Abstract
The method of superoperators in Liouville space was applied to study spectral properties of hot nuclei. It is shown that properly defined fermionic superoperators allow us to generalize the equation-of-motion method to hot nuclei. Within the superoperator approach, for the nuclear model with separable particle–hole residual interaction of Landau–Migdal type, we derived the equations of thermal quasiparticle random phase approximation, which allow the spectral densities and strength functions of charge-exchange and charge-neutral excitations of hot nuclei to be calculated in a thermodynamically consistent way, i.e., without violating the principle of detailed balance. For the quasiparticle-phonon nuclear model, a thermodynamically consistent way is proposed for going beyond the random phase approximation by considering the interaction of thermal phonons. Using the Donnelly–Walecka method and the superoperator approach, expressions for cross sections of semileptonic weak reactions with hot nuclei are obtained.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
In the case of a self-adjoint operator \(\mathcal{T} = {{\mathcal{T}}^{\dag }}\), the principle of detailed balance relates the excitation and deexcitation rates of hot systems, \({{S}_{\mathcal{T}}}( - E,T) = {{{\text{e}}}^{{ - E/T}}}{{S}_{\mathcal{T}}}(E,T)\).
If the set \(\left\{ {\left| n \right\rangle } \right\}\) consists of the eigenstates of the Hamiltonian \(H\), then \({\kern 1pt} \left| m \right\rangle \left\langle n \right|\) are the eigenstates of the Liouville superoperator
$$\mathcal{L}(\left| m \right\rangle \left\langle n \right|) = {{E}_{{mn}}}\left| m \right\rangle \left\langle n \right|,$$(13)where \({{E}_{{mn}}} = {{E}_{m}} - {{E}_{n}}\). Moreover \({\kern 1pt} \left| m \right\rangle \left\langle n \right|\) and the Hermitian-adjoint operator \({\kern 1pt} \left| n \right\rangle \left\langle m \right|\) are matched by eigenvalues equal in absolute value but having opposite sign.
The definition of left superoperators \({{\vec {a}}^{\dag }}\), \(\vec {a}\) that we use does not differ from the definition in the paper by Schmutz [36]. However, for right fermionic superoperators, as will be shown below, we use a more convenient definition. Also note that in [36] the left superoperators were denoted with the symbol “hat,” while the right ones, with the symbol “tilde.”
Another way to prove relations (33) is to consider the scalar products of the right and left sides with basis vectors. For example:
$$\begin{gathered} \left\langle {\left\langle {mn\left\| {{{{\vec {a}}}_{i}}} \right\|I} \right\rangle } \right\rangle = \sum\limits_k \left\langle {\left\langle {\left. {mn{\kern 1pt} } \right\|{{a}_{i}}\left| {{\kern 1pt} k} \right\rangle \left\langle {{\kern 1pt} k} \right|} \right\rangle } \right\rangle \\ = \sum\limits_k \left\langle {m\left| {{{a}_{i}}} \right|k} \right\rangle {{\delta }_{{kn}}} = \left\langle {m\left| {{{a}_{i}}} \right|n} \right\rangle = \left\langle {\left\langle {\left. {mn} \right\|{{a}_{i}}} \right\rangle } \right\rangle , \\ \end{gathered} $$from where follows \({{\vec {a}}_{i}}\left| {\left| {I{\kern 1pt} } \right\rangle } \right\rangle = \left| {\left| {{{a}_{i}}{\kern 1pt} } \right\rangle } \right\rangle \). The other relations are proved similarly.
Really, \({{(\vec {A}\vec {B})}^{\dag }} = {{(\overleftarrow {AB} )}^{\dag }} = \overleftarrow {{{{(AB)}}^{\dag }}} = \overleftarrow {{{B}^{\dag }}{{A}^{\dag }}} = {{\vec {B}}^{\dag }}{{\vec {A}}^{\dag }}{\kern 1pt} .\)
For a time-independent Liouvillian, the formal solution of Eq. (10) has the form
$$\left| {\left| {\rho (t)} \right\rangle } \right\rangle = {\kern 1pt} {{e}^{{ - i\mathcal{L}(t - {{t}_{0}})}}}\left| {\left| {\rho ({{t}_{0}})} \right\rangle } \right\rangle .$$In [42–46], in order to obtain the superoperator representation of the Lindblad equation for the density matrix of an open quantum system, relations (63) were used in the following way
$$\left| {\left| {A\rho B} \right\rangle } \right\rangle = {{\sigma }_{B}}\vec {A}{\kern 1pt} {{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{B} }^{\dag }}\left| {\left| \rho \right\rangle } \right\rangle .$$(75)Products of the form \(A\rho B\) are contained in the part of Lindblad equation that describes the processes of dissipation in the system [77].
From (50) it follows that
$$\left\langle {\left\langle {k\left\| {{{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} }}_{j}}} \right\|{\kern 1pt} mn} \right\rangle } \right\rangle = i{{( - 1)}^{{(m + n)}}}\left\langle {\left\langle {lk\left\| {{{{\vec {a}}}_{j}}} \right\|nm} \right\rangle } \right\rangle {\text{*}}.$$However, since only matrix elements with \(k + l = m + n - 1\) differ from zero, then
$$\begin{gathered} \sigma _{{k + l}}^{*}{{\sigma }_{{m + n}}} = {{( + i)}^{{{{{(k + l)}}^{2}}}}}{{( - i)}^{{{{{(m + n)}}^{2}}}}} \\ = {{( + i)}^{{(k + l + m + n)(k + l - m - n)}}} = {{( + i)}^{{ - 2(m + n) + 1}}} = i{{( - 1)}^{{(m + n)}}}. \\ \end{gathered} $$The latter rule, the double tilde rule, is consistent with (78), since
From the tilde invariance of the density matrix, it follows that \(\tilde {\mathcal{L}} = - \mathcal{L}\) even in the case when \(\mathcal{L} \ne {{\mathcal{L}}^{\dag }}\) [42–46].
If
$$\left\langle {\left\langle {I\left\| {{{{\vec {A}}}_{i}}{{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{B} }}_{i}}} \right\|I} \right\rangle } \right\rangle = {{( - 1)}^{{({{\eta }_{{{{B}_{i}}}}} + 1){{\eta }_{{{{B}_{i}}}}}/2}}}{\text{Tr(}}{{A}_{i}}B_{i}^{\dag }) \ne 0,$$(94)then \({{N}_{{{{A}_{i}}}}} + {{N}_{{{{B}_{i}}}}}\) is even, while \({{m}_{{{{A}_{i}}}}} + {{n}_{{{{B}_{i}}}}} = {{n}_{{{{A}_{i}}}}} + {{m}_{{{{B}_{i}}}}}\).
If right superoperators of creation and annihilation are defined according to (50), then
$$\left\langle {\left\langle {I\left\| {{{{\vec {A}}}_{i}}{{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{B} }}_{i}}} \right\|I} \right\rangle } \right\rangle = \sigma _{{{{A}_{i}}}}^{*}\sigma _{{{{B}_{i}}}}^{*}{{( - 1)}^{{{{N}_{{{{A}_{i}}}}}{{N}_{{{{B}_{i}}}}}}}}\left\langle {\left\langle {I\left\| {{{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{A} }}_{i}}{{{\vec {B}}}_{i}}} \right\|I} \right\rangle } \right\rangle {\text{*}}.$$For a fermion-like \({{A}_{i}}{{B}_{i}}\), the left and right matrix elements are zero. Otherwise. \(\sigma _{{{{A}_{i}}}}^{*}\sigma _{{{{B}_{i}}}}^{*}{{( - 1)}^{{{{N}_{{{{A}_{i}}}}}{{N}_{{{{B}_{i}}}}}}}} = 1\).
Let us prove the first equality:
$$\begin{gathered} \vec {A}{\kern 1pt} \left| {\left| {\sqrt {\rho (T)} } \right\rangle } \right\rangle = \vec {A}{{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{\rho } }}^{{1/2}}}\left| {\left| {I{\kern 1pt} } \right\rangle } \right\rangle = {{\sigma }_{A}}{{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{\rho } }}^{{1/2}}}{{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{A} }}^{\dag }}\left| {\left| {I{\kern 1pt} } \right\rangle } \right\rangle {\kern 1pt} \\ = {{\sigma }_{A}}{\kern 1pt} {{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{\rho } }}^{{1/2}}}{{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{A} }}^{\dag }}{\kern 1pt} {{{\vec {\rho }}}^{{ - 1/2}}}\vec {\rho }{{{\kern 1pt} }^{{1/2}}}\left| {\left| {I{\kern 1pt} } \right\rangle } \right\rangle = {{\sigma }_{A}}{\kern 1pt} {{{\text{e}}}^{{\mathcal{L}/2T}}}{{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{A} }}^{\dag }}\left| {\left| {\sqrt {\rho (T)} } \right\rangle } \right\rangle . \\ \end{gathered} $$We have taken into account that \(\vec {A}\) commutes with \({{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{\rho } }^{{1/2}}}\)and that in the equilibrium case the operator inverse to \({{\rho }^{{1/2}}}\) is equal to \({{\rho }^{{ - 1/2}}}\) (see (96)).
Consider the following chain of equalities
$$\begin{gathered} \left\langle {\left\langle {\sqrt {\rho (T)} \left\| {\vec {A}(t)\vec {B}(t{\kern 1pt} ')} \right\|\sqrt {\rho (T)} } \right\rangle } \right\rangle \\ = {{\sigma }_{{AB}}}\left\langle {\left\langle {\sqrt {\rho (T)} \left\| {{{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{B} }}^{\dag }}(t{\kern 1pt} '){\kern 1pt} {{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{A} }}^{\dag }}(t)} \right\|\sqrt {\rho (T)} } \right\rangle } \right\rangle = {{\sigma }_{{AB}}}\sigma _{A}^{*}{{\sigma }_{B}} \\ \times \,\,\left\langle {\left\langle {\sqrt {\rho (T)} \left\| {\vec {B}(t{\kern 1pt} '\,\, - {i \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {i {2T}}} \right. \kern-0em} {2T}})\vec {A}(t + {i \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {i {2T}}} \right. \kern-0em} {2T}})} \right\|\sqrt {\rho (T)} } \right\rangle } \right\rangle \\ = {{\sigma }_{{AB}}}\sigma _{A}^{*}{{\sigma }_{B}}\left\langle {\left\langle {\sqrt {\rho (T)} \left\| {\vec {B}(t{\kern 1pt} ')\vec {A}(t + {i \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {i T}} \right. \kern-0em} T})} \right\|\sqrt {\rho (T)} } \right\rangle } \right\rangle . \\ \end{gathered} $$If \(AB\) is the fermion-like operator, then matrix elements are zero. Otherwise \({{\sigma }_{{AB}}}\sigma _{A}^{*}{{\sigma }_{B}} = 1\), which proves (103).
We assume that the proton has an isospin projection \({{ - 1} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ - 1} 2}} \right. \kern-0em} 2}\), while neutron, \({{ + 1} \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{ + 1} 2}} \right. \kern-0em} 2}\). Then charge-exchange operators of \(n \to p\) transitions contain the operator lowering the isospin \({{t}_{ - }}\) (\({{t}_{ - }}{\kern 1pt} \left| n \right\rangle = \left| p \right\rangle \)), while operators of \(p \to n\) transitions contain the isospin-raising operator \({{t}_{ + }}\) (\({{t}_{ + }}{\kern 1pt} \left| p \right\rangle = \left| n \right\rangle \)). Note also that if \(A\) corresponds to transition \(n \to p\), then \({{A}^{\dag }}\) is the \(p \to n\) transition operator and vice versa.
Since the calculations are carried out in the grand canonical ensemble, the thermal Hamiltonian contains the chemical potentials
$$\mathcal{H} = (H - {{\mu }_{p}}Z - {{\mu }_{n}}N) - (\tilde {H} - {{\mu }_{p}}\tilde {Z} - {{\mu }_{n}}\tilde {N}).$$(123)The expression for the detailed balance obtained in [88] transforms into (136) if the ratio of the partition functions of the parent and daughter nuclei is set equal to unity, while a difference in the masses of the nuclei is considered equal to the effective threshold.
Recall that it is precisely this situation is realized in the derivation of the RPA equations, when the Hartree–Fock vacuum is used as the ground state in the equation of motion instead of the phonon vacuum [41].
Following [85, v. 1, p. 86], we use the following definition of a reduced matrix element \(t_{{{{j}_{1}}{{j}_{2}}}}^{{(J)}} = \left\langle {{{j}_{1}}\left\| {{{T}_{J}}} \right\|{{j}_{2}}} \right\rangle \)
$$\left\langle {{{j}_{1}}{{m}_{1}}\left| {{{T}_{{JM}}}} \right|{{j}_{2}}{{m}_{2}}} \right\rangle = \hat {j}_{1}^{{ - 1}}\left\langle {\left. {{{j}_{2}}{{m}_{2}}JM} \right|{{j}_{1}}{{m}_{1}}} \right\rangle t_{{{{j}_{1}}{{j}_{2}}}}^{{(J)}}.$$(153)Then for the \(M\)th component of an arbitrary one-particle tensor operator \({{T}_{J}}\), we can write
$$\begin{gathered} {{T}_{{JM}}} = \sum\limits_{\begin{array}{*{20}{c}} {{{j}_{1}}{{m}_{1}}} \\ {{{j}_{2}}{{m}_{2}}} \end{array}} \left\langle {{{j}_{1}}{{m}_{1}}\left| {{{T}_{{JM}}}} \right|{{j}_{2}}{{m}_{2}}} \right\rangle a_{{{{j}_{1}}{{m}_{1}}}}^{\dag }{{a}_{{{{j}_{2}}{{m}_{2}}}}} \\ = - {{{\hat {J}}}^{{ - 1}}}\sum\limits_{{{j}_{1}}{{j}_{2}}} t_{{{{j}_{1}}{{j}_{2}}}}^{{(J)}}[a_{{{{j}_{1}}}}^{\dag }{{a}_{{{{{\bar {j}}}_{2}}}}}]{{\,}_{{JM}}}, \\ \end{gathered} $$(154)where \(\hat {J} = \sqrt {2J + 1} \), and with the use of square brackets \({{[ \ldots ]}_{{JM}}}\), the coupling of two angular momenta into the total angular momentum \(J\) with the projection \(M\) is denoted:
$${{[a_{{{{j}_{1}}}}^{\dag }a_{{{{j}_{2}}}}^{\dag }]}_{{JM}}} = \sum\limits_{{{m}_{1}}{{m}_{2}}} \left\langle {\left. {{{j}_{1}}{{m}_{1}}{{j}_{2}}{{m}_{2}}} \right|JM} \right\rangle a_{{{{j}_{1}}{{m}_{1}}}}^{\dag }a_{{{{j}_{2}}{{m}_{2}}}}^{\dag }.$$(155)The notation \({{[a_{{{{j}_{1}}}}^{\dag }{{a}_{{{{{\bar {j}}}_{2}}}}}]}_{{JM}}}\) in (154) and (157) means
$${{[a_{{{{j}_{1}}}}^{\dag }{{a}_{{{{{\bar {j}}}_{2}}}}}]}_{{JM}}} = \sum\limits_{{{m}_{1}}{{m}_{2}}} \left\langle {\left. {{{j}_{1}}{{m}_{1}}{{j}_{2}}{{m}_{2}}} \right|JM} \right\rangle a_{{{{j}_{1}}{{m}_{1}}}}^{\dag }{{a}_{{\overline {{{j}_{2}}{{m}_{2}}} }}}.$$(156)We also introduce the notation used in what follows \({{A}_{{\overline {JM} }}} = {{( - 1)}^{{J - M}}}{{A}_{{J - M}}}\).
The bosonic expansion method was used to diagonalize the thermal Hamiltonian of the Lipkin model in our works [102, 103].
In the absence of pairing correlations, we consider particles and holes as quasiparticles.
The second relation uses the fact that it is \(\widetilde \beta _{{\overline {jm} }}^{\dag }\) that is transformed as a spherical tensor operator of rank \(j\) during the rotation of the coordinate system. To verify this, it suffices to express the nucleon creation operator in terms of thermal quasiparticles \(a_{{jm}}^{\dag } = {{x}_{j}}({{u}_{j}}\beta _{{jm}}^{\dag } + {{v}_{j}}{{\beta }_{{\overline {jm} }}}) - i{{y}_{j}}({{v}_{j}}\tilde {\beta }_{{\overline {jm} }}^{\dag } - {{u}_{j}}{{\tilde {\beta }}_{{jm}}})\).
In what follows, we will call the hole (particle) states that are below (above) the Fermi surface.
For bosonic operators \({{b}^{\dag }}{\kern 1pt} \left| n \right\rangle = \sqrt {n + 1} \left| {n + 1} \right\rangle \) and \(b{\kern 1pt} \left| n \right\rangle = \sqrt n \left| {n - 1} \right\rangle \).
Recall that, in contrast to charge-neutral transitions, there is no one-to-one correspondence between the excitation of charge-exchange nontilde (tilde) states and \( \uparrow \)(\( \downarrow \))-transitions.
As well as for \(T = 0\), the validity of the quasi-boson approximation is related to the requirement that the number of thermal quasiparticles in the vacuum of thermal phonons be small. This requirement is the main assumption in the TQRPA.
Other amplitudes when permuting the indices \({{j}_{1}}\) and \({{j}_{2}}\) are multiplied by \({{( - 1)}^{{{{j}_{1}} - {{j}_{2}} + J}}}\) (i.e., \(\psi _{{{{j}_{2}}{{j}_{1}}}}^{{Ji}} = {{( - 1)}^{{{{j}_{1}} - {{j}_{2}} + J}}}\psi _{{{{j}_{1}}{{j}_{2}}}}^{{Ji}}\) etc.).
Using relations (222) it is easy to show that if \(\mathcal{T}_{{JM}}^{\dag } = {{( - 1)}^{{J - M}}}{{\mathcal{T}}_{{J - M}}}\) (and, therefore, \(t_{{{{j}_{2}}{{j}_{1}}}}^{{(J)}} = {{( - 1)}^{{{{j}_{1}} - {{j}_{2}} + J}}}t_{{{{j}_{1}}{{j}_{2}}}}^{{(J)}}\)), then \(\Gamma _{i}^{{( - )}}({{\mathcal{T}}_{J}}) = 0\). On the contrary, if \(\mathcal{T}_{{JM}}^{\dag } = - {{( - 1)}^{{J - M}}}{{\mathcal{T}}_{{J - M}}}\) (and, therefore, \(t_{{{{j}_{2}}{{j}_{1}}}}^{{(J)}} = {{( - 1)}^{{{{j}_{1}} + {{j}_{2}} + J}}}t_{{{{j}_{1}}{{j}_{2}}}}^{{(J)}}\)), then \(\Gamma _{i}^{{( + )}}({{\mathcal{T}}_{J}}) = 0\).
The approximately equal sign in (240) means that in the QPM thermal Hamiltonian we neglect the part containing the products of the creation and annihilation operators of thermal quasiparticles of the form \({{\beta }^{\dag }}\beta {{\beta }^{\dag }}\beta \). As with \(T = 0\), terms of this form are fourth-order operators in phonon operators, while \({{\mathcal{H}}_{{{\text{qph}}}}} \sim {{Q}^{\dag }}{{Q}^{\dag }}Q\) is the leading correction to the thermal Hamiltonian of noninteracting phonons.
In TQRPA (see Eq. (210)), the analogs of these mixed components in the structure of a thermal phonon are two thermal quasiparticle states of the form \({{\beta }^{\dag }}{{\widetilde \beta }^{\dag }}\), which describe the scattering of thermally excited Bogolyubov quasiparticles. By analogy, terms of the form \({{Q}^{\dag }}{{\widetilde Q}^{\dag }}\)correspond to the scattering of thermally excited \(q\)-phonons.
To obtain expressions for \(\mathcal{M}_{{JM}}^{{(k)\dag }}\) and \(\mathcal{S}_{{LJM}}^{{(k)\dag }}\) from (193), it suffices to make the substitutions: \({{j}_{{1,2}}} \to {{j}_{{p,n}}}\) and \(t_{{{{j}_{1}}{{j}_{2}}}}^{{(J)}} \to f_{{{{j}_{p}}{{j}_{n}}}}^{{(J;k)}},f_{{{{j}_{p}}{{j}_{n}}}}^{{(LJ;k)}}\).
To consider a distortion of the wave function of a charged lepton in the Coulomb field of the nucleus, see below.
As shown in [149], the nuclear recoil can be neglected provided that the energy of incident lepton and the energy of nucleus excitation are much less than the nuclear mass \({{M}_{A}}\). If this condition is omitted, then the largest correction will be a coefficient for the density of final states (recoil factor)
$$\begin{gathered} {{f}_{R}} = {{\left[ {1 + \frac{{{{\varepsilon }_{l}}{{p}_{{l{\kern 1pt} '}}} - {{\varepsilon }_{{l{\kern 1pt} '}}}{{p}_{l}}\cos \theta }}{{{{p}_{{l{\kern 1pt} '}}}{{M}_{A}}{{c}^{2}}}}} \right]}^{{ - 1}}} \\ \approx {{\left[ {1 + \frac{{2{{\varepsilon }_{l}}{{{\sin }}^{2}}({\theta \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {\theta 2}} \right. \kern-0em} 2})}}{{{{M}_{A}}{{c}^{2}}}}} \right]}^{{ - 1}}}, \\ \end{gathered} $$(279)by which the right-hand side of (280) is multiplied.
REFERENCES
H. A. Bethe, “Nuclear physics B. Nuclear dynamics, theoretical,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 9, 69–244 (1937).
Ya. I. Frenkel, Phys. Zs. Sowjetunion 9, 533 (1936).
L. D. Landau, “On the statistical theory of nuclei,” Zh. Eksp. Teor. Fiz. 7, 819–824 (1937).
V. Weisskopf, “Statistics and nuclear reactions,” Phys. Rev. 52, 295–303 (1937).
V. S. Stavinskii, “Level density of atomic nuclei,” Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra 3, 832–893 (1972).
E. Suraud, C. Grégoire, and B. Tamain, “Birth, life and death of hot nuclei,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 23, 357–467 (1989).
D. J. Morrissey, W. Benenson, and W. A. Friedman, “Measurement of temperature in nuclear reactions,” Annu. Rev. Nucl. Part. Sci. 44, 27–63 (1994).
A. Kelić, J. B. Natowitz, and K. H. Schmidt, “Nuclear thermometry,” Eur. Phys. J. A 30, 203–213 (2006).
S. Song, M. Rivet, R. Bimbot, et al., “Evidence for the formation of highly excited compound-like nuclei (T ≈ 5 MeV) in collisions of 720 MeV C projectiles with 238U, 232Th and 197Au targets,” Phys. Lett. B 130, 14–18 (1983).
S. Shlomo and V. M. Kolomietz, “Hot nuclei,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 68, 1–76 (2005).
J. O. Newton, B. Herskind, R. M. Diamond, et al., “Observation of giant dipole resonances built on states of high energy and spin,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 46, 1383–1386 (1981).
P. F. Bortignon, A. Bracco, and R. A. Broglia, “Giant Resonances: Nuclear Structure at Finite Temperature,” in Contemporary Concepts in Physics (Harwood Acad. Publ., 1998), Vol. 10.
M. Di Toro, V. Baran, M. Cabibbo, et al., “The nuclear giant dipole resonance under extreme conditions,” Phys. Elem. Part. At. Nucl. 31, 874–904 (2000).
D. Santonocito and Y. Blumenfeld, “Evolution of the giant dipole resonance properties with excitation energy,” Eur. Phys. J. A 30, 183–202 (2006).
D. Santonocito and Y. Blumenfeld, “The hot GDR revisited,” Eur. Phys. J. A 56, 279 (2020).
D. Brink, PhD Thesis (Univ. Oxford, 1955).
P. Axel, “Electric dipole ground-state transition width strength function and 7 MeV photon interactions,” Phys. Rev. 126, 671–683 (1962).
D. Vautherin and N. Vinh Mau, “Temperature dependence of collective states in the random-phase approximation,” Nucl. Phys. A 422, 140–156 (1984).
Y. F. Niu, N. Paar, D. Vretenar, and J. Meng, “Low-energy monopole and dipole response in nuclei at finite temperature,” Phys. Lett. B 681, 315–319 (2009).
P. Ring, L. M. Robledo, J. L. Egido, and M. Faber, “Microscopic theory of the isovector dipole resonance at high angular momenta,” Nucl. Phys. A 419, 261–294 (1984).
E. Yüksel, G. Colò, E. Khan, et al., “Multipole excitations in hot nuclei within the finite temperature quasi-particle random phase approximation framework,” Phys. Rev. C 96, 024303 (2017).
H. Sagawa and G. F. Bertsch, “Self-consistent calculations of finite temperature nuclear response function,” Phys. Lett. B 146, 138–142 (1984).
E. V. Litvinova, S. P. Kamerdzhiev, and V. I. Tselyaev, “Temperature generalization of the quasi-particle random-phase approximation with allowance for a continuum,” Phys. Atom. Nucl. 66, 558—564 (2003).
E. Khan, N. Van Giai, and M. Grasso, “Collective motions in hot exotic nuclei: The finite temperature continuum QRPA,” Nucl. Phys. A 731, 311–316 (2004).
A. A. Abrikosov, L. P. Gor’kov, and I. E. Dzyaloshinskii, Methods of Quantum Field Theory in Statistical Physics (Fizmatlit, Moscow, 1962; Prentice Hall Press, 1963).
P. F. Bortignon, R. A. Broglia, G. F. Bertsch, and J. Pacheco, “Damping of nuclear excitations at finite temperature,” Nucl. Phys. A 460, 149–163 (1986).
G. G. Bunatyan, “On statistical description of the compound states of nuclei,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 26, 979–990 (1977).
S. P. Kamerdzhiev, Preprint FEI-1860 (FEI, Obninsk, 1987).
S. P. Kamerdzhiev, G. Ya. Tertychnyi, and V. I. Tselyaev, “Method of chronological decoupling of diagrams and its application to description of giant resonances in magic nuclei,” Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra 28, 333–390 (1997).
E. Litvinova and H. Wibowo, “Finite-temperature relativistic nuclear field theory: An application to the dipole response,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 121,082501 (2018).
E. Litvinova and H. Wibowo, “Nuclear response in a finite-temperature relativistic framework,” Eur. Phys. J. A 55, 223 (2019).
H. Wibowo and E. Litvinova, “Nuclear dipole response in the finite-temperature relativistic time-blocking approximation,” Phys. Rev. C 100, 024307 (2019).
Y. Takahashi and H. Umezawa, “Thermo-field dynamics,” Collect. Phenom. 2. 55 (1975).
H. Umezawa, H. Matsumoto, and M. Tachiki, Thermo-Field Dynamics and Condensed States (Elsevier, Amsterdam, 1982; Mir, Moscow, 1985).
A. A. Dzhioev and A. I. Vdovin, “On the TFD treatment of collective vibrations in hot nuclei,” Int. J. Mod. Phys. E 18, 1535–1560 (2009).
M. Schmutz, “Real-time Green’s functions in many body problems,” Z. Phys. B 30, 97–106 (1978).
I. Ojima, “Gauge fields at finite temperatures—“Thermo field dynamics” and the KMS condition and their extension to gauge theories,” Ann. Phys. 137, 1–32 (1981).
N. P. Landsman and van C. G. Weert, “Real- and imaginary-time field theory at finite temperature and density,” Phys. Rep. 145, 141–249 (1987).
D. J. Rowe, “Equations of motion method and the extended shell model,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 40, 153–166 (1968).
D. J. Rowe, Nuclear Collective Motion: Models and Theory (World Scientific, 2010).
J. Suhonen, From Nucleons to Nucleus (Springer, Berlin, 2007).
A. A. Dzhioev and D. S. Kosov, “Second-order post-Hartree-Fock perturbation theory for the electron current,” J. Chem. Phys. 134, 154107 (2011).
A. A. Dzhioev and D. S. Kosov, “Super-fermion representation of quantum kinetic equations for the electron transport problem,” J. Chem. Phys. 134, 044121 (2011).
A. A. Dzhioev and D. S. Kosov, “Nonequilibrium perturbation theory in Liouville-Fock space for inelastic electron transport,” J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 24, 225304 (2012).
A. A. Dzhioev and D. S. Kosov, “Nonequilibrium configuration interaction method for transport in correlated quantum systems,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 47, 095002 (2014).
A. A. Dzhioev and D. S. Kosov, “Superoperator coupled cluster method for nonequilibrium density matrix,” J. Phys. A: Math. Theor. 48, 015004 (2015).
H. A. Bethe, “Supernova mechanisms,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 62. 801–866 (1990).
K. Langanke and G. Martínez-Pinedo, “Nuclear weak-interaction processes in stars,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 75, 819–862 (2003).
H.-T. Janka, K. Langanke, A. Marek, et al., “Theory of core-collapse supernovae,” Phys. Rep. 442, 38–74 (2007).
G. Martínez-Pinedo, M. Liebendörfer, and D. Frekers, “Nuclear input for core-collapse models,” Nucl. Phys. A 777, 395–423 (2006).
F. Hoyle, “The synthesis of the elements from hydrogen,” Mon. Not. R. Astron. Soc. 106, 343–383 (1946).
J. J. Cowan, C. Sneden, J. E. Lawler, et al., “Origin of the heaviest elements: The rapid neutron-capture process,” Rev. Mod. Phys. 93, 15002 (2021).
A. Heger, K. Langanke, G. Martínez-Pinedo, and S. E. Woosley, “Presupernova collapse models with improved weak-interaction rates,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 86, 1678–1681 (2001).
A. Heger, S. E. Woosley, G. Martínez-Pinedo, and K. Langanke, “Presupernova evolution with improved rates for weak interactions,” Astrophys. J. 560, 307 (2001).
K. Langanke, G. Martínez-Pinedo, J. M. Sampaio, et al., “Electron capture rates on nuclei and implications for stellar core collapse,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 90, 241102 (2003).
W. R. Hix, O. E. B. Messer, A. Mezzacappa, et al., “Consequences of nuclear electron capture in core collapse supernovae,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 201102 (2003).
K. G. Balasi, K. Langanke, and G. Martínez-Pinedo, “Neutrino-nucleus reactions and their role for supernova dynamics and nucleosynthesis,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 85, 33–81 (2015).
C. Sullivan, E. O’Connor, R. G. T. Zegers, et al., “The sensitivity of core-collapse supernovae to nuclear electron capture,” Astrophys. J. 816, 44 (2016).
R. Titus, C. Sullivan, R. G. T. Zegers, et al., “Impact of electron-captures on nuclei near N = 50 on core-collapse supernovae,” J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 45, 014004 (2018).
A. Pascal, S. Giraud, A. F. Fantina, et al., “Impact of electron capture rates for nuclei far from stability on core-collapse supernovae,” Phys. Rev. C 101, 015803 (2020).
K. Langanke, G. Martínez-Pinedo, and R. Zegers, “Electron capture in stars,” Rep. Prog. Phys. 84, 066301 (2021).
K. Langanke and G. Martínez-Pinedo, “Shell-model calculations of stellar weak interaction rates: II. Weak rates for nuclei in the mass range A = 45–65 in supernovae environments,” Nucl. Phys. A 673, 481–508 (2000).
K. Langanke and G. Martínez-Pinedo, “Rate tables for the weak processes of pf-shell nuclei in stellar environments,” At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 79, 1–46 (2001).
J. M. Sampaio, K. Langanke, and G. Martínez-Pinedo, “Neutrino absorption cross sections in the supernova environment,” Phys. Lett. B 511, 11–18 (2001).
J. M. Sampaio, K. Langanke, G. Martínez-Pinedo, and D. J. Dean, “Neutral-current neutrino reactions in the supernova environment,” Phys. Lett. B 529, 19–25 (2002).
C. T. Angell, S. L. Hammond, H. J. Karwowski, et al., “Evidence for radiative coupling of the pygmy dipole resonance to excited states,” Phys. Rev. C 86, 51302 (2012).
J. Cooperstein and J. Wambach, “Electron capture in stellar collapse,” Nucl. Phys. A 420, 591–620 (1984).
N. Paar, G. Colò, E. Khan, and D. Vretenar, “Calculation of stellar electron-capture cross sections on nuclei based on microscopic Skyrme functionals,” Phys. Rev. C 80, 055801 (2009).
Y. F. Niu, N. Paar, D. Vretenar, and J. Meng, “Stellar electron-capture rates calculated with the finite-temperature relativistic random-phase approximation,” Phys. Rev. C 83, 45807 (2011).
A. F. Fantina, E. Khan, G. Colò, et al., “Stellar electron-capture rates on nuclei based on a microscopic Skyrme functional,” Phys. Rev. C 86, 035805 (2012).
A. Ravlić, E. Yüksel, Y. F. Niu, et al., “Stellar electron-capture rates based on finite-temperature relativistic quasi-particle random-phase approximation,” Phys. Rev. C 102, 65804 (2020).
S. E. Koonin, D. J. Dean, and K. Langanke, “Shell model Monte Carlo methods,” Phys. Rep. 278, 1–77 (1997).
J. L. Egido and P. Ring, “The decay of hot nuclei,” J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 19, 1–54 (1993).
K. Blum, Density Matrix Theory and its Applications (Springer, Berlin, 2012; Mir, Moscow, 1983).
V. E. Tarasov, Basics of Quantum Mechanics (Vuzovskaya Kniga, Moscow, 2000) [in Russian].
F. A. Buot, “General theory of quantum distribution function transport equations: Superfluid systems and ultrafast dynamics of optically excited semiconductors,” Rivista del Nuovo Cimento 20, 1–75 (1997).
H. P. Breuer and F. Petruccione, Theory of Open Quantum Systems (Oxford Univ. Press, Oxford, 2002; NITs Regulyarnaya i Khaoticheskaya Dinamika, Izhevsk, 2010)
A. Ben-Reuven, “Symmetry considerations in pressure-broadening theory,” Phys. Rev. 141, 34–40 (1966).
R. Kubo, “Statistical-mechanical theory of irreversible processes. I. General theory and simple applications to magnetic and conduction problems,” J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 12, 570–586 (1957).
P. C. Martin and J. Schwinger, “Theory of many-particle systems. I,” Phys. Rev. 115, 1342–1373 (1959).
G. Emch, Algebraic Methods in Statistical Mechanics and Quantum Field Theory (Wiley, New York, 1974; Mir, Moscow, 1976).
T. Hatsuda, “Mean field theory and boson expansion at finite temperature on the basis of the thermo field dynamics,” Nucl. Phys. A 492, 187–204 (1989).
O. Civitarese and A. L. DePaoli, “Thermo field dynamics in the treatment of the nuclear pairing problem at finite temperature,” Z. Phys. A 344, 243–249 (1992).
A. I. Vdovin and D. S. Kosov, “Single-phonon states in hot nuclei,” Phys. At. Nucl. 58, 829–836 (1995).
A. Bohr and B. Mottelson, Nuclear Structure (World Scientific, Singapore, 2008; Mir, Moscow, 1971).
A. V. Ignatyuk, Statistic Properties of Excited Atomic Nuclei (Energoatomizdat, Moscow, 1983) [in Russian].
S. Levit, “Hot nuclei–theory and phenomena. The response of nuclei under extreme conditions,” Ed. by R. A. Broglia and G. F. Bertsch (Springer US Boston, MA, 1988), pp. 87–114.
G. W. Misch, “Nuclear weak rates and detailed balance in stellar conditions,” Astrophys. J. 844, 20 (2017).
I. A. Kvasnikov, Thermodynamics and Statistical Physics (URSS, Moscow, 2010), Vol. 4. Quantum Statistics.[in Russian]
M. Brack and P. Quentin, “Selfconsistent calculations of highly excited nuclei,” Phys. Lett. B 52, 159–162 (1974).
P. Bonche, S. Levit, and D. Vautherin, “Properties of highly excited nuclei,” Nucl. Phys. A 427, 278–296 (1984).
V. G. Soloviev, Nuclear Theory: Quasi-particles and Phonons (Energoatomizdat, Moscow, 1989; CRC Press, 2019).
A. B. Migdal, Theory of Finite Fermi Systems and Properties of Atomic Nuclei (Nauka, Moscow, 1983; Interscience Publishers, 1967).
N. V. Giai and H. Sagawa, “Spin-isospin and pairing properties of modified Skyrme interactions,” Phys. Lett. B 106, 379–382 (1981).
N. V. Giai, Ch. Stoyanov, and V. V. Voronov, “Finite rank approximation for random phase approximation calculations with Skyrme interactions: An application to Ar isotopes,” Phys. Rev. C 57, 1204–1209 (1998).
A. P. Severyukhin, Ch. Stoyanov, V. V. Voronov, and N. V. Giai, “Quasi-particle random phase approximation with finite rank approximation for Skyrme interactions,” Phys. Rev. C 66, 34304 (2002).
M. G. Urin, “Analog resonances and states,” Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra 4, 991–1047 (1980).
Yu. V. Gaponov and Yu. S. Lyutostanskii, “Microscopic description of the Gamow-Teller resonance and collective isobaric 1+ states of spherical nuclei,” Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra 12, 1324–1363 (1981).
N. I. Pyatov and S. A. Fayans, “Charge-exchange nuclear excitations,” Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra 14, 953–1019 (1983).
M. Abramowitz and I. A. Stegun, Handbook of Mathematical Functions with Formulas, Graphs, and Mathematical Tables (Wiley, 1972).
I. A. Vdovin and V. G. Soloviev, “Quasi-particle-phonon nuclear model. III. Single-phonon states in spherical nuclei,” Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra 14, 237–285 (1983).
A. Dzhioev, Z. Aouissat, A. Storozhenko, et al., “Extended Holstein-Primakoff mapping for the next-to-leading order of the 1/N expansion at finite temperature,” Phys. Rev. C 69, 014318 (2004).
A. I. Vdovin, A. A. Dzhioev, and A. N. Storozhenko, “Boson-fermion Holstein–Primakoff mapping at nonzero temperatures for the example of the Lipkin model,” Phys. At. Nucl. 66, 1861 (2003).
D. S. Kosov and A. I. Vdovin, “The TFD treatment of the quasi-particle-phonon interaction at finite temperature,” Mod. Phys. Lett. A 09, 1735–1743 (1994).
A. L. Goodman, “Finite-temperature HFB theory,” Nucl. Phys. A 352, 30–44 (1981).
O. Civitarese, G. G. Dussel, and R. P. J. Perazzo, “Thermal aspects of the pairing correlations in finite nuclei,” Nucl. Phys. A 404, 15–28 (1983).
A. I. Vdovin and A. A. Dzhioev, “Thermal Bogoliubov transformation in nuclear structure theory,” Phys. Part. Nucl. 41, 1127–1131 (2010).
C. Esebbag and J. Egido, “Number projected statistics and the pairing correlations at high excitation energies,” Nucl. Phys. A 552, 205–231 (1993).
D. Gambacurta, D. Lacroix, and N. Sandulescu, “Pairing and specific heat in hot nuclei,” Phys. Rev. C 88, 034324 (2013).
D. S. Kosov and A. I. Vdovin, “Approximate number projection at finite temperature,” Z. Phys. A 355, 17–21 (1996).
K. Ikeda, S. Fujii, and J. Fujita, “The (p,n) reactions and beta decays,” Phys. Lett. 3, 271–272 (1963).
P. Ring and P. Schuck, The Nuclear Many-Body Problem (Springer, 2004).
F. Alasia and O. Civitarese, “Finite temperature random phase approximation with the inclusion of scattering terms,” Phys. Rev. C 42, 1335–1340 (1990).
G. G. Dussel, R. J. Liotta, H. Sofia, and T. Vertse, “Temperature dependent resonant random phase approximation,” Phys. Rev. C 46, 558–564 (1992).
A. A. Dzhioev, A. I. Vdovin, G. Martínez-Pinedo, et al., “Thermal quasi-particle random-phase approximation with Skyrme interactions and supernova neutral-current neutrino-nucleus reactions,” Phys. Rev. C 94, 015805 (2016).
A. I. Vdovin and D. S. Kosov, “Thermofield transformation in the quasi-particle-phonon nuclear model,” Izv. RAN, Ser. Fiz. 58, 41–47 (1994).
A. N. Storozhenko, A. I. Vdovin, A. Ventura, and A. I. Blokhin, “Temperature dependence of spreading width of giant dipole resonance,” Phys. Rev. C 69, 64320 (2004).
V. V. Voronov and V. G. Soloviev, “Quasi-particle-phonon nuclear model. IV. Fragmentation of one- and two-quasi-particle states in spherical nuclei,” Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra 14, 1380–1442 (1983).
A. I. Vdovin, V. V. Voronov, V. G. Soloviev, and Ch. Stoyanov, “Quasi-particle-phonon nuclear model. V. Odd spherical nuclei,” Fiz. Elem. Chastits At. Yadra 16, 245–279 (1985).
V. G. Soloviev, Ch. Stoyanov, and A. I. Vdovin, “Fragmentation of giant multipole resonances over two-phonon states in spherical nuclei,” Nucl. Phys. A 288, 376–396 (1977).
S. Galès, Ch. Stoyanov, and A. I. Vdovin, “Damping of high-lying single-particle modes in heavy nuclei,” Phys. Rep. 166, 125–193 (1988).
A. I. Vdovin and A. N. Storozhenko, “Temperature dependence of a spreading width of giant dipole resonance in neutron-rich nuclei,” Nucl. Phys. A 722, C497–C501 (2003).
A. A. Dzhioev and A. I. Vdovin, “Thermodynamically consistent description of the fragmentation of single-phonon states in hot nuclei,” Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett. 18, 629–639 (2021).
A. V. Ignatyuk, “Contribution of collective motions to the density of excited nuclear states,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 21, 20–30 (1975).
H. M. Sommermann, “Microscopic description of giant resonances in highly excited nuclei,” Ann. Phys. 151, 163–203 (1983).
S. N. Fedotkin, I. N. Mikhailov, and R. G. Nazmitdinov, “The microscopic description of the isovector dipole excitations at high spins,” Phys. Lett. B 121, 15–20 (1983).
O. Civitarese, R. A. Broglia, and C. H. Dasso, “On the temperature dependence of the nuclear response,” Ann. Phys. 156, 142–154 (1984).
J. A. Halbleib and R. A. Sorensen, “Gamow–Teller beta decay in heavy spherical nuclei and the unlike particle–hole RPA,” Nucl. Phys. A 98, 542–568 (1967).
Yu. V. Gaponov and Yu. S. Lyutostanskii, “Gamow-Teller isobaric 1+ resonance,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 19, 62–74 (1974).
V. A. Kuzmin and V. G. Soloviev, “Description of giant resonances in spherical nuclei,” Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 35, 620–627 (1982).
A. A. Dzhioev, A. I. Vdovin, and Ch. Stoyanov, “The Skyrme-TQRPA calculations of electron capture on hot nuclei in pre-supernova environment,” Phys. At. Nucl. 79, 1019–1029 (2016).
A. A. Dzhioev, A. I. Vdovin, V. Yu. Ponomarev, and J. Wambach, “Gamow–Teller resonance in hot nuclei and astrophysical applications,” Bull. Russ. Acad. Sci.: Phys. 72, 269–273 (2008).
A. A. Dzhioev, A. I. Vdovin, V. Yu. Ponomarev, and J. Wambach, “Charge-exchange transitions in hot nuclei,” Phys. Atom. Nucl. 72, 1320–1331 (2009).
A. A. Dzhioev, A. I. Vdovin, V. Yu. Ponomarev, et al., “Gamow–Teller strength distributions at finite temperatures and electron capture in stellar environments,” Phys. Rev. C 81, 015804 (2010).
O. Civitarese and A. Ray, “Centroids of Gamow–Teller transitions at finite temperature in fp-shell neutron-rich nuclei,” Phys. Scr. 59, 352–354 (1999).
O. Civitarese, J. G. Hirsch, F. Montani, and M. Reboiro, “Extended quasi-particle random phase approximation at finite temperatures: Calculation of single β-decay Fermi transitions,” Phys. Rev. C 62, 54318 (2000).
O. Civitarese, and M. Reboiro, “Gamow–Teller transitions at finite temperatures in the extended quasi-particle random phase approximation,” Phys. Rev. C 63, 34323 (2001).
J. S. O’Connell, T. W. Donnelly, and J. D. Walecka, “Semileptonic weak interactions with 12C,” Phys. Rev. C 6, 719–733 (1972).
J. D. Walecka, “Semileptonic Weak Interactions in Nuclei,” in Muon Physics V2: Weak Interactions, Ed. by V. W. Hughes and C. S. Wu (Elsevier Science, 1975), p. 113.
E. Kolbe, K. Langanke, and G. Martínez-Pinedo, “Neutrino-nucleus reactions and nuclear structure,” J. Phys. G 29, 2569–2596 (2003).
N. Paar, D. Vretenar, T. Marketin, and P. Ring, “Inclusive charged-current neutrino-nucleus reactions calculated with the relativistic quasi-particle random-phase approximation,” Phys. Rev. C 77, 024608 (2008).
H. Đapo and N. Paar, “Neutral-current neutrino-nucleus cross sections based on relativistic nuclear energy density functional,” Phys. Rev. C 86, 35804 (2012).
V. C. Chasioti, T. S. Kosmas, and P. C. Divari, “Inelastic neutrino-nucleus reaction cross sections at low neutrino-energies,” Prog. Part. Nucl. Phys. 59, 481–485 (2007).
R. Lazauskas and C. Volpe, “Neutrino beams as a probe of the nuclear isospin and spin-isospin excitations,” Nucl. Phys. A 792, 219–228 (2007).
P. Vogel, “Neutrino-nucleus cross section at low energies,” Nucl. Phys. A 777, 340–355 (2006).
N. T. Zinner, K. Langanke, and P. Vogel, “Muon capture on nuclei: Random phase approximation evaluation versus data for 6 ≤ Z ≤ 79 nuclei,” Phys. Rev. C 74, 24326 (2006).
J. D. Walecka, Theoretical Nuclear and Subnuclear Physics (Imperial College Press, 2004).
T. W. Donnelly and R. D. Peccei, “Neutral current effects in nuclei,” Phys. Rep. 50, 1–85 (1979).
A. I. Akhiezer, A. G. Sitenko, and V. K. Tartakovskii, Nuclear Electrodynamics (Naukova Dumka, Kiev, 1989; Springer, 1994).
J. Beringer, J.-F. Arguin, R. M. Barnett, et al., “Review of particle physics,” Phys. Rev. D 86, 10001 (2012).
V. V. Balashov, G. Ya. Korenman, and R. A. Eramzhyan, Absorption of Mesons by Atomic Nuclei (Atomizdat, Moscow, 1978).
V. C. Chasioti and T. S. Kosmas, “A unified formalism for the basic nuclear matrix elements in semi-leptonic processes,” Nucl. Phys. A 829, 234–252 (2009).
T. W. Donnelly and W. C. Haxton, “Multipole operators in semileptonic weak and electromagnetic interactions with nuclei,” At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 23, 103–176 (1979).
T. W. Donnelly and W. C. Haxton, “Multipole operators in semileptonic weak and electromagnetic interactions with nuclei: II. General single-particle matrix elements,” At. Data Nucl. Data Tables 25, 1–28 (1980).
W. Haxton and C. Lunardini, “SevenOperators, a Mathematica script for harmonic oscillator nuclear matrix elements arising in semileptonic electroweak interactions,” Comput. Phys. Commun. 179, 345–358 (2008).
S. S. Gershtein and Ya. B. Zeldovich, “On mesonic corrections to the theory of β-decay,” Sov. Phys. JETP 29, 698–699 (1955).
R. P. Feynman and M. Gell-Mann, “Theory of the Fermi interaction,” Phys. Rev. 109, 193–198 (1958).
M. Gell-Mann and M. Lévy, “The axial vector current in beta decay,” Nuovo Cimento, 16, 705–726 (1960).
Y. Nambu, “Axial vector current conservation in weak interactions,” Phys. Rev. Lett. 4, 380–382 (1960).
E. Commins and F. Bucksbaum, Weak Interactions of Leptons and Quarks (Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge, 1983; Atomizdat, Moscow, 1987).
S. K. Singh, “Electroweak form factors,” Nucl. Phys. B Proc. Suppl. 112, 77–85 (2002).
W.-M. Yao, “Review of particle physics,” J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 33, 1–1232 (2006).
H. Behrens and W. Bühring, Electron Radial Wave Functions and Nuclear Beta-Decay (Clarendon, Oxford, 1982).
J. Engel, “Approximate treatment of lepton distortion in charged-current neutrino scattering from nuclei,” Phys. Rev. 57, 2004–2009 (1998).
A. Aste and D. Trautmann, “Focusing of high-energy particles in the electrostatic field of a homogeneously charged sphere and the effective momentum approximation,” Eur. Phys. J. A 33, 11–20 (2007).
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS
The work was supported by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation, grant no. 075-10-2020-117.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Translated by M. Samokhina
Appendices
APPENDICES
1.1 APPENDIX A: Finding functions \(\alpha (m,n)\) and \(\beta (m,n)\)
For the right superoperators defined according to (47), the conditions \({{[{\kern 1pt} {{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} }_{i}},{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} }_{j}}]}_{\sigma }} = 0\), \({{[{\kern 1pt} \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} _{i}^{\dag },\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} _{j}^{\dag }]}_{\sigma }} = 0\) are satisfied regardless of the choice of the functions \(\alpha (m,n)\) and \(\beta (m,n)\). From the condition \({{[{\kern 1pt} {{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} }_{i}},\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} _{j}^{\dag }]}_{\sigma }} = 0\) for \(i \ne j\) and relations
we obtain
With allowance for this relation, from \({{[{\kern 1pt} {{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} }_{j}},\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} _{j}^{\dag }]}_{\sigma }} = 1\) it follows that
Consequently, \(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} _{i}^{\dag }{\kern 1pt} {{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} }_{i}}\) satisfies condition (45), i.e., is the superoperator of the number of particles.
Since
Then the requirement \({{[{\kern 1pt} {{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} }_{j}},\vec {a}{\kern 1pt} _{{i}}^{\dag }]}_{\sigma }} = 0\) leads to
whence it follows that
The same relation follows from \({{[{\kern 1pt} {{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} }_{j}},{{\vec {a}}_{i}}]}_{\sigma }} = 0\). Proceeding similarly, from the conditions \({{[{\kern 1pt} \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} _{j}^{\dag },\vec {a}{\kern 1pt} _{{i}}^{\dag }]}_{\sigma }} = 0\) and \({{[{\kern 1pt} \overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} _{j}^{\dag },{{\vec {a}}_{i}}]}_{\sigma }} = 0\), we get
or
Consider now the following chains of equalites:
and
Then from the condition \(\left\langle {\left\langle {{{m}_{1}}{{n}_{1}}\left\| {\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} _{i}^{\dag }} \right\|{{m}_{2}}{{n}_{2}}} \right\rangle } \right\rangle = \left\langle {\left\langle {{{m}_{2}}{{n}_{2}}\left\| {{{{\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} }}_{i}}} \right\|{{m}_{1}}{{n}_{1}}} \right\rangle } \right\rangle {\text{*}}\), it follows that
Consider what the last of the conditions listed on page 892 leads to. Since
and \(\left\langle {\left\langle {\left. {mn} \right|{{a}_{j}}} \right\rangle } \right\rangle = \langle m\left| {{{a}_{j}}} \right|n\rangle \), then the condition \(\overset{\lower0.5em\hbox{$\smash{\scriptscriptstyle\leftarrow}$}}{a} _{j}^{\dag }\left| {\left| {{\kern 1pt} I} \right\rangle } \right\rangle = c\left| {\left| {{{a}_{j}}} \right\rangle } \right\rangle \) means that
Comparing (322) and (317), we obtain
Using this equality on the right-hand side of (320), we get
which is consistant with (320). Substituting the expressions obtained for \(\alpha (m,n)\) and \(\beta (m,n)\) into (312), we arrive at the condition \(cc^{*} = 1\).
APPENDIX B:
1.1 Secular Equation for Charge-Neutral Thermal Phonons
In addition to condition (213), the amplitudes of charge-neutral thermal phonons satisfy the following relations:
• from \([{{Q}_{{JMi}}},{{Q}_{{JMi{\kern 1pt} '}}}] = 0\), it follows that
• from \([{{Q}_{{JMi}}},\widetilde Q_{{JMi{\kern 1pt} '}}^{\dag }] = 0\), it follows that
• from \([{{Q}_{{JMi}}},{{\widetilde Q}_{{JMi{\kern 1pt} '}}}] = 0\), it follows that
With the help of effective amplitudes (220) four orthonormalization conditions (Eqs. (213), (325)–(337)) can be written as two relations: (223) and
The separable form of the residual interaction allows the TQRPA equations (224) and (225) to be reduced to a system of \(4N\) linear homogeneous equations. Indeed, for charge-neutral phonons of normal parity, the formal solution to the problem (224) can be represented in the following form
Substitution of obtained expressions in (226) leads to a system of \(4N\) homogeneous equations for the functions \(D_{{Ji}}^{{(k)}}(\tau )\) and \(D_{{JJi}}^{{(k)}}(\tau )\) (\(1 \leqslant k \leqslant N\), \(\tau = p,n\)). In matrix notation, the resulting system has the form:
The vectors \({{\mathbb{D}}_{J}}\) and \({{\mathbb{D}}_{{JJ}}}\) of dimension \(2N\) consist of the elements
while the matrices \({{\mathbb{M}}_{{\alpha \beta }}}\) \((\alpha ,\beta = m,s)\) are the \(2N \times 2N\) matrices, composed of \(2 \times 2\) units
Here the following notation for functions of \(\omega \) are introduced:
and \(\mathcal{X}_{{sm;\tau }}^{{(J;kk{\kern 1pt} ')}}(\omega ) = \mathcal{X}_{{ms;\tau }}^{{(j;k{\kern 1pt} 'k)}}(\omega )\). The solvability condition for the system of homogeneous equations (330) leads to a secular equation for finding the energy ωJi of thermal phonons
For thermal phonons of anomalous parity, the formal solution of the system of TQRPA equations (225) has the form
As in the case of the normal parity phonons, a substitution of the obtained expressions in (226) leads to a system of \(4N\) homogeneous equations for the functions \(D_{{J \pm 1J}}^{{(k)}}(\tau )\) (\(1 \leqslant k \leqslant N\), \(\tau = p,{\kern 1pt} {\kern 1pt} n\)):
Here \({{\mathbb{M}}_{{LL{\kern 1pt} '}}}\) are the \(2N \times 2N\) matrices, composed of \(2 \times 2\) units
with the matrix elements
while the vector \({{\mathbb{D}}_{{LJ}}}\) of \(2N\) dimension has the following components:
The thermal phonon energy is found from the condition for the existence of a nontrivial solution for the system (334), therefore, it is a solution to the secular equation
APPENDIX C:
1.1 Secular Equation for Charge-Exchange Thermal Phonons
The requirement to preserve the bosonic commutation relations for charge-exchange thermal phonons leads to four orthonormalization conditions for the amplitudes:
• from \([{{\Omega }_{{JMi}}},\Omega _{{J{\kern 1pt} 'M{\kern 1pt} 'i{\kern 1pt} '}}^{\dag }] = {{\delta }_{{JJ{\kern 1pt} '}}}{{\delta }_{{MM{\kern 1pt} '}}}{{\delta }_{{ii{\kern 1pt} '}}}\), it follows that
• from \([{{\Omega }_{{JMi}}},{{\Omega }_{{J{\kern 1pt} 'M{\kern 1pt} 'i{\kern 1pt} '}}}] = 0\), it follows that
• from \([{{\Omega }_{{JMi}}},\widetilde \Omega _{{J{\kern 1pt} 'M{\kern 1pt} 'i{\kern 1pt} '}}^{\dag }] = 0\), it follows that
• from \([{{\Omega }_{{JMi}}},{{\widetilde \Omega }_{{J{\kern 1pt} 'M{\kern 1pt} 'i{\kern 1pt} '}}}] = 0\), it follows that
For effective amplitudes, the above conditions take the form of two relations: (265) and
In proving the fulfillment of the Ikeda sum rule in TQRPA approximation (277), we used the completeness properties of effective amplitudes
These properties can be easily obtained by writing down the completeness conditions for phonon amplitudes and then expressing \(\phi , \psi \), etc. through effective amplitudes.
As in the case of charge-neutral phonons, the separable form of the residual interaction makes it possible to reduce the system of TQRPA equations (266) to \(4N\) homogeneous equations
Here \({{\mathbb{M}}_{\sigma }}\) (\(\sigma = + , - , + - \)) are the \(2N \times 2N\) matrices, composed of \(2 \times 2\) units
For the normal parity phonons, the indices \(a,{\kern 1pt} b\) assume the values \(a = J\), \(b = JJ\), while for the anomalous parity phonons \(a = (J - 1)J\), \(b = (J + 1)J\). In addition, \(\chi _{1}^{{(J;k)}} = \chi _{1}^{{(m;k)}}\) and \(\chi _{1}^{{(LJ;k)}} = \chi _{1}^{{(s;k)}}\). The functions \(\mathcal{X}_{\sigma }^{{(cd;kk{\kern 1pt} ')}}(\omega )\) (\(c = a,b\), \(d = a,b\)) are defined as
The vectors \({{\mathbb{D}}^{{( \pm )}}}\) of the \(2N\) dimension consist of the functions \(D_{J}^{{( \pm ;k)}}\), \(D_{{LJ}}^{{( \pm ;k)}}\) (267)
The condition for the existence of a nontrivial solution for system (342) leads to a secular equation for finding the energy of charge-exchange thermal phonons
For the QPM Hamiltonian, the secular equation for determining the energy of charge-exchange phonons in hot nuclei is given in our paper [134].
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Dzhioev, A.A., Vdovin, A.I. Superoperator Approach to the Theory of Hot Nuclei and Astrophysical Applications: I—Spectral Properties of Hot Nuclei. Phys. Part. Nuclei 53, 885–938 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779622050033
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S1063779622050033