Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Climate change may speed democratic turnover

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The electoral fate of incumbent politicians depends heavily upon voters’ well-being. Might climate change – by amplifying threats to human well-being – cause incumbent democratic politicians and parties to lose office more frequently? Here I conduct the first-ever investigation of the relationship between temperature, electoral returns, and future climate change. Using data from over 1.5 billion votes in over 4,800 electoral contests held in 19 countries between 1925 and 2011, coupled with meteorological data, I show that increases in annual temperatures above 21 °C (70 °F) markedly decrease officeholders’ vote share. I combine these empirical estimates with an ensemble of climate models to project the impact of climate change on the fate of future officeholders. Resulting forecasts indicate that by 2099 climate change may reduce average incumbent party vote share across all nations in the sample, with the most acute worsening occurring in poorer countries. If realized, these predictions indicate that climate change could amplify future rates of democratic turnover by causing incumbent parties and their politicians to lose office with increasing frequency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Numerous studies directly link perceptions and personal experience of climate change related events to changes in political attitudes and behaviors regarding climate change. One topic includes literature on the “local warming effect”, or the propensity of individuals to report greater belief in and political concern about climate change when they experience warmer temperatures (Egan and Mullin 2012; Lang 2014; Zaval et al. 2014). Other studies directly examine the underpinnings for political behaviors regarding climate change (Krosnick et al. 2006; Gifford 2011; Myers et al. 2012; Roser-Renouf et al. 2014; Brügger et al. 2015; Linden 2015; Obradovich and Guenther 2016). Here I do not focus on climate change related political attitudes or behaviors themselves but instead on the potential for climatic changes to alter broader political behaviors.

References

  • Abney F, Hill L (1966) Natural disasters as a political variable: the effect of a hurricane on an urban election. Am Polit Sci Rev 60(4):974–981

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Albouy D, Graf W, Kellogg R, Wolff H (2016) Climate amenities, climate change, and american quality of life. J Assoc Environ Res Econ 3(1):205–246

    Google Scholar 

  • Arceneaux K, Stein RM (2006) Who is held responsible when disaster strikes? The attribution of responsibility for a natural disaster in an urban election. Journal of Urban Affairs 28(1):43–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Auffhammer M, Hsiang SM, Schlenker W, Sobel A (2013) Using weather data and climate model output in economic analyses of climate change. Rev Environ Econ Policy. ret016

  • Barnhart J (1925) Rainfall and the populist party in Nebraska. Am Polit Sci Rev 19:527–540

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barry JM (2007) Rising tide: The great Mississippi ood of 1927 and how it changed America. Simon and Schuster

  • Bester CA, Conley TG, Hansen CB (2011) Inference with dependent data using cluster covariance estimators. J Econ 165(2):137–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bratton M (2008) Vote buying and violence in Nigerian election campaigns. Elect Stud 27(4):621–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brügger A, Dessai S, Devine-Wright P, Morton TA (2015) Psychological responses to the proximity of climate change. Nat Clim Chang

  • Burke M, Hsiang S, Miguel E, et al (2015) Global non-linear effect of temperature on economic production. Nature 527(7577):235–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cameron AC, Gelbach JB, Miller DL (2011) Robust inference with multiway clustering. J Bus Econ Stat 29(2)

  • Cole S, Healy A, Werker E (2012) Do voters demand responsive governments? Evidence from Indian disaster relief. J Dev Econ 97(2):167–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collier P, Vicente PC (2012) Violence, bribery, and fraud: The political economy of elections in Sub-Saharan Africa. Public Choice 153(1-2):117–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connolly M (2013) Some like it mild and not too wet: The influence of weather on subjective well-being. J Happiness Stud 14(2):457–473

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell M, Jones B, Olken B (2012) Temperature shocks and economic growth: Evidence from the last half century. Am Econ J Macroecon 4(3):66–95

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dell M, Jones BF, Olken BA (2014) What do we learn from the weather? The new climate-economy literature. J Econ Lit 52(3):740–798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dercon S, Gutiérrez-Romero R (2012) Triggers and characteristics of the 2007 Kenyan electoral violence. World Dev 40(4):731–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deryugina T (2014) Does the environment still matter? Daily temperature and income in the United States (Rapport technique). National Bureau of Economic Research

  • Doherty TJ, Clayton S (2011) The psychological impacts of global climate change. Am Psychol 66(4):265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duch RM, Stevenson R (2010) The global economy, competency, and the economic vote. J Polit 72(01):105–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duch RM, Stevenson RT (2008) The economic vote: How political and economic institutions condition election results. Cambridge University Press

  • Egan PJ, Mullin M (2012) Turning personal experience into political attitudes: the effect of local weather on Americans perceptions about global warming. J Polit 1(1):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson R (1989) Economic conditions and the presidential vote. Am Polit Sci Rev 83:567–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fair R (1978) The effect of economic events on votes for president. Rev Econ Stat 60(2):159–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiorina MP (1981) Retrospective voting in American national elections. Yale University Press

  • Fischer E, Knutti R (2015) Anthropogenic contribution to global occurrence of heavy-precipitation and high-temperature extremes. Nat Clim Chang

  • Fowler JH (2006) Elections and markets: The effect of partisanship, policy risk, and electoral margins on the economy. J Polit 68(1):89–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fraga B, Hersh E (2010) Voting costs and voter turnout in competitive elections. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5(4):339–356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Friedl MA, Sulla-Menashe D, Tan B, Schneider A, Ramankutty N, Sibley A, et al (2010) MODIS Collection 5 global land cover: Algorithm refinements and characterization of new datasets. Remote Sens Environ 114(1):168–182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gasper J, Reeves A (2011) Make it rain? Retrospection and the attentive electorate in the context of natural disasters. Am J Polit Sci 55(2):340–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gifford R (2011) The dragons of inaction: Psychological barriers that limit climate change mitigation and adaptation. Am Psychol 66(4):290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graff Zivin JS, Neidell M (2014) Temperature and the allocation of time: Implications for climate change. J Labor Econ 32(1):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R (2012) Perception of climate change. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109(37):E2415—E2423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hausman J (2001) Mismeasured variables in econometric analysis: Problems from the right and problems from the left. J Econ Perspect:57–67

  • Healy A, Malhotra N (2009) Myopic voters and natural disaster policy. Am Polit Sci Rev 103(3):387–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy A, Malhotra N (2010) Random events, economic losses, and retrospective voting: Implications for democratic competence. Quarterly Journal of Political Science 5(2):193–208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy A, Malhotra N (2013) Retrospective voting reconsidered. Annual Review of Political Science 16:285–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Healy A, Malhotra N, Mo CH (2010) Irrelevant events affect voters’ evaluations of government performance. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(29):12804–12809

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiang SM (2010) Temperatures and cyclones strongly associated with economic production in the Carribean and Central America. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107 (35):15367–15372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiang SM, Burke M, Miguel E (2013) Quantifying the in uence of climate on human con ict. Science 341(6151):1235367

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller MC, Fredrickson BL, Ybarra O, Côté S, Johnson K, Mikels J, et al (2005) A warm heart and a clear head the contingent effects of weather on mood and cognition. Psychol Sci 16(9):724–731

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klimstra TA, Frijns T, Keijsers L, Denissen JJ, Raaijmakers QA, Aken MAV, et al (2011) Come rain or come shine: Individual differences in how weather affects mood. Emotion 11(6):1495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kollman K, Hicken A, Caramani D, Backer D (2015) Constituency-level elections archive (CLEA). Ann Arbor. University of Michigan Center for Political Studies, MI

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramer GH (1971) Short-term uctuations in US voting behavior: 1896-1964. Cowles Foundation for Research in Economics at Yale University

  • Krosnick JA, Holbrook AL, Lowe L, Visser PS (2006) The origins and consequences of democratic citizens’ policy agendas: A study of popular concern about global warming. Clim Chang 77(1-2):7–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lang C (2014) Do weather uctuations cause people to seek information about climate change Clim Chang 125(3-4):291–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck M (2006) Does economics still matter? Econometrics and the vote. J Polit 68(1):208–212

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck M, Stegmaier M (2000) Economic determinants of electoral outcomes. Pol Sci 3(1):183

    Google Scholar 

  • Lewis-Beck M, Stegmaier M (2008) The economic vote in transitional democracies. Journal of Elections Public Opinion and Parties 18(3):303–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Linden SVD (2015) The social-psychological determinants of climate change risk perceptions: Towards a comprehensive model. J Environ Psychol 41:112–124

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maddison D, Rehdanz K (2011) The impact of climate on life satisfaction. Ecol Econ 70(12):2437–2445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malhotra N, Kuo AG (2008) Attributing blame: The public’s response to Hurricane Katrina. J Polit 70(01):120–135

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Min S, Zhang X, Zwiers F, Hegerl G (2011) Human contribution to more-intense precipitation extremes. Nature 470(7334):378–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell TD, Jones PD (2005) An improved method of constructing a database of monthly climate observations and associated high-resolution grids. Int J Climatol 25 (6):693–712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morton JF (2007) The impact of climate change on smallholder and subsistence agriculture. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104(50):19680–19685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundfrom DJ, Perrett JJ, Schaffer J, Piccone A, Roozeboom M (2006) Bonferroni adjustments in tests for regression coefficients. Multiple Linear Regression Viewpoints 32(1):1–6

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers TA, Maibach EW, Roser-Renouf C, Akerlof K, Leiserowitz AA (2012) The relationship between personal experience and belief in the reality of global warming. Nat Clim Chang 3(4):343–347

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordhaus WD (1991) To slow or not to slow: The economics of the greenhouse effect. Econ J 101(407):920–937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Obradovich N, Guenther SM (2016) Collective responsibility amplifies mitigation behaviors. Clim Chang 137(1):307–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Przeworski A (2000) Democracy and development: Political institutions and well-being in the world, vol 3. Cambridge University Press, pp 1950–1990

  • Rahmstorf S, Coumou D (2011) Increase of extreme events in a warming world. Proc Natl Acad Sci 108(44):17905–17909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Riahi K, Rao S, Krey V, Cho C, Chirkov V, Fischer G, et al (2011) RCP 8.5 – a scenario of comparatively high greenhouse gas emissions. Clim Chang 109 (1-2):33–57

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roser-Renouf C, Maibach EW, Leiserowitz A, Zhao X (2014) The genesis of climate change activism: from key beliefs to political action. Clim Chang 125(2):163–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Seneviratne SI, Donat MG, Mueller B, Alexander LV (2014) No pause in the increase of hot temperature extremes. Nat Clim Chang 4(3):161–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stern N (2006) Review on the economics of climate change. London HM Treasury

  • Straus S (2011) It’s sheer horror here: Patterns of violence during the first four months of Côte d’Ivoire’s post-electoral crisis. African Affairs, adr024

  • Taylor KE, Stouffer RJ, Meehl GA (2012) An overview of CMIP5 and the experiment design. Bull Amer Meteor Soc 93(4):485–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tufte E (1978) Political control of the economy. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Vaaler PM, Schrage BN, Block SA (2006) Elections, opportunism, partisanship and sovereign ratings in developing countries. Rev Dev Econ 10(1):154–170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker Jr H, Hansen P (1946) Rural local government: Local government and rainfall: The problem of local government in the northern great plains. Am Polit Sci Rev 40:1113–1123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weitzman ML (2009) On modeling and interpreting the economics of catastrophic climate change. Rev Econ Stat 91(1):1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilkin S, Haller B, Norpoth H (1997) From Argentina to Zambia: a world-wide test of economic voting. Elect Stud 16(3):301–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wooldridge JM (2010) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT press

  • Zaval L, Keenan EA, Johnson EJ, Weber EU (2014) How warm days increase belief in global warming. Nat Clim Chang 4:143–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation (Grant Nos. DGE0707423, 0903551, TG-SES130013, and 1424091). I thank D. Alex Hughes and the San Diego Supercomputer Center for their assistance and J. Burney, J. Fowler, C. Gibson, B. LeVeck, A. Lo, D. Victor, and members of the UCSD Human Nature Group and Comparative Politics Workshop for their helpful comments.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs, Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Nick Obradovich

  2. Media Lab, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA

    Nick Obradovich

Authors
  1. Nick Obradovich
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nick Obradovich.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(PDF 1.05 MB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Obradovich, N. Climate change may speed democratic turnover. Climatic Change 140, 135–147 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1833-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1833-8

Keywords

Search

Navigation