Skip to main content
Log in

Telling the tree: Narrative representation and the study of evolutionary history

Biology and Philosophy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Accounts of the evolutionary past have as much in common with works of narrative history as they do with works of science. Awareness of the narrative character of evolutionary writing leads to the discovery of a host of fascinating and hitherto unrecognized problems in the representation of evolutionary history, problems associated with the writing of narrative. These problems include selective attention, narrative perspective, foregrounding and backgrounding, differential resolution, and the establishment of a canon of important events. The narrative aspects of evolutionary writing, however, which promote linearity and cohesiveness in conventional stories, conflict with the underlying chronicle of evolution, which is not linear, but branched, and which does not cohere, but diverges. The impulse to narrate is so great, however, and is so strongly reinforced by traditional schemes of taxonomic attention, that natural historians have more often abandoned the diverging tree than they have abandoned the narrative mode of representation. If we are to understand the true nature of the evolutionary past then we must adopt “tree thinking”, and develop new and creative ways, both narrative and non-narrative, of telling the history of life.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Ornithologists' Union: 1983, Check-list of North American Birds, sixth edition, American Ornithologists' Union.

  • Atran, S.: 1990, Cognitive Foundations of Natural History: Towards an Anthropology of Science, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bailyn, B.: 1967, The Ideological Origins of the American Revolution, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, P. H.: 1960, ‘A Transcription of Darwin's First Notebook on “Transmutation of Species”’, Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology 122, 247–296.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonnet, C.: 1745, Traité d'Insectologie, Premier Parte, Durand, Paris.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borges, J. L.: 1964, ‘The Garden of Forking Paths’, in Labyrinths: Selected Stories and Other Writings, New Directions, New York, pp. 19–29.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckland, F.: 1874, Curiosities of Natural History, Richard Bentley and Son, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Butterfield, H.: 1931, The Whig Interpretation of History, George Bell & Sons, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, R. L.: 1988, vertebrate Paleontology and Evolution, W. H. Freeman and Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Danto, A. C.: 1985, Narration and Knowledge, Columbia University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Downs, R. M., and D. Stea: 1977, Maps in Minds: Reflections on Cognitive Mapping, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dray, W.: 1989, On History and Philosophers of History, E. J. Brill, Leiden.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrell, L.: 1957, Justine, E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrell, L.: 1958, Balthazar, E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durrell, L.: 1959, Mountolive, E. P. Dutton & Co., Inc., New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernholm, B., K. Bremer, L. Brundin, H. Jörnvall, L. Rutberg, and H.-E. Wanntorp (organizing committee): 1989, The Hierarchy of Life: Molecules and Morphology in Phylogenetic Analysis, Proceedings from Nobel Symposium 70, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, New York, and Oxford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Feyerabend, P. K.: 1988, Against Method, revised edition, Verso, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallie, W. B.: 1964, Philosophy and the Historical Understanding, Schocken Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, J.: 1971, Grendel, Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gauthier, J., D. Cannatella, K. de Queeiroz, A. G. Kluge, and T. Rowe: 1989, ‘Tetrapod Phylogeny’, in B. Fernholm et al. (eds.), The Hierarchy of Life, Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, pp. 337–353.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonick, L.: 1990, The Cartoon History of the Universe, Doubleday, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, P., and R. White: 1986, Mental Maps, second edition, Allen & Unwin, Boston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J.: 1987, Time's Arrow, Time's Cycle, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J.: 1989, Wonderful Life: The Burgess Shale and the Nature of History, W. W. Norton & Company, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greene, J. C.: 1961, The Death of Adam, Mentor Books, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haynes, R. M.: 1980, Geographical Images and Mental Maps, Macmillan Education Ltd., Houndmills.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hull, D. L.: 1988, Science as a Process, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Landau, M.: 1991, Narratives of Human Evolution, Yale University Press, New Haven.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larson, G.: 1989, The Prehistory of the Far Side: A 10th Anniversary Exhibit, Andrews and McMeel, Kansas City.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewin, R.: 1982, Thread of Life: The Smithsonian Looks at Evolution, Smithsonian Books, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovejoy, A. O.: 1936, The Great Chain of Being, Harvard University Press, Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mallory, J. P.: 1989, In Search of the Indo-Europeans: Language, Archeology and Myth, Thames and Hudson, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E., and J. C. Greenway, Jr.: 1956, ‘Sequence of Passerine Families (Aves)’, Breviora 58.

  • Mink, L. O.: 1987, Historical Understanding, Cornell University Press, Ithaca.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nagel, E.: 1959, ‘The Logic of Historical Analysis’, in H. Meyerhoff (ed.), The Philosophy of History in Our Time, Doubleday, Garden City, pp. 203–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Geographic Society: 1990, National Geographic Atlas of the World, sixth edition, National Geographic Society, Washington, D. C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nitecki, M. H. (ed.): 1988, Evolutionary Progress, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hara, R. J.: 1988a, ‘Homage to Clio, or, Toward an Historical Philosophy for Evolutionary Biology’, Systematic Zoology 37, 142–155.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hara, R. J.: 1988b, ‘Diagrammatic Classifications of Birds, 1819–1901: Views of the Natural System in 19th-Century British Ornithology’, in H. Ouellet (ed.), Acta XIX Congressus Internationalis Ornithologici, National Museum of Natural Sciences, Ottawa, pp. 2746–2759.

    Google Scholar 

  • O'Hara, R. J.: 1991, ‘Representations of the Natural System in the Nineteenth Century’, Biology and Philosophy 6, 255–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, D. J.: 1988, ‘The Evolution of Protozoa’, Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio de Janeiro, Supplemento I 83, 580–600.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Queiroz, K.: 1988, ‘Systematics and the Darwin ian Revolution’, Philosophy of Science 55, 238–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raikow, R. J.: 1986, ‘Why Are There so Many Kinds of Passerine Birds’, Systematic Zoology 35, 255–259.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raikow, R. J.: 1988, ‘The Analysis of Evolutionary Success’, Systematic Zoology 37, 76–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reader, J.: 1986, The Rise of Life: The First 3.5 Billion Years, Knopf, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Richards, R. J.: 1987, Darwin and the Emergence of Evolutionary Theories of Mind and Behavior, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romer, A. S.: 1959, The Vertebrate Story, fourth edition, University of Chicago Press, Chicago.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rouse, J.: 1990, ‘The Narrative Reconstruction of Science’, Inquiry 33, 179–196.

    Google Scholar 

  • Savage, H. M.: 1983, ‘The Shape of Evolution: Systematic Tree Topology’, Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 20, 225–244.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scholes, R., and R. Kellogg: 1966, The Nature of Narrative, Oxford University Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao, K.-T., and R. R. Sokal: 1990, ‘Tree Balance’, Systematic Zoology 39, 266–276.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sloan, P. R.: 1987, ‘From Logical Universals to Historical Individuals: Buffon's Idea of Biological Species’, in Histoire du Concept d'Espèce dans les Sciences de la Vie, Fondation Singer-Polignac, Paris, pp. 101–140.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, P. F.: 1990, ‘Nomenclatura Stability, Taxonomic Instinct, and Flora Writing — a Recipe for Disaster?’, in P. Baas et al. (eds.), The Plant Diversity of Malesia, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Dordrecht, pp. 387–410.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.: 1982, The Return to Cosmology: Postmodern Science and the Theology of Nature, University of California Press, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.: 1988, ‘The Recovery of Practical Philosophy’, American Scholar 57, 337–352.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S.: 1990, Cosmopolis: The Hidden Agenda of Modernity, The Free Press, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Toulmin, S., and J. Goodfield: 1965, The Discovery of Time, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H.: 1973, Metahistory: The Historical Imagination in Nineteenth-Century Europe, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, H.: 1987, The Content of the Form, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M.: 1965, Foundations of Historical Knowledge, Harper & Row, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, E. O.: 1980, ‘Is the Evolutionary Species Concept Fiction? — A Consideration of Classes, Individuals and Historical Entities’, Systematic Zoology 29, 76–80.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O'Hara, R.J. Telling the tree: Narrative representation and the study of evolutionary history. Biol Philos 7, 135–160 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129880

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00129880

Key words

Navigation