Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for catheter-related thrombosis in children

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Compared with consultative US performed by the radiology department, point-of-care US performed by non-radiology physicians can accurately diagnose deep venous thrombosis in adults.

Objective

In preparation for a multicenter randomized controlled trial, we determined the accuracy of point-of-care US in diagnosing central venous catheter-related thrombosis in critically ill children.

Materials and methods

Children <18 years old with a central venous catheter who were admitted to the intensive care unit were enrolled. Consultative and point-of-care compression ultrasounds with Doppler were done on the vein where the catheter was inserted within 24 h after insertion. Repeat US was obtained within 24 h of removal of the catheter. All images were centrally, blindly and independently adjudicated for thrombosis by a team of pediatric radiologists. Chance-corrected agreement between readings was calculated.

Results

From 84 children, 152 pairs of consultative and point-of-care ultrasounds were analyzed. A total of 38 (25.0%) consultative and 17 (11.2%) point-of-care ultrasounds were positive for thrombosis. The chance-corrected agreement between consultative and point-of-care ultrasounds was 0.17 (standard error: 0.07; P = 0.008). With consultative US as a reference, the sensitivity of point-of-care US was 28.1% (95% confidence interval: 13.7%-46.7%) with a specificity of 91.8% (95% confidence interval: 84.4%-96.4%). A catheter in the subclavian vein was associated with discordant readings (adjusted odds ratio: 4.00; 95% confidence interval: 1.45-13.94).

Conclusion

Point-of-care US, when performed by non-radiology physicians and centrally adjudicated by pediatric radiologists in the setting of a multicenter randomized controlled trial, may not accurately diagnose catheter-related thrombosis in critically ill children.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mitchell LG, Male C (2011) Outcome measures in interventional trials for prevention or treatment of venous thrombosis in the pediatric population. Semin Thromb Hemost 37:840–847

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Monagle P, Adams M, Mahoney M et al (2000) Outcome of pediatric thromboembolic disease: a report from the Canadian childhood thrombophilia registry. Pediatr Res 47:763–766

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Massicotte MP, Sofronas M, deVeber G (2006) Difficulties in performing clinical trials of antithrombotic therapy in neonates and children. Thromb Res 118:153–163

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kory PD, Pellecchia CM, Shiloh AL et al (2011) Accuracy of ultrasonography performed by critical care physicians for the diagnosis of DVT. Chest 139:538–542

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Caronia J, Sarzynski A, Tofighi B et al (2014) Resident performed two-point compression ultrasound is inadequate for diagnosis of deep vein thrombosis in the critically III. J Thromb Thrombolysis 37:298–302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Pomero F, Dentali F, Borretta V et al (2013) Accuracy of emergency physician-performed ultrasonography in the diagnosis of deep-vein thrombosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Thromb Haemost 109:137–145

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Faustino EV, Li S, Silva CT et al (2015) Factor VIII may predict catheter-related thrombosis in critically ill children: a preliminary study. Pediatr Crit Care Med 16:497–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Faustino EV, Spinella PC, Li S et al (2013) Incidence and acute complications of asymptomatic central venous catheter-related deep venous thrombosis in critically ill children. J Pediatr 162:387–391

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Beck C, Dubois J, Grignon A et al (1998) Incidence and risk factors of catheter-related deep vein thrombosis in a pediatric intensive care unit: a prospective study. J Pediatr 133:237–241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Schouten HJ (1993) Estimating kappa from binocular data and comparing marginal probabilities. Stat Med 12:2207–2217

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Vidal E, Sharathkumar A, Glover J et al (2014) Central venous catheter-related thrombosis and thromboprophylaxis in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Thromb Haemost 12:1096–1109

    Article  CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Male C, Julian JA, Massicotte P et al (2005) Significant association with location of central venous line placement and risk of venous thrombosis in children. Thromb Haemost 94:516–521

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Male C, Chait P, Ginsberg JS et al (2002) Comparison of venography and ultrasound for the diagnosis of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in the upper body in children: results of the PARKAA study. Prophylactic antithrombin replacement in kids with ALL treated with asparaginase. Thromb Haemost 87:593–598

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Flegal KM, Cole TJ (2013) Construction of LMS parameters for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention 2000 growth charts. Natl Health Stat Report:1–3

  15. Larsen K, Petersen JH, Budtz-Jorgensen E et al (2000) Interpreting parameters in the logistic regression model with random effects. Biometrics 56:909–914

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Blaivas M (2010) Point-of-care ultrasonographic deep venous thrombosis evaluation after just ten minutes' training: Is this offer too good to be true? Ann Emerg Med 56:611–613

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Crisp JG, Lovato LM, Jang TB (2010) Compression ultrasonography of the lower extremity with portable vascular ultrasonography can accurately detect deep venous thrombosis in the emergency department. Ann Emerg Med 56:601–610

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lamontagne F, McIntyre L, Dodek P et al (2014) Nonleg venous thrombosis in critically ill adults: a nested prospective cohort study. JAMA Intern Med 174:689–696

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Cook D, Meade M, Guyatt G et al (2011) Dalteparin versus unfractionated heparin in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 364:1305–1314

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Kassai B, Boissel JP, Cucherat M et al (2004) A systematic review of the accuracy of ultrasound in the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis in asymptomatic patients. Thromb Haemost 91:655–666

    CAS  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported in part by grants to Dr. Polikoff from the National Institutes of Health (T32 HD068201), and to Dr. Faustino from the National Institutes of Health (CTSA Grants Numbers UL1 TR000142 and KL2 TR000140) and American Heart Association (Award Number 14CRP20490002).

Conflicts of interest

None

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. Vincent S. Faustino.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, S., Silva, C.T., Brudnicki, A.R. et al. Diagnostic accuracy of point-of-care ultrasound for catheter-related thrombosis in children. Pediatr Radiol 46, 219–228 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3467-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-015-3467-9

Keywords

Navigation