Abstract
In this case study, we present an approach for employing modeling to help define the design space for a reaction with potential to generate an impurity that could impact the quality of an API. Our approach broadly consisted of (1) evaluating the reaction parameters that can affect the critical impurity level to develop appropriate assumptions for a mechanistic model, (2) developing and evaluating a mechanistic model to predict the formation of the critical impurity, (3) defining a design space based on the model output to reduce in practice the acceptable parameter space to a practical number of parameters, and (4) verifying the design space through experimental testing. This work resulted in a verified design space that can be practically employed and includes wide parameters ranges for manufacturing flexibility.
References
JPI interviews Moheb Nasr, Ph.D.: Director, Office of New Drug Quality Assesment (ONDQA), CDER, US FDA. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. 2007;2:67–70
Somma R. Development knowledge can increase manufacturing capability and facilitate quality by design. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. 2007;2:87–92.
International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Q8 (R2): Pharmaceutical Development. 2009.
Garcia T, Cook G, Nosal R. PQLI key topics—Criticality, design space, and control strategy. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. 2008;3:60–8.
am Ende D, Bronk KS, Mustakis J, O’Connor G, Santa Maria CL, Nosal R, et al. API quality by design example from the torcetrapib manufacturing process. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. 2007;2:71–86.
Huang J, Kaul G, Cai C, Chatlapalli R, Hernandez-Abad P, Ghosh K, et al. Quality by design case study: an integrated multivariate approach to drug product and process development. Int J Pharm. 2009;382:23–32.
Ganzer WP, Materna JA, Mitchell MB, Wall LK. Current thoughts on critical process parameters and API synthesis. Pharm Technol. 2005;29:46–66.
Eckert CA, Hsieh CK, McCabe JR. Molecular thermodynamics for chemical reaction design. AlChE J. 1974;20:20–36.
Acknowledgements
We would like to acknowledge Maurico Futran, Sushil Srivastava, Jean Tom, Robert Waltermire, and Jason Sweeney for their support, guidance and helpful discussions. We would also like to acknowledge Justin Burt, Jale Muslehiddinoglu, Antonio Ramirez, Nicolas Cuniere, Jing Liang, Praveen Sharma, Alice Yang, Christopher Wood, Process Research and Development Operations, and Swords Technical Operations for their contributions. We would also like to acknowledge Joe Hannon and Andrew Bird of Scale-up Systems Ltd. for their helpful discussions and support with DynoChem®.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hallow, D.M., Mudryk, B.M., Braem, A.D. et al. An Example of Utilizing Mechanistic and Empirical Modeling in Quality by Design. J Pharm Innov 5, 193–203 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-010-9094-y
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-010-9094-y