Skip to main content
Log in

Functional morphology of the locomotory podia ofHolothuria forskali (Echinodermata, Holothuroida)

  • Published:
Zoomorphology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The ventral surface ofHolothuria forskali (Holothuroida, Aspidochirotida) is almost completely covered by small-sized podia that are locomotory. Each podium consists of a stem that allows the podium to lengthen, to flex, and to retract, and this is topped by a disc that allows the podium to adhere to the substratum during locomotion. Podia ofH. forskali do not end in a sucker and their adhesion to the substratum thus relies entirely on the disc epidermal secretions. The disc epidermis is made of five cell types: non-ciliated secretory cells of two different types that contain granules whose content is either mucopolysaccharidic (NCS1 cells) or mucopolysaccharidic and proteinic in nature (NCS2 cells), ciliated secretory cells containing small granules of unknown nature (CS cells), cilitated nonsecretory cells (CNS cells), and support cells. The cilia ofCS cells are subcuticular whereas those ofCNS cells, although also short and rigid, traverse the cuticle and protrude in the outer medium. During locomotion, epidermal cells of the podial disc are presumably involved in an adhesive/de-adhesive process functioning as a duogland adhesive system. Adhesive secretions would be produced byNCS1 andNCS2 cells and de-adhesive secretion byCS cells. All these secretions would be controlled by stimulations of the two types of ciliated cells (receptor cells) which presumably interact with the secretory cells by way of the nerve plexus. The lack of suckers and the coexistence of two adhesive cell types in the disc epidermis give the locomotory podia ofH. forskali a “compromise” structure which would perhaps explain their ability to move as efficiently along soft and hard substrata.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ball B, Jangoux M (1990) Ultrastructure of the tube foot sensorysecretory complex inOphiocomina nigra (Echinodermata, Ophiuridea). Zoomorphology 109:201–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Bouland C, Massin C, Jangoux M (1982) The fine structure of the buccal tentacles ofHolothuria for skali (Echinodermata, Holothuroidea). Zoomorphology 101:133–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron JL, Fankboner PV (1984) Tentacle structure and feeding processes in life stages of the commercial sea cucumberParastichopus californicus (Stimpson). J Exp Mar Biol Ecol 81:193–209

    Google Scholar 

  • Coleman R (1969) Ultrastructure of the tube foot sucker of a regular echinoid,Diadema antillarum Philippi, with special reference to the secretory cells. Z Zellforsch Mikrosk Anat 96:151–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Dietrich HF, Fontaine AR (1975) A decalcification method for ultrastructure of echinoderm tissues. Stain Technol 50(5):351–354

    Google Scholar 

  • Flammang P, De Ridder C, Jangoux M (1990) Morphologie fonctionnelle des podia pénicillés chez l'échinide fouisseurEchinocardium cordatum (Echinodermata). In: De Ridder C, Dubois Ph, Lahaye M-C, Jangoux M (eds) Echinoderm Research. Balkema, Rotterdam, pp 233–238

    Google Scholar 

  • Flammang P, De Ridder C, Jangoux M (1991) Ultrastructure of the penicillate podia of the spatangoid echinoidEchinocardium cordatum (Echinodermata) with special emphasis on the epidermal sensory-secretory complexes. Acta Zool (Stockholm) 72:151–158

    Google Scholar 

  • Florey E, Cahill MA (1977) Ultrastructure of sea urchin tube feet. Evidence for connective tissue involvement in motor control. Cell Tissue Res 177:195–214

    Google Scholar 

  • Ganter P, Jollés G (1969–1970) Histochimie normale et pathologique, vol1 et 2. Gauthiers-Villars, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison G (1968) Subcellular particles in echinoderm tube feet. II. Class Holothuroidea. J Ultrastruct Res 23:124–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Harrison G, Philpott D (1966) Subcellular particles in echinoderm tube feet. I. Class Asteroidea. J Ultrastruct Res 16:537–547

    Google Scholar 

  • Hermans CO (1983) The duo-gland adhesive system. Oceanogr Mar Biol Ann Rev 21:281–339

    Google Scholar 

  • Hyman LH (1955) The Invertebrates, vol 4. Echinodermata. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kawaguti S (1964) Electron microscopic structure of the podial wall of an echinoid with special references to the nerve plexus and the muscle. Biol J Okayama Univ 10:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Lahaye M-C, Jangoux M (1985) Functional morphology of the podia and ambulacral grooves of the comatulid crinoidAntedon bifida (Echinodermata). Mar Biol 86:307–318

    Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence JM (1987) A functional Biology of Echinoderms. Croom Helm, London, Sidney

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie JD (1987) The ultrastructure of the tentacles of eleven species of dendrochirote holothurians studied with special reference to surface coats and papillae. Cell Tissue Res 248:187–199

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie JD (1988a) Ultrastructure of the tentacles of the apodous holothurianLeptosynapta spp (Holothuroidea:Echinodermata) with special reference to the epidermis and surface coats. Cell Tissue Res 251:387–397

    Google Scholar 

  • McKenzie JD (1988b) The ultrastructure of tube foot epidermal cells and secretions: their relationship to the duo-glandular hypothesis and the phylogeny of the echinoderm classes. In: Paul CRC, Smith AB (eds) Echinoderm Phylogeny and Evolutionary Biology. Clarendon Press, Oxford, pp 287–298

    Google Scholar 

  • Menton DN, Eisen AZ (1970) The structure of the integument of the sea cucumber,Thyone briareus. J Morphol 131:17–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Nichols D (1966) Functional morphology of the water-vascular system. In: Boolootian RA (ed) Physiology of Echinodermata. Interscience Publishers, New York, pp 219–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Sedmak JJ, Grossberg SE (1977) A rapide, sensitive, and versatile assay for protein using Coomassie Brilliant blue G250. Anal Biochem 79:544–552

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith JE (1937) The structure and function of the tube feet in certain echinoderms. J Mar Biol Assoc UK 22:345–357

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith TB (1983) Tentacular ultrastructure and feeding behaviour ofNeopentadactyla mixta (Holothuroidea:Dendrochirota). J Mar Biol Assoc UK 63:301–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza Santos H, Silva Sasso W (1968) Morphological and histochemical studies on the secretory glands of starfish tube feet. Acta Anat 69:41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood RL, Cavey MJ (1981) Ultrastructure of the coelomic lining in the podium of the starfishStylasterias forreri. Cell Tissue Res 218:449–473

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Flammang, P., Jangoux, M. Functional morphology of the locomotory podia ofHolothuria forskali (Echinodermata, Holothuroida). Zoomorphology 111, 167–178 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01632906

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01632906

Keywords

Navigation