Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Planning for an unknowable future: uncertainty in climate change adaptation planning

  • Published:
Climatic Change Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Uncertainty in climate projections poses a serious challenge to adaptation planning. Ignoring this uncertainty can cause adaptation plans and strategies to be ineffective and even maladaptive. As such, there is growing awareness that adaptation planning must adopt approaches that enable discovering, assessing, and addressing uncertainty. In this paper, I examine how uncertainty is managed in adaptation planning. Content analysis of 44 local climate adaptation plans in the U.S. indicates that most plans recognize uncertainty, however, very few employ approaches to address uncertainty. To better understand how uncertainty influences the planning process, I conducted informant interviews in three communities: Boulder, CO; Denver, CO and Salem, MA. These communities capture the variation across plans in content analysis scores, climate threats, and plan author. Interview results suggest that adaptation plans do not fully reflect how uncertainty is managed in the planning process. Rather than focusing on climate projections in the vulnerability assessment, which may reinforce planning for one future, communities in which interviews were conducted emphasized sensitivity and adaptive capacity. Interviewees also emphasized the importance of no-regrets strategies and an iterative adaptation process. Institutional barriers were viewed as a major challenge for adopting uncertainty approaches. For approaches, such as robust strategies and flexible strategies, to be more widely used, we must first breakdown the deeply embedded practice of planning for one future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2 Percent of plans that include each code.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abunnasr Y, Hamin EM, Brabec E (2015) Windows of opportunity: addressing climate uncertainty through adaptation plan implementation. J Environ Plan Manag 58(1):135–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baltimore (2013) Disaster preparedness and planning project: a combined all hazards mitigation and adaptation plan. Baltimore

  • Barnett J, Graham S, Mortreux C, Fincher R, Waters E, Hurlimann A (2014) A local coastal adaptation pathway. Nat Clim Chang 4(12):1103–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berke P, Lyles W (2013) Public risks and the challenges to climate-change adaptation: a proposed framework for planning in the age of uncertainty. Cityscape 15(1):189–216

    Google Scholar 

  • Berke P, Cooper J, Aminto M, Grabich S, Horney J (2014) Adaptive planning for disaster recovery and resiliency: an evaluation of 87 local recovery plans in eight states. J Am Plann Assoc 80(4):310–323

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berkhout F, van den Hurk B, Bessembinder J, de Boer J, Bregman B, van Drunen M (2013) Framing climate uncertainty: socio-economic and climate scenarios in vulnerability and adaptation assessments. Reg Environ Change

  • Capela Lourenço T, Rovisco A, Groot A, Nilsson C, Füssel HM, Van Bree L, Street, RB (2014) Adapting to an uncertain climate. Springer International Publishing

  • Denver (2014) City and county of Denver climate adaptation plan. Denver Environmental Health, Colorado

    Google Scholar 

  • Dessai S, Hulme M (2007) Assessing the robustness of adaptation decisions to climate change uncertainties: a case study on Water Resources Management in the East of England. Glob Environ Chang 17(1):59–72

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich R, Wreford A, Moran D (2016) A survey of decision-making approaches for climate change adaptation: are robust methods the way forward? Ecol Econ 122:79–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier TG, Thompson CM, Dezzani RJ (2014) A framework for the development of the SERV model: a spatially explicit resilience-vulnerability model. Appl Geogr 51:158–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gersonius B, Ashley R, Pathirana A, Zevenbergen C (2013) Climate change uncertainty: building flexibility into water and flood risk infrastructure. Clim Chang 116(2):411–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haasnoot M, Middelkoop H, Offermans A, Beek E, Deursen WPA (2012) Exploring pathways for sustainable water management in river deltas in a changing environment. Clim Chang 115(3–4):795–819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haasnoot M, Kwakkel JH, Walker WE, ter Maat J (2013) Dynamic adaptive policy pathways: a method for crafting robust decisions for a deeply uncertain world. Glob Environ Change 23(2):485–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hallegatte S (2009) Strategies to adapt to an uncertain climate change. Glob Environ Chang 19(2):240–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins LD, Zapata M (2007) Engaging the future: forecasts, scenarios, plans, and projects. Cambridge

  • IPCC (2000) Emissions scenarios: summary for policymakers: a Special Report of IPCC Working Group III. Geneva

  • IPCC (2012) Managing the risks of extreme events and disasters to advance climate change adaption: special report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. In: Field CB (ed) New York

  • Kirshen P, Merrill S, Slovinsky P, Richardson N (2012) Simplified method for scenario-based risk assessment adaptation planning in the coastal zone. Clim Chang 113(3–4):919–931

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kwakkel JH, Walker WE, Haasnoot M (2016) Coping with the wickedness of public policy problems: approaches for decision making under deep uncertainty. J Water Res Pl-ASCE 142(3):01816001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson K, White D, Gober P, Wutich A (2015) Decision-making under uncertainty for water sustainability and urban climate change adaptation. Sustainability 7(11):14761–14784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence J, Reisinger A, Mullan B, Jackson B (2013) Exploring climate change uncertainties to support adaptive management of changing flood-risk. Environ Sci Policy 33:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert RJ, Groves DJ (2010) Identifying and evaluating robust adaptive policy responses to climate change for Water Management Agencies in the American West. Technol Forecast Soc 77(6):960–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert RJ, Schlesinger ME, Bankes SC (1996) When we don’t know the costs or the benefits: adaptive strategies for abating climate change. Clim Chang 33(2):235–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyles W, Stevens M (2014) Plan quality evaluation 1994–2012: growth and contributions, limitations, and new directions. J Plan Educ Res 34(4):433–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC (2005) Impact assessments and policy responses to sea-level rise in three US states: an exploration of human-dimension uncertainties. Glob Environ Chang 15(4):353–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Occhipinti N, Ferguson A (2013) Grand rapids climate resiliency report: an initial report on grand rapids climate resiliency and preparedness. West Michigan Environmental Action Council

  • Preston BL, Westaway RM, Yuen EJ (2011) Climate adaptation planning in practice: an evaluation of adaptation plans from three developed nations. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Chang 16(4):407–438

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quay R (2010) Anticipatory governance. J Am Plann Assoc 76(4):496–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranger N, Reeder T, Lowe J (2013) Addressing “deep” uncertainty over long-term climate in major infrastructure projects: four innovations of the Thames Estuary 2100 Project. EJDP 1(3–4):233–262

    Google Scholar 

  • Reeder T, Ranger N (2010) How do you adapt in an uncertain world? Lessons from the Thames Estuary 2100 project. World Resources Report, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Rietveld P, van Buuren A, Teisman G, Salet W, Driessen PPJ, van Rijswick M, Spit T (2013) Towards adaptive spatial planning for climate change: balancing between robustness and flexibility. JEEPL 10(1):29–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker W, Haasnoot M, Kwakkel J (2013) Adapt or perish: a review of planning approaches for adaptation under deep uncertainty. Sustainability 5(3):955–979

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walsh J, Wuebbles D, Hayhoe K, Kossin J, Kunkel G, Stephens G, Thorne P et al (2014) Climate science supplement. In: Melillo JM, Richmond TC, Yohe GW (eds) Climate change impacts in the United States, 735–89. U.S. Global Change Research Program

  • Werners SE, Pfenninger S, van Slobbe E, Haasnoot M, Kwakkel JH, Swart RJ (2013) Thresholds, tipping and turning points for sustainability under climate change. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 5(3–4):334–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woodruff SC, Stults M (2016) Numerous strategies but limited implementation guidance in US local adaptation plans. Nat Clim Chang

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work would not be possible without the assistance of Missy Stults, who helped design and conduct the content analysis. Thank you to my dissertation committee – Todd BenDor, Phil Berke, Pam Jagger, Laura Moore, and Gavin Smith – for their support. Bianca Lopez and Alissa Brown also provided reviews. Thank you to the UNC Institutional Review Board for their review and approval of this research (IRB# 15-3020).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sierra C. Woodruff.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

ESM 1

(DOCX 126 kb)

ESM 2

(DOCX 22 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Woodruff, S.C. Planning for an unknowable future: uncertainty in climate change adaptation planning. Climatic Change 139, 445–459 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1822-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-016-1822-y

Keywords

Navigation