Skip to main content
Log in

Metadoc: An adaptive hypertext reading system

  • Published:
User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Presentation of textual information is undergoing rapid transition. Millennia of experience writing linear documents is gradually being discarded in favor of non-linear hypertext writing. In this paper, we investigate how hypertext — in its current node-and-link form — can be augmented by an adaptive, user-model-driven tool. Currently the reader of a document has to adapt to that document — if the detail level is wrong the reader either skims the document or has to consult additional sources of information for clarification. The MetaDoc system not only has hypertext capabilities but also has knowledge about the documents it represents. This knowledge enables the document to modify its level of presentation to suit the user. MetaDoc builds and dynamically maintains a user model for each reader. The model tailors the presentation of the document to the reader. The three-dimensionality of MetaDoc allows the text presented to be changed either by the user model or through explicit user action. MetaDoc is more a documentation reading system rather than a hypertext navigation or reading tool. MetaDoc is a fully developed and debugged system that has been applied to technical documentation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akscyn, R., D. McCracken and E. Yoder: 1987, ‘KMS: A Distributed Hypermedia System for Managing Knowledge In Organizations’,Proceedings of Hypertext'87. Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, M.: 1988, ‘The Bookmark and the Compass: Orientation Tools for Hypertext Users’, ACMS1GOIS Bulletin 9 (4), 34–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, P. J.: 1987, ‘Turning Ideas into Products: The Guide System’,Proceedings of Hypertext'87. Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chin, D.: 1986, ‘User Modelling in UC: the Unix Consultant’,Proceedings of the CHI-86 Conference. Boston.

  • Dynatext Corp: 1990, One Richmond Square. Providence, Rhode Island.

  • Egan, D, J. R. Remde, T. K. Landauer, C. C. Lochbaum and L. M. Gornez: 1989, ‘Behavioral Analysis of a Hypertext Browser’,Proceedings of CHI 89. Addison Wesley.

  • Finin, T.: 1988, ‘Default Reasoning and Stereotypes’,International Journal of Expert Systems 1 (2), 131–158.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisse, M. E.: 1987, ‘Searching for Information on a Hypertext Medical Handbook’,Proceedings of Hypertext'87. ACM Press, Baltimore, MD, pp. 57–66.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frisse, M.F., S. B. Cousins: 1989, ‘Query by Browsing: An Alternate Hypertext Information Retrieval Method’,Proceedings of the 13th Annual Symposium on Computer Applications inMedical Care. IEEE Computer Society Press.

  • Furnas, G. W.: 1986, ‘Generalized Fisheye Views’,Proceedings of the 1986 ACM Conference of Human Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 16–23.

  • Guthrie, J. T. and I. S. Kirsch.: 1987, ‘Distinctions Between Reading Comprehension and Locating Information in Text’,Journal of Educational Psychology 79, 220–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Halasz, F. T. Moran, and R. Trigg: 1987, ‘NoteCards in a nutshell’,Proceedings of the CHI '87 Conference. Toronto, Canada, pp. 45–52.

  • IBMa: IBM Advanced Workstations Division, Austin, Texas.

  • IBMb: IBM Entry Systems Division, Austin, Texas.

  • Interleaf Inc.: 1990, Waltham, MA.

  • Kobsa, A. and W. Wahlster: 1989,User Models in Dialog Systems. Berlin, Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korfhage, R. R.: 1985, ‘Intelligent Information Retrieval: Issues in User Modelling’,Conference paper in Expert Systems in Government Symposium. IEEE Computer Society Press, Washington, DC.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, T.: 1971, ‘Computopia and Cybercrud’, in: Levien (ed.):Computers in Instruction. The Rand Corporation.

  • Nielsen, J.: 1990,Hypertext and Hypermedia. Academic Press, NY.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen, J. and U. Lyngbaek: 1989, ‘Two Field Studies of Hypermedia Usability’,Proceedings Hypertext2 Conference. York, United Kingdom, pp. 29–30.

  • Reinking, D. and R. Schreiner: 1985, ‘The Effects of Computer-mediated Text on Measures of Reading Comprehension and Reading Behavior’,Reading Research Quarterly, Fall 1985, 536–552.

  • Rich, E.: 1983, ‘Users Are Individuals: Individualizing User Models’,International Journal of Man-Machine Studies 18, 199–214.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schnase, J., J. Leggett, C. Kacmar and C. Boyle: 1988, ‘A Comparison of Hypertext Systems’,TAMU Technical Report 88-017. Dept. of Computer Science, Texas A&M University, College Station, TX.

    Google Scholar 

  • Texas Instruments (1988), Austin, TX

  • Yankelovich, N., N. Meyrowitz and A. van Dam: 1985, ‘Reading and Writing the Electronic Book’,IEEE Computer, Oct. 1985, 15–30.

  • Yankelovich, N., B. J. Haan, N. Meyrowitz, and S. M. Drucker: 1988, ‘Intermedia: The Concept and the Construction of a Seamless Information Environment’,IEEE Computer, Jan. 1988, 81–96.

  • Zellweger, P.: 1989, ‘Scripted Documents: A Hypermedia Path Mechanism’,Proceedings of Hypertext'89. Seattle, Washington.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Boyle, C., Encarnacion, A.O. Metadoc: An adaptive hypertext reading system. User Model User-Adap Inter 4, 1–19 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142355

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01142355

Key words

Navigation