References
Ilyas H, Mikhaeel NG, Dunn JT, Rahman F, Møller H, Smith D, et al. Defining the optimal method for measuring baseline metabolic tumour volume in diffuse large B cell lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-3953-z.
Bland JM, Altman DG. Measuring agreement in method comparison studies. Stat Methods Med Res. 1999;8(2):135–60.
JCGM. Evaluation of measurement data — Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. 2008. www.bipm.org, September 2008.
Barrington SF, Sulkin T, Forbes A, PWM J. All that glitters is not gold - new reconstruction methods using Deauville criteria for patient reporting. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2018;45:316–7.
Laffon E, Marthan R. On the cutoff of baseline total metabolic tumor volume in high-tumor-burden follicular lymphoma. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:919–20.
Meignan M, Cottereau AS, Versari A, Chartier L, Dupuis J, Boussetta S, et al. Reply to H.J.A. Adams et al and E. Laffon et al. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:920–3.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Research involving human participants and/or animals
Not applicable.
Informed consent
Not applicable.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Laffon, E., Marthan, R. Optimal method for measuring baseline metabolic tumor volume in DLBCL patients: are statistical agreements of SUV ≥2.5 satisfactory?. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45, 1832–1833 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4049-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-018-4049-5