Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

All that glitters is not gold - new reconstruction methods using Deauville criteria for patient reporting

  • Letter to the Editor
  • Published:
European Journal of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging Aims and scope Submit manuscript

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Meignan M, Gallamini A, Meignan M, Gallamini A, Haioun C. Report on the first international workshop on interim-PET-scan in lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma. 2009;50:1257–60.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aide N, Lasnon C, Veit-Haibach P, Sera T, Sattler B, Boellaard R. EANM/EARL harmonization strategies in PET quantification: from daily practice to multicentre oncological studies. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:17–31.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Q.Clear - PET/CT Applications - PET/CT - Molecular Imaging - Nuclear Medicine\PET-CT\PET-Radiopharmacy - Products. Accessed 10/25/2017 2017.

  4. Johnson P, Federico M, Fossa A, O'Doherty M, Roberts T, Stevens L, et al. Response-adapted therapy based on interim FDG-PET scans in advanced Hodgkin lymphoma first analysis of the safety of de-escalation and efficacy of escalation in the international RATHL study (CRUK/07/033). Hematol Oncol. 2015;33:100–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. mi_emea_sharpir_white_paper_pdf_092010_doc0852276.pdf. Accessed 10/25/2017 2017.

  6. Panin VY, Kehren F, Michel C, Casey M. Fully 3-D PET reconstruction with system matrix derived from point source measurements. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2006;25:907–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. van der Vos CS, Koopman D, Rijnsdorp S, Arends AJ, Boellaard R, van Dalen JA, et al. Quantification, improvement, and harmonization of small lesion detection with state-of-the-art PET. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2017;44:4–16.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Alessio AM, Stearns CW, Tong S, Ross SG, Kohlmyer S, Ganin A, et al. Application and evaluation of a measured spatially variant system model for PET image reconstruction. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2010;29:938–49.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Bettinardi V, Presotto L, Rapisarda E, Picchio M, Gianolli L, Gilardi MC. Physical performance of the new hybrid PETCT Discovery-690. Med Phys. 2011;38:5394–411.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Teoh EJ, McGowan DR, Bradley KM, Belcher E, Black E, Gleeson FV. Novel penalised likelihood reconstruction of PET in the assessment of histologically verified small pulmonary nodules. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:576–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Teoh EJ, McGowan DR, Bradley KM, Belcher E, Black E, Moore A, et al. 18F-FDG PET/CT assessment of histopathologically confirmed mediastinal lymph nodes in non-small cell lung cancer using a penalised likelihood reconstruction. Eur Radiol. 2016;26:4098–106.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Parvizi N, Franklin JM, McGowan DR, Teoh EJ, Bradley KM, Gleeson FV. Does a novel penalized likelihood reconstruction of 18F-FDG PET-CT improve signal-to-background in colorectal liver metastases? Eur J Radiol. 2015;84:1873–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kuhnert G, Boellaard R, Sterzer S, Kahraman D, Scheffler M, Wolf J, et al. Impact of PET/CT image reconstruction methods and liver uptake normalization strategies on quantitative image analysis. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging. 2016;43:249–58.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Quak E, Le Roux PY, Lasnon C, Robin P, Hofman MS, Bourhis D, Callahan J, Binns DS, Desmonts C, Salaun PY, Hicks RJ, Aide N. Does PET SUV Harmonization affect PERCIST response classification?. J Nucl Med 2016;57:1699–1706.

  15. Cheson BD, Fisher RI, Barrington SF, Cavalli F, Schwartz LH, Zucca E, et al. Recommendations for initial evaluation, staging, and response assessment of Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphoma: the Lugano classification. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3059–68.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Andre MPE, Girinsky T, Federico M, Reman O, Fortpied C, Gotti M, et al. Early positron emission tomography response-adapted treatment in stage I and II Hodgkin lymphoma: final results of the randomized EORTC/LYSA/FIL H10 trial. J Clin Oncol. 2017;35:1786–94.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Engert A, Haverkamp H, Kobe C, Markova J, Renner C, Ho A, et al. Reduced-intensity chemotherapy and PET-guided radiotherapy in patients with advanced stage Hodgkin's lymphoma (HD15 trial): a randomised, open-label, phase 3 non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2012;379:1791–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Radford J, Illidge T, Counsell N, Hancock B, Pettengell R, Johnson P, et al. Results of a trial of PET-directed therapy for early-stage Hodgkin's lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:1598–607.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. EQPET_WP.indd - eq-pet_wp-02580275.pdf. Accessed 11/10/2017 2017.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. KCL and Guy’s and St Thomas’ PET Centre, School of Biomedical Engineering and Imaging Sciences, King’s College London, London, UK

    Sally F. Barrington

  2. Clinical Imaging Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK

    Tom Sulkin

  3. Haematology Department, Royal Cornwall Hospital, Truro, UK

    Adam Forbes

  4. Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, UK

    Peter W. M. Johnson

Authors
  1. Sally F. Barrington
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Tom Sulkin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Adam Forbes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Peter W. M. Johnson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sally F. Barrington.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare they have no conflicts of interest related to this submission.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barrington, S.F., Sulkin, T., Forbes, A. et al. All that glitters is not gold - new reconstruction methods using Deauville criteria for patient reporting. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 45, 316–317 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3893-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00259-017-3893-z

Search

Navigation