Abstract
Background
The effectiveness of screening mammography (MMG) has mainly been demonstrated by studies in western countries. This study was conducted to evaluate cumulative survival and the risk of breast cancer death among Japanese women aged 40–69 years with screening-detected and interval breast cancer divided into three groups: MMG with clinical breast examination (CBE), CBE alone, and self-detection.
Methods
By matching a list of 126,537 women (358,242 person-screenings) who participated in the Miyagi Cancer Society Screening program between 1 April 1995 and 31 December 2002 with the Miyagi Prefectural Cancer Registry, 429 MMG with CBE, 522 CBE, and 3,047 self-detected cases were included in this study. Follow-up was performed until the date of death or 31 December 2007. Survival was estimated by the Kaplan–Meier method. The Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) and 95 % confidence intervals (CI) for breast cancer death.
Results
Five-year survival for women in the MMG with CBE, CBE, and self-detection groups was 96.8, 92.7, and 86.6 %, respectively. The HR (95 % CI) for breast cancer death was 2.38 (0.72–7.94) among CBE-screened and 4.44 (1.42–13.89) among self-detected cases for women aged 40–49 years, but was 3.00 (1.63–5.50) among CBE-screened and 4.51 (2.69–7.56) among self-detected cases for women aged 50–69 years relative to cases screened by use of MMG with CBE.
Conclusions
In terms of the survival and risk of breast cancer death, MMG with CBE may be more effective than MMG alone or self-detection for Japanese women aged 40–69 years.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Matsuda T, Marugame T, Kamo K, Katanoda K, Ajiki W, Sobue T. Cancer incidence and incidence rates in Japan in 2006: based on data from 15 population-based cancer registries in the monitoring of cancer incidence in Japan (MCIJ) project. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2012;42:139–47.
Nelson HD, Tyne K, Naik A, Bougatsos C, Chan BK, Humphrey L. Screening for breast cancer: an update for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:727–37. W237–42.
Kanemura S, Tsuji I, Ohuchi N, Takei H, Yokoe T, Koibuchi Y, et al. A case control study on the effectiveness of breast cancer screening by clinical breast examination in Japan. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1999;90:607–13.
Ohuchi N, Yoshida K, Kimura M, Ouchi A, Kamioki S, Shiiba K, et al. Improved detection rate of early breast cancer in mass screening combined with mammography. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1993;84:807–12.
Ohuchi N, Yoshida K, Kimura M, Ouchi A, Shiiba K, Ohnuki K, et al. Comparison of false negative rates among breast cancer screening modalities with or without mammography: Miyagi trial. Jpn J Cancer Res. 1995;86:501–6.
Ohnuki K, Kuriyama S, Shoji N, Nishino Y, Tsuji I, Ohuchi N. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening modalities for breast cancer in Japan with special reference to women aged 40–49 years. Cancer Sci. 2006;97:1242–7.
Suzuki A, Kuriyama S, Kawai M, Amari M, Takeda M, Ishida T, et al. Age-specific interval breast cancers in Japan: estimation of the proper sensitivity of screening using a population-based cancer registry. Cancer Sci. 2008;99:2264–7.
Kawai M, Kuriyama S, Suzuki A, Nishino Y, Ishida T, Ohnuki K, et al. Effect of screening mammography on breast cancer survival in comparison to other detection methods: a retrospective cohort study. Cancer Sci. 2009;100:1479–84.
Raffle AE, Gray JAM. Screening: evidence and practice. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2007.
Domingo L, Blanch J, Servitja S, Corominas JM, Murta-Nascimento C, Rueda A, et al. Aggressiveness features and outcomes of true interval cancers: comparison between screen-detected and symptom-detected cancers. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2012. doi:10.1097/CEJ.0b013e328354d324.
Nishino Y, Tsuji I, Moro K. Cancer incidence in Miyagi, Japan (1998–2002). In: Curado MP, Edwards B, Shin HR, Storm H, Ferlay J, Heanue M, et al., editors. Cancer incidence in five continents, vol IX, IARC Scientific Publications No 160. Lyon: IARC; 2007.
World Health Organization. International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, 2nd edn (ICD-O-2). Lyon: World Health Organization; 1990.
Sobue T, Tsukuma H, Okamoto N, Ajiki W, editors. Handbook on population-based cancer registration in Japan fifth revision. Tokyo: Japanese Association of Cancer Registries; 2007 (in Japanese).
Cox DR. Regression models and life-tables (with discussion). J R Stat Soc. 1972;34:187–220.
Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination. The periodic health examination. Can Med Assoc J. 1979;121:1193–254.
Ohuchi N, Ishida T, Kawai M, Narikawa Y, Yamamoto S, Sobue T. Randomized controlled trial on effectiveness of ultrasonography screening for breast cancer in women aged 40–49 (J-START): research design. Jpn J Clin Oncol. 2011;41:275–7.
The Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Health statistics in Japan, 2007. Tokyo: Health Statistics Office, Statistics and Information Department, p. 35.
Armesto SG, Lapetra ML, Wei L, Kelley E, the Members of the HCQI Expert Group. Health Care Quality Indicators Project 2006 Data Collection Update Report. 29th ed. Paris: OECD; 2007. p. 35.
Ferroni E, Camilloni L, Jimenez B, Furnari G, Borgia P, Guasticchi G, et al. How to increase uptake in oncologic screening: a systematic review of studies comparing population-based screening programs and spontaneous access. Prev Med. 2012. doi:10.1016/j.ypmed.2012.10.007.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by KAKENHI, including Grant-in-Aid for Scientific Research (C) (24590781), Grant-in-Aid for Young Scientists (A) (24689032), and the 3rd Term Comprehensive Control Research for Cancer (H23-Sanjigan-shitei-002) from the Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare, Japan.
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Kawai, M., Suzuki, A., Nishino, Y. et al. Effect of screening mammography on cumulative survival of Japanese women aged 40–69 years with breast cancer. Breast Cancer 21, 542–549 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-012-0434-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12282-012-0434-2