Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Onartuzumab with or without bevacizumab in combination with weekly paclitaxel does not prolong QTc or adversely affect other ECG parameters in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Cancer Chemotherapy and Pharmacology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The potential effect of onartuzumab, when administered with or without bevacizumab in combination with weekly paclitaxel, on the corrected QT interval (QTc) and other electrocardiogram (ECG) parameters, was investigated in a randomized, phase 2 study OAM4861g of first- or second-line therapy in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer.

Methods

Triplicate 12-lead ECGs were recorded at screening, pre- and post-dose on day 1 of cycles 1, 2, and 4, and at the study drug discontinuation visit (SDDV). Onartuzumab serum samples were collected pre- and post-dose on day 1 of cycles 1–4 and at the SDDV. Fridericia’s correction was applied to QT recordings (QTcF), and change from baseline (ΔQTcF) was calculated. Post-baseline measurements were reported as baseline-adjusted control arm (placebo plus bevacizumab plus paclitaxel)-corrected values (ΔΔQTcF). Categorical ECG findings were noted. Linear mixed effects modeling evaluated a potential concentration–ΔQTcF relationship.

Results

Out of 185 enrolled patients, 165 patients had ECG-evaluable data for analyses. Similar ΔQTcF and ΔΔQTcF values were observed across all treatment arms, with mean increase <10 and <7 ms, respectively, across all time points. Similar changes in heart rate, PR interval, and QRS duration were noted across all treatment arms. Incidences of abnormal ECG findings of clinical interest were comparable in the onartuzumab-containing arms and the control arm. No concentration–ΔQTcF relationship was evident at onartuzumab serum concentrations up to 1,200 μg/ml.

Conclusions

These data suggest that onartuzumab, at the dose and exposures studied in this clinical trial, does not meaningfully affect the QTcF interval.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Zagouri F, Bago-Horvath Z, Rössler F et al (2013) High MET expression is an adverse prognostic factor in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Br J Cancer 108:1100–1105

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Ho-Yen CM, Green AR, Rakha EA, Brentnall AR, Ellis IO, Kermorgant S, Jones JL (2014) C-Met in invasive breast cancer: is there a relationship with the basal-like subtype? Cancer 120:163–171

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Kim JY, Choi JS, Seo J et al (2014) MET is a potential target for use in combination therapy with EGFR inhibition in triple-negative/basal-like breast cancer. Int J Cancer 134:2424–2436

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Salgia R, Patel P, Bothos J et al (2014) Phase I dose-escalation study of onartuzumab as a single agent and in combination with bevacizumab in patients with advanced solid malignancies. Clin Cancer Res 20:1666–1675

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Spigel DR, Ervin TJ, Ramlau RA et al (2013) Randomized phase II trial of onartuzumab in combination with erlotinib in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol 31:4105–4114

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dieras V, Yardley DA, Romieu G et al (2013) A randomized, phase II, multicenter, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial evaluating onartuzumab with or without bevacizumab in combination with weekly paclitaxel in locally recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). Cancer Res 73(24 suppl):P2-16-01. doi:10.1158/0008-5472.SABCS13-P2-16-01

  7. European Medicines Agency (2005) The clinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for non-antiarrhythmic drugs E14 (CHMP/ICH/2/04). http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/Scientific_guideline/2009/09/WC500002879.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2014

  8. International Conference on Harmonization/US Food and Drug Administration Guidance for Industry (2005) E14 clinical evaluation of QT/QTc interval prolongation and proarrhythmic potential for non-antiarrhythmic drugs. http://www.fda.gov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformation/Guidances/ucm073153.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2014

  9. Rodriguez I, Erdman A, Padhi D et al (2010) Electrocardiographic assessment for therapeutic proteins—scientific discussion. Am Heart J 160:627–634

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu Q, Madabushi R, Garnett C, Booth B (2008) Experience in QT evaluation of oncology drug products since ICH E14 guidance. J Clin Oncol 26(15 suppl):125 (Abstract 2554)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Fridericia LS (2003) The duration of systole in an electrocardiogram in normal humans and in patients with heart disease. Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol 8:343–351

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Garnett CE, Beasley N, Bhattaram VA et al (2008) Concentration-QT relationships play a key role in the evaluation of proarrhythmic risk during regulatory review. J Clin Pharmacol 48:13–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Xin Y, Jin D, Eppler S et al (2013) Population pharmacokinetic analysis from phase I and phase II studies of the humanized monovalent antibody, onartuzumab (MetMAb), in patients with advanced solid tumors. J Clin Pharmacol 53:1103–1111

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Bednar MM, Harrigan EP, Anziano RJ, Camm AJ, Ruskin JN (2001) The QT interval. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 43(5 suppl 1):1–45

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. European Medicines Agency (1997) Anonymous Committee for Proprietary Medicinal Products (CPMP) points to consider: the assessment of the potential for QT interval prolongation by non-cardiovascular medicinal products. http://www.fda.gov/ohrms/dockets/ac/03/briefing/pubs/cpmp.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2014

  16. Rock EP, Finkle J, Fingert HJ et al (2009) Assessing proarrhythmic potential of drugs when optimal studies are infeasible. Am Heart J 157:827–836

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Yavas O, Yazici M, Eren O, Oyan B (2007) The acute effect of trastuzumab infusion on ECG parameters in metastatic breast cancer patients. Swiss Med Wkly 137:556–558

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Garg A, Li J, Clark E et al (2013) Exposure–response analysis of pertuzumab in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer: absence of effect on QTc prolongation and other ECG parameters. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 72:1133–1141

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Deeken JF, Shimkus B, Liem A et al (2013) Evaluation of the relationship between cetuximab therapy and corrected QT interval changes in patients with advanced malignancies from solid tumors. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 71:1473–1483

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Taxol® (Paclitaxel) US package insert. http://packageinserts.bms.com/pi/pi_taxol.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2014

  21. Avastin® (Bevacizumab) US package insert. http://www.gene.com/download/pdf/avastin_prescribing.pdf. Accessed 25 June 2014

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to acknowledge the contribution of Melinda Teng in developing an analysis plan and reviewing the ECG analyses. Support for third-party writing assistance for this manuscript was provided by Genentech, Inc.

Conflict of interest

The study was funded by F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd., Basel, Switzerland, and Genentech, Inc., a member of the Roche Group, South San Francisco, CA, USA. MTB was a paid consultant of Genentech, Inc. for this project. MC is an employee of F. Hoffmann-La Roche Ltd. SM, WA, SP, and MS are Genentech employees and own Roche stock. IR and JC are Pharsight employees.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mark Stroh.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOC 133 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Borin, M.T., Chen, M., Mocci, S. et al. Onartuzumab with or without bevacizumab in combination with weekly paclitaxel does not prolong QTc or adversely affect other ECG parameters in patients with locally recurrent or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol 75, 401–410 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-014-2652-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00280-014-2652-0

Keywords

Navigation