)
- 2 F 1 :
-
hypergeometric function
- g :
-
1 + f
- I :
-
definite integral expression (Pa3.s−1 for pipe and Pa2.s−1 for slit)
- k :
-
viscosity coefficient in power law model (Pa.sn -bar)
- L :
-
length of conduit (m)
- m :
-
indicial parameter in Cross model
- n :
-
flow behavior index in Carreau model
- n’ :
-
n − 1
- \(\overline {n}\) :
-
flow behavior index in power law model
- Δp :
-
pressure drop (Pa)
- Q :
-
volumetric flow rate (m3.s−1)
- r :
-
radius (m)
- R :
-
tube radius (m)
- v :
-
fluid velocity in the flow direction (m.s−1)
- W :
-
slit width (m)
- z :
-
coordinate of slit smallest dimension (m)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sochi, T. Analytical solutions for the flow of Carreau and Cross fluids in circular pipes and thin slits. Rheol Acta 54, 745–756 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-015-0863-x
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00397-015-0863-x