Skip to main content
Log in

Validity of plain films in intussusception

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Emergency Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of this study was to re-evaluate the specificity of plain film findings in intussusception. The plain film findings in 80 cases of proven intussusception were reviewed. Findings documented were: (1) presence or absence of small bowel obstruction, (2) paucity of right lower quadrant gas, (3) presence of an intracolonic mass, (4) presence of a rim or target sign, and (5) presence of the classic triad of intestinal obstruction, intracolonic mass, and paucity of right lower quadrant gas. Intestinal obstruction was present in 54% of patients. In 19 patients (24%) the abdominal films were completely normal. Paucity of right lower quadrant gas was seen in 10% of patients, while specific findings of a mass or a target (rim) sign were seen in 29% of patients. The classic triad of an intracolonic mass, obstruction, and paucity of gas in the right lower quadrant occurred in only 1 patient (1%). Plain films of the abdomen were diagnostic of intussusception in only 29% of cases. A completely normal gas pattern was seen in one-quarter of our patients. This being the case, most patients with suspected intussusception will require further imaging, either by ultrasound or contrast enema. In our institution we favor the ultrasound study.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig.1a, b.
Fig. 2a, b.
Fig. 3.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Daneman A, Alton DJ (1996) Intussusception issues and controversies related to diagnosis and reduction. Pediatr Gastrointest Radiol 34:743–756

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Sargent MA, Babyn P, Alton DJ (1994) Plain abdominal radiography in suspected intussusception: a reassessment. Pediatr Radiol 24:17–20

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. del-Pozo G, Albilos JC, Tejedor D, Calero R, Rasero M, de-la-Calle U (1999) Intussusception in children: current concepts in diagnosis and enema reduction. Radiographics 19:299–319

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Lee JM, Kim H, Bymn YY, et al (1994) Intussusception: characteristic radiolucencies on the abdominal radiograph. Pediatr Radiol 24:293–295

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ratcliffe JF, Fong S, Cheong I, O’Connell P (1992) Plain film diagnosis of intussusception: prevalence of the target sign. AJR Am J Roentgenol 158:619–621

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Lazar L, Rathaus V, Erez I, et al (1995) Interrupted air column in the large bowel on plain abdominal film: a new radiological sign of intussusception. J Pediatr Surg 30:1551–1553

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barr LL, Stansberry SD, Swischuk LE (1990) Significance of age, duration, obstruction and the dissection sign in intussusception. Pediatr Radiol 20:454–456

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Alberto Hernandez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hernandez, J.A., Swischuk, L.E. & Angel, C.A. Validity of plain films in intussusception. Emergency Radiology 10, 323–326 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-004-0354-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10140-004-0354-3

Keywords

Navigation