Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fetal sex prediction measuring yolk sac size and yolk sac–fetal pole distance in the first trimester via ultrasound screening

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Ultrasound Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of the study was to determine the accuracy of fetal sex definition by measuring the yolk sac size and the yolk sac–fetal pole distance in the first trimester via ultrasound (US) screening.

Methods

We enrolled 92 gestational women in this prospective study. In the first trimester of US examination, the gestational sac, the gestational sac–fetal pole distance, and the yolk sac size were measured. When the fetal pole was in the longitudinal position, the distance between the fetal pole and the yolk sac was measured in millimeters (mm). The crown–rump length (CRL) was measured in the same position. US examination at 22 weeks was performed to determine whether the fetal gender was male or female. The genders of the fetuses were recorded. The sexes were also confirmed and recorded after birth.

Results

Fifty-five (59.8%) of the newborns were found to be male, while 37 (40.2%) of them were found to be female. We compared the yolk sac size and the yolk sac–fetal pole distance in both the female and male groups. We found that the genders showed a significant difference in terms of yolk sac–fetal pole distance, whereas the yolk sac size showed no significant difference between the genders. The optimal cutoff value of the yolk sac–fetal pole distance was 1.80 mm, with 70% sensitivity and 67% specificity for female gender prediction. The distance also showed an independent association with gender prediction in the first trimester.

Conclusion

Yolk sac–fetal pole distance may have the potential to predict gender in the first trimester of pregnancy.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Odeh M, Granin V, Kais M, Ophir E, Bornstein J (2009) Sonographic fetal sex determination. Obstet Gynecol Surv 64:50–57. https://doi.org/10.1097/OGX.0b013e318193299b (indexedinPubmed: 19099612)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Efrat Z, Akinfenwa OO, Nicolaides KH (1999) First-trimester determination of fetal gender by ultrasound. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13:305–307. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13050305.x (indexedinPubmed: 10380292)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Manzanares S, Benítez A, Naveiro-Fuentes M, López-Criado MS, Sánchez-Gila M (2016) Accuracy of fetal sex determination on ultrasound examination in the first trimester of pregnancy. J Clin Ultrasound 44:272–277. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcu.22320 (indexedinPubmed:26663411)

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Cocco G, Ricci V, Boccatonda A, Schiavone C (2020) Focused ultrasound for the diagnosis of non-palpable endometriotic lesions of the abdominal wall: a not-uncommon surgical complication. J Ultrasound. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-019-00425-x (indexed in Pupmed: 7242514)

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Emerson DS, Felker RE, Brown DL (1989) The sagital sign: an early second trimester sonographic indicator of fetal gender. J Ultrasond Med 8:293–297. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.1989.8.6.293 (indexedinPubmed: 2661854)

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Natsuyama E (1984) Sonograpic determination of fetal sex from twelve weeks of gestation. Am J Obstet Gynecol 149:748–757. https://doi.org/10.1016/0002-9378(84)90116-9 (indexedinPubmed: 6465226)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Mielkke G, Kiesel L, Backsch C (1998) Fetal sex determination by high resolution ultrasound in early pregnancy. Eur J Ultrasound. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0929-8266(98)00014-7 (indexed in Pubmed: 9614279)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Benoit B (1999) Early fetal gender determination. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13:299–300. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13050299.x (indexedinPubmed: 10380290)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Whitlow BJ, Lazanakis MS, Economides DI (1999) The sonographic identification of fetal gender from 11 to 14 weeks of gestation. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol 13:301–304. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1469-0705.1999.13050301.x (indexedinPubmed: 10380291)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All the authors have accepted responsibility for entire content of this submitted manuscriptand approved submission.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yüksel Kurban.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors declare no conficts of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures followed were in accordance with the ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, and its later amendments.

Human and animal rights

This article does not contain any studies with human or animal subjects performed by any of the authors.

Informed consent

Additional informed consent was obtained from all the patients for whom identifying information is not included in this article.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kurban, Y., Uyar, I., Alan, M. et al. Fetal sex prediction measuring yolk sac size and yolk sac–fetal pole distance in the first trimester via ultrasound screening. J Ultrasound 24, 489–492 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-020-00516-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-020-00516-0

Keywords

Navigation