Abstract
The relationship between R&D investments and technical change is inherently uncertain. In this paper we combine economics and decision analysis to incorporate the uncertainty of technical change into climate change policy analysis. We present the results of an expert elicitation on the prospects for technical change in carbon capture and storage. We find a significant amount of disagreement between experts, even over the most mature technology; and this disagreement is most pronounced in regards to cost estimates. We then use the results of the expert elicitations as inputs to the MiniCAM integrated assessment model, to derive probabilistic information about the impacts of R&D investments on the costs of emissions abatement. We conclude that we need to gather more information about the technical and societal potential for Carbon Storage; cost differences among the different capture technologies play a relatively smaller role.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Baker E, Adu-Bonnah K (2008) Investment in risky R&D programs in the face of climate uncertainty. Energy Econ 30:465–486
Baker E, Chon H, Keisler J (2008a) NuclearPower: combining expert elicitations with economic analysis to inform climate policy. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1407048
Baker E, Chon H, Keisler J (2009) Advanced solar R&D: combining economic analysis with expert elicitations to inform climate policy. Energy Econ 31:S37–S49
Baker E, Clarke L, Keisler J, Shittu E (2007) Uncertainty, technical change, and policy models. Technical Report 1028, College of Management, University of Massachusetts, Boston
Baker E, Clarke L, Shittu E (2008b) Technical change and the marginal cost of abatement. Energy Econ 30:2799–2816
Baker E, Clarke L, Weyant J (2006) Optimal technology R&D in the face of climate uncertainty. Clim Change 78:157–179
Blanford GJ (2006) Technology strategy for climate change: optimal R&D investment and its interaction with abatement policy. Ph.D. thesis, Stanford University
Bohringer C, Rutherford TF (2006) Innovation, uncertainty and instrument choice for climate policy. Working paper. http://rockefeller.dartmouth.edu/assets/pdf/Rutherford.pdf
Bramoulle Y, Olson LJ (2005) Allocation of pollution abatement under learning by doing. J Public Econ 89:1935–1960
Brenkert AS, Smith S, Kim S, Pitcher H (2003) Model documentation for the MiniCAM. Technical report PNNL-14337, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Clarke JF, Edmonds JA (1993) Modeling energy technologies in a competitive market. Energy Econ J 15:123–129
Clarke L, Edmonds J, Jacoby H, Pitcher H, Reilly J, Richels R (2007a) Scenarios of greenhouse gas emissions and atmospheric concentrations. Final report, U.S. Climate Change Science Program. http://www.climatescience.gov/Library/sap/sap2-1/finalreport/sap2-1a-final-all.pdf
Clarke L, Wise M, Kim S, Smith S, Lurz J, Edmonds J, Pitcher H (2007b) Model documentation for the minicam climate change science program stabilization scenarios: Ccsp product 2.1a. Technical report, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Clarke L, Wise M, Placet M, Izaurralde RC, Lurz J, Kim S, Smith S, Thomson A (2006) Climate change mitigation: an analysis of advanced technology scenarios. Technical report PNNL-16078, Pacific Northwest National Laboratory
Clemen RT, Winkler RL (1999) Combining probability distributions from experts in risk analysis. Risk Anal 19:187–203
David J, Herzog H (2000) The cost of carbon capture. Presented at the fifth international conference on greenhouse gas control technologies, Cairns, Australia, 13–16 August
DOE (2007) Carbon sequestration technology roadmap and program plan. United States Department of Energy, Washington D.C.
Dooley JJ, Dahowski RT, Davidson CL, Wise MA, Gupta N, Kim SH (2006) Carbon dioxide capture and geologic storage: a core element of a global energy technology strategy to address climate change. PNNL, Richland, WA
Downing PB, White LJ (1986) Innovation in pollution control. J Environ Econ Manage 13:18–29
Edmonds JA, Clarke JF, Dooley JJ, Kim SH, Smith SJ (2005) Stabilization of CO2 in a B2 world: insights on the roles of carbon capture and storage, hydrogen, and transportation technologies. In: Weyant J, Tol R (eds) Special issue, energy economics
Fischer C, Parry IWH, Pizer WA (2003) Instrument choice for environmental protection when technological innovation is endogenous. J Environ Econ Manage 45:523–545
Goulder L, Mathai K (2000) Optimal CO2 abatement in the presence of induced technological change. J Environ Econ Manage 39:1–38
Goulder L, Schneider S (1999) Induced technological change and the attractiveness of CO2 abatement policies. Resour Energy Econ 21:211–253
Hotelling H (1931) The economics of exhaustible resources. J Polit Econ 39:137–175
Howard RA, Matheson JE (2005) Influence diagram retrospective. Decision Anal 2:144–147
Esber III GS (2006) Carbon dioxide capture technology for the coal-powered electricity industry: a systematic prioritization of research needs. MIT, Cambridge
IPCC (2005) Special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge University Press, New York, NY
Jensen MD, Musich MA, Rubya JD, Steadman EN, Harju JA (2005) Carbon seperation and capture. Technical report, Energy and Environmental Research Center, National Energy Technology Laboratory
Jung C, Krutilla K, Boyd R (1996) Incentives for advanced pollution abatement technology at the industry level: an evaluation of policy alternatives. J Environ Econ Manage 30:95–111
Katzer J, Moniz EJ, Deutch J, Ansolabehere S, Beer J et al (2007) The future of coal: an interdisciplinary MIT study. Technical report, Massachusetts Institute of Technology
Keith DW (1996) When is it appropriate to combine expert judgments? Clim Change 33:139–143
Metz B, Davidson O, de Coninck HC, Loos M, Meyer LA (eds) (2005) IPCC special report on carbon dioxide capture and storage. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Milliman SR, Prince R (1989) Firm incentives to promote technological change in pollution control. J Environ Econ Manage 17:247–265
Montero J-P (2002) Permits, standard, and technology innovation. J Environ Econ Manage 44:23–44
Morgan MG, Keith DW (1995) Subjective judgments by climate experts. Environ Sci Technol 29:468–476
National Research Council (2007) Prospective evaluation of applied energy research and development at DOE (Phase two). The National Academies Press, Washington D.C. http://www.nap.edu/catalog/11806.html
Nemet GF, Baker E (2009) Demand subsidies versus R&D: comparing the uncertain impacts of policy on a pre-commercial low-carbon energy technology. Energy Journal, forthcoming
Parry I (1998) Pollution regulation and the efficiency gains from technological innovation. J Regul Econ 14:229–254
Peck SC, Wan YH (1996) Analytic solutions of simple greenhouse gas emission models. In: Van Ierland EC, Gorka K (eds) Economics of atmospheric pollution, chapter 6. Springer, Berlin
Riahi K, Rubin ES, Taylor MR, Schrattenholzer L, Hounshell D (2004) Technological learning for carbon capture and sequestration technologies. Energy Econ 26:539–564
Rosendahl KE (2004) Cost-effective environmental policy: implications of induced technological change. J Environ Econ Manage 48:1099–1121
Rubin ES, Taylor MR, Yeh S, Hounshell DA (2004) Learning curves for environmental technology and their importance for climate policy analysis. Energy 29:1551–1559
Salo AA, Bunn DW (1995) Decomposition in the assessment of judgmental probability forecasts. Technol Forecast Soc Change 49:13–25
Spetzler CS, Stael von Holstein C-AS (1975) Probability encoding in decision analysis. Manage Sci 22:340–358
von Winterfeldt D, Edwards W (1986) Decision analysis and behavioral research. Cambridge Universtiy Press, Cambridge
Weyant JP, Hill J (1999) Introduction and overview. The costs of the Kyoto protocol: a multi-model evaluation. Special Issue of The Energy Journal, pp vii–xliv
Winkler RL, Clemen RT (2004) Multiple experts vs. multiple methods: combining correlation assessments. Decision Anal 1:167–176
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Baker, E., Chon, H. & Keisler, J. Carbon capture and storage: combining economic analysis with expert elicitations to inform climate policy. Climatic Change 96, 379–408 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9634-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10584-009-9634-y