Skip to main content
Log in

An Example of Utilizing Mechanistic and Empirical Modeling in Quality by Design

  • Case Report
  • Published:
Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this case study, we present an approach for employing modeling to help define the design space for a reaction with potential to generate an impurity that could impact the quality of an API. Our approach broadly consisted of (1) evaluating the reaction parameters that can affect the critical impurity level to develop appropriate assumptions for a mechanistic model, (2) developing and evaluating a mechanistic model to predict the formation of the critical impurity, (3) defining a design space based on the model output to reduce in practice the acceptable parameter space to a practical number of parameters, and (4) verifying the design space through experimental testing. This work resulted in a verified design space that can be practically employed and includes wide parameters ranges for manufacturing flexibility.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14

References

  1. JPI interviews Moheb Nasr, Ph.D.: Director, Office of New Drug Quality Assesment (ONDQA), CDER, US FDA. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. 2007;2:67–70

    Google Scholar 

  2. Somma R. Development knowledge can increase manufacturing capability and facilitate quality by design. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. 2007;2:87–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH). Q8 (R2): Pharmaceutical Development. 2009.

  4. Garcia T, Cook G, Nosal R. PQLI key topics—Criticality, design space, and control strategy. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. 2008;3:60–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. am Ende D, Bronk KS, Mustakis J, O’Connor G, Santa Maria CL, Nosal R, et al. API quality by design example from the torcetrapib manufacturing process. Journal of Pharmaceutical Innovation. 2007;2:71–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang J, Kaul G, Cai C, Chatlapalli R, Hernandez-Abad P, Ghosh K, et al. Quality by design case study: an integrated multivariate approach to drug product and process development. Int J Pharm. 2009;382:23–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Ganzer WP, Materna JA, Mitchell MB, Wall LK. Current thoughts on critical process parameters and API synthesis. Pharm Technol. 2005;29:46–66.

    Google Scholar 

  8. Eckert CA, Hsieh CK, McCabe JR. Molecular thermodynamics for chemical reaction design. AlChE J. 1974;20:20–36.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to acknowledge Maurico Futran, Sushil Srivastava, Jean Tom, Robert Waltermire, and Jason Sweeney for their support, guidance and helpful discussions. We would also like to acknowledge Justin Burt, Jale Muslehiddinoglu, Antonio Ramirez, Nicolas Cuniere, Jing Liang, Praveen Sharma, Alice Yang, Christopher Wood, Process Research and Development Operations, and Swords Technical Operations for their contributions. We would also like to acknowledge Joe Hannon and Andrew Bird of Scale-up Systems Ltd. for their helpful discussions and support with DynoChem®.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Daniel M. Hallow or Srinivas Tummala.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hallow, D.M., Mudryk, B.M., Braem, A.D. et al. An Example of Utilizing Mechanistic and Empirical Modeling in Quality by Design. J Pharm Innov 5, 193–203 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-010-9094-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12247-010-9094-y

Keywords

Navigation