Abstract
Objective This study examined data from the second National Longitudinal Transition Study to determine variables associated with post-high school competitive employment, and to develop a logistic regression model for predicting successful employment outcomes. Design A longitudinal survey design. Setting United States. Participants A nationally representative sample (N = 2,900) of special education students who exited high school in the 2002/2003 school year. Main Outcome Measure Any competitive employment during the 6-year study period. Results A number of predictors of competitive employment were confirmed, including high school employment experiences, parental expectations of post-high school employment, arrest record, and school type. The strongest predictors were high school employment experiences and parental expectations of a post-high school employment. Conclusions The current study supports finding of several prior studies and fail to support others, such as the importance of self-determination for adult success. The findings highlight two aspects of the transition process that are critical for success: employment training and work experiences in high school, and high parental expectations for their child’s future.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004, Pub L No. 108–446, 118 Stat 2647 (2004).
Biden J. Ready to work: job-driven training and American opportunity (White House report) .2014. Available from http://www.whitehouse.gov/sites/default/files/docs/skills_report.pdf.
Carter EW, Austin D, Trainor AA. Factors associated with the early work experiences of adolescents with severe disabilities. Intellect Dev Disabil. 2011;49:233–47.
Certo N, Luecking R, Murphy S, Brown L, Courey S, Belanger D. Seamless transition and long-term support for individuals with severe intellectual disabilities. Res Pract Persons Severe Disabl. 2008;33:85–95.
Cobb RB, Alwell M. Transition planning/coordinating interventions for youth with disabilities: a systematic review. Career Dev Except Individ. 2009;32:70–81.
Landmark LJ, Ju S, Zhang D. Substantiated best practices in transition: fifteen plus years later. Career Dev Transit Except Individ. 2010;33(3):165–76.
National Organization on Disability. Kessler Foundation/NOD 2010 survey of employment of Americans with disabilities. Available from http://www.2010disabilitysurveys.org/.
US General Accounting Office. Students with disabilities: better federal coordination could lessen challenges in the transition from high school. GAO-12-594. Washington (DC): Government Printing Office; 2012.
Doren B, Benz MR. Employment inequality revisited: predictors of better employment outcomes for young women with disabilities in transition. J Spec Educ. 1998;31:425–42.
Benz RB, Yovanoff P, Doren B. School-to-work components that predict post-school success for students with and without disabilities. Except Child. 1997;63(2):151–65.
Test DW, Fowler CH, Richter SM, White J, Mazzotti V, Walker AR, Kohler P, Kortering L. Evidence-based practices in secondary transition. Career Dev Except Individ. 2009;32(2):115–28.
Jeynes WH. The effects of parental involvement on the academic achievement of African American youth. J Negro Educ. 2005;74:260–74.
Pomerantz EM, Moorman EA. The how, whom, and why of parents’ involvement in children’s academic lives: more is not always better. Rev Educ Res. 2007;77:373–410.
Seyfried SF, Chung IJ. Parent involvement as parental monitoring of student motivation and parent expectations predicting later achievement among African American and European American middle school age students. J Ethn Cult Divers Soc Work. 2002;11:109–31.
Boeltzig H, Timmons JC, Butterworth J. Gender differences in employment outcomes of individuals with disabilities. J Vocat Rehabil. 2009;31(1):29–38.
Newman L, Wagner M, Cameto R, Knokey AM. The post-high school outcomes of youth with disabilities up to 4 years after high school. A report of findings from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2) (NCSER 2009-3017). Menlo Park CA: SRI International; 2009.
Hosmer DW, Lemeshow S. Applied logistic regression. New York: Wiley; 2000.
Bursac Z, Gauss CH, Williams DK, Hosmer DW. Purposeful selection of variables in logistic regression. Source Code Biol Med. 2008;3:17.
Test DW, Mazzotti VL, Mustian AL, Fowler CH, Kortering L, Kohler P. Evidence-based secondary transition predictors for improving postschool outcomes for students with disabilities. Career Dev Except Individ. 2009;32(3):160–81.
Wood SJ, Cronin ME. Students with emotional/behavioral disorders and transition planning: what the follow-up studies tell us. Psychol Sch. 1999;36:327–45.
Wehmeyer ML, Palmer SB. Adult outcomes for students with cognitive disabilities three years after high school: the impact of self-determination. Ed Train Dev Dis. 2003;38:131–44.
Wehmeyer M, Schwartz M. Self-determination and positive adult outcomes: a follow-up study of youth with mental retardation or learning disabilities. Except Child. 1997;63:245–55.
Burke J, Bezyak J, Fraser RT, Pete J, Ditchman N, Chan F. Employers’ attitudes towards disability: a literature review. Aust J Rehabil Couns. 2013;19:21–38.
Kaye HS, Jans LH, Jones EC. Why don’t employers hire and retain workers with disabilities? J Occup Rehabil. 2011;21:526–36.
Doren B, Gau JM, Lindstrom LE. The relationship between parent expectations and postschool outcomes of adolescents with disabilities. Except Child. 2012;79:7–23.
Acknowledgments
The development of this manuscript was supported by a subcontract with TransCen, Inc. under Grant #H133A100007 with the National Institute on Disability and Rehabilitation Research, U.S. Department of Education.
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wehman, P., Sima, A.P., Ketchum, J. et al. Predictors of Successful Transition from School to Employment for Youth with Disabilities. J Occup Rehabil 25, 323–334 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9541-6
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-014-9541-6