Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of porcine antihuman lymphocyte immunoglobulin compared to rabbit antithymocyte immunoglobulin as a first-line treatment against acquired severe aplastic anemia

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Annals of Hematology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Immunosuppressive therapy (IST) with antithymocyte immunoglobulin (ATG) or antilymphocyte immunoglobulin (ALG) and cyclosporine A (CsA) is the treatment of choice against severe aplastic anemia (SAA) worldwide. However, a comparison of the efficacy of porcine ALG (pALG) and rabbit ATG (rATG) as a first-line treatment for acquired SAA has not been reported. In the present study, we retrospectively analyzed SAA patients treated with either pALG (n = 43) or rATG (n = 32) and compared their hematologic responses and survivals. There were no significant differences in overall response (OR) rates between pALG and rATG groups at 3 months (OR 41.86 versus 40.62 % (P = 0.914), 6 months (OR 66.67 versus 61.29 % (P = 0.635), 9 months (OR 69.05 versus 61.29 % (P = 0.490), or 12 months (OR 69.05 versus 64.51 % (P = 0.684), respectively. The OR rates in patients with SAA or very severe aplastic anemia (vSAA) in both groups were similar after a 12-month treatment (pALG 74.07 versus 60.00 %, P = 0.550; rATG 70.00 versus 54.55 %, P = 0.640). Patients who experienced <30-day interval between diagnosis and treatment displayed higher OR rates (at 12 months) than those with intervals ≥30 days (pALG 83.33 versus 50.00 %, P = 0.021; rATG 87.50 versus 40.00 %, P = 0.006). There were no significant differences in 2-year overall survival (OS) between pALG (87.4 ± 6.2 %) and rATG (83.2 ± 7.8 %) (P = 0.493). Infection was the major cause of death in both groups. In summary, pALG + CsA showed similar efficacy as rATG + CsA, as a first-line treatment for acquired SAA.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brodsky RA, Jones RJ (2005) Aplastic anemia. Lancet 365:1647–1656

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Marsh JC, Ball SE, Cavenagh J et al (2009) Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of aplastic anaemia. Br J Haematol 147:43–70

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Scheinberg P (2012) Aplastic anemia: therapeutic updates in immunosuppression and transplantation. Hematol Am Soc Hematol Educ Prog 2012:292–300

    Google Scholar 

  4. Young NS, Calado RT, Scheinberg P (2006) Current concepts in the pathophysiology and treatment of aplastic anemia. Blood 108:2509–2519

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Scheinberg P, Young NS (2012) How I treat acquired aplastic anemia. Blood 120:1185–1196

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Scheinberg P, Wu CO, Nunez O et al (2008) Long-term outcome of pediatric patients with severe aplastic anemia treated with antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine. J Pediatr 153:814–819

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Huang IA, Jaing TH, Yang CP et al (2009) Single-Center Experience: immunosuppressive therapy as frontline treatment for 33 children with acquired severe aplastic anemia. Pediatr Hematol Oncol 26:487–495

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fuhrer M, Rampf U, Baumann I et al (2005) Immunosuppressive therapy for aplastic anemia in children: a more severe disease predicts better survival. Blood 106:2102–2104

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Scheinberg P, Wu CO, Nunez O et al (2009) Predicting response to immunosuppressive therapy and survival in severe aplastic anaemia. Br J Haematol 144:206–216

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tichelli A, Schrezenmeier H, Socie G et al (2011) A randomized controlled study in patients with newly diagnosed severe aplastic anemia receiving antithymocyte globulin (ATG), cyclosporine, with or without G-CSF: a study of the SAA Working Party of the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation. Blood 117:4434–4441

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Scheinberg P, Nunez O, Young NS (2006) Retreatment with rabbit anti-thymocyte globulin andciclosporin for patients with relapsed or refractory severe aplastic anaemia. Br J Haematol 133:622–627

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Di Bona E, Rodeghiero F, Bruno B et al (1999) Rabbit antithymocyte globulin (r-ATG) plus cyclosporine and granulocyte colony stimulating factor is an effective treatment for aplastic anaemia patients unresponsive to a first course of intensive immunosuppressive therapy: Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo (GITMO). Br J Haematol 107:330–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Atta EA, Dias SP D, Marra VLN et al (2010) Comparison between horse and rabbit antithymocyte globulin as first-line treatment for patients with severe aplastic anemia: a single centre retrospective study. Ann Hematol 89:851–859

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Halkes CJM, Brand A, von dem Borne PA et al (2011) Increasing the dose of rabbit-ATG does not lead to a higher response rate in the first-line treatment of severe aplastic anaemia. Bone Marrow Transplant 46:S90–S389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kadia T, Ravandi F, Garcia-Manero G et al (2010) Updated results of combination cytokine immunotherapy in the treatment of aplastic anaemia and myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) [abstract]. Blood 116(Suppl):2920, ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts

    Google Scholar 

  16. Saracco P, Lorenzati A, Oneto R et al (2011) Italian Registry of Pediatric Acquired Aplastic Anaemia: a retrospective study. Bone Marrow Transplant 46:S90–S389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Marsh JC, Bacigalupo A, Schrezenmeier H et al (2012) Prospective study of rabbit antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporine for aplastic anemia from the EBMT Severe Aplastic AnaemiaWorking Party. Blood 119:5391–5396

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Vallejo C, Montesinos P, Rosell A et al (2009) Comparison between lymphoglobuline- and thymoglobuline-based immunosuppressive therapy as firstline treatment for patients with aplastic anemia [abstract]. Blood 114:3194a, ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts

    Google Scholar 

  19. Yamazaki H, Saito C, Sugimori N et al (2011) Thymoglobuline is as effective as Lymphoglobuline in Japanese patients with aplastic anemia possessing increased glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchored protein (GPI-AP) deficient cells [abstract]. Blood 118:1339, ASH Annual Meeting Abstracts

    Google Scholar 

  20. Jeong D-C, Chung NG, Lee JW et al (2011) Long-term outcome of immunosuppressive therapy with rabbit Antithymocyte Globulin (rATG) for childhood severe aplastic anemia for 15 years [abstract]. Blood 118:1346

    Google Scholar 

  21. Red Blood Cells (anemia) Group of Hematology Branch of the Chinese Medical Association (2010) Expert consensus on the diagnosis and treatment for aplastic anemia. Chin J Hematol 31:790–792 (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. Bing H, Siyi Y, Wei Z et al (2010) The use of anti-human T lymphocyte porcine immunoglobulin and cyclosporine A to treat patients with acquired severe aplastic anemia. Acta Haematol 124:245–250

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Afable MG, Shaik M, Sugimoto Y et al (2011) Efficacy of rabbit antithymocyte globulin in severe aplastic anemia. Haematologica 96:1269–1275

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Chen AP, Setser A, Anadkat MJ, Cotliar J, Olsen EA, Garden BC et al (2012) Grading dermatologic adverse events of cancer treatments: the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 4.0. J Am Acad Dermatol 67:1025–1039

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Teramura M, Kimura A, Iwase S et al (2007) Treatment of severe aplastic anemia with antithymocyte globulin and cyclosporin A with or without G-CSF in adults: a multicenter randomized study in Japan. Blood 110:1756–1761

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Scheinberg P, Nunez O, Weinstein B et al (2011) Horse versus rabbit antithymocyte globulin in acquired aplastic anemia. N Engl J Med 365:430–438

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Hattori M, Terasawa T, Tsushita K et al (2008) The status of antithymocyte globulin therapy for adult patients in Japan: retrospective analysis of a nationwide survey. Int J Hematol 87:48–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Barcigalupo A, Broccia G, Corda G et al (1995) the European Group for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT) Working Party on SAA: Antilymphocyte globulin, cyclosporine, and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor in patients with acquired severe aplastic anemia (SAA): a pilot study on the EBMT SAA Working Party. Blood 85:1348–1353

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the Network Hospital of Clinical Medicine Science and Technology Project, Jiangsu Science and Technology Department (No. BL2012005), Hematology Academician Workstation of Huai’an City (No. HAP201321), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions (PAPD), Jiangsu Province’s Key Medical Center (ZX201102), National Clinical Key Specialty Development Project, and National Public Health Grand Research Foundation (No. 201202017).

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Yanming Zhang or Depei Wu.

Additional information

Limin Liu, Li Ding, and Lin Hao contributed equally to this paper. They are co-first authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, L., Ding, L., Hao, L. et al. Efficacy of porcine antihuman lymphocyte immunoglobulin compared to rabbit antithymocyte immunoglobulin as a first-line treatment against acquired severe aplastic anemia. Ann Hematol 94, 729–737 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-014-2279-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00277-014-2279-6

Keywords

Navigation