Abstract
Phillip Johnson claims that Creationism is a better explanation of the existence and characteristics of biological species than is evolutionary theory. He argues that the only reason biologists do not recognize that Creationist's negative arguments against Darwinism have proven this is that they are wedded to a biased ideological philosophy —Naturalism — which dogmatically denies the possibility of an intervening creative god. However, Johnson fails to distinguish Ontological Naturalism from Methodological Naturalism. Science makes use of the latter and I show how it is not dogmatic but follows from sound requirements for empirical evidential testing. Furthermore, Johnson has no serious alternative type of positive evidence to offer for Creationism, and purely negative argumentation, despite his attempt to legitimate it, will not suffice.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Berra, T. M.: 1990, Evolution and the Myth of Creationism, Stanford, Stanford Univ. Press.
Bocarsly, A. et al.: 1993, ‘Ad Hoc Origins Committee's Letter to Colleagues’.
Culliton, B.J.: 1989, ‘The Dismal State of Scientific Literacy’, Science 243, 600.
Gould, S.J.: 1965, ‘Is Uniformitarianism Necessary?’, American Journal of Science 265, 223–228.
Johnson, P.E.: 1990, Evolution as Dogma: The Establishment of Naturalism, U.S.A.: Haughton Publishing Company.
Johnson, P.E.: 1991, Darwin on Trial, Washington, D.C., Regnery Gateway.
Johnson, P.E.: 1992, ‘Darwinism on Trial’ (Video), Pasadena, CA, Reasons to Believe.
Kitcher, P.: 1982, Abusing Science: The Case Against Creationism, U.S.A., The MIT Press.
Provine, W.B.: 1990, ‘Response to Phillip Johnson’, in P.E. Johnson, Evolution as Dogma: The Establishment of Naturalism, U.S.A., Haughton Publishing Company, pp. 19–22.
Ruse, M.: 1982, Darwinism Defended, Reading, Mass., Addison-Wesley.
Ruse, M.: ‘Nonliteralist Antievolution’, American Association for the Advancement of Science Annual Meeting. Symposium on “The New Antievolutionism”, February 13, 1993.
Simpson, G.G.: 1970, ‘Uniformitarianism. An Inquiry into Principle, Theory, and Method in Geohistory and Biohistory’, in Kecht, M.K. and Steere, W.C. (eds.), Essays in Evolution and Genetics in Honor of Theodosius Dobzhansky, New York, Appleton-Century-Crofts, pp. 43–96.
Strahler, A.N.: 1987, Science and Earth History: The Evolution/Creation Controversy, Buffalo, N.Y., Prometheus Books.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pennock, R.T. Naturalism, evidence and creationism: The case of Phillip Johnson. Biol Philos 11, 543–559 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138334
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00138334