Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Framing uncertainty in water policy discourse: insights from Arizona’s Project ADD Water

  • Research and Theory
  • Published:
Journal of Environmental Studies and Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Water resource managers contend with and leverage uncertainty in complex decision-making processes. Uncertainty has passive characteristics (context and type), but it is also actively deployed and leveraged by stakeholders via framing and discourse. These passive and active elements of uncertainty interact with each other to shape discourse, which has direct consequences for policy, especially when uncertainty is invoked to delay action in addressing pressing environmental challenges. We explore the interactions of active and passive elements of uncertainty management in a water management decision-making process in the water-limited US state of Arizona. Project ADD Water was intended to engage stakeholders in dialogue about securing water resources under existing state water management policy. Understanding how uncertainty influenced Project ADD Water has only become more important as water management under prolonged drought becomes increasingly complex in Arizona and other similar sites. In the Project ADD Water deliberations, we found examples of both disruptive and productive efforts to frame different types of uncertainty, and we use illustrative examples to explore their relevance to the policy-making process. In addition to our analysis of how stakeholders engage with uncertainty through this process, we also contribute a codebook for holistically examining uncertainty in natural resource decision-making processes beyond ADD Water and materials to structure workshops with stakeholders centered on exploring uncertainty. Our contributions strengthen our understanding of how stakeholders deploy uncertainty in decision-making processes and offer a pathway to facilitate discussions about uncertainty with stakeholders.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the authors upon request.

References

  • Alcamo J, Flörke M, Märker M (2007) Future long-term changes in global water resources driven by socio-economic and climatic changes. Hydrol Sci J 52(2):247–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen CR, Birge HE, Angeler DG, Arnold CA, Chaffin BC, DeCaro DA, Garmestani AS, Gunderson L (2018) Quantifying uncertainty and trade-offs in resilience assessments. Ecol Soc 23(1) https://www.jstor.org/stable/26799062

  • Bark RH (2009) The Arizona water settlement act and urban water supplies. Irrig Drainage Syst 23:79–96. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10795-009-9075-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boretti A, Rosa L (2019) Reassessing the projections of the world water development report. NPJ Clean Water 2(1):15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brugnach M, Dewulf A, Henriksen HJ, Van der Keur P (2011) More is not always better: coping with ambiguity in natural resources management. J Environ Manag 92(1):78–84

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brugnach M, Tagg A, Keil F, de Lange WJ (2007) Uncertainty matters: computer models at the science–policy interface. Water Resour Manag 21(7):1075–1090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chocat B, Krebs P, Marsalek J, Rauch W, Schilling W (2001) Urban drainage redefined: from stormwater removal to integrated management. Water Sci Technol 43(5):61–68

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Chokkavarapu N, Mandla VR (2019) Comparative study of GCMs, RCMs, downscaling and hydrological models: a review toward future climate change impact estimation. SN Appl Sci 1(12):1698. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-019-1764-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cliburn DC, Feddema JJ, Miller JR, Slocum TA (2002) Design and evaluation of a decision support system in a water balance application. Comput Graph 26(6):931–949

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Contreras G, Platania F (2019) Economic and policy uncertainty in climate change mitigation: the London Smart City case scenario. Technol Forecast Soc Chang 142:384–393. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2018.07.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Curtis C, McLeod S, Hultén J, Pettersson-Lofstedt F, Paulsson A, Hedegaard Sørensen C (2021) Knowledge for policy-making in times of uncertainty: the case of autonomous vehicle model results. Transp Rev 41(4):478–498. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2020.1857885

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dias LF, Aparício BA, Nunes JP, Morais I, Fonseca AL, Pastor AV, Santos FD (2020) Integrating a hydrological model into regional water policies: co-creation of climate change dynamic adaptive policy pathways for water resources in southern Portugal. Environ Sci Pol 114:519–532. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2020.09.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dilling L, Daly ME, Travis WR, Ray AJ, Wilhelmi OV (2023) The role of adaptive capacity in incremental and transformative adaptation in three large U.S. urban water systems. Glob Environ Chang 79:102649. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2023.102649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Giménez M, Augustine D, Porensky L, Wilmer H, Derner J, Briske D, Stewart M (2019) Complexity fosters learning in collaborative adaptive management. Ecol Soc 24(2). https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-10963-240229

  • Gastelum JR, Cullom C (2013) Application of the Colorado River simulation system model to evaluate water shortage conditions in the Central Arizona project. Water Resour Manag 27(7):2369–2389. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-013-0292-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrick D, Jacobs KL, Garfin GM (2008) Decision making under uncertainty: shortage, stakeholders and modeling in the Colorado River basin. J Am Water Resour As 44:381–398

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gawne B, Thompson R (2023) Adaptive water management in response to climate change: the case of the southern Murray Darling Basin. Australas J Water Resour 0(0):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/13241583.2023.2181844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gober P, Kirkwood CW (2010) Vulnerability assessment of climate-induced water shortage in Phoenix. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(50):21295–21299

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Gosling SN, Bretherton D, Haines K, Arnell NW (2010) Global hydrology modelling and uncertainty: running multiple ensembles with a campus grid. Phil Trans Royal Soc London A: Math, Physic Eng Sci 368(1926):4005–4021

    Google Scholar 

  • Hart OE, Halden RU (2019) On the need to integrate uncertainty into U.S. water resource planning. Sci Total Environ 691:1262–1270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.07.164

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Head BW (2010) Water policy—evidence, learning and the governance of uncertainty. Polic Soc 29(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Herman JD, Quinn JD, Steinschneider S, Giuliani M, Fletcher S (2020) Climate adaptation as a control problem: review and perspectives on dynamic water resources planning under uncertainty. Water Resour Res 56(2):e24389. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR025502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirt P, Gustafson A, Larson K (2008) The mirage in the valley of the sun. Environ Hist 13(3):482–514. https://doi.org/10.1093/envhis/13.3.482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isendahl N, Dewulf A, Brugnach M, François G, Möllenkamp S, Pahl-Wostl C (2009) Assessing framing of uncertainties in water management practice. Water Resour Manag 23(15):3191–3205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Isendahl N, Dewulf A, Pahl-Wostl C (2010) Making framing of uncertainty in water management practice explicit by using a participant-structured approach. J Environ Manag 91(4):844–851

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kimbell L, Richardson L, Mazé R, Durose C (2022) Design for public policy: Embracing uncertainty and hybridity in mapping future research. In: Lockton D, Lenzi S, Hekkert P, Oak A, Sádaba J, Lloyd P (eds) DRS2022: Bilbao, Bilbao, Spain, 25 June - 3 July. https://doi.org/10.21606/drs.2022.303

  • Konapala G, Mishra AK, Wada Y, Mann ME (2020) Climate change will affect global water availability through compounding changes in seasonal precipitation and evaporation. Nat Commun 11(1):1. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-16757-w

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lambin EF, Meyfroidt P (2010) Land use transitions: socio-ecological feedback versus socio-economic change. Land Use Policy 27(2):108–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson KL, Gustafson A, Hirt P (2009) Insatiable thirst and a finite supply: an assessment of municipal water-conservation policy in greater Phoenix, Arizona, 1980–2007. J Policy Hist 21(02):107–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lempert RJ, Groves DG (2010) Identifying and evaluating robust adaptive policy responses to climate change for water management agencies in the American west. Technol Forecast Soc Change 77(6):960–974

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li M, Fu Q, Singh VP, Ji Y, Liu D, Zhang C, Li T (2019) An optimal modelling approach for managing agricultural water-energy-food nexus under uncertainty. Sci Total Environ 651:1416–1434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.291

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lookadoo RE, Bell JE (2020) Public health policy actions to address health issues associated with drought in a changing climate. J Law Med Ethics 48(4):653–663. https://doi.org/10.1177/1073110520979372

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lubell M, Lippert L (2011) Integrated regional water management: a study of collaboration or water politics-as-usual in California, USA. Int Rev Adm Sci 77(1):76–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacDonald GM (2010) Water, climate change, and sustainability in the southwest. Proc Natl Acad Sci 107(50):21256–21262. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0909651107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacQueen KM, McLellan E, Kay K, Milstein B (1998) Codebook development for team-based qualitative analysis. Cult Anthropol Methods 10(2):31–36

    Google Scholar 

  • Marchau, V. A. W. J., Walker, W. E., Bloemen, P. J. T. M., & Popper, S. W. (Eds.). (2019). Decision making under deep uncertainty: from theory to practice. Springer Nature https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05252-2

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mays LW (2013) Groundwater resources sustainability: past, present, and future. Water Resour Manag 27(13):4409–4424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Megdal SB, Gerlak AK, Huang L-Y, Delano N, Varady RG, Petersen-Perlman JD (2017) Innovative approaches to collaborative groundwater governance in the United States: case studies from three high-growth regions in the Sun Belt. Environ Manag 59(5):718–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mirumachi N, White DD, Kingsford RT (2021) Facing change: understanding transitions of river basin policies over time. Management and Governance in Times of Change, In Water Resilience, pp 213–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Morton TA, Rabinovich A, Marshall D, Bretschneider P (2011) The future that may (or may not) come: how framing changes responses to uncertainty in climate change communications. Glob Environ Chang 21(1):103–109. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.09.013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moss T (2004) The governance of land use in river basins: prospects for overcoming problems of institutional interplay with the EU Water Framework Directive. Land Use Policy 21(1):85–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Munoz Castillo R, Feng K, Sun L, Guilhoto J, Pfister S, Miralles-Wilhelm F, Hubacek K (2019) The land-water nexus of biofuel production in Brazil: analysis of synergies and trade-offs using a multiregional input-output model. J Clean Prod 214:52–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.12.264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nazari-Sharabian M, Taheriyoun M, Ahmad S, Karakouzian M, Ahmadi A (2019) Water quality modeling of Mahabad Dam watershed–reservoir system under climate change conditions, using SWAT and system dynamics. Water 11(2):2. https://doi.org/10.3390/w11020394

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nel JL, Roux DJ, Driver A, Hill L, Maherry AC, Snaddon K, Petersen CR, Smith-Adao LB, Van Deventer H, Reyers B (2016) Knowledge co-production and boundary work to promote implementation of conservation plans. Conserv Biol 30(1):176–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2020) Adaptive and sustainable water management: from improved conceptual foundations to transformative change. Int J Water Resour Dev 36(2–3):397–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/07900627.2020.1721268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C (2007) The implications of complexity for integrated resources management. Environ Model Softw 22(5):561–569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pahl-Wostl C, Craps M, Dewulf A, Mostert E, Tabara D, Taillieu T (2007) Social learning and water resources management. Ecol Soc 12(2):2007 Retrieved from http://repository.tudelft.nl/view/ir/uuid:9bcb1311-74ac-4400-88e2-e6b816397dfd/

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pielke RA Jr (2007) The honest broker: making sense of science in policy and politics. Cambridge University Press

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Polasky S, Carpenter SR, Folke C, Keeler B (2011) Decision-making under great uncertainty: environmental management in an era of global change. Trends Ecol Evol 26(8):398–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2011.04.007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Potter J (1997) Discourse analysis as a way of analysing naturally occurring talk. Qual Res: Theory, Method Pract 2:200–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Potter J, Wetherell M (1987) Discourse and social psychology: beyond attitudes and behaviour. Sage Publications, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quay R (2010) Anticipatory governance. J Am Plan Assoc 76(4):496–511. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2010.508428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quay R, Sternlieb F, Rauh E, Andrade R, Bartholomew A, White D et al (2022) Evaluating the effectiveness of land and water integrative practices for achieving water sustainability within the Colorado River Basin: perceptions and indicators. Water Int 47(2):257–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raadgever GT, Dieperink C, Driessen PPJ, Smit AAH, Van Rijswick H (2011) Uncertainty management strategies: lessons from the regional implementation of the Water Framework Directive in the Netherlands. Environ Sci Pol 14(1):64–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Raei E, Reza Alizadeh M, Reza Nikoo M, Adamowski J (2019) Multi-objective decision-making for green infrastructure planning (LID-BMPs) in urban storm water management under uncertainty. J Hydrol 579:124091. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2019.124091

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Roelich K, Giesekam J (2019) Decision making under uncertainty in climate change mitigation: introducing multiple actor motivations, agency and influence. Clim Pol 19(2):175–188. https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2018.1479238

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz JR (2009) Sociological discourse analysis: methods and logic. In Forum qualitative sozialforschung/Forum: Qualitative social research 10(2)

  • Sarewitz D (2004) How science makes environmental controversies worse. Environ Sci Pol 7(5):385–403. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2004.06.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scanlon BR, Reedy RC, Faunt CC, Pool D, Uhlman K (2016) Enhancing drought resilience with conjunctive use and managed aquifer recharge in California and Arizona. Environ Res Lett 11(3):035013

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackley S, Wynne B (1996) Representing uncertainty in global climate change science and policy: boundary-ordering devices and authority. Sci Technol Hum Values 21(3):275–302

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shamir E, Megdal SB, Carrillo C, Castro CL, Chang H-I, Chief K, Corkhill FE, Eden S, Georgakakos KP, Nelson KM (2015) Climate change and water resources management in the Upper Santa Cruz River, Arizona. J Hydrol 521:18–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp EA, Thwaites R, Curtis A, Millar J (2013) Trust and trustworthiness: conceptual distinctions and their implications for natural resources management. J Environ Plan Manag 56(8):1246–1265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shelton RE, Baeza A, Janssen MA, Eakin H (2018) Managing household socio-hydrological risk in Mexico City: a game to communicate and validate computational modeling with stakeholders. J Environ Manag 227:200–208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.08.094

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sigel K, Klauer B, Pahl-Wostl C (2010) Conceptualising uncertainty in environmental decision-making: the example of the EU water framework directive. Ecol Econ 69(3):502–510

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan A, White DD, Larson KL, Wutich A (2017) Towards water sensitive cities in the Colorado River basin: a comparative historical analysis to inform future urban water sustainability transitions. Sustainability 9(5):761. https://doi.org/10.3390/su9050761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan A, White DD, Hanemann M (2019) Designing collaborative governance: insights from the drought contingency planning process for the lower Colorado River basin. Environ Sci Pol 91:39–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanaka Y, Minggat E, Roseli W (2021) The impact of tropical land-use change on downstream riverine and estuarine water properties and biogeochemical cycles: a review. Ecol Process 10(1):40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13717-021-00315-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Eeten MJ (1999) “Dialogues of the deaf”on science in policy controversies. Sci Public Policy 26(3):185–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Pelt SC, Haasnoot M, Arts B, Ludwig F, Swart R, Biesbroek R (2015) Communicating climate (change) uncertainties: simulation games as boundary objects. Environ Sci Pol 45:41–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2014.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vörösmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers RB (2000) Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289(5477):284–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walker WE, Harremoës P, Rotmans J, van der Sluijs JP, van Asselt MB, Janssen P, Krayer von Krauss MP (2003) Defining uncertainty: a conceptual basis for uncertainty management in model-based decision support. Integr Assess 4(1):5–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White DD, Rauh EK, Sullivan A, Larson KL, Wutich A, Linthicum D, Horvath V, Lawless KL (2019) Public attitudes toward urban water sustainability transitions: a multi-city survey in the western United States. Sustain Sci 14(6):1469–1483. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-019-00658-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White DD, Corley EA, White MS (2008) Water managers’ perceptions of the science–policy interface in Phoenix, Arizona: implications for an emerging boundary organization. Soc Nat Resour 21(3):230–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitney KM, Vivoni ER, Wang Z, White DD, Quay R, Mahmoud MI, Templeton NP (2023) A stakeholder-engaged approach to anticipating forest disturbance impacts in the Colorado River basin under climate change. J Water Resour Plan Manag 149(7):04023020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Workman M, Dooley K, Lomax G, Maltby J, Darch G (2020) Decision making in contexts of deep uncertainty—an alternative approach for long-term climate policy. Environ Sci Pol 103:77–84. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2019.10.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B (1992) Uncertainty and environmental learning: reconceiving science and policy in the preventive paradigm. Glob Environ Chang 2(2):111–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yue Q, Guo P (2021) Managing agricultural water-energy-food-environment nexus considering water footprint and carbon footprint under uncertainty. Agric Water Manag 252:106899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2021.106899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yung L, Louder E, Gallagher LA, Jones K, Wyborn C (2019) How methods for navigating uncertainty connect science and policy at the water-energy-food nexus. Front Environ Sci 7. https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2019.00037

  • Zagayevskiy Y, Deutsch CV (2015) A methodology for sensitivity analysis based on regression: applications to handle uncertainty in natural resources characterization. Nat Resour Res 24(3):239–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zehr SC (2000) Public representations of scientific uncertainty about global climate change. Public Underst Sci 9(2):85–103

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research was supported by the National Science Foundation under award SES-1462086.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Earth and Environment, Boston University, Boston, USA

    Abigail Sullivan

  2. School of Public Affairs, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, USA

    V. Kelly Turner

  3. School of Community Resources and Development, Arizona State University, Tempe, USA

    Dave D. White

Authors
  1. Abigail Sullivan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. V. Kelly Turner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dave D. White
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abigail Sullivan.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Disclaimer

Any opinions, findings, and conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the National Science Foundation.

Supplementary information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sullivan, A., Turner, V.K. & White, D.D. Framing uncertainty in water policy discourse: insights from Arizona’s Project ADD Water. J Environ Stud Sci 14, 256–268 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-023-00868-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13412-023-00868-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation