Skip to main content
Log in

Diagnostic Value of Inflammation Markers in Predicting Perforation in Acute Sigmoid Diverticulitis

  • Published:
World Journal of Surgery Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The importance of inflammation markers in predicting perforation in acute sigmoid diverticulitis is not well known. Predicting perforation by clinical examination alone may be hazardous. If perforation is suspected, then appropriate diagnostic tools such as computed tomography (CT) are indicated, and surgical intervention might be necessary.

Methods

A cohort of consecutive patients with acute sigmoid diverticulitis diagnosed by CT and with complete laboratory findings (n = 247) were retrospectively divided into two groups, one with perforation (n = 86) and another without (n = 161). The latest values of C-reactive protein (CRP), white blood cell count (WBC), and serum bilirubin, as well as the activity of the alkaline phosphatase (AP) measured during the 48 h period before the CT scan, were assessed.

Results

In the Wilcoxon rank sum test CRP and WBC correlate significantly (p < 0.05) with perforation in acute sigmoid diverticulitis, whereas the logistic regression model shows only CRP to correlate significantly (p = 0.001) with perforation. The sensitivities/specificities for perforation are 98%/5% for elevated CRP (>5 mg/l), 86%/27% for a CRP higher than 50 mg/l, 44%/81% for a CRP higher than 150 mg/l, 28%/93% for a CRP higher than 200 mg/l, 88%/44% for elevated WBC (>10 × 109/l), 35%/90% for hyperbilirubinemia (>20 μmol/l), and 35%/91% for elevated AP (>110 U/l).

Conclusions

A CRP below 50 mg/l suggests a perforation to be unlikely in acute sigmoid diverticulitis, whereas a CRP higher than 200 mg/l is a strong indicator of perforation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Tursi A, Brandimarte G, Giorgetti G et al (2008) The clinical picture of uncomplicated versus complicated diverticulitis of the colon. Dig Dis Sci 53:2474–2479

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kaiser AM, Jiang JK, Lake JP et al (2005) The management of complicated diverticulitis and the role of computed tomography. Am J Gastroenterol 100:910–917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Gasche C, Vermeire S (2006) Laboratory tests—what do they tell us? In: Kruis W, Forbes A, Jauch KW, Kreis ME, Wexner SD (eds) Diverticular disease: emerging evidence in a common condition. Springer, New York, pp 55–66

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  4. Schentag JJ, O’Keeffe D, Marmion M et al (1984) C-reactive protein as an indicator of infection relapse in patients with abdominal sepsis. Arch Surg 119:300–304

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Póvoa P, Almeida E, Moreira P et al (1998) C-reactive protein as an indicator of sepsis. Intensive Care Med 24:1052–1056

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. John SK, Teo NB, Forster AL (2007) A prospective study of acute admissions in a surgical unit due to diverticular disease. Dig Surg 24:186–190

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Tung CB, Tung CF, Yang DY et al (2005) Extremely high levels of alkaline phosphatase in adult patients as a manifestation of bacteremia. Hepatogastroenterology 52:1347–1350

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Fang MH, Ginsberg AL, Dobbins WO 3rd (1980) Marked elevation in serum alkaline phosphatase activity as a manifestation of systemic infection. Gastroenterology 78:592–597

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Whitehead MW, Hainsworth I, Kingham JG (2001) The causes of obvious jaundice in South West Wales: perceptions versus reality. Gut 48:409–413

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Clare A, Teubner A, Shaffer JL (2008) What information should lead to a suspicion of catheter sepsis in HPN? Clin Nutr 27:552–556

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Garvin IP (1837) Remarks on pneumonia biliosa. S Med Surg J 1:536–544

    Google Scholar 

  12. Utili R, Abernathy CO, Zimmerman HJ (1976) Cholestatic effects of Escherichia coli endotoxin on the isolated perfused rat liver. Gastroenterology 70:248–253

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Trauner M, Fickert P, Stauber RE (1999) Inflammation-induced cholestasis. J Gastroenterol Hepatol 14:946–959

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Moradpour D (2006) Leber. In: Siegenthaler W, Blum HE (eds) Klinische pathophysiologie, 9th edn. Thieme, Stuttgart, New York, pp 859–888

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sand M, Bechara FG, Holland-Letz T et al (2009) Diagnostic value of hyperbilirubinemia as a predictive factor for appendiceal perforation in acute appendicitis. Am J Surg 198:193–198

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Sellner F, Sobhian B, Baur M et al (2007) Intermittent hepatic portal vein gas complicating diverticulitis—a case report and literature review. Int J Colorectal Dis 22:1395–1399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kircher MF, Rhea JT, Kihiczak D et al (2002) Frequency, sensitivity, and specificity of individual signs of diverticulitis on thin-section helical CT with colonic contrast material: experience with 312 cases. Am J Roentgenol 178:1313–1318

    Google Scholar 

  18. Hinchey E, Schaal P, Richards G (1978) Treatment of perforated diverticular disease of the colon. Adv Surg 12:85–109

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflicts of interest statement

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Christoph A. Maurer.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Käser, S.A., Fankhauser, G., Glauser, P.M. et al. Diagnostic Value of Inflammation Markers in Predicting Perforation in Acute Sigmoid Diverticulitis. World J Surg 34, 2717–2722 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0726-7

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00268-010-0726-7

Keywords

Navigation