Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

The cloud radiative effect on the atmospheric energy budget and global mean precipitation

  • Published:
Climate Dynamics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

An Erratum to this article was published on 27 August 2014

Abstract

This study seeks to explain the effects of cloud on changes in atmospheric radiative absorption that largely balance changes in global mean precipitation under climate change. The partial radiative perturbations (PRPs) due to changes in cloud and due to the effects of the pre-existing climatological cloud distribution on non-cloud changes, known as “cloud masking”, are calculated when atmospheric CO2 concentration is doubled for the HadSM3 and MIROC models and for a large ensemble of parameter perturbed models based on HadSM3. Because the effect of cloud on changes in atmospheric shortwave absorption is almost negligible, longwave fluxes are analysed alone. We find that the net effects of cloud masking and cloud PRP on atmospheric absorption are both substantial. For the tropics, our results are reviewed in light of hypotheses put forward to explain cloud and radiative flux changes. We find that the major effects of clouds on radiation change are linked to known physical processes that are quite consistently simulated by models. Cloud top height changes are quite well described by the fixed anvil temperature hypothesis of Hartmann and Larson; cloud base heights change little, remaining near the same pressure. Changes in cloud geographical location and cloud amount are significant, but play a smaller role in driving radiative flux changes. Finally, because clouds are a large source of modelling uncertainty, we consider whether resolving errors in cloud simulation could reconcile modelled global mean precipitation trends of about 1–3 %\(\hbox {K}^{-1}\) with some estimates of observed trends of 7 %\(\hbox {K}^{-1}\) or more. This would require the radiative effect of clouds to change from one that increases atmospheric radiative absorption by about \(0.5\,\hbox {Wm}^{-2}\,\hbox {K}^{-1}\) to one that decreases it by \(-3.5\,\hbox {Wm}^{-2}\,\hbox {K}^{-1}\). Based on our results, this seems difficult to achieve within our current rationale for the tropics at least.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allan RP, Liu C, Lavers MZDA, Koukouvagias E, Bodas-Salcedo A (2013) Physically consistent responses of the global atmospheric hydrological cycle in models and observations. Surv Geophys. doi:10.1007/s10,712-012-9213-z

    Google Scholar 

  • Allen MR, Ingram WJ (2002) Constraints on future changes in climate and the hydrologic cycle. Nature 419:224–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bony S, Dufresne J (2005) Marine boundary layer clouds at the heart of tropical cloud feedback uncertainties in climate models. Geophys Res Lett 32. doi:10.1029/2005GL023,851

  • Cess RD, Potter GL, Blanchet JP, Boer GJ, Delgenio AD, Deque M, Dymnikov V, Galin V, Gates VL, Ghan SJ, Kiehl JT, Lacis AA, Letreut H, Li ZX, Liang XZ, Mcaveney BJ, Meleshko VP, Mitchell JFB, Morcrette J, Randall DA, Rikus L, Roeckner E, Royer JF, Schlese U, Sheinin DA, Slingo A, Sokolov AP, Taylor KE, Washington WM, Wetherald RT, Yagai I, Zhang MH (1990) Intercomparison and interpretation of climate feedback processes in 19 atmospheric general-circulation models. J Geophys Res 95:16601–16615

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chadwick R, Boutle I, Martin G (2013) Spatial patterns of precipitation change in CMIP5: Why the rich dont get richer in the tropics. J Clim 26:3803–3822

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colman R (2003) A comparison of climate feedbacks in general circulation models. Clim Dyn 20:865–873

    Google Scholar 

  • Colman RA, McAvaney BJ (1997) A study of GCM climate feedbacks from perturbed SST experiments. J Geophys Res 102:19383–19402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Colman RA, McAvaney BJ (2011) On tropospheric adjustment to forcing and climate feedbacks. Clim Dyn 36:1649–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durack PJ, Wijffels SE, Matear RJ (2012) Ocean salinities reveal strong global water cycle intensification during 1950 to 2000. Science 336:455–458

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edwards JM, Slingo A (1996) Studies with a flexible new radiation code. I: choosing a configuration for a large-scale model. Q J R Meteorol Soc 122:689–720

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frieler K, Meinshausen M, Schneider von Deimling T, Andrews T, Forster P (2011) Changes in global-mean precipitation in response to warming, greenhouse gas forcing and black carbon. Geophys Res Lett 38. doi:10.1029/2010GL045,953

  • Gregory JM, Webb MJ (2008) Tropospheric adjustment induces a cloud component in CO2 forcing. J Clim 21:58–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory JM, Ingram WJ, Palmer MA, Jones G, Stott PA, Thorpe R, Lowe J, Johns TC, Williams K (2004) A new method for diagnosing radiative forcing and climate sensitivity. Geophys Res Lett 31(L03):205. doi:10.1029/2003GL018747

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansen J, Sato M, Ruedy R, Nazarenko L, Laics A, Schmidt GA, Russell G, Aleinov I, Bauer M, Bauer S, Bell N, Cairns B, Canuto V, Chandler M, Cheng Y, Del Genio A, Faluvegi G, Fleming E, Friend A, Hall T, Jackman C, Kelley M, Kiang N, Koch D, Lean J, Lerner J, Lo K, Menon S, Miller R, Minnis P, Novakov T, Oinas V, Perlwitz J, Perlwitz J, Rind D, Romanou A, Shindell D, Stone P, Sun S, Tausnev N, Thresher D, Wielicki B, Wong T, Yao M, Zhang S (2005) Efficacy of climate forcings. J Geophys Res 110. doi:10.1029/2005DJ005,776

  • Hartmann DL, Larson K (2002) An important constraint on tropical cloud-climate feedback. Geophys Res Lett 29:1951–1954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hasumi H, Emori S (2004) K-1 coupled model (MIROC) description. Tech. rep., Center for Climate System Research, University of Tokyo

  • Hegerl G et al (2007) Understanding and attributing climate change. In: Solomon S et al (eds) Climate change 2007: the physical science basis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, chap 9, pp 663–745

  • Held IM, Soden BJ (2006) Robust responses of the hydrological cycle to global warming. J Clim 19:5686–5699

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huffman GJ, Adler RF, Arkin PA, Chang A, Ferraro R, Gruber A, Janowiak J, McNab A, Rudolf B, Schnieder U (1997) The global precipitation climatology project (GPCP) combined precipitation dataset. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78(1):5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson CM, Fu Q (2009) Hadley cell widening: model simulations versus observations. J Clim 22:2713–2725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson NC, Xie S (2010) Changes in the sea surface temperature threshold for tropical convection. Nat Clim Change 3:842–845

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambert FH, Allen MR (2009) Are changes in global precipitation constrained by the tropospheric energy budget? J Clim 23:499–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lambert FH, Webb MJ (2008) Dependency of global mean precipitation on surface temperature. Geophys Res Lett 35. doi:10.1029/2008GL034,838

  • Lambert FH, Stine Z, Krakauer NY, Chiang JCH (2008) How much will precipitation increase with global warming? Eos trans 89. doi:10.1029/2008EO210,001

  • Li Y, Yang P, North GR, Dessler A (2012) Test of the fixed anvil temperature hypothesis. J Atmos Sci 69:2317–2328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenz DJ, DeWeaver ET, Vimont DJ (2010) Evaporation change and global warming: The role of net radiation and relative humidity. J Geophys Res 115. doi:10.1029/2010JD013,949

  • Lu J, Cai M (2009) Stabilization of atmospheric boundary layer and the muted hydrological cycle response to global warming. J Hydrometeor 10:347–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ming Y, Ramaswamy V, Persad G (2010) Two opposing effects of absorbing aerosols on global-mean precipitation. Geophys Res Lett 37. doi:10.1029/2010GL042,895

  • Mitchell JFB, Wilson CA, Cunnington WM (1987) On CO2 climate sensitivity and model dependence of results. Q J R Meteorol Soc 113:293–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy JM, Sexton DMH, Barnett DN, Jones GS, Webb MJ, Collins M, Stainforth DJ (2004) Quantification of modelling uncertainties in a large ensemble of climate change simulations. Nature 430:768–772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newell RE, Herman GF, Gould-Stewart S, Tanaka M (1975) Decreased global rainfall during the past ice age. Nature 253:33–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogura T, Emori S, Webb MJ, Tsushima Y, Yokohata T, Abe-Ouchi A, Kimoto M (2008) Towards understanding cloud response in atmospheric GCMs: the use of tendency diagnostics. J Meteorol Soc Jpn 86:69–79

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendergrass AG, Hartmann DL (2012) Global-mean precipitation and black carbon in AR4 simulations. Geophys Res Lett 39: doi:10.1029/2011GL050,067

  • Pendergrass AG, Hartmann DL (2014) The atmospheric energy constraint on global-mean precipitation change. J Clim 27:757–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierrehumbert RT (1995) Thermostats, radiator fins, and the local runaway greenhouse. J Atmos Sci 52:1784–1806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pope VD, Gallani ML, Rowntree PR, Stratton RA (2000) The impact of new physical parametrizations in the Hadley Centre climate model: HadAM3. Clim Dyn 16:123–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Previdi M (2010) Radiative feedbacks on global precipitation. Environ Res Lett 5. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/025,211

  • Previdi M, Liepert B (2008) Monitoring and understanding rainfall changes on a warming planet. Eos trans 89. doi:10.1029/2008EO210002

  • Richter I, Xie S (2008) The muted precipitation increase in global warming simulations: A surface evaporation perspective. J Geophys Res 113. doi:10.1029/2008JD010,561

  • Soden BJ, Vecchi GA (2011) The vertical distribution of cloud feedback in coupled ocean-atmosphere models. Geophys Res Lett 38. doi:10.1029/2011GL047,632

  • Soden BJ, Broccoli AJ, Hemler RS (2004) On the use of cloud forcing to estimate cloud feedback. J Clim 17:3661–3665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stephens GL, Ellis TD (2008) Controls of global-mean precipitation increases in global warming gcm experiments. J Clim 21:6141–6155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi K (2009a) The global hydrological cycle and atmospheric shortwave absorption in climate models under CO2 forcing. J Clim 22:5667–5675

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takahashi K (2009b) Radiative constraints on the hydrological cycle in an idealized radiative-convective equilibrium model. J Atmos Sci 66:77–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thuburn J, Craig GC (2002) On the temperature structure of the tropical substratosphere. J Geophys Res 107(D2):4017. doi:10.1029/2001JD000448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trenberth KE (2011) Changes in precipitation with climate change. Clim Res 47:123–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchi GA, Soden BJ (2007) Global warming and the weakening of the tropical circulation. J Clim 20:4316–4340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb MJ, Senior CA, Sexton DMH, Ingram WJ, Williams KD, Ringer MA, McAveney BJ, Colman R, Soden BJ, Gudgel R, Knutson T, Emori S, Ogura T, Tsushima Y, Andronova N, Li B, Musat I, Bony S, Taylor KE (2006) On the contribution of local feedback mechanisms to the range of climate sensitivity in two GCM ensembles. Clim Dyn 27:17–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentz FJ, Ricciardulli L, Hilburn K, Mears C (2007) How much more rain will global warming bring? Science. doi:10.1126/science.1140746

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetherald RT, Manabe S (1988) Cloud feedback processes in a general circulation model. J Atmos Sci 45:1397–1416

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie P, Arkin PA (1997) Global precipitation: a 17-year monthly analysis based on gauge observations, satellite estimates, and numerical model outputs. Bull Am Meteorol Soc 78(11):2539–2558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xie S, Deser C, Vecchi GA, Ma J, Teng H, Wittenberg AT (2010) Global warming pattern formation: sea surface temperature and rainfall. J Clim 23:966–986

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yin JH (2005) A consistent poleward shift of the storm tracks in simulations of 21st century climate. Geophys Res Lett 32. doi:10.1029/2005GL023,684

  • Yokohata T, Webb MJ, Collins M, Williams KD, Yoshimori M, Hargreaves JC, Annan JD (2010) Structural similarities and differences in climate responses to CO2 increase between two perturbed physics ensembles. J Clim 23:1392–1410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimori M, Broccoli AJ (2008) Equilibrium response of an atmosphere-mixed layer ocean model to different radiative forcing agents: Global and zonal mean response. J Clim 21:4399–4423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yoshimori M, Yokohata T, Abe-Ouchi A (2009) A comparison of climate feedback strength between CO2 doubling and LGM experiments. J Clim 22:3374–3395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zelinka MD, Hartmann DL (2010) Why is longwave cloud feedback positive? J Geophys Res 115. doi:10.1029/2010JD013,817

  • Zelinka MD, Hartmann DL (2012) Climate feedbacks and their implications for poleward energy flux changes in a warming climate. J Clim 25:608–624

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We are very grateful to James Manners and William Ingram for help with running the Edwards–Slingo radiation code and to Rob Chadwick, Joe Osborne and Jon Petch for helpful discussions. We thank two reviewers for thorough reviews. Mark Webb was supported by the Joint DECC/Defra Met Office Hadley Centre Climate Programme (GA01101) and by funding from the European Union, Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement number 244067 via the EU Cloud Intercomparison and Process Study Evaluation project (EUCLIPSE).

Author information

Author notes

  1. Masakazu Yoshimori

    Present address: Faculty of Environmental Earth Science, Hokkaido University, Kita-10, Nishi-5, Kita-ku, Sapporo, 060-0810, Japan

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Engineering, Mathematics and Physical Sciences, University of Exeter, Harrison Building, North Park Road, Exeter, EX4 4QF, UK

    F. Hugo Lambert

  2. Met Office Hadley Centre, Fitzroy Road, Exeter, EX1 3PB, UK

    Mark J. Webb

  3. Atmosphere and Ocean Research Institute, The University of Tokyo, 5-1-5, Kashiwanoha, Kashiwa, Chiba, 277-8568, Japan

    Masakazu Yoshimori

  4. National Institute for Environmental Studies, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, 305-8506, Japan

    Tokuta Yokohata

Authors
  1. F. Hugo Lambert
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Mark J. Webb
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Masakazu Yoshimori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tokuta Yokohata
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Hugo Lambert.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (pdf 134 KB)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lambert, F.H., Webb, M.J., Yoshimori, M. et al. The cloud radiative effect on the atmospheric energy budget and global mean precipitation. Clim Dyn 44, 2301–2325 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2174-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00382-014-2174-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation